Overview
- In our view, U.K.-based social housing provider Places for People's (PfP's) performance would improve gradually on the back of moderation of investments in existing homes and rent increases outpacing cost growth.
- Furthermore, we anticipate that the integration of Origin Housing into the group will not materially impact PfP's financials.
- Nevertheless, we see risks that PfP's cost base will remain high, which, combined with large debt-funded development aspirations, could result in weaker credit metrics.
- We therefore revised our outlook on PfP to negative from stable and at the same time, affirmed our 'A-' ratings PfP and the group's issued debt.
Rating Action
On Oct. 30, 2024, S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on U.K.-based social housing provider Places for People Group Ltd. (PfP) to negative from stable. At the same time, we affirmed the 'A-' long-term issuer credit rating on PfP.
We also revised our outlook on Places for People Treasury PLC, a finance vehicle that we consider a core subsidiary of the group, to negative from stable, and affirmed the 'A-' long-term issuer credit rating.
We further affirmed our 'A-' issue ratings on the group's senior secured and unsecured debt and the senior unsecured medium-term note program issued by Places for People Treasury and Places for People Homes. We consider Places for People Homes to also be a core subsidiary of the group, as an issuer of the group's medium-term note program and the main asset-holding subsidiary.
Outlook
The negative outlook reflects the risks that higher costs, related for example to investments in existing stock, in combination with ambitious development and absorption of weaker entities aspirations, may weaken the group's credit metrics on a sustained basis.
We could lower the rating in the next 24 months if we see S&P Global Ratings adjusted EBITDA margins remaining around 15% and interest cover substantially below 1x on a sustained basis.
Upside scenario
We could revise the outlook to stable if management's actions to contain costs are effective, such that the group performs in line, or better, than our base-case scenario.
Rationale
The outlook revision reflects heightened risks that PfP's financial metrics will be weaker than we currently project, due to higher costs on existing stock or development of new homes. PfP is one of the largest social housing providers in the U.K., with a strong track record of successfully absorbing weaker entities. We project that PfP's management will recover its financials indicators after two fairly weak years. This is underpinned by balancing cost pressures, delivering efficiencies in its repairs model, cost controls, and rents growth outpacing costs inflation. That said, we consider that the group's financial headroom had tightened, such that our projected recovery may be delayed and credit metrics will remain at current levels.
Enterprise profile: Economies of scale from a large asset base spread across England and Scotland support the rating on PfP
PfP is one of the largest housing associations in the U.K., supporting its financial capacity and operational performance. Following the merger with Origin, we project the group will own about 80,000 social, affordable, and shared-ownership rental units. Including managed units, the number of units PfP oversees to about 250,000, spread over England and Scotland. The group's activities are more diversified than many peers', including management of leisure facilities, property management, development, and construction services. Although we think these could bring more volatility to financial results and carry operational challenges, we consider them less risky than sales activities, and that PfP has adequately managed these in the past. In our forecast, we expect the group's exposure to sales activity will increase, but remain below one-third of total revenue.
We expect that demand for the group's properties and services will remain sound. PfP's social and affordable rent and service charges, compared with average market rent, remains under 60%, and its average vacancy rates stood at 1.6% over the past three years, and we consider this to be in line with the sector average.
We think that PfP's management has sound experience with managing its diversified operations and accommodating for complex business combinations. Its large asset base also offers more flexibility in making development decisions compared with smaller providers, and we think it is not over-reliant on sales of fixed assets to achieve its financial targets. Nevertheless, PfP is set to maintain high levels of investments in existing homes, while ramping up an ambitious development program and incorporating Origin into the group. We think these tighten the group's financial headroom.
We assess the regulatory framework under which registered providers of social housing in England operate as strong (see "Regulatory Framework Assessment: Social Housing Providers In The U.K. Benefit From Strong Regulatory Frameworks," published Oct. 23, 2023, on RatingsDirect).
Financial profile: We expect PfP's financial metrics will recover, but remain weaker than historical ones due to continued high investments in existing homes and debt funding of new homes
We project PfP's adjusted EBITDA margins will gradually improve from a weak fiscal 2024 (ended March 31, 2024) but remain below a modest 20% through fiscal 2027. In our view, the weaker-than-historical performance over the past two years reflects high cost inflation, enhanced regulatory requirements, and significantly increased demand for repairs services, while rents growth was well below inflation. Our base-case assumes that some of these pressures will persist in the current fiscal year, before recovery as the group shifts focus from reactive to proactive investments in homes, and rent increases outpace cost inflation. The group's large share of non-traditional activities, including sales, will nonetheless constrain further improvement in margins, in our view.
Debt metrics are expected to stay weak through our forecast horizon, as PfP ramps up debt-funded development spend. Beyond the additional units from mergers, we expect gross development of new units to be quite ambitious, at about 3% per year. This will be funded by a combination of sales proceeds, from newly developed and existing assets, as well as grant funding, PfP will increase its debt faster than we previously projected. The group usually holds 20%-25% of its debt at variable rates, which additionally weakened its interest coverage over the past two years because of elevated interest rates. We expect that a gradual decline in rates will alleviate some of these pressures in the coming two to three years.
We forecast PfP's liquidity position will remain very strong over the next 12 months, underpinned by a sources to uses ratio of about 1.6x and our view of the group's strong access to external liquidity. Over the coming year, we forecast the group's liquidity sources will stand at about £1.65 billion, comprising cash, large amount of undrawn and available revolving credit facilities, asset sales, grant receipts, and cash from operations (adding back the noncash cost of sales), while we forecast liquidity uses will stand at about £1.05 billion (mainly capital expenditure and debt service payments). The group has a diversified pool of lenders and a proven strong track record of accessing the debt capital markets, which we consider positively in our assessment.
Government-related entity analysis
We believe there is a moderately high likelihood that PfP would receive timely extraordinary government support in case of financial distress. This leads to a two-notch uplift from the stand-alone credit profile. As one of the Regulator of Social Housing's (RSH's) key goals is to maintain lender confidence and low funding costs across the sector, it is likely that the RSH would step in to try and prevent a default in the sector, in our opinion. We base this view on previous records of the RSH mediating mergers or arranging liquidity support from other registered providers in cases of financial distress and think this would also apply to PfP.
Selected Indicators
Table 1
Places for People Group Limited--Financial statistics | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
--Year ended March 31-- | ||||||||||||
Mil. £ | 2023a | 2024a | 2025bc | 2026bc | 2027bc | |||||||
Number of units owned or managed | 240,129 | 245,272 | 254,276 | 255,617 | 257,310 | |||||||
Adjusted operating revenue | 827 | 809 | 1,102 | 1,149 | 1,241 | |||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 135 | 99 | 172 | 208 | 239 | |||||||
Nonsales adjusted EBITDA | 120 | 87 | 141 | 177 | 199 | |||||||
Capital expense | 386 | 395 | 758 | 704 | 728 | |||||||
Debt | 3,374 | 3,684 | 4,461 | 4,838 | 5,115 | |||||||
Interest expense | 136 | 186 | 221 | 218 | 229 | |||||||
Adjusted EBITDA/Adjusted operating revenue (%) | 16.3 | 12.2 | 15.6 | 18.1 | 19.3 | |||||||
Debt/Nonsales adjusted EBITDA (x) | 28.2 | 42.5 | 31.6 | 27.3 | 25.7 | |||||||
Nonsales adjusted EBITDA/interest coverage(x) | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | |||||||
a--Actual. e--Estimate. bc--Base case reflects S&P Global Ratings' expectations of the most likely scenario. |
Ratings Score Snapshot
Table 2
Places for People Group Limited--Ratings Score Snapshot | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment | ||||
Enterprise risk profile | 3 | |||
Industry risk | 2 | |||
Regulatory framework | 3 | |||
Market dependencies | 2 | |||
Management and governance | 3 | |||
Financial risk profile | 4 | |||
Financial performance | 5 | |||
Debt profile | 6 | |||
Liquidity | 2 | |||
Stand-alone credit profile | bbb | |||
Issuer credit rating | A- | |||
S&P Global Ratings bases its ratings on nonprofit social housing providers on the seven main rating factors listed in the table above. Our "Methodology For Rating Public And Nonprofit Social Housing Providers," published on June 1, 2021, summarizes how the seven factors are combined to derive each social housing provider's stand-alone credit profile and issuer credit rating. |
Related Criteria
- General Criteria: Environmental, Social, And Governance Principles In Credit Ratings, Oct. 10, 2021
- Criteria | Governments | General: Methodology For Rating Public And Nonprofit Social Housing Providers, June 1, 2021
- General Criteria: Group Rating Methodology, July 1, 2019
- General Criteria: Rating Government-Related Entities: Methodology And Assumptions, March 25, 2015
- General Criteria: Principles Of Credit Ratings, Feb. 16, 2011
Related Research
- Cyber Risk Brief: U.K. Public Sector Is Increasingly Under Threat, Oct. 24, 2024
- United Kingdom 'AA/A-1+' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Stable, Oct. 18, 2024
- Non-U.S. Social Housing Providers Ratings Score Snapshot: March 2024, March 11, 2024
- Non-U.S. Social Housing Providers Ratings Risk Indicators: March 2024, March 11, 2024
- Non-U.S. Social Housing Providers Ratings History: March 2024, March 11, 2024
- U.K. Social Housing Borrowing 2024: Borrowing capacity remains constrained, March 6, 2024
- European Housing Markets: Forecast Brightens Amid Ongoing Correction, Jan. 25, 2024
- Non-U.S. Social Housing Sector Outlook 2024: At A Turning Point?, Nov. 29 2023
- Regulatory Framework Assessment: Social Housing Providers In The U.K. Benefit From Strong Regulatory Frameworks, Oct. 23, 2023
- U.K. Social Housing Providers' Credit Headroom Could Tighten If The Operating Environment Deteriorates, Oct. 4, 2023
Ratings List
Ratings Affirmed | ||
---|---|---|
Places For People Treasury PLC |
||
Senior Unsecured | A- | |
Places for People Homes Ltd. |
||
Senior Secured | A- | |
Senior Unsecured | A- | |
Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Action | ||
To | From | |
Places for People Group Ltd. |
||
Places For People Treasury PLC |
||
Issuer Credit Rating | A-/Negative/-- | A-/Stable/-- |
Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.spglobal.com/ratings for further information. A description of each of S&P Global Ratings' rating categories is contained in "S&P Global Ratings Definitions" at https://disclosure.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/sourceId/504352. Complete ratings information is available to RatingsDirect subscribers at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.spglobal.com/ratings. Alternatively, call S&P Global Ratings' Global Client Support line (44) 20-7176-7176.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Noa Fux, London + 44 20 7176 0730; noa.fux@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Karin Erlander, London + 44 20 7176 3584; karin.erlander@spglobal.com |
Mahek Bhojani, London +44 2071760846; mahek.bhojani@spglobal.com | |
Additional Contact: | Sovereign and IPF EMEA; SOVIPF@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.