articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240613-creditweek-is-u-s-housing-becoming-a-little-more-affordable-13145244 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

CreditWeek: Is U.S. Housing Becoming (A Little) More Affordable?

Take Notes - The Rise Of U.S. CLO ETFs

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Will 2024's Ratings Performance Shape The Year Ahead?

Covered Bonds Uncovered

COMMENTS

2025 U.S. Residential Mortgage And Housing Outlook


CreditWeek: Is U.S. Housing Becoming (A Little) More Affordable?

Editor's Note: CreditWeek is a weekly research offering from S&P Global Ratings, providing actionable and forward-looking insights on emerging credit risks and exploring the questions that matter to markets today. Subscribe to receive a new edition every Thursday at: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/creditweek-7115686044951273472/)

Every June, the Department of Housing and Urban Development celebrates National Homeownership Month in the U.S. But prospective buyers may not be in such a celebratory mood, as access to affordable housing remains a nationwide challenge.

What We're Watching

The "American dream" of owning one's home—as a way to gain household stability and financial security, and to build generational wealth—has been delayed for many. The Federal Reserve's inflation-fighting tightening of monetary policy has helped push mortgage rates to their highest in decades, and the limited supply of new homes being built and existing homes coming to market has pushed prices out of reach for many first-time buyers.

With conventional mortgage rates peaking at more than 7% for 17 weeks combined last year, and with only a four-month inventory of single-family housing, it's no surprise that median home prices have risen. At the same time, much of the existing housing stock is mortgaged at record low fixed rates. This has reduced the likelihood that homeowners will move and take on new mortgages at higher rates—what is known as the lock-in effect—and this in turn has put downward pressure on existing home supply.

Interest rates and home-price appreciation (HPA) aren't the only factors affecting affordability. Insurance premiums have also jumped, in many cases due to climate-related events, and these recurring costs could be starting to play a role in the decision to buy a home—and in home values.

On the bright side, overvaluation has been easing since the middle of last year. We view home prices as overvalued or undervalued based on how much a specified region's price-to-income ratio is above or below its long-term average. Our latest assessment of nationwide valuations showed a decline in overvaluation of approximately one percentage point, to 14.3%, due to per-capita income growth and negligible gains in HPA. The calculation—for the fourth quarter of 2023—showed 25 states experienced some home-price depreciation, compared with only two states in the previous quarter. (Note that the index has historically increased 0.86% on average in the fourth quarter.)

image

What We Think And Why

Nationwide, overvaluation remains high, with 89% of metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) still overvalued—albeit with substantial regional variation in both the number of overvalued MSAs and the extent of the overvaluation. For instance, certain MSAs—including several in Northern California—remain undervalued by as much as 20%, while numerous areas in Florida are overvalued by more than 40%.

Further up the East Coast, New York City’s limited affordable housing inventory is unlikely to ease any time soon. While wider affordability has improved somewhat, as mortgage rates fell and remained below 7% during the first quarter of this year, New York seems to have been immune to any relief. Median and average single-family home sales prices and rental costs in the Northeast and New York City are the highest in the nation. Worse yet, much of the New York metropolitan area is undervalued, suggesting that any reversion to the mean will increase the price-to-income ratio in that region.

From a credit perspective, there's a silver lining to low housing supply and resilient demand, in that these conditions will likely be a tailwind for the U.S. homebuilding sector in the next two years. We think homebuilders will enjoy year-over-year growth in both revenues and EBITDA this year, and better growth momentum into 2025. Even as profit margins remain pinched by incentives that many offered early in the year, we expect margins to normalize in coming quarters as builders pull back on incentives and demand recovers. We expect relative ratings stability after several upgrades last year pushed more homebuilders into investment-grade territory. Also, some 93% of ratings are on stable outlook and stronger-than-expected performance could make for some ratings upside.

What Could Change

The bulk of an American homeowner's monthly housing-related payment typically comes from the mortgage principal and interest, with other monthly costs, such as taxes and insurance, being secondary. Generally, mortgage rates are based on the 10-year Treasury note yield—which, in turn, is affected by the Fed's policy rate. With the U.S. economy outperforming expectations and the central bank continuing its battle against persistent above-target inflation, S&P Global Ratings now believes that conditions for a monetary policy easing won't be in place before autumn—and more likely not until very late in the year. S&P Global economists forecast the 30-year mortgage rate will average 6.4% in the fourth quarter, declining only to 5.6% in 2025.

We think it would take a sharp slowdown in U.S. GDP growth, along with a sudden jump in unemployment, to cause a quick Fed pivot. And even if policymakers begin lowering the key rate, it's unclear how much of an effect that could have on home prices. A cheaper mortgage would likely bring more prospective buyers to market, which would likely underpin prices given the short supply.

All told, we believe U.S. home prices will continue to depend on a combination of factors, including the trajectory and stability of the 30-year mortgage rate, local housing dynamics, and economic fundamentals.

Writers: Molly Mintz and Joe Maguire

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Tom Schopflocher, New York + 1 (212) 438 6722;
tom.schopflocher@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Alexandra Dimitrijevic, London + 44 20 7176 3128;
alexandra.dimitrijevic@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in