Key Takeaways
- Although U.S. corporate upgrades reached a new high in 2021, the credit rating improvement is slowing as we enter 2022.
- Rating levels may be settling at below pre-pandemic levels--cumulative downgrades since the start of 2020 outnumber upgrades by 429, and now a higher share of issuers are rated 'B-' or lower than before the pandemic.
- The pace of downgrades also continues to slow, and U.S. corporates begin 2022 with the negative bias at 13%, the lowest level to start a year since 2015.
- The concentration of upgrades moved up the rating scale in the fourth quarter with 'CCC+' and lower issuers accounting for a shrinking share of upgrades as more came from the 'B' category.
Downgrade Risk Ebbs Across Most Sectors
Fewer U.S. companies were at risk of downgrade at the start of 2022 than in any year since 2015. At 13%, the U.S. corporate negative bias (the proportion of issuers with negative outlooks or ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications) is more than 20 percentage points lower than it was at the beginning of 2021, nine percentage points below its long-term average, and is just two percentage points above its all-time low. Negative bias continued its decline across most sectors in the fourth quarter of 2021, and now just three sectors show downgrade risk that is above their long-term average.
The combination of low interest rates, exceptionally favorable financing conditions, and above-trend economic growth contributed to a remarkable improvement in credit quality in 2021, exemplified by the record number of upgrades. However, that pace of improvement will be hard to match in 2022, especially as issuers grapple with inflation, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical risk, while the specter of rising interest rates looms.
Chart 1
With a negative bias of 29%, the aerospace and defense sector enters 2022 with the highest downgrade risk of U.S. sectors. This sector also shows a negative bias that is highest above its long-term average (of 19%). Despite the elevated negative bias in this sector, we're seeing signs of improvement as air traffic is picking up in some large domestic markets globally, boosting demand for aircraft, and the sector's negative bias fell by 10 percentage points in the fourth quarter of 2021.
Chart 2
Chart 3
The consumer products sector has the second highest negative bias (at 21%), and this bias is worsening as the sector faces higher material and labor costs, coupled with supply-chain bottlenecks. The negative bias for the consumer products rose by 1 percentage point during the fourth quarter, and it was just one of the three sectors to show such an increase. However, recent ratings actions for the consumer products sector have been mainly positive, reflecting issuers' higher-than-anticipated resilience to the challenging operating conditions.
The sector with the largest increase in downgrade risk in fourth-quarter 2021 was homebuilders/real estate, as concerns of China Evergrande Group's liquidity spilled over to into capital markets. This risk of limited access to new capital market funding for other Chinese property developers is carrying into 2022. Several Chinese property developers are included within the data for U.S. corporate rating actions because they are incorporated in the Cayman Islands, which we group with the U.S. as a tax haven. Led by rising credit risk for Chinese property developers, the homebuilder/real estate negative bias rose 2 percentage points in the fourth quarter to 13%. Chinese developers continue to face declining sales volume and liquidity strains, even as those homebuilders in the U.S. market are benefitting from the brisk pace of sales in the U.S. that is supporting improving credit quality.
Meanwhile, rising hydrocarbon prices are contributing to a falling negative bias for oil and gas companies. This sector saw the steepest decrease in downgrade risk in the fourth quarter, as the negative bias dropped by 9 percentage points to 9%. Companies are taking the opportunity of higher oil and gas prices to reduce debt and repair balance sheets.
Besides aerospace and defense, only the health care and utilities sectors have negative biases that are above their long-term averages. Although in both cases the current negative bias is very close to its long-term average, with a difference of just 1 percentage point to 2 percentage points.
Chart 4
Even though the negative bias is rising in a few sectors, overall downgrade risk continues to ebb for higher- and lower-rated companies alike. The negative bias fell by 2 percentage points for both speculative-grade (rated 'BB+' or lower) and investment-grade ('BBB-' and above) companies in the fourth quarter.
Chart 5
Chart 6
At 14%, the speculative-grade negative bias is nearing its all-time low of 12% from 2014. Within speculative grade, the lowest rated category of 'CCC/C' shows the highest negative bias, at 62%, and yet even this rating category's negative bias is considerably lower than its 79% average of the past 10 years.
Chart 7
Meanwhile, the investment-grade negative bias (at 12%) is back to its lowest level since before the pandemic. Within investment grade, the negative bias is highest for the 'A' category, which includes several issuers from the utilities sector (in which high capital spending has led to minimal financial cushions) and the consumer products sector (which face challenges posed by inflation and supply chain pressures).
Upgrade Potential Has Risen But Remains Near Average
The positive bias showed less of a change in the fourth quarter as the pace of upgrades also slowed. The speculative-grade positive bias was unchanged (at 11%), while the investment-grade positive bias rose by 1 percentage point to 7%. Both the investment- and speculative-grade positive biases are at their long-term average.
Eight sectors show upgrade potential above their long-term average, and this number is unchanged from the third quarter (see chart 8).
Chart 8
The automotive sector has the highest positive bias at 21%, which is well above its long-term average of 11%. After recent earnings and cash flow improvements, both Ford Motor Co. and Tesla Inc. are now among the automakers with a positive outlook, and each are potential rising stars (issuers rated 'BB+' with either a positive outlook or ratings on CreditWatch positive). Tesla was also among the automotive sector upgrades during the quarter, as S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating to 'BB+'.
Meanwhile, the metals, mining, and steel sector continues to show above-average upgrade potential as it benefits from the boom in metals prices.
Pace Of U.S. Corporate Rating Improvement Appears To Be Slowing
The pace of upgrades slowed in the fourth quarter as the omicron variant of COVID-19 emerged and as higher-than-expected inflation started to weigh on consumer demand. After upgrades had already reached a new annual record in the third quarter of 2021, upgrades and downgrades were more balanced in the fourth quarter, with net upgrades (upgrades minus downgrades) dropping to their lowest level of the year (with 33).
Chart 9
As net upgrades slow, rating levels are settling below pre-pandemic levels. During full-year 2020, net downgrades totaled 643 (excluding defaults). But even the record number of upgrades in 2021 has only lowered the cumulative number of net downgrades since the start of 2020 to 429 (see chart 10).
While the ratings distribution of U.S. corporate ratings (including financial and nonfinancial issuers) has been trending lower for years, the pandemic accelerated this trend. Currently, 20% of U.S. issuers are rated 'B-' or lower, and this share remains 3 percentage points higher than at the beginning of 2020. We expect these lower-rated issuers to be less resilient if confronted by a business, financial, or economic shock than their higher-rated peers, so this higher concentration of lower-ratings suggests issuers may be on weaker footing to weather the next shock (see chart 11).
Chart 10
Chart 11
Downgrades Leveled Off During 2021
The pace of U.S. corporate downgrades leveled off through 2021. Downgrades fell to 43-45 per quarter in the second through fourth quarters from 57 in the first quarter. Downgrades continue to be highly concentrated among speculative-grade nonfinancials. There were just six investment-grade downgrades in the quarter, and three of these were fallen angels (issuers downgraded to speculative grade from investment grade). These fallen angels included Hyatt Hotels Corp. and specialty and packaging papers producer Domtar Corp, both of which were downgraded as a result of merger and acquisition activity.
Chart 12
Chart 13
Chart 14
Table 1
Fourth-Quarter 2021 U.S. Corporate Ratings Statistics | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall | Investment-Grade | Speculative-Grade | Financial | Nonfinancial | ||||||||
Downgrades (issuer count) | 44 | 6 | 38 | 2 | 42 | |||||||
Debt volume (bil. $) | 141 | 67 | 74 | 1 | 140 | |||||||
Upgrades (issuer count) | 77 | 5 | 72 | 4 | 73 | |||||||
Debt volume (bil. $) | 239 | 39 | 200 | 21 | 218 | |||||||
Total rating actions | 121 | 11 | 110 | 6 | 115 | |||||||
-- | ||||||||||||
Downgrade ratio (%) | 36.4 | 54.5 | 34.5 | 33.3 | 36.5 | |||||||
Historical average (%) | 60.3 | 59.7 | 60.4 | 52.6 | 61.1 | |||||||
High (%), quarter | 94, 2020Q2 | 92, 2020Q2 | 95, 2020Q2 | 100, 2000Q3 | 95, 2020Q2 | |||||||
Low (%), quarter | 26, 2021Q2 | 21, 2012Q2 | 23, 1997Q3 | 9, 1996Q3 | 25, 2021Q2 | |||||||
-- | ||||||||||||
Negative bias (%) | 13 | 12 | 14 | 9 | 14 | |||||||
Historical average (%) | 22 | 16 | 25 | 18 | 23 | |||||||
High (%), quarter | 44, 2020Q2 | 28, 2009Q3 | 52, 2020Q2 | 45, 2009Q3 | 46, 2020Q2 | |||||||
Low (%), quarter | 11, 2013Q4 | 9, 2013Q4 | 12, 2014Q2 | 4, 1996Q1 | 11, 2014Q2 | |||||||
-- | ||||||||||||
Positive bias (%) | 10 | 7 | 11 | 10 | 10 | |||||||
Historical average (%) | 9 | 7 | 11 | 8 | 10 | |||||||
High (%), quarter | 17, 1996Q3 | 14, 1997Q4 | 23, 1996Q2 | 17, 2006Q1 | 17, 1996Q2 | |||||||
Low (%), quarter | 2, 2020Q2 | 1, 2020Q2 | 2, 2020Q2 | 2, 2020Q3 | 2, 2020Q2 | |||||||
Historical average from 1995Q1-2021Q4. See tables 4 and 5 for details. Rating changes exclude entities with no rated debt and downgrades excluding default. Data as of Dec. 31, 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Upgrades Move Up The Rating Scale
Upgrades were more concentrated among the lowest-rated issuers in the first part of 2021 than in the latter. While issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower accounted for 27% of upgrades in the second quarter, this share dipped to 17% in the third quarter, and 12% by the fourth.
Fourth-quarter upgrades were more concentrated in the 'B' category, as 47% of upgrades were of issuers rated 'B' or 'B-'. The 'B' category upgrades included 11 issuers from the media and entertainment sector, which is already highly concentrated within the 'B' rating category. These 'B' category media and entertainment upgrades included gaming companies and out-of-home entertainment companies that have shown faster-than-expected revenue and debt-reduction in 2021, and several of these companies had already been downgraded in 2020.
With upgrades moving up the rating scale, we also saw an uptick in 'BB' category upgrades, including five rising stars, in the fourth quarter (see table 3). The 'BB' category upgrades included both Netflix (now investment grade) and Tesla (now just one notch below investment grade). The 'BB' upgrades also included several rated subsidiaries of FirstEnergy Corp., which accounted for many of the utility sector's upgrades during the quarter.
Chart 15
Chart 16
Table 2
U.S. Rating Actions By Sector (Fourth-Quarter 2021) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
--Number-- | --Mil. $-- | --Totals-- | ||||||||||||
Up | Down | Up | Down | Number | Mil. $ | |||||||||
Aerospace and defense | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2,388 | 4 | 2,388 | ||||||||
Automotive | 2 | 3 | 4,068 | 1,153 | 5 | 5,221 | ||||||||
Capital goods | 3 | 3 | 3,705 | 1,125 | 6 | 4,830 | ||||||||
Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2,801 | 1 | 2,801 | ||||||||
Consumer products | 11 | 3 | 19,251 | 4,324 | 14 | 23,575 | ||||||||
Financial instituition | 4 | 2 | 21,418 | 810 | 6 | 22,228 | ||||||||
Forest products and building materials | 1 | 3 | 1,050 | 5,731 | 4 | 6,781 | ||||||||
Health care | 4 | 3 | 13,400 | 7,150 | 7 | 20,550 | ||||||||
High technology | 6 | 4 | 57,640 | 12,844 | 10 | 70,484 | ||||||||
Homebuilders/Real estate co. | 0 | 7 | 0 | 11,920 | 7 | 11,920 | ||||||||
Media and entertainment | 12 | 2 | 32,044 | 16,150 | 14 | 48,194 | ||||||||
Metals, mining, and steel | 6 | 0 | 11,426 | 0 | 6 | 11,426 | ||||||||
Oil and gas | 6 | 0 | 17,250 | 0 | 6 | 17,250 | ||||||||
Retail/Restaurants | 5 | 0 | 13,207 | 0 | 5 | 13,207 | ||||||||
Telecommunications | 2 | 3 | 3,485 | 18,245 | 5 | 21,730 | ||||||||
Transportation | 1 | 1 | 1,545 | 765 | 2 | 2,310 | ||||||||
Utility | 14 | 5 | 39,496 | 55,661 | 19 | 95,157 | ||||||||
Total | 77 | 44 | 238,985 | 141,067 | 121 | 380,052 | ||||||||
Media and entertainment includes leisure. Utility sector includes midstream companies. Rating changes exclude entities with no rated debt and downgrades excluding default. Data as of Dec. 31, 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Table 3
First-Quarter 2016 To Fourth-Quarter 2021 S&P Global Ratings Trends, U.S. Corporates | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Defaulted issuers | Weakest links | Fallen angels | Rising stars | Potential downgrades | Potential upgrades | |||||||||
2016Q1 | 30 | 164 | 9 | 6 | 310 | 131 | ||||||||
2016Q2 | 32 | 186 | 4 | 4 | 332 | 140 | ||||||||
2016Q3 | 25 | 178 | 5 | 5 | 319 | 151 | ||||||||
2016Q4 | 18 | 177 | 4 | 4 | 317 | 139 | ||||||||
2017Q1 | 17 | 168 | 5 | 287 | 151 | |||||||||
2017Q2 | 23 | 153 | 9 | 299 | 145 | |||||||||
2017Q3 | 9 | 155 | 2 | 5 | 293 | 162 | ||||||||
2017Q4 | 15 | 146 | 6 | 3 | 293 | 170 | ||||||||
2018Q1 | 18 | 137 | 1 | 5 | 285 | 178 | ||||||||
2018Q2 | 14 | 143 | 5 | 4 | 295 | 187 | ||||||||
2018Q3 | 3 | 144 | 4 | 5 | 302 | 197 | ||||||||
2018Q4 | 12 | 144 | 6 | 2 | 301 | 180 | ||||||||
2019Q1 | 21 | 150 | 4 | 1 | 308 | 164 | ||||||||
2019Q2 | 23 | 167 | 2 | 2 | 314 | 150 | ||||||||
2019Q3 | 13 | 178 | 3 | 2 | 318 | 134 | ||||||||
2019Q4 | 20 | 195 | 4 | 7 | 348 | 125 | ||||||||
2020Q1 | 21 | 315 | 13 | 1 | 569 | 90 | ||||||||
2020Q2 | 62 | 430 | 6 | 1 | 773 | 41 | ||||||||
2020Q3 | 37 | 392 | 3 | 1 | 723 | 57 | ||||||||
2020Q4 | 26 | 340 | 2 | 1 | 640 | 109 | ||||||||
2021Q1 | 15 | 266 | 2 | 5 | 489 | 152 | ||||||||
2021Q2 | 11 | 191 | 1 | 7 | 333 | 215 | ||||||||
2021Q3 | 5 | 160 | 4 | 3 | 265 | 219 | ||||||||
2021Q4 | 9 | 131 | 3 | 5 | 225 | 227 | ||||||||
Data as of Dec. 31, 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Credit Conditions Likely To Slow Growth Of Default Rate
Despite the positive credit trends for many companies, the number of defaults in the fourth quarter rose to nine from five in the third quarter. However, many of these fourth-quarter defaults were of the Chinese homebuilders that were incorporated in the Cayman Islands.
However, with the pace of downgrades slowing and with the negative bias dipping, default risk shows signs of moderating. The count of weakest links (issuers rated 'B-' and below with negative outlooks or on CreditWatch negative) fell to 131 in the fourth quarter from 160 in the third, pointing toward a decline in the number of issuers with the greatest risk of default. However, even as weakest links have declined, risks to Chinese developers remain. As noted in recent publications, we expect defaults for Chinese developers to increase over the next six to 12 months, and about one-third of the rated Chinese developers' liquidity could come under pressure under our most severe scenario stress test, according to our recent sensitivity analysis (see "China Property Watch: Strains In The Key Of 'B'," published Oct. 27, 2021).
Even though the number of defaults rose in the fourth quarter, the default rate in 2021 remained exceptionally low at just 1.5%. We expect the U.S. trailing-12-month speculative-grade corporate default rate to reach 2.5% by September. While this would be an increase from 2021, it would still be considerably lower than the long-term average of 4%. Above-trend economic growth, credit trends that have been more positive than negative, and remarkably favorable financing conditions have all contributed to the low default rate over the past year, and the continuation of these factors will likely continue to slow the growth of default rates.
Table 4
U.S. Corporate Upgrades (Fourth Quarter 2021) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer | Country | To | From | Date | Sector |
Sonic Automotive Inc. |
U.S. | BB | BB- | 10/13/2021 | Automotive |
Tesla Inc. |
U.S. | BB+ | BB | 10/22/2021 | Automotive |
Form Technologies LLC |
U.S. | B- | CCC+ | 12/3/2021 | Capital Goods |
Helix Acquisition Holdings Inc. | U.S. | B- | CCC+ | 10/28/2021 | Capital Goods |
Leggett & Platt Inc. |
U.S. | BBB | BBB- | 11/8/2021 | Capital Goods |
Advantage Solutions Inc. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 10/20/2021 | Consumer Products |
Anastasia Holdings LLC |
U.S. | CCC+ | CCC | 12/16/2021 | Consumer Products |
Coty Inc. |
U.S. | B | B- | 11/12/2021 | Consumer Products |
Del Monte Foods Inc. | U.S. | B | B- | 10/5/2021 | Consumer Products |
Kontoor Brands Inc. |
U.S. | BB | BB- | 11/5/2021 | Consumer Products |
LG Parent Holdco Inc. |
U.S. | B- | CCC+ | 12/7/2021 | Consumer Products |
Lifetime Brands Inc. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 11/17/2021 | Consumer Products |
Prestige Brands Inc. (Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc.) | U.S. | BB- | B+ | 12/10/2021 | Consumer Products |
S&S Holdings LLC |
U.S. | B | B- | 11/4/2021 | Consumer Products |
Vector Group Ltd. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 12/1/2021 | Consumer Products |
Weber-Stephen Products LLC (Weber Inc.) | U.S. | BB- | B | 10/5/2021 | Consumer Products |
Cadence Bancorporation (Cadence Bancorp LLC) | U.S. | BBB | BB+ | 11/1/2021 | Financial Institutions |
Greystone Select Financial LLC |
U.S. | B | B- | 10/29/2021 | Financial Institutions |
Intercontinental Exchange Inc. | U.S. | A- | BBB+ | 11/29/2021 | Financial Institutions |
Nasdaq Inc. | U.S. | BBB+ | BBB | 11/29/2021 | Financial Institutions |
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc. |
U.S. | B | B- | 11/23/2021 | Forest Products & Building Materials |
Aegis Toxicology Sciences Corp. (Aegis Acquistion Inc.) | U.S. | B | B- | 11/5/2021 | Health Care |
Hill-Rom Holdings Inc. |
U.S. | BBB | BB+ | 12/16/2021 | Health Care |
Hologic Inc. |
U.S. | BBB- | BB+ | 11/9/2021 | Health Care |
Option Care Health Inc. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 10/20/2021 | Health Care |
Cvent Inc., | U.S. | B | CCC+ | 12/17/2021 | High Technology |
Finastra Ltd. |
Cayman Islands | B- | CCC+ | 10/22/2021 | High Technology |
LogMeIn Inc. | U.S. | B | B- | 10/6/2021 | High Technology |
NAB Holdings LLC |
U.S. | B+ | B | 11/10/2021 | High Technology |
Project Angel Intermediate Holdings, LLC (MeridianLink Inc.) | U.S. | B+ | B- | 10/14/2021 | High Technology |
Qualcomm Inc. |
U.S. | A | A- | 12/9/2021 | High Technology |
Century Casinos Inc. |
U.S. | B | B- | 10/15/2021 | Media & Entertainment |
E.W. Scripps Co. (The) |
U.S. | B+ | B | 11/12/2021 | Media & Entertainment |
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Co. |
U.S. | B | B- | 11/22/2021 | Media & Entertainment |
Hoya Midco LLC | U.S. | B | B- | 11/4/2021 | Media & Entertainment |
Netflix Inc. |
U.S. | BBB | BB+ | 10/25/2021 | Media & Entertainment |
Peninsula Pacific Entertainment LLC |
U.S. | B | B- | 10/25/2021 | Media & Entertainment |
Penn National Gaming Inc. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 11/24/2021 | Media & Entertainment |
Realogy Group LLC |
U.S. | BB- | B+ | 11/10/2021 | Media & Entertainment |
Restaurant Technologies Inc. |
U.S. | B | B- | 12/7/2021 | Media & Entertainment |
Spectacle Gary Holdings LLC |
U.S. | B | B- | 10/7/2021 | Media & Entertainment |
Sterling Intermediate Corp. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 11/10/2021 | Media & Entertainment |
The Octave Music Group Inc. | U.S. | B | B- | 11/16/2021 | Media & Entertainment |
Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc. |
U.S. | B- | CCC+ | 12/14/2021 | Metals, Mining & Steel |
Big River Steel LLC |
U.S. | B+ | B | 12/21/2021 | Metals, Mining & Steel |
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 11/5/2021 | Metals, Mining & Steel |
Ryerson Holding Corp. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 12/3/2021 | Metals, Mining & Steel |
United States Steel Corp. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 12/21/2021 | Metals, Mining & Steel |
WireCo WorldGroup Inc. |
U.S. | B | B- | 10/18/2021 | Metals, Mining & Steel |
Antero Resources Corp. |
U.S. | BB | BB- | 10/8/2021 | Oil & Gas |
California Resources Corp. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 10/20/2021 | Oil & Gas |
Chesapeake Energy Corp. |
U.S. | BB- | B+ | 11/2/2021 | Oil & Gas |
Gran Tierra Energy Inc. |
U.S. | B | B- | 10/21/2021 | Oil & Gas |
Hilcorp Energy I L.P. |
U.S. | BB | BB- | 10/21/2021 | Oil & Gas |
Vine Energy Inc. | U.S. | BB- | B- | 11/2/2021 | Oil & Gas |
Darden Restaurants Inc. |
U.S. | BBB | BBB- | 10/12/2021 | Retail/Restaurants |
Inspire Brands Inc. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 12/2/2021 | Retail/Restaurants |
PHD Group Holdings LLC |
U.S. | B | CCC+ | 11/12/2021 | Retail/Restaurants |
Party City Holdings Inc. (PC Nextco Holdings LLC) | U.S. | B | CCC+ | 12/3/2021 | Retail/Restaurants |
United Natural Foods Inc. |
U.S. | B+ | B | 10/15/2021 | Retail/Restaurants |
Block Communications Inc. |
U.S. | BB | BB- | 10/22/2021 | Telecommunications |
WideOpenWest Finance LLC |
U.S. | BB- | B | 12/1/2021 | Telecommunications |
Hertz Global Holdings Inc. |
U.S. | BB- | B | 11/17/2021 | Transportation |
American Transmission Systems Inc. (FirstEnergy Corp.) | U.S. | BB+ | BB | 10/19/2021 | Utility |
Antero Midstream Partners L.P. (Antero Resources Corp.) | U.S. | BB | BB- | 10/15/2021 | Utility |
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) | U.S. | BB+ | BB | 10/19/2021 | Utility |
FirstEnergy Corp. |
U.S. | BBB- | BB | 11/8/2021 | Utility |
Jersey Central Power & Light Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) | U.S. | BB+ | BB | 10/19/2021 | Utility |
Metropolitan Edison Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) | U.S. | BB+ | BB | 10/19/2021 | Utility |
Monongahela Power Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) | U.S. | BB+ | BB | 10/19/2021 | Utility |
New Fortress Energy Inc. |
U.S. | BB- | B+ | 11/22/2021 | Utility |
Ohio Edison Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) | U.S. | BB+ | BB | 10/19/2021 | Utility |
Pennsylvania Electric Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) | U.S. | BB+ | BB | 10/19/2021 | Utility |
Potomac Edison Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) | U.S. | BB+ | BB | 10/19/2021 | Utility |
Toledo Edison Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) | U.S. | BB+ | BB | 10/19/2021 | Utility |
Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) | U.S. | BB+ | BB | 10/19/2021 | Utility |
West Penn Power Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) | U.S. | BB+ | BB | 10/19/2021 | Utility |
Rating changes exclude sovereign and entities with no rated debt. Data as of Dec. 31, 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Table 5
U.S. Corporate Downgrades (Fourth-Quarter 2021) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer | Country | To | From | Date | Sector | |||||||
API Holdings III Corp. |
U.S. | CCC+ | B- | 12/21/2021 | Aerospace & Defense | |||||||
Advanced Integration Technology L.P. |
U.S. | CCC+ | B- | 12/9/2021 | Aerospace & Defense | |||||||
PM General Purchaser LLC |
U.S. | B- | B | 12/21/2021 | Aerospace & Defense | |||||||
Vertex Aerospace Services Corp. |
U.S. | B | B+ | 10/27/2021 | Aerospace & Defense | |||||||
IXS Holdings Inc. |
U.S. | B- | B | 10/15/2021 | Automotive | |||||||
UC Holdings Inc. (Chassix Holdings Inc.) | U.S. | B- | B | 12/7/2021 | Automotive | |||||||
USF Holdings LLC |
U.S. | CCC+ | B | 10/7/2021 | Automotive | |||||||
Ahern Rentals Inc. |
U.S. | CCC | CCC+ | 10/8/2021 | Capital Goods | |||||||
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling Inc. |
U.S. | B | B+ | 11/30/2021 | Capital Goods | |||||||
Park-Ohio Industries Inc. |
U.S. | B- | B | 12/3/2021 | Capital Goods | |||||||
LABL Inc. (LABL Intermediate Holding Corp.) | U.S. | B- | B | 10/12/2021 | Chemicals, Packaging & Environmental Services | |||||||
KNB Holdings Corp. |
U.S. | CCC | CCC+ | 11/17/2021 | Consumer Products | |||||||
LS Parent Corp. |
U.S. | B- | B | 11/30/2021 | Consumer Products | |||||||
TreeHouse Foods Inc. |
U.S. | B | B+ | 11/8/2021 | Consumer Products | |||||||
Kestra Advisor Services Holdings A Inc. |
U.S. | B- | B | 11/15/2021 | Financial Institutions | |||||||
Mariner Wealth Advisors LLC |
U.S. | B- | B | 12/15/2021 | Financial Institutions | |||||||
Apex Tool Group LLC |
U.S. | CCC | CCC+ | 12/1/2021 | Forest Products & Building Materials | |||||||
DiversiTech Holdings Inc. (Icebox Holdco III Inc.) | U.S. | B- | B | 12/6/2021 | Forest Products & Building Materials | |||||||
Domtar Corp. |
U.S. | BB | BBB- | 12/3/2021 | Forest Products & Building Materials | |||||||
Avalign Holdings Inc. |
U.S. | CCC+ | B- | 11/19/2021 | Health Care | |||||||
Baxter International Inc. |
U.S. | BBB | A- | 12/16/2021 | Health Care | |||||||
TecoStar Holdings Inc. |
U.S. | B- | B | 11/24/2021 | Health Care | |||||||
Balboa Intermediate Holdings LLC |
U.S. | B- | B | 10/11/2021 | High Technology | |||||||
MKS Instruments Inc. |
U.S. | BB | BB+ | 10/1/2021 | High Technology | |||||||
Ping Identity Holding Corp. |
U.S. | B- | B+ | 11/9/2021 | High Technology | |||||||
Riverbed Parent Inc. | U.S. | CC | CCC | 10/13/2021 | High Technology | |||||||
Agile Group Holdings Ltd. |
Cayman Islands | BB- | BB | 11/10/2021 | Homebuilders/Real Estate Co. | |||||||
China Aoyuan Group Ltd. | Cayman Islands | B | B+ | 10/15/2021 | Homebuilders/Real Estate Co. | |||||||
China Aoyuan Group Ltd. | Cayman Islands | CCC | B | 11/16/2021 | Homebuilders/Real Estate Co. | |||||||
Service Properties Trust |
U.S. | B+ | BB- | 11/19/2021 | Homebuilders/Real Estate Co. | |||||||
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. | Cayman Islands | BB+ | BBB- | 11/9/2021 | Homebuilders/Real Estate Co. | |||||||
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. | Cayman Islands | B+ | BB+ | 12/21/2021 | Homebuilders/Real Estate Co. | |||||||
Shinsun Holdings (Group) Co. Ltd., | Cayman Islands | B- | B | 11/2/2021 | Homebuilders/Real Estate Co. | |||||||
Hyatt Hotels Corp. |
U.S. | BB+ | BBB- | 11/3/2021 | Media & Entertainment | |||||||
Wynn Resorts Ltd. |
U.S. | B+ | BB- | 10/13/2021 | Media & Entertainment | |||||||
DISH Network Corp. |
U.S. | B- | B | 11/8/2021 | Telecommunications | |||||||
Fusion Connect Inc. |
U.S. | CC | CCC+ | 12/15/2021 | Telecommunications | |||||||
U.S. TelePacific Holdings Corp. |
U.S. | CCC- | CCC+ | 12/6/2021 | Telecommunications | |||||||
IBC Capital Ltd. |
Cayman Islands | B- | B | 10/15/2021 | Transportation | |||||||
PSS Industrial Group Corp. |
U.S. | CCC- | CCC+ | 11/17/2021 | Utility | |||||||
Pinnacle West Capital Corp. |
U.S. | BBB+ | A- | 11/9/2021 | Utility | |||||||
Ruby Pipeline LLC |
U.S. | CC | CCC | 11/4/2021 | Utility | |||||||
Southern Co. |
U.S. | BBB+ | A- | 10/27/2021 | Utility | |||||||
TransMontaigne Partners L.P. (TLP Finance Holdings LLC) | U.S. | B+ | BB- | 10/20/2021 | Utility | |||||||
Rating changes exclude sovereign and entities with no rated debt and downgrades excluding default. Data as of Dec. 31, 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Related Research
- Industry Top Trends 2022: Consumer Products, Jan. 25, 2022
- Industry Top Trends 2022: Oil and Gas, Jan. 25, 2022
- Industry Top Trends 2022: Aerospace and Defense, Jan. 25, 2022
- Industry Top Trends 2022: Homebuilders and Developers, Jan. 25, 2022
- Why China Property Firms Are Succumbing To Evergrande Effects, Nov. 18, 2021
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Ratings Performance Analytics: | Nick W Kraemer, FRM, New York + 1 (212) 438 1698; nick.kraemer@spglobal.com |
Evan M Gunter, New York + 1 (212) 438 6412; evan.gunter@spglobal.com | |
Jon Palmer, CFA, New York 212 438 1989; jon.palmer@spglobal.com | |
Secondary Contact: | Patrick Drury Byrne, Dublin (00353) 1 568 0605; patrick.drurybyrne@spglobal.com |
Research Contributor: | Yogesh Kumar, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.