articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220216-credit-trends-u-s-corporate-credit-quality-rebound-may-be-losing-steam-12276786 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Credit Trends: U.S. Corporate Credit Quality Rebound May Be Losing Steam

COMMENTS

Credit Trends: U.S. Corporate Bond Yields As Of Nov. 20, 2024

COMMENTS

Private Credit Could Bridge The Infrastructure Funding Gap

COMMENTS

The Opportunity Of Asset-Based Finance Draws In Private Credit

COMMENTS

Private Credit Casts A Wider Net To Encompass Asset-Based Finance And Infrastructure


Credit Trends: U.S. Corporate Credit Quality Rebound May Be Losing Steam

Downgrade Risk Ebbs Across Most Sectors

Fewer U.S. companies were at risk of downgrade at the start of 2022 than in any year since 2015. At 13%, the U.S. corporate negative bias (the proportion of issuers with negative outlooks or ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications) is more than 20 percentage points lower than it was at the beginning of 2021, nine percentage points below its long-term average, and is just two percentage points above its all-time low. Negative bias continued its decline across most sectors in the fourth quarter of 2021, and now just three sectors show downgrade risk that is above their long-term average.

The combination of low interest rates, exceptionally favorable financing conditions, and above-trend economic growth contributed to a remarkable improvement in credit quality in 2021, exemplified by the record number of upgrades. However, that pace of improvement will be hard to match in 2022, especially as issuers grapple with inflation, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical risk, while the specter of rising interest rates looms.

Chart 1

image

With a negative bias of 29%, the aerospace and defense sector enters 2022 with the highest downgrade risk of U.S. sectors. This sector also shows a negative bias that is highest above its long-term average (of 19%). Despite the elevated negative bias in this sector, we're seeing signs of improvement as air traffic is picking up in some large domestic markets globally, boosting demand for aircraft, and the sector's negative bias fell by 10 percentage points in the fourth quarter of 2021.

Chart 2

image

Chart 3

image

The consumer products sector has the second highest negative bias (at 21%), and this bias is worsening as the sector faces higher material and labor costs, coupled with supply-chain bottlenecks. The negative bias for the consumer products rose by 1 percentage point during the fourth quarter, and it was just one of the three sectors to show such an increase. However, recent ratings actions for the consumer products sector have been mainly positive, reflecting issuers' higher-than-anticipated resilience to the challenging operating conditions.

The sector with the largest increase in downgrade risk in fourth-quarter 2021 was homebuilders/real estate, as concerns of China Evergrande Group's liquidity spilled over to into capital markets. This risk of limited access to new capital market funding for other Chinese property developers is carrying into 2022. Several Chinese property developers are included within the data for U.S. corporate rating actions because they are incorporated in the Cayman Islands, which we group with the U.S. as a tax haven. Led by rising credit risk for Chinese property developers, the homebuilder/real estate negative bias rose 2 percentage points in the fourth quarter to 13%. Chinese developers continue to face declining sales volume and liquidity strains, even as those homebuilders in the U.S. market are benefitting from the brisk pace of sales in the U.S. that is supporting improving credit quality.

Meanwhile, rising hydrocarbon prices are contributing to a falling negative bias for oil and gas companies. This sector saw the steepest decrease in downgrade risk in the fourth quarter, as the negative bias dropped by 9 percentage points to 9%. Companies are taking the opportunity of higher oil and gas prices to reduce debt and repair balance sheets.

Besides aerospace and defense, only the health care and utilities sectors have negative biases that are above their long-term averages. Although in both cases the current negative bias is very close to its long-term average, with a difference of just 1 percentage point to 2 percentage points.

Chart 4

image

Even though the negative bias is rising in a few sectors, overall downgrade risk continues to ebb for higher- and lower-rated companies alike. The negative bias fell by 2 percentage points for both speculative-grade (rated 'BB+' or lower) and investment-grade ('BBB-' and above) companies in the fourth quarter.

Chart 5

image

Chart 6

image

At 14%, the speculative-grade negative bias is nearing its all-time low of 12% from 2014. Within speculative grade, the lowest rated category of 'CCC/C' shows the highest negative bias, at 62%, and yet even this rating category's negative bias is considerably lower than its 79% average of the past 10 years.

Chart 7

image

Meanwhile, the investment-grade negative bias (at 12%) is back to its lowest level since before the pandemic. Within investment grade, the negative bias is highest for the 'A' category, which includes several issuers from the utilities sector (in which high capital spending has led to minimal financial cushions) and the consumer products sector (which face challenges posed by inflation and supply chain pressures).

Upgrade Potential Has Risen But Remains Near Average

The positive bias showed less of a change in the fourth quarter as the pace of upgrades also slowed. The speculative-grade positive bias was unchanged (at 11%), while the investment-grade positive bias rose by 1 percentage point to 7%. Both the investment- and speculative-grade positive biases are at their long-term average.

Eight sectors show upgrade potential above their long-term average, and this number is unchanged from the third quarter (see chart 8).

Chart 8

image

The automotive sector has the highest positive bias at 21%, which is well above its long-term average of 11%. After recent earnings and cash flow improvements, both Ford Motor Co. and Tesla Inc. are now among the automakers with a positive outlook, and each are potential rising stars (issuers rated 'BB+' with either a positive outlook or ratings on CreditWatch positive). Tesla was also among the automotive sector upgrades during the quarter, as S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating to 'BB+'.

Meanwhile, the metals, mining, and steel sector continues to show above-average upgrade potential as it benefits from the boom in metals prices.

Pace Of U.S. Corporate Rating Improvement Appears To Be Slowing

The pace of upgrades slowed in the fourth quarter as the omicron variant of COVID-19 emerged and as higher-than-expected inflation started to weigh on consumer demand. After upgrades had already reached a new annual record in the third quarter of 2021, upgrades and downgrades were more balanced in the fourth quarter, with net upgrades (upgrades minus downgrades) dropping to their lowest level of the year (with 33).

Chart 9

image

As net upgrades slow, rating levels are settling below pre-pandemic levels. During full-year 2020, net downgrades totaled 643 (excluding defaults). But even the record number of upgrades in 2021 has only lowered the cumulative number of net downgrades since the start of 2020 to 429 (see chart 10).

While the ratings distribution of U.S. corporate ratings (including financial and nonfinancial issuers) has been trending lower for years, the pandemic accelerated this trend. Currently, 20% of U.S. issuers are rated 'B-' or lower, and this share remains 3 percentage points higher than at the beginning of 2020. We expect these lower-rated issuers to be less resilient if confronted by a business, financial, or economic shock than their higher-rated peers, so this higher concentration of lower-ratings suggests issuers may be on weaker footing to weather the next shock (see chart 11).

Chart 10

image

Chart 11

image

Downgrades Leveled Off During 2021

The pace of U.S. corporate downgrades leveled off through 2021. Downgrades fell to 43-45 per quarter in the second through fourth quarters from 57 in the first quarter. Downgrades continue to be highly concentrated among speculative-grade nonfinancials. There were just six investment-grade downgrades in the quarter, and three of these were fallen angels (issuers downgraded to speculative grade from investment grade). These fallen angels included Hyatt Hotels Corp. and specialty and packaging papers producer Domtar Corp, both of which were downgraded as a result of merger and acquisition activity.

Chart 12

image

Chart 13

image

Chart 14

image

Table 1

Fourth-Quarter 2021 U.S. Corporate Ratings Statistics
Overall Investment-Grade Speculative-Grade Financial Nonfinancial
Downgrades (issuer count) 44 6 38 2 42
Debt volume (bil. $) 141 67 74 1 140
Upgrades (issuer count) 77 5 72 4 73
Debt volume (bil. $) 239 39 200 21 218
Total rating actions 121 11 110 6 115
--
Downgrade ratio (%) 36.4 54.5 34.5 33.3 36.5
Historical average (%) 60.3 59.7 60.4 52.6 61.1
High (%), quarter 94, 2020Q2 92, 2020Q2 95, 2020Q2 100, 2000Q3 95, 2020Q2
Low (%), quarter 26, 2021Q2 21, 2012Q2 23, 1997Q3 9, 1996Q3 25, 2021Q2
--
Negative bias (%) 13 12 14 9 14
Historical average (%) 22 16 25 18 23
High (%), quarter 44, 2020Q2 28, 2009Q3 52, 2020Q2 45, 2009Q3 46, 2020Q2
Low (%), quarter 11, 2013Q4 9, 2013Q4 12, 2014Q2 4, 1996Q1 11, 2014Q2
--
Positive bias (%) 10 7 11 10 10
Historical average (%) 9 7 11 8 10
High (%), quarter 17, 1996Q3 14, 1997Q4 23, 1996Q2 17, 2006Q1 17, 1996Q2
Low (%), quarter 2, 2020Q2 1, 2020Q2 2, 2020Q2 2, 2020Q3 2, 2020Q2
Historical average from 1995Q1-2021Q4. See tables 4 and 5 for details. Rating changes exclude entities with no rated debt and downgrades excluding default. Data as of Dec. 31, 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research.

Upgrades Move Up The Rating Scale

Upgrades were more concentrated among the lowest-rated issuers in the first part of 2021 than in the latter. While issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower accounted for 27% of upgrades in the second quarter, this share dipped to 17% in the third quarter, and 12% by the fourth.

Fourth-quarter upgrades were more concentrated in the 'B' category, as 47% of upgrades were of issuers rated 'B' or 'B-'. The 'B' category upgrades included 11 issuers from the media and entertainment sector, which is already highly concentrated within the 'B' rating category. These 'B' category media and entertainment upgrades included gaming companies and out-of-home entertainment companies that have shown faster-than-expected revenue and debt-reduction in 2021, and several of these companies had already been downgraded in 2020.

With upgrades moving up the rating scale, we also saw an uptick in 'BB' category upgrades, including five rising stars, in the fourth quarter (see table 3). The 'BB' category upgrades included both Netflix (now investment grade) and Tesla (now just one notch below investment grade). The 'BB' upgrades also included several rated subsidiaries of FirstEnergy Corp., which accounted for many of the utility sector's upgrades during the quarter.

Chart 15

image

Chart 16

image

Table 2

U.S. Rating Actions By Sector (Fourth-Quarter 2021)
--Number-- --Mil. $-- --Totals--
Up Down Up Down Number Mil. $
Aerospace and defense 0 4 0 2,388 4 2,388
Automotive 2 3 4,068 1,153 5 5,221
Capital goods 3 3 3,705 1,125 6 4,830
Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services 0 1 0 2,801 1 2,801
Consumer products 11 3 19,251 4,324 14 23,575
Financial instituition 4 2 21,418 810 6 22,228
Forest products and building materials 1 3 1,050 5,731 4 6,781
Health care 4 3 13,400 7,150 7 20,550
High technology 6 4 57,640 12,844 10 70,484
Homebuilders/Real estate co. 0 7 0 11,920 7 11,920
Media and entertainment 12 2 32,044 16,150 14 48,194
Metals, mining, and steel 6 0 11,426 0 6 11,426
Oil and gas 6 0 17,250 0 6 17,250
Retail/Restaurants 5 0 13,207 0 5 13,207
Telecommunications 2 3 3,485 18,245 5 21,730
Transportation 1 1 1,545 765 2 2,310
Utility 14 5 39,496 55,661 19 95,157
Total 77 44 238,985 141,067 121 380,052
Media and entertainment includes leisure. Utility sector includes midstream companies. Rating changes exclude entities with no rated debt and downgrades excluding default. Data as of Dec. 31, 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research.

Table 3

First-Quarter 2016 To Fourth-Quarter 2021 S&P Global Ratings Trends, U.S. Corporates
Defaulted issuers Weakest links Fallen angels Rising stars Potential downgrades Potential upgrades
2016Q1 30 164 9 6 310 131
2016Q2 32 186 4 4 332 140
2016Q3 25 178 5 5 319 151
2016Q4 18 177 4 4 317 139
2017Q1 17 168 5 287 151
2017Q2 23 153 9 299 145
2017Q3 9 155 2 5 293 162
2017Q4 15 146 6 3 293 170
2018Q1 18 137 1 5 285 178
2018Q2 14 143 5 4 295 187
2018Q3 3 144 4 5 302 197
2018Q4 12 144 6 2 301 180
2019Q1 21 150 4 1 308 164
2019Q2 23 167 2 2 314 150
2019Q3 13 178 3 2 318 134
2019Q4 20 195 4 7 348 125
2020Q1 21 315 13 1 569 90
2020Q2 62 430 6 1 773 41
2020Q3 37 392 3 1 723 57
2020Q4 26 340 2 1 640 109
2021Q1 15 266 2 5 489 152
2021Q2 11 191 1 7 333 215
2021Q3 5 160 4 3 265 219
2021Q4 9 131 3 5 225 227
Data as of Dec. 31, 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research.

Credit Conditions Likely To Slow Growth Of Default Rate

Despite the positive credit trends for many companies, the number of defaults in the fourth quarter rose to nine from five in the third quarter. However, many of these fourth-quarter defaults were of the Chinese homebuilders that were incorporated in the Cayman Islands.

However, with the pace of downgrades slowing and with the negative bias dipping, default risk shows signs of moderating. The count of weakest links (issuers rated 'B-' and below with negative outlooks or on CreditWatch negative) fell to 131 in the fourth quarter from 160 in the third, pointing toward a decline in the number of issuers with the greatest risk of default. However, even as weakest links have declined, risks to Chinese developers remain. As noted in recent publications, we expect defaults for Chinese developers to increase over the next six to 12 months, and about one-third of the rated Chinese developers' liquidity could come under pressure under our most severe scenario stress test, according to our recent sensitivity analysis (see "China Property Watch: Strains In The Key Of 'B'," published Oct. 27, 2021).

Even though the number of defaults rose in the fourth quarter, the default rate in 2021 remained exceptionally low at just 1.5%. We expect the U.S. trailing-12-month speculative-grade corporate default rate to reach 2.5% by September. While this would be an increase from 2021, it would still be considerably lower than the long-term average of 4%. Above-trend economic growth, credit trends that have been more positive than negative, and remarkably favorable financing conditions have all contributed to the low default rate over the past year, and the continuation of these factors will likely continue to slow the growth of default rates.

Table 4

U.S. Corporate Upgrades (Fourth Quarter 2021)
Issuer Country To From Date Sector

Sonic Automotive Inc.

U.S. BB BB- 10/13/2021 Automotive

Tesla Inc.

U.S. BB+ BB 10/22/2021 Automotive

Form Technologies LLC

U.S. B- CCC+ 12/3/2021 Capital Goods
Helix Acquisition Holdings Inc. U.S. B- CCC+ 10/28/2021 Capital Goods

Leggett & Platt Inc.

U.S. BBB BBB- 11/8/2021 Capital Goods

Advantage Solutions Inc.

U.S. B+ B 10/20/2021 Consumer Products

Anastasia Holdings LLC

U.S. CCC+ CCC 12/16/2021 Consumer Products

Coty Inc.

U.S. B B- 11/12/2021 Consumer Products
Del Monte Foods Inc. U.S. B B- 10/5/2021 Consumer Products

Kontoor Brands Inc.

U.S. BB BB- 11/5/2021 Consumer Products

LG Parent Holdco Inc.

U.S. B- CCC+ 12/7/2021 Consumer Products

Lifetime Brands Inc.

U.S. B+ B 11/17/2021 Consumer Products
Prestige Brands Inc. (Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc.) U.S. BB- B+ 12/10/2021 Consumer Products

S&S Holdings LLC

U.S. B B- 11/4/2021 Consumer Products

Vector Group Ltd.

U.S. B+ B 12/1/2021 Consumer Products
Weber-Stephen Products LLC (Weber Inc.) U.S. BB- B 10/5/2021 Consumer Products
Cadence Bancorporation (Cadence Bancorp LLC) U.S. BBB BB+ 11/1/2021 Financial Institutions

Greystone Select Financial LLC

U.S. B B- 10/29/2021 Financial Institutions
Intercontinental Exchange Inc. U.S. A- BBB+ 11/29/2021 Financial Institutions
Nasdaq Inc. U.S. BBB+ BBB 11/29/2021 Financial Institutions

Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc.

U.S. B B- 11/23/2021 Forest Products & Building Materials
Aegis Toxicology Sciences Corp. (Aegis Acquistion Inc.) U.S. B B- 11/5/2021 Health Care

Hill-Rom Holdings Inc.

U.S. BBB BB+ 12/16/2021 Health Care

Hologic Inc.

U.S. BBB- BB+ 11/9/2021 Health Care

Option Care Health Inc.

U.S. B+ B 10/20/2021 Health Care
Cvent Inc., U.S. B CCC+ 12/17/2021 High Technology

Finastra Ltd.

Cayman Islands B- CCC+ 10/22/2021 High Technology
LogMeIn Inc. U.S. B B- 10/6/2021 High Technology

NAB Holdings LLC

U.S. B+ B 11/10/2021 High Technology
Project Angel Intermediate Holdings, LLC (MeridianLink Inc.) U.S. B+ B- 10/14/2021 High Technology

Qualcomm Inc.

U.S. A A- 12/9/2021 High Technology

Century Casinos Inc.

U.S. B B- 10/15/2021 Media & Entertainment

E.W. Scripps Co. (The)

U.S. B+ B 11/12/2021 Media & Entertainment

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Co.

U.S. B B- 11/22/2021 Media & Entertainment
Hoya Midco LLC U.S. B B- 11/4/2021 Media & Entertainment

Netflix Inc.

U.S. BBB BB+ 10/25/2021 Media & Entertainment

Peninsula Pacific Entertainment LLC

U.S. B B- 10/25/2021 Media & Entertainment

Penn National Gaming Inc.

U.S. B+ B 11/24/2021 Media & Entertainment

Realogy Group LLC

U.S. BB- B+ 11/10/2021 Media & Entertainment

Restaurant Technologies Inc.

U.S. B B- 12/7/2021 Media & Entertainment

Spectacle Gary Holdings LLC

U.S. B B- 10/7/2021 Media & Entertainment

Sterling Intermediate Corp.

U.S. B+ B 11/10/2021 Media & Entertainment
The Octave Music Group Inc. U.S. B B- 11/16/2021 Media & Entertainment

Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc.

U.S. B- CCC+ 12/14/2021 Metals, Mining & Steel

Big River Steel LLC

U.S. B+ B 12/21/2021 Metals, Mining & Steel

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.

U.S. B+ B 11/5/2021 Metals, Mining & Steel

Ryerson Holding Corp.

U.S. B+ B 12/3/2021 Metals, Mining & Steel

United States Steel Corp.

U.S. B+ B 12/21/2021 Metals, Mining & Steel

WireCo WorldGroup Inc.

U.S. B B- 10/18/2021 Metals, Mining & Steel

Antero Resources Corp.

U.S. BB BB- 10/8/2021 Oil & Gas

California Resources Corp.

U.S. B+ B 10/20/2021 Oil & Gas

Chesapeake Energy Corp.

U.S. BB- B+ 11/2/2021 Oil & Gas

Gran Tierra Energy Inc.

U.S. B B- 10/21/2021 Oil & Gas

Hilcorp Energy I L.P.

U.S. BB BB- 10/21/2021 Oil & Gas
Vine Energy Inc. U.S. BB- B- 11/2/2021 Oil & Gas

Darden Restaurants Inc.

U.S. BBB BBB- 10/12/2021 Retail/Restaurants

Inspire Brands Inc.

U.S. B+ B 12/2/2021 Retail/Restaurants

PHD Group Holdings LLC

U.S. B CCC+ 11/12/2021 Retail/Restaurants
Party City Holdings Inc. (PC Nextco Holdings LLC) U.S. B CCC+ 12/3/2021 Retail/Restaurants

United Natural Foods Inc.

U.S. B+ B 10/15/2021 Retail/Restaurants

Block Communications Inc.

U.S. BB BB- 10/22/2021 Telecommunications

WideOpenWest Finance LLC

U.S. BB- B 12/1/2021 Telecommunications

Hertz Global Holdings Inc.

U.S. BB- B 11/17/2021 Transportation
American Transmission Systems Inc. (FirstEnergy Corp.) U.S. BB+ BB 10/19/2021 Utility
Antero Midstream Partners L.P. (Antero Resources Corp.) U.S. BB BB- 10/15/2021 Utility
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) U.S. BB+ BB 10/19/2021 Utility

FirstEnergy Corp.

U.S. BBB- BB 11/8/2021 Utility
Jersey Central Power & Light Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) U.S. BB+ BB 10/19/2021 Utility
Metropolitan Edison Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) U.S. BB+ BB 10/19/2021 Utility
Monongahela Power Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) U.S. BB+ BB 10/19/2021 Utility

New Fortress Energy Inc.

U.S. BB- B+ 11/22/2021 Utility
Ohio Edison Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) U.S. BB+ BB 10/19/2021 Utility
Pennsylvania Electric Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) U.S. BB+ BB 10/19/2021 Utility
Potomac Edison Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) U.S. BB+ BB 10/19/2021 Utility
Toledo Edison Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) U.S. BB+ BB 10/19/2021 Utility
Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) U.S. BB+ BB 10/19/2021 Utility
West Penn Power Co. (FirstEnergy Corp.) U.S. BB+ BB 10/19/2021 Utility
Rating changes exclude sovereign and entities with no rated debt. Data as of Dec. 31, 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research.

Table 5

U.S. Corporate Downgrades (Fourth-Quarter 2021)
Issuer Country To From Date Sector

API Holdings III Corp.

U.S. CCC+ B- 12/21/2021 Aerospace & Defense

Advanced Integration Technology L.P.

U.S. CCC+ B- 12/9/2021 Aerospace & Defense

PM General Purchaser LLC

U.S. B- B 12/21/2021 Aerospace & Defense

Vertex Aerospace Services Corp.

U.S. B B+ 10/27/2021 Aerospace & Defense

IXS Holdings Inc.

U.S. B- B 10/15/2021 Automotive
UC Holdings Inc. (Chassix Holdings Inc.) U.S. B- B 12/7/2021 Automotive

USF Holdings LLC

U.S. CCC+ B 10/7/2021 Automotive

Ahern Rentals Inc.

U.S. CCC CCC+ 10/8/2021 Capital Goods

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling Inc.

U.S. B B+ 11/30/2021 Capital Goods

Park-Ohio Industries Inc.

U.S. B- B 12/3/2021 Capital Goods
LABL Inc. (LABL Intermediate Holding Corp.) U.S. B- B 10/12/2021 Chemicals, Packaging & Environmental Services

KNB Holdings Corp.

U.S. CCC CCC+ 11/17/2021 Consumer Products

LS Parent Corp.

U.S. B- B 11/30/2021 Consumer Products

TreeHouse Foods Inc.

U.S. B B+ 11/8/2021 Consumer Products

Kestra Advisor Services Holdings A Inc.

U.S. B- B 11/15/2021 Financial Institutions

Mariner Wealth Advisors LLC

U.S. B- B 12/15/2021 Financial Institutions

Apex Tool Group LLC

U.S. CCC CCC+ 12/1/2021 Forest Products & Building Materials
DiversiTech Holdings Inc. (Icebox Holdco III Inc.) U.S. B- B 12/6/2021 Forest Products & Building Materials

Domtar Corp.

U.S. BB BBB- 12/3/2021 Forest Products & Building Materials

Avalign Holdings Inc.

U.S. CCC+ B- 11/19/2021 Health Care

Baxter International Inc.

U.S. BBB A- 12/16/2021 Health Care

TecoStar Holdings Inc.

U.S. B- B 11/24/2021 Health Care

Balboa Intermediate Holdings LLC

U.S. B- B 10/11/2021 High Technology

MKS Instruments Inc.

U.S. BB BB+ 10/1/2021 High Technology

Ping Identity Holding Corp.

U.S. B- B+ 11/9/2021 High Technology
Riverbed Parent Inc. U.S. CC CCC 10/13/2021 High Technology

Agile Group Holdings Ltd.

Cayman Islands BB- BB 11/10/2021 Homebuilders/Real Estate Co.
China Aoyuan Group Ltd. Cayman Islands B B+ 10/15/2021 Homebuilders/Real Estate Co.
China Aoyuan Group Ltd. Cayman Islands CCC B 11/16/2021 Homebuilders/Real Estate Co.

Service Properties Trust

U.S. B+ BB- 11/19/2021 Homebuilders/Real Estate Co.
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. Cayman Islands BB+ BBB- 11/9/2021 Homebuilders/Real Estate Co.
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. Cayman Islands B+ BB+ 12/21/2021 Homebuilders/Real Estate Co.
Shinsun Holdings (Group) Co. Ltd., Cayman Islands B- B 11/2/2021 Homebuilders/Real Estate Co.

Hyatt Hotels Corp.

U.S. BB+ BBB- 11/3/2021 Media & Entertainment

Wynn Resorts Ltd.

U.S. B+ BB- 10/13/2021 Media & Entertainment

DISH Network Corp.

U.S. B- B 11/8/2021 Telecommunications

Fusion Connect Inc.

U.S. CC CCC+ 12/15/2021 Telecommunications

U.S. TelePacific Holdings Corp.

U.S. CCC- CCC+ 12/6/2021 Telecommunications

IBC Capital Ltd.

Cayman Islands B- B 10/15/2021 Transportation

PSS Industrial Group Corp.

U.S. CCC- CCC+ 11/17/2021 Utility

Pinnacle West Capital Corp.

U.S. BBB+ A- 11/9/2021 Utility

Ruby Pipeline LLC

U.S. CC CCC 11/4/2021 Utility

Southern Co.

U.S. BBB+ A- 10/27/2021 Utility
TransMontaigne Partners L.P. (TLP Finance Holdings LLC) U.S. B+ BB- 10/20/2021 Utility
Rating changes exclude sovereign and entities with no rated debt and downgrades excluding default. Data as of Dec. 31, 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Ratings Performance Analytics:Nick W Kraemer, FRM, New York + 1 (212) 438 1698;
nick.kraemer@spglobal.com
Evan M Gunter, New York + 1 (212) 438 6412;
evan.gunter@spglobal.com
Jon Palmer, CFA, New York 212 438 1989;
jon.palmer@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Patrick Drury Byrne, Dublin (00353) 1 568 0605;
patrick.drurybyrne@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Yogesh Kumar, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in