IN THIS LIST

SPIVA Japan Mid-Year 2022

SPIVA MENA Mid-Year 2022

SPIVA India Mid-Year 2022

SPIVA Latin America Mid-Year 2022

SPIVA Canada Mid-Year 2022

SPIVA Japan Mid-Year 2022

Contributor Image
Tim Edwards

Managing Director and Global Head of Index Investment Strategy

S&P Dow Jones Indices

Contributor Image
Anu R. Ganti

Head of U.S. Index Investment Strategy

S&P Dow Jones Indices

Contributor Image
Davide Di Gioia

Director, Index Investment Strategy

S&P Dow Jones Indices

Since the first publication of the S&P Indices Versus Active (SPIVA) U.S. Scorecard in 2002, S&P Dow Jones Indices has been the de facto scorekeeper of the ongoing active versus passive debate.

The SPIVA Japan Scorecard measures the performance of actively managed funds offered in Japan against their respective benchmarks over various time horizons, covering large-, mid- and small-cap as well as international and global equity funds.

Mid-Year 2022 Highlights

A firm majority of 72% of All Japanese Equity funds underperformed the broad-based S&P Japan 500 over the first six months of 2022, and a majority of equity funds underperformed their benchmarks in every reported category apart from one.  International Equity funds were the notable exception, with an underperformance rate of 35% in H1 2022.

SPIVA Japan Mid-Year 2022: Exhibit 1

  • The S&P/TOPIX 150 lost 5.19% in the first half of the year, and 69% of Japanese Large-Cap funds underperformed the index over the period. This was the worst underperformance rate reported for the large-cap category since June 2019, and it acted to push up the 10-year underperformance rate to 86% (from the 82% reported in December 2021).
  • It was a different story in the International Equity funds category, with just 35% of actively managed funds underperforming the S&P Global 1200 Ex-Japan in H1 2022.
  • For Japanese Mid-/Small-Cap funds, 77% underperformed the S&P Japan MidSmallCap, which declined 3.57% in H1 2022. However, the long-term record of actively managed Japanese Mid-/Small-Cap funds remained relatively admirable, with just 46%, 38% and 53% underperforming over the 3-, 5- and 10-year periods, respectively.

pdf-icon PD F Download Full Article


Processing ...