articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/250225-hungary-s-fiscal-consolidation-faces-several-key-risks-13420046 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Hungary's Fiscal Consolidation Faces Several Key Risks

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: China's Latest Budget Shows A Willingness To Take On More Debt

COMMENTS

Sustainability Insights: Sustainable Bond Outlook 2025: Latin America Leading The Way For Nature Financing

COMMENTS

Sovereign Brief: What The End Of The Debt Brake Means For Germany's 'AAA' Rating


Hungary's Fiscal Consolidation Faces Several Key Risks

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Hungary's (BBB-/Stable/A-3) fiscal consolidation agenda could face challenges amid external headwinds and complex policy trade-offs. The country posted general government deficits of 4.9% of GDP in 2024 and 6.7% in 2023. Considering the weak growth outlook for Hungary's trade-intensive economy, authorities could struggle to achieve their objective of reducing budgetary deficits to below 3% of GDP by 2026 (see chart 1).

The government's fiscal plan is based on the assumption that real GDP growth will accelerate to 3.4% in 2025 and 4.1% in 2026, up from below 1% in 2024. S&P Global Ratings' GDP growth projections are 2.7% for this year and 2.8% for 2026.

Chart 1

image

Key Risks

The uncertain external environment could weigh on Hungary's growth.  Rising trade tensions between the EU and the U.S. could weaken the already fragile growth outlook in Germany, Hungary's largest trading partner. Germany accounts for about 25% of Hungary's goods exports, of which about two-thirds relate to machinery and transport equipment.

This means a shift in demand from Germany, particularly from the automotive industry, would affect Hungary's economy (see chart 2). We have recently revised downward our forecast for Germany's annual growth to 0.5% in 2025--compared with our expectation of 1.2% in September 2024--and 1.0% in 2026, versus our forecast of 1.3% in September 2024.

Chart 2

image

The implementation of the government's Economic Policy Action Plan could result in additional tax and spending proposals.  Considering external headwinds, the government could focus on boosting domestic demand to reach its near-term growth targets. This could increase the risk of overspending. We believe the government could stimulate the economy over the medium term, for example via state-owned enterprises, which have previously been involved in the execution of various government policy programs.

In line with its Economic Policy Action Plan, the government aims to increase real GDP growth to 3%-6% over the medium term by mobilizing about Hungarian forint (HUF) 4,000 billion (€9.8 billion or about 5% of estimated GDP in 2024) in 2025, including more than HUF2,600 billion (3.2% of GDP) on households and HUF1,400 billion (1.7% of GDP) on businesses.

Changes in the forint exchange rate will affect fiscal developments.  Hungary's outstanding foreign exchange-denominated debt accounts for about 30% of total debt. We estimate that the depreciation of the forint in 2024--with a HUF/EUR exchange rate of 411 at the end of the year (down 7.3% over the full year)--increased general government debt by about 1.4 percentage points of GDP. Even though the economy has been running a current account surplus, the forint exchange rate has been sensitive to the market's perception of Hungary's macroeconomic policy outlook, its relations with the EU, and regional geopolitical developments.

The outlook for EU funding is also relevant to our growth and exchange rate projections.  Even though Hungary has access to cohesion funds of €12.2 billion (about 6% of GDP) under the 2021–2027 appropriation cycle, we estimate that its absorption of EU funds was lackluster in 2024. We note that cohesion fund disbursements were curtailed over the second half of 2024 because payments were netted off the fines that the EU imposed on Hungary after a ruling by the European Court of Justice on June 13, 2024. The ruling focused on Hungary's non-compliance with EU asylum policies and resulted in a €200 million fine, with an additional daily penalty of €1 million until compliance is achieved.

We recognize that Hungary has received about 8.5% (€2.0 billion) of its total allocated cohesion policy funds as of December 2024, ranking it 11th among the EU27 group in terms of absorption. We estimate that Hungary received, or has access to, about 45% of its recovery and resilience facility (RRF) and cohesion policy financing envelopes, while the remainder continues to be blocked (see chart 3).

On Dec. 31, 2024, the total cohesion fund allocation to Hungary permanently reduced by €1.04 billion, following the expiration of deadlines to satisfy EU disbursement requirements. We note that deadlines for unblocking and absorbing EU funding, including RRF allocations, could become pertinent over the next two years.

At present, we expect neither Hungary nor the EU are likely to change their political stance, which, in our view, makes any breakthrough in EU funding disbursement unlikely. This increases the risk of the capital account balance falling short of our current forecast of, on average, 1.5% of GDP over 2025-2026. Additionally, it could impair the foreign exchange rate and broader economic growth.

Chart 3

image

The parliamentary elections in 2026 could lead to new tax and spending pledges.  Additionally, weaker fiscal outcomes would likely complicate the Hungarian central bank's capacity to meet its inflation targets, which would affect fiscal and monetary policies alike. We note that the yields of Hungarian government bonds and the forint foreign exchange rate have been sensitive to Hungary's economic policy developments. This suggests the market's reaction to government overreach could complicate consolidation efforts further.

What's Next

In our base-case scenario, we expect general government debt to GDP will peak in 2026, followed by a modest decline due to fiscal consolidation measures. Considering that inflation has decreased, the repricing of the government's inflation-linked retail bonds could support the decline in government deficits and reduce the interest bill to close to 4% of GDP this year, compared with almost 5% of GDP--or above 11% of revenues--in 2024. Yet this fiscal path could require policy trade-offs due to the risks mentioned above.

Related Research

Primary Credit Analyst:Gabriel Forss, Stockholm + 46 84 40 5933;
gabriel.forss@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Karen Vartapetov, PhD, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9225;
karen.vartapetov@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in