articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/250116-economic-research-slowing-immigration-could-derail-u-s-economic-growth-momentum-13387274 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Economic Research: Slowing Immigration Could Derail U.S. Economic Growth Momentum

COMMENTS

Economic Research: Growth Prospects Strained After The U.S. Takes The Tariff Plunge

COMMENTS

Vietnam: Many Growth Drivers, Some Roadblocks

COMMENTS

Economic Research: Understanding The Decoupling Of Copper Prices And GDP Growth In Chile And Peru

COMMENTS

Economic Research: Asia-Pacific Economies Likely To Be Hit By U.S. Trade Tariffs


Economic Research: Slowing Immigration Could Derail U.S. Economic Growth Momentum

Near-record population growth in the U.S. in 2024--led by a surge in immigration--boosted the economy. But stricter curbs on illegal immigration by the incoming administration and a likely slowdown in legal immigration could lead net immigration levels this year to fall to the 2017-2019 average.

As a result, immigration, one of the most important factors in the U.S. economy in the last couple of years, will likely become a headwind to growth. Based on trend productivity growth of 1.5%, the economy's growth potential is likely going to be closer to 2%, from over 2.5% the last couple of years.

The U.S. Census Bureau defines net immigration as the difference between the number of people entering the U.S. and the number of people leaving the U.S. in a given year. It is a component of population change, along with births and deaths.

Net Immigration Accounts For A Substantial Share Of Population Growth

Record growth in net immigration underlies the demographic strength.  The U.S. population grew by nearly 1.0% between 2023 and 2024, according to the new Vintage 2024 population estimates released by the U.S. Census Bureau on Dec. 19, marking the highest growth rate recorded over a 12-month period since 2001 (see chart 1). Net international migration accounted for nearly 84% of the population growth in 2024. In the last three years, 85% of population growth came from net migration, a much higher share than the average 35% during 2001-2019.

The number of net immigrants in 2024 was about 4.1 million higher than it would have been if the pace from 2022-2024 had reverted to the 2001-2019 average. Even when eliminating the shortfall in immigration that occurred due to COVID-19, the total number in 2024 is about 3.2 million higher.

The undercounting of recent immigrants in the CPS raises important questions about the reliability of key economic indicators, like labor productivity and the employment-to-population ratio. Alexander Bick of the St. Louis Fed shows, in recent research, that the potential for upward bias in productivity growth caused by the undercounting of recent immigrants is unfounded ("The Recent Surge in Immigration and Its Impact on Measured Productivity Growth," 2025). Separately, Mr. Bick also finds results that imply that the impact on the employment rate may have been minimal from a statistical standpoint ("The Recent Surge in Immigration and Its Impact on Unemployment," 2025).

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

In per capita terms, the U.S. economy grew 2.0%, on average, during 2023-2024 (last two years of the Biden administration), weaker than the 2.3% average growth of 2018-2019 (Trump's first administration, before the pandemic and following tax cuts).  Real GDP growth, without adjusting for population growth, was just about the same during the two time periods, at approximately 2.8%.

Rising Labor Productivity And Employment Rate Will Be Key To Offset Declining Population Growth

If net immigration levels this year were to fall to the 2017-2019 average of approximately 750,000, the country is likely going to see the slowest population growth on record outside of the pandemic.  Assuming the country's natural population growth stays about the same as the last two years (as births outnumbered deaths by nearly 519,000 between 2023 and 2024), population growth is likely to slow meaningfully--to 0.4% in the next few years from 1.0% last year. This growth rate would be the slowest population growth since the early 1950s--with the exception of 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic.

As a result, it will weigh on labor supply growth. Almost all of labor force growth since 2019 had come from the foreign-born population (the share of which climbed to near 19% by 2023) (see chart 3).

A decline in immigration will likely constrain economic growth this year.  To compensate for the smaller annual contribution (50 basis points smaller) from population growth, labor productivity and the employment rate would need to rise (see the appendix). We suspect there is scope for the employment rate (employment-to-population ratio) among the U.S.-born population to climb this year following a small decline last year (see chart 4). But it's unlikely that an increase will offset the drag from slower immigration given the economy is already operating near full employment.

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

Lower net immigration will constrain labor supply growth in the coming years, which will hit the labor-intensive sectors with meaningful shares of immigrant labor.  It will put further pressure on an already declining labor participation rate (due to increasing share of retirees). Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics suggests construction is the most exposed (see table)--especially with additional resources that will be needed for reconstruction after the Los Angeles area wildfires. The leisure and hospitality sector and the agricultural sector are also more exposed than average.

According to Burning Glass Institute, a labor market research firm, workers who are lacking legal status and are at risk of deportation also tend to be concentrated in these sectors (and in states such as California, Texas, and Nevada).

Foreign-born civilian workers employed across sectors (age 16 years and above)
--2023-- --2019-- --Difference between 2023 and 2019 (in percentage points)--
(% of total employed) Both men and women Men Women Both men and women Men Women Both men and women Men Women
All industries 18.5 20.0 16.9 17.8 19.4 15.9 0.8 0.6 1.0
Construction 28.6 29.8 18.8 27.6 28.88 16.35 1.0 0.9 2.4
Professional and business services 22.9 23.4 22.2 20.7 21.85 19.04 2.3 1.6 3.2
Other services 21.9 21.8 21.9 24.2 23.41 24.92 -2.4 -1.6 -3.0
Transportation and utilities 21.4 21.8 20.0 20.5 21.71 16.46 0.9 0.1 3.6
Leisure and hospitality 21.0 21.6 20.4 20.6 21.87 19.46 0.4 -0.3 1.0
Manufacturing 20.2 18.4 24.5 18.6 17.03 22.44 1.6 1.3 2.1
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting 19.8 20.8 17.3 23.0 23.15 22.51 -3.2 -2.4 -5.2
Wholesale and retail trade 15.6 16.1 15.0 15.3 15.48 15.13 0.3 0.6 -0.1
Educational and health services 14.8 16.8 14.2 14.2 16.14 13.58 0.6 0.6 0.6
Financial activities 14.6 15.9 13.5 14.1 16.03 12.40 0.5 -0.1 1.1
Information 13.7 15.0 11.6 11.9 14.24 8.67 1.7 0.8 2.9
Mining 12.5 12.0 16.3 12.4 13.34 7.02 0.2 -1.4 9.2
Public administration 10.0 7.8 12.5 8.6 8.15 9.08 1.4 -0.3 3.4
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, and Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 2023.

While probably less of a risk, immigration restrictions for so-called "high-skilled" workers could exacerbate shortages in knowledge-intensive sectors such as information technology services, professional services, and high-tech manufacturing. Disruption in such industries requiring "high skills" (see chart 5) would be counterproductive to enhancing economywide competitiveness.

Chart 5

image

Chart 6

image

The inflationary impact is not straightforward because immigration boosts both demand and supply.  Unauthorized immigration is the reason aggregate demand and aggregate supply both have surprised to the upside. It has helped the economy grow at near 3% while also allowing for labor market tightness to recede.

Research from the National Bureau of Economic Research suggests labor contributions from unauthorized immigration boost supply more than demand because the workers are underpaid compared with authorized immigrants of similar productivity level ("The Earnings of Undocumented Immigrants," George Borjas, 2018). That said, our sense is that deportations would likely be disruptive for the sectors that rely most on unauthorized immigration, including agriculture, food processing, and construction.

The prospect of higher wage growth, together with food and construction inflation, potentially at the same time as import tariffs, could boost prices in goods-producing sectors. At the margin, this would be another reason the Federal Reserve could keep interest rates higher than would have been the case otherwise. To the extent that slower immigration weighs on longer-run potential growth, it points to a lower real neutral interest rate eventually.

Appendix: Modified Growth Accounting Framework

A modified version of a simple growth accounting framework can demonstrate the impact of slowing working-age population growth on an economy's long-run economic performance.

Here we break down real GDP into its two primary contributions: GDP per employed person, and share of employed persons in the population and population growth.

GDP = (GDP/hrs worked)*(hrs worked/number of employed)*(number of employed/population 16+)*population 16+

(Notice that the non-GDP terms cancel out in the above equation.)

Or, simplifying the above equation gives:

GDP = (GDP/number of employed)*(number of employed/population 16+)*population 16+

GDP = GDP per employed (or labor productivity) * employment rate * working age population

Transforming the above equation in log differences on both sides, which recasts the multiplicative factor into an additive relationship, gives the contribution of each component (in percentage points) to GDP growth.

The views expressed here are the independent opinions of S&P Global Ratings' economics group, which is separate from but provides forecasts and other input to S&P Global Ratings' analysts. S&P Global Ratings' analysts use these views in determining and assigning credit ratings in ratings committees, which exercise analytical judgment in accordance with S&P Global Ratings' publicly available methodologies.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

U.S. Chief Economist:Satyam Panday, San Francisco + 1 (212) 438 6009;
satyam.panday@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Debabrata Das, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P Global Ratings affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in