articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241212-central-and-eastern-europe-sovereign-rating-outlook-2025-now-more-complicated-13356310 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Central And Eastern Europe Sovereign Rating Outlook 2025: Now More Complicated

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Will Argentina's Economic Adjustment Be Different This Time?

COMMENTS

Not-For-Profit Higher Education Outside Of The U.S. Outlook 2025: Credit Stability Amid Market Turbulence

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: What Are The Biggest Risks To Global Credit In 2025?


Central And Eastern Europe Sovereign Rating Outlook 2025: Now More Complicated

This report does not constitute a rating action.

S&P Global Ratings projects that GDP growth in CEE will average 2.0% this year and accelerate to 2.8% in 2025 thanks to strengthening consumer spending and investment, spurred by EU fund inflows. These inflows will help overfund CEE economies' modest current account deficits and maintain their generally strong external stock positions. We expect disinflation and monetary easing to continue. Despite global and regional headwinds and elevated fiscal risks, we expect our CEE sovereign ratings to remain broadly stable.

That said, uncertainty over the external backdrop has increased. This stems from global trade dynamics and geopolitical tensions, both of which will be shaped by the new U.S. administration's policy decisions. CEE is one of the most open and trade-intensive regions globally, with exports to GDP averaging over 60%.

There is a risk that higher U.S. trade tariffs for the EU and greater uncertainty over the evolution of the Russian-Ukraine war might hamper CEE's GDP growth through weaker external demand in advanced Europe; flagging investor confidence, including lower foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows; and higher market volatility. This could complicate the already challenging fiscal outlook for CEE governments and put pressure on the sovereign credit ratings (see table 1).

Table 1

CEE macroeconomic forecasts for 2024-2026
Sovereign Ratings GDP growth (%) Current account balance (% GDP) Fiscal balance (% GDP) Government debt (% GDP) CPI average (%)
2025 2026 2025 2026 2025 2026 2025 2026 2025 2026

Bulgaria

BBB/Positive/A-2 2.7 3.0 -0.6 -0.4 -2.9 -2.8 27.2 28.8 2.8 2.3

Croatia

A-/Positive/A-2 3.0 2.8 0.3 0.7 -2.4 -2.3 57.9 56.8 2.8 2.5

Czechia

AA-/Stable/A-1+ 2.5 2.3 0.3 0.3 -2.4 -1.9 42.7 43.2 2.3 2.1

Estonia

A+/Stable/A-1 1.9 2.5 -2.3 -2.6 -3.1 -2.9 24.1 25.6 4.2 3.6

Hungary

BBB-/Stable/A-3 2.7 2.8 0.2 0.2 -4.5 -4.0 76.4 77.0 3.6 3.1

Latvia

A/Stable/A-1 2.5 2.8 -4.1 -4.0 -3.5 -2.8 46.3 46.9 2.8 2.5

Lithuania

A/Stable/A-1 2.9 2.5 2.3 1.4 -2.4 -1.9 40.5 41.2 2.6 2.6

Poland

A-/Stable/A-2 3.1 2.9 -0.1 -0.2 -5.5 -4.7 59.7 62.8 4.1 2.7

Romania

BBB-/Stable/A-3 2.9 2.6 -8.2 -7.7 -6.8 -5.9 54.8 56.4 5.3 4.1

Slovakia

A+/Stable/A-1 2.1 2.4 -2.3 -1.8 -4.7 -3.9 57.9 58.8 5.2 2.8

Slovenia

AA-/Positive/A-1+ 2.3 2.1 3.3 3.0 -2.6 -2.5 64.0 63.4 2.9 2.5
Ratings--long- and short-term foreign currency sovereign ratings as of the publication date. CEE--Central and Eastern Europe. CPI--Consumer price index. Source: S&P Global Ratings' Sovereign Risk Indicators for December 2024.

Risk 1: Much Weaker GDP Growth In Key CEE Trading Partners, Including Germany

The external backdrop, including global trade settings, could change our baseline growth expectations for Western Europe, CEE's key trading partner.   Specifically, under some scenarios, the new U.S. administration's tariff policies and the EU's policy response could dampen economic activity in Europe (see "Economic Outlook Eurozone Q1 2025: Next Year Will Be A Game Changer," published on Nov. 26, 2024).

Even if CEE economies' trade links with the U.S. are limited, their indirect exposure is meaningful. CEE's high reliance on exports to Germany, whose trade exposure to the U.S. economy is much higher, could hamper regional GDP growth (see chart 1). Germany's struggling manufacturing sector has already softened GDP growth in CEE economies in 2024.

Chart 1

image

Risk 2: Rising Geopolitical Tensions

The new U.S. administration under President Donald Trump could test European security settings.   This will be especially true if the U.S. reduces its support for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) or military and financial aid for Ukraine. Our baseline is that the Russia-Ukraine war will linger into 2025, but not spread beyond Ukraine's territory or result in direct confrontation with NATO countries. That said, the position that the U.S. administration takes could influence efforts to end active fighting (see "Geopolitics: How Will Markets Navigate Ongoing Geopolitical Risks?," published Dec. 4, 2024).

Heightened uncertainties could have adverse macroeconomic repercussions for CEE economies.   In light of CEE's proximity to the Russia-Ukraine war zone, adverse geopolitical and security scenarios will undermine business confidence and increase risk premiums. Possible volatility of commodity prices could also negatively affect the small, open, and energy-intensive CEE economies, even though their reliance on Russian energy supplies has fallen substantially since 2022.

Risk 3: Delayed Fiscal Consolidation Amid One of Highest Fiscal Deficits In EMEA

Electoral considerations could intensify spending pressures and derail governments' fiscal consolidation plans.   The average fiscal deficit in CEE will remain high due to softer GDP growth, public wage and pension hikes amid ongoing electoral cycles, elevated interest bills, but also higher defense spending. We project that almost all CEE NATO members will spend 2% of GDP or above in 2025-2026, with Poland and the Baltic States likely to spend up to 4% of GDP. Spending pressures will keep primary fiscal deficits in the region wide and government debt on an upward path, even if debt remains at a moderate 50% of GDP in a global context (see chart 2).

Chart 2

image

Weaker fiscal efforts could worsen CEE sovereign funding conditions.   CEE government bond yields are below their peak in 2022, but government debt is more costly to service. We project that interest costs as a share of GDP will be 1.5x-1.6x higher than in 2021. Interest spending will consume more than 5% of total budgetary revenue in CEE on average in 2024, reaching as high as 11% in Hungary.

Government funding costs could show elevated volatility depending on global and regional interest rate developments, as well as investors' risk perception (see chart 3). The latter is partly contingent on governments' compliance with EU fiscal rules. Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and Romania are under the EU's excessive deficit procedure.

Chart 3

image

Risk 4: Weaker Take-Up Of Available EU Funds, Undermining GDP Growth And Fiscal And Balance-Of-Payment Positions

Disbursements of some EU funds are contingent on reforms and rule-of-law performance.   Delayed reforms have already resulted in the slow disbursement of EU Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) funding. By December 2024, less than one-third of RRF allotments to CEE sovereigns had been allocated (see chart 4). Almost all funds under the RRF are still frozen for Hungry due to what the European Commission perceives as insufficient efforts to address its rule-of-law concerns. Under the current settings, sovereigns can tap RRF funds no later than end-2026.

Chart 4

image

EU funds are important for CEE's external funding and investor confidence.   Following a period of external rebalancing after the energy-price shock in 2022, we project that the CEE economies will run only a modest current account deficit on average. We expect that EU funds will primarily cover these deficits, alongside FDI (see chart 5). This will allow the CEE economies to avoid or contain the buildup of net external debt. Romania is a notable exception, as government foreign borrowings are increasingly financing the country's wide, fiscally induced, current account deficits.

Chart 5

image

Risk 5: Monetary Policy Mistakes Amid Exchange-Rate Volatility And Underlying Price Pressure

Macroeconomic developments, as well as investor perceptions of geopolitical risks, could continue to result in exchange-rate volatility in CEE.   The Hungarian forint exchange rate serves as a good example. Even though the Hungarian economy has been running a current account surplus, the forint depreciated by over 12% versus the U.S. dollar this year, including by almost 6% in November 2024. While this currency weakness occurred in the context of broader pressures on emerging-market currencies, the forint has also demonstrated its vulnerability to investor concerns about Hungary's GDP growth outlook and uncertainty over EU fund disbursements and the fiscal path.

We expect that CEE central banks will be more cautious than usual given a relatively high exchange-rate pass-through to domestic prices and elevated underlying price pressure.   After rapid headline disinflation, price growth has picked up in recent months as wage growth remains high and tax cuts and energy price caps have been reversed. Underlying price pressure remains sticky, with core inflation exceeding food and energy inflation (see chart 6).

It will likely take longer for CEE to reach price stability targets (generally 2%-3%) on a sustainable basis compared to advanced Europe. This is not least due to loose fiscal settings, but also to the region's structurally tight labor markets amid a shrinking labor force.

Our expectation is that policy easing will continue in 2025 in most of CEE, but further rate cuts might be less forthcoming as the likelihood of monetary policy missteps is higher than before due to the uncertainty over the global macroeconomic outlook and the volatility of regional exchange rates.

Chart 6

image

Related Research

Primary Credit Analyst:Karen Vartapetov, PhD, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9225;
karen.vartapetov@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Christian Esters, CFA, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9262;
christian.esters@spglobal.com
Niklas Steinert, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9248;
niklas.steinert@spglobal.com
Ludwig Heinz, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9246;
ludwig.heinz@spglobal.com
Gabriel Forss, Stockholm + 46 84 40 5933;
gabriel.forss@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Carl Sacklen, London;
carl.sacklen@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in