articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241204-data-centers-can-infrastructure-developments-keep-up-with-the-increasing-demand-13341846.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Data Centers: Can Infrastructure Developments Keep Up With The Increasing Demand?

COMMENTS

Sustainable Finance FAQ: The Rise Of Green Equity Designations

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Sheinbaum's Agenda And Looming Changes In U.S. And Mexico Relations

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: What Are The Biggest Risks To Global Credit In 2025?

COMMENTS

Global Trade: How Might Uncertain Trade Policies Affect Macro-Credit Conditions In 2025?


Data Centers: Can Infrastructure Developments Keep Up With The Increasing Demand?

(Editor's Note: In this series of articles, we answer the pressing Questions That Matter on the uncertainties that will shape 2025--collected through our interactions with investors and other market participants. The series is aligned with the key themes we're watching in the coming year and is part of our Global Credit Outlook 2025.)

Since the significant speed and extent of data center growth have taken many by surprise, there are only a few plans in place to provide the physical infrastructure that these power-hungry assets require. We expect sectors exposed to data centers will continue to benefit from favorable tailwinds in 2025. After that, pressure could likely increase as bottlenecks materialize.

How This Will Shape 2025

Growth potential in the data center sector is significant.  Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), 5G adoption, and cloud services increase the demand for data centers, whose numbers and growth rates are highest in the U.S. This is notably due to the country's high concentration of major technology companies, which invest heavily in capacity expansion to support their global operations. The AI revolution constitutes an exceptional growth opportunity for the technology sector. We forecast that global AI-related revenues will increase at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 25%-30% to nearly $650 billion by 2028, from less than $200 billion in 2023. This is a global trend: In South Asia and Southeast Asia, for instance, we anticipate that data center capacity will increase at a CAGR of 10%-25% over the next few years, spurring investments and funding opportunities.

Chart 1

image

The increase in the number and capacity of data centers requires ample physical infrastructure.  For 2025-2030, we expect U.S. data centers could require 150 to 250 terawatt hours annually, which is equivalent to the power demands of New York City. The speed and extent of data center growth have taken a significant portion of the market by surprise, meaning there are few plans in place to accommodate it. After two decades of stagnating power demand, insufficient grid infrastructure--which results in long interconnection queues--will likely be the biggest hurdle to meeting data centers' energy needs. In our base case for the U.S., we assume that the increase in annual electricity sales will not cover the technology industry's electricity needs after 2026.

The surge in data centers will increase funding requirements in 2025.  Given the pace and extent of capital deployment required, careful and consistent funding will be key to support data center operators' credit quality. Private credit has emerged as a more prominent financing source for data centers since it provides flexible capital solutions that support the rapid growth and technological advancements in this asset class. In some markets, sustainability-linked or green bonds could play an increasingly important role, notably to fund green initiatives that aim to increase energy efficiency or provide renewable energy solutions.

Chart 2

image

What We Think And Why

Data center developers and operators will benefit from the demand for new facilities and support high rental prices.  We expect the leasing environment for data centers will remain strong in 2025. This should result in positive re-leasing spreads and low vacancy rates. We expect strong demand, limited near-term supply, and improved pricing dynamics will bolster data centers' earnings and valuations, at least over the next few years. The location of data centers, similar to other real estate assets, is critical for their valuations. Tier 1 assets, which are interconnected and have access to reliable power supplies, will likely continue to benefit the most.

Positive credit developments will likely offset credit challenges in the energy sector in 2025.  The surge in the number and capacity of data centers will support credit quality in 2025 for sectors exposed to the trend, including power generators, electricity utilities, and midstream gas companies. In an already tight power market, additional demand will result in tighter supply and higher power prices through 2030. We believe this trend will support earnings growth and visibility for all power generators--particularly green power generators--due to the increase in long-term contracts. We view this as credit positive for companies operating in the competitive power markets. Additionally, data centers' increased electricity demand will support regulated utilities' credit quality. That said, the rising electricity demand could introduce funding and billing risks, which utilities will have to consider to protect existing clients from cost increases.

Data centers provide an additional lifeline for gas and nuclear assets.  Low-risk gas projects with manageable capital expenditures will likely meet the rapid growth in data centers' energy demands over the near term, despite long-term decarbonization trends. Additional electricity demand from data centers will hence spur supply growth over the next decade and support credit quality in the gas midstream sector. Over the longer term, we expect nuclear power will potentially provide a low-carbon, reliable solution to power data centers. Consequently, financing needs for new projects--notably for small nuclear reactors--could increase in 2025.

What Could Change

Increasing risk appetite could curb real estate companies' overall credit profiles.  Real estate companies remain exposed to development risks. So far, the sector has been prudent, with fit-for-purpose, pre-leased new builds and a limited risk of overbuilding over the next two years. Yet more speculative development approaches and risks related to unmanaged power price exposures could emerge and increase credit risk considerably. If demand for data centers declines due to slower AI adoption, vacancy rates could increase significantly, notably for tier 2 assets. Prudent expansion will also be key in emerging markets due to evolving regulations, interconnectivity issues, and insufficient power supply infrastructure in these regions.

Inflation and increasing financing needs could become a bigger challenge.  Data center construction costs could increase substantially due to expenses related to construction, inflation, and financing. Rental rates and construction costs do not necessarily increase in tandem, even though they did so over the past two years. Data centers' inability to cover rising construction costs by increasing rental rates could derail growth prospects. Utilities will also have to increase capital spending considerably to meet the demands of relatively few, but very large, data center customers. Simply passing on a significant portion of these infrastructure costs to existing residential customers would increase customer bills, lead to more complaints, and potentially impair utilities' ability to manage regulatory risk.

Environmental constraints may rise.  Despite securing renewable energy supply and improving efficiencies, data centers could nearly double their emissions by 2030. These projected increased carbon emissions are unlikely to pose a material credit risk to operators in 2025, given their key role in supporting AI-based technologies and economic growth. Yet data centers could face several headwinds since their power use will rapidly expand. We expect continuous improvements in energy efficiency will only partly offset the risks. Data centers' exposure to environmental restrictions, which is currently low, could increase as several countries across the world tighten regulations and local resources come under increased pressure. This could lead to long-term challenges, including increased scrutiny from regulators, investors, and other stakeholders over data centers' environmental effects.

Read More

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Pierre Georges, Paris + 33 14 420 6735;
pierre.georges@spglobal.com
Sudeep K Kesh, New York + 1 (212) 438 7982;
sudeep.kesh@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.