After a short-lived boom, business model and earnings capacity questions are again coming to the fore for German bauspar banks. After a years-long period of low interest rates, building savings or bauspar contracts in Germany recovered significantly over 2023-2024. However, we consider this recovery is a flash in the pan. As interest rates for standard mortgages have peaked, customer demand returns to standard amortizing mortgages. Bauspar banks usually offer both bauspar and standard mortgage products, with the latter segment facing stiffer competition from market-leading retail banks.
What's Happening
Demand for bauspar products is normalizing after a material rise over 2023-2024. This stands in stark contrast to standard mortgages, for which new business and transaction volumes in the residential real estate market declined over the same period, as refinancing costs increased. Bauspar mortgages are option-like instruments and particularly attractive during periods of high volatility and structurally rising interest rates. Since market participants expect that interest rates will decrease and that demand for housing in Germany will remain structurally high, customer demand shifts back to standard mortgages.
Why It Matters
Bauspar products are an important subsegment of Germany's retail residential real estate financing market and indicative of customer expectations. Even though the total number of bauspar contracts is decreasing, 25% of Germans still have active bauspar contracts, which benefit from a 10% government subsidy on bauspar deposits for lower- and middle-income households. Bauspar banks account for €165 billion or about 13% of systemwide loans in Germany's residential real estate financing sector. With volumes of typically €30,000-€50,000, bauspar products are usually only part of a larger financing mix or are used for existing homeowners' modernization projects.
Past challenges could re-emerge. Before the European Central Bank's (ECB's) rate hike in 2022, bauspar products were difficult to market. Bauspar banks' profitability and cost efficiency metrics were trailing those of competitors with similar business risk profiles. After the rate hike, new bauspar business spiked. That said, improvements in earnings were largely cyclical. Weaker new business activity and the stabilization of standard mortgages' underwriting volumes indicate that bauspar contracts' relative attractiveness has decreased. New business generation has almost returned to pre-2022 volumes and bauspar banks yet again need to focus on underwriting profitability, while the inverse yield curve will add pressure over the short term. We expect bauspar banks' aggregate pretax return on equity--which increased to 4.1% in 2023, from 1.4% in 2021--will decline to 2%-3%, which remains below that of peers with similar business risk profiles.
What Comes Next
We expect the ECB will cut rates to 2.5% in 2025. Falling interest rates make it more difficult for bauspar banks to transform the strong contracted new business over the past two years into interest-earning assets.
Background In Brief
Bauspar products appeal to customers that aim to minimize their interest rate risk exposure. Bauspar contracts consist of a savings and a loan phase:
- During the savings phase, customers accumulate bauspar equity of up to 40%-50% of the contracted amount (the bauspar sum), which is then used as equity after becoming eligible for a bauspar mortgage at pre-agreed terms. Borrowing costs for the remaining 50%-60% of the bauspar sum tend to be relatively low.
- After the payout, the loan phase begins.
Bauspar contracts are usually combined with a bullet pre/interim mortgage, meaning customers accumulate bauspar deposits and replace the bullet mortgage with a bauspar mortgage once they become eligible for the latter.
We expect combined pre/interim mortgages will prevail. Pre/interim mortgages now account for more than 50% of German bauspar banks' aggregate balance sheet, while bauspar mortgages--despite a significant increase since 2022--constitute only slightly more than 7%. We expect this distribution pattern will persist. When interest rates are relatively stable or structurally declining, customers tend to view standard mortgages as more attractive than bauspar mortgages.
Related Research
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Claudio Hantzsche, Frankfurt +49 69 33999 188; claudio.hantzsche@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.