articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241112-germany-brief-debt-brake-could-continue-to-complicate-policymaking-after-snap-elections-13321723.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Germany Brief: Debt Brake Could Continue To Complicate Policymaking After Snap Elections

COMMENTS

Calendar Of 2025 EMEA Sovereign, Regional, And Local Government Rating Publication Dates

COMMENTS

Sustainable Finance FAQ: The Rise Of Green Equity Designations

COMMENTS

China's Local Governments: Downside Risk Is Rising For Fiscal Consolidation

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research


Germany Brief: Debt Brake Could Continue To Complicate Policymaking After Snap Elections

What Happened

Germany's three-party coalition collapsed on Nov. 6, 2024, after a budget dispute over the debt brake.  The debt brake, which was enshrined in Germany's constitution in 2009, limits annual structural deficits to 0.35% of GDP plus a small counter-cyclical component.

The collapse followed months of disagreement among the previous coalition partners.  The three parties were unable to compromise on their differing spending priorities against limited budgetary space imposed by the debt brake, notably regarding fiscal measures to support Germany's weak economy, the green transition, and financial support for Ukraine.

Chart 1

image

Why It Matters

Germany's constrained fiscal policy could obstruct counter-cyclical measures.  At an estimated 59% of GDP in 2024, Germany's government debt--net of liquid assets--is the second-lowest of all G7 countries, while its interest spending as a percentage of government revenue is the lowest. At the same time, however, each G7 country's post-pandemic GDP growth has outpaced that of Germany, whose 2024 GDP barely exceeds pre-pandemic levels.

Overall, Germany's credit metrics are strong.  Apart from government fiscal metrics, our sovereign ratings also consider a country's institutional strength, its economic and external profile, and its monetary flexibility. We view Germany's credit metrics as strong in these three areas, which supports our 'AAA' long-term sovereign credit rating.

What Comes Next

We currently do not expect changes to the fiscal framework, even after early elections.  After chancellor Olaf Scholz ousted one of his governing partners, snap elections are currently scheduled for February 2025. The debt brake will likely continue to determine Germany's fiscal policy. Any amendments to the rule would require a two-thirds majority in parliament. That said, exemptions to the debt brake are possible if the government declares an emergency situation, as happened during the COVID-19 pandemic. This could loosen the debt brake, depending on the next government's policy priorities.

Even if snap elections result in a stable government, policymaking will remain complex.  Germany's political fragmentation has deepened over the past few years. Challenges that the next government will face include low economic growth, persistently subdued domestic demand, the effects of sluggish foreign trade on Germany's export-oriented economy, and the country's aging population.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Niklas Steinert, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9248;
niklas.steinert@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Christian Esters, CFA, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9262;
christian.esters@spglobal.com
Karen Vartapetov, PhD, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9225;
karen.vartapetov@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in