articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241016-home-improvement-securitization-proposals-are-on-the-rise-13288698.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Home Improvement Securitization Proposals Are On The Rise

COMMENTS

Private Credit Could Bridge The Infrastructure Funding Gap

COMMENTS

The Opportunity Of Asset-Based Finance Draws In Private Credit

COMMENTS

Private Credit Casts A Wider Net To Encompass Asset-Based Finance And Infrastructure

COMMENTS

Weekly European CLO Update


Home Improvement Securitization Proposals Are On The Rise

We have observed an increase in home improvement (HI) loan asset-backed securitization proposals over the last year, and we expect that the funding needs for these loans will likely continue to grow over the next few years.

There are several medium- and longer-term trends driving this view. First, a lack of housing affordability due to high interest rates and rising home prices has caused homeowners to renovate rather than move. Secondly, due to aging housing stock, improvements are expected to continue as new home construction takes time to add inventory.

Relatedly, a recent Redfin analysis noted that the median length of homeownership as of 2023 was about 12 years, up from 6.5 years in 2005. The homeownership rate stands at 65.6% as of Q2 2024, which, while below the recent pandemic-era peak of 67.9% in Q2 2020, stands 270 basis points higher than the 62.9% rate from Q2 2016. The growing popularity of energy efficiency and smart homes products, an increase in remote/hybrid jobs, and a recent increase in real disposable personal income (a 3.1% increase from a year ago as of August 2024 per U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis data) should also support continued funding needs for this sector.

Alongside the increase in proposals that we've observed, the securitization market has also showed recent signs of growth: Per Green Street data, of the $6 billion in issuance over 19 transactions since 2019, half of the dollar volume was priced this year, in eight deals.

Home Improvement Loans Versus Other Forms of Unsecured Consumer/Personal Lending

The business model for HI loan lenders differs somewhat from traditional personal loan lenders.

Comparing and contrasting home improvement and personal loan securitizations
Home improvement loans Personal loans
Typical term Longer (15-30 years) Shorter (2-8 years)
Average loan size $10,000-$20,000, but could be more than $100,000 Typically less than $10,000
Loan repayment options Standard principal and interest and deferred options Standard principal and interest
Permitting/inspection Maybe required Not required
Disbursement Dealers/installers Loan obligor
Loan purpose Specific General
Source: S&P Global Ratings and Green Street.

HI loan lenders typically work with installers who provide financing options to borrowers for their projects. HI loans may require permitting and inspection and are typically disbursed directly to third-party dealers/installers rather than to the loan obligor. Given this interdependence, loan underwriting typically incorporates the experience and track record of the dealer/installer.

Additionally, compared to general-purpose unsecured consumer loans, including loans for debt consolidation, HI loans generally have longer terms of 15-30 years, more in line with the useful life of the physical assets. Further, borrowers are typically homeowners with higher FICO scores than those in the broader unsecured personal loan sector.

Loan repayment options typically include standard amortizing loans and deferred payment options. Although the loan proceeds are used to finance the purchase and installation of equipment, there is usually no lien or senior lien created against the equipment unless the project is of high value. Some loan originators may use springing liens in their collections practices to incentivize obligor behavior if a borrower becomes delinquent.

Our Approach

Based on the proposals we have received so far, we approach HI loans as unsecured consumer loans and apply our "Global Consumer ABS Methodology And Assumptions," published March 31, 2022 . We consider some of the unique characteristics of HI loans that differentiate them from traditional personal loans.

For example, in our view there could be additional default risks tied to longer useful life and related loan tenure, complaints about the projects or installers, risks associated with disbursing funds before project completion, and operational risks associated with servicing these loans by a third party, especially if there are post-origination complaints requiring the lender's involvement.

In our analysis, we also consider whether the HI projects are completed and inspected at the time of loan repayment and whether there is an operating condition tied to external factors or an ongoing economic incentive for obligors to pay, as opposed to fixed terms and conditions. A longer performance history around these characteristics would help us better understand their impact on these increasingly common transactions.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Contacts:Rahul Mehta, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4627;
rahul.mehta@spglobal.com
Ronald G Burt, New York + 1 (212) 438 4011;
ronald.burt@spglobal.com
Ildiko Szilank, New York + 1 (212) 438 2614;
ildiko.szilank@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in