articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241010-u-s-not-for-profit-health-care-rating-actions-september-and-third-quarter-2024-13281733.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Rating Actions, September And Third Quarter 2024

COMMENTS

Hurricanes Helene And Milton Add To U.S. Public Finance Issuers’ Climate And Financial Challenges

COMMENTS

S&P Global Ratings Definitions

COMMENTS

U.S. Higher Education Rating Actions, Third-Quarter 2024

COMMENTS

Florida State Finances And Insurance Mechanisms Help Absorb The Blow Of Another Major Storm


U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Rating Actions, September And Third Quarter 2024

S&P Global Ratings maintained 23 ratings without revising the outlooks, took five negative rating actions, and revised five outlooks favorably and three outlooks unfavorably without changing the ratings in the U.S. not-for-profit health care sector in September. There were no upgrades this month.

The month had six new debt issuances with existing ratings and outlooks unchanged; five were systems, the other was a stand-alone hospital, and all were rated investment grade. We also initially assigned a seventh new sale rating to a transaction that was guaranteed by Mayo Clinic.

The 13 rating actions and outlook revisions consisted of the following:

  • Five downgrades--two systems and three stand-alone hospitals--two of which were defaults, one due to a distressed debt exchange and the other a missed interest payment.
  • Five outlooks revised favorably on four stand-alone hospitals and one system, with four outlooks revised to stable from negative, and one to positive from stable.
  • Three outlooks revised unfavorably on two systems and one stand-alone hospital, with two revised to negative from stable, and one to stable from positive.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Table 1

U.S. not-for-profit health care rating action summary, year-to-date 2024
First quarter Second quarter July August September Third quarter Year-to-date
Maintained 63 78 27 18 23 68 209
Downgrades 13 8 5 7 5 17 38
Upgrades 3 4 0 2 0 2 9
Unfavorable outlook revisions 4 13 0 3 3 6 23
Favorable outlook revisions 8 10 6 4 5 15 33

Table 2

September 2024, U.S. not-for-profit health care rating actions
State Rating Outlook Entity type Action Description
Adena Health System OH A- Negative Stand-alone Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
AtlantiCare Health System NJ AA- Negative Stand-alone Unfavorable outlook revision Trend of operating losses that while improving are not aligned with rating level expectations
Baptist Health AL BBB+ Stable Stand-alone Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Barlow Respiratory Hospital CA BBB Stable Stand-alone Favorable outlook revision Improved operating performance garnered positive operating margins and solid MADS coverage
Bexar County Hospital District TX AA Stable Stand-alone Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Bibb County Healthcare Authority AL BB Stable Stand-alone Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Bon Secours Health System MD A+ Stable System Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Bozeman Health MT A Stable Stand-alone Favorable outlook revision Positive interim operations and balance sheet accretion with the expectation for sustained improvement
Carle Foundation IL AA- Negative System Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia PA AA Stable Stand-alone Maintained; new sale Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Covenant Healthcare System MI A+ Stable Stand-alone Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Garnet Health Medical Center NY BB- Negative Stand-alone Downgrade Higher-than-budgeted loss expectations and further weakening in unrestricted reserves and balance sheet metrics
Genesis Healthcare System OH BB+ Positive Stand-alone Favorable outlook revision Strengthening operations and stabilized balance sheet from pension plan termination and successfully opened new facilities
Jackson Hospital and Clinic AL D Not meaningful Stand-alone Downgrade Missed interest payment following a notice of acceleration
LifeBridge Health MD A+ Stable System Maintained; new sale Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Long Island Community Hospital NY A Stable System Maintained; new sale Credit quality consistent with existing rating based on a subordinate guarantee from NYU Langone Hospitals
Mary Rutan Hospital OH A- Stable Stand-alone Favorable outlook revision Sustained financial performance and positive operating margins
Maury Regional Hospital TN BBB Stable Stand-alone Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Mohawk Valley Health System NY BB Negative Stand-alone Downgrade Pressured operations and balance sheet stress with the opening of the new hospital
Montefiore Health System NY BBB- Negative System Maintained; new sale Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Moorings Park Institute FL A+ Stable Long-term care Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Noland Health Services AL A Stable Long-term care Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Northwell Health NY A- Stable System Maintained; new sale Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Norton Healthcare KY A Stable System Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
NYU Langone Hospitals NY A+ Stable System Maintained; new sale Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Oak Valley Hospital District CA BB Stable Stand-alone Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
PAFAF|Phoenix LLC AZ AA Stable Other Rating initially assigned; new sale Based on an unconditional, absolute, and irrevocable guaranty from Mayo Clinic
PeaceHealth WA A- Negative System Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Renown Regional Medical Center NV A Stable Stand-alone Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
San Antonio Regional Hospital CA BBB+ Stable Stand-alone Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Southcoast Health System MA BBB+ Stable System Favorable outlook revision Healthy balance sheet with expected continued improvement in operating results to breakeven excluding provider relief funds
Texas Health Resources TX AA Stable System Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
Tower Health PA D Not meaningful System Downgrade Based on our criteria, distressed debt exchange occurred and is viewed as a de facto default
UMass Memorial Health Care MA BBB+ Stable System Unfavorable outlook revision Weaker than projected fiscal 2023 earnings and integration and turnaround risks from an acquisition
University Hospitals Health System OH A Negative System Unfavorable outlook revision Multiyear trend of operating losses along with weakened unrestricted reserves and declining DCOH
UofL Health KY BBB+ Negative System Downgrade Decline in DCOH and unrestricted reserves to long-term debt below expectations along with softer operating margins
Vidant Health NC A Stable System Maintained Credit quality consistent with existing rating
DCOH--Days' cash on hand. MADS--Maximum annual debt service.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Blake C Fundingsland, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4703;
blake.fundingsland@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Cynthia S Keller, Augusta + 1 (212) 438 2035;
cynthia.keller@spglobal.com
Suzie R Desai, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7046;
suzie.desai@spglobal.com
Amy He, New York +1 2124380381;
amy.he@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in