Key Takeaways
- We expect retransmission and core advertising revenue for U.S. local TV broadcasters will modestly decline over the next few years due to secular pressures, and issuers will become increasingly reliant on political advertising revenue.
- We believe the industry's concentration of debt maturities starting in 2026 increases refinancing risk.
- We revised our recovery analyses to reflect lower anticipated recovery prospects given downward pressure on valuations from the secular pressures facing the sector.
"Previously, On…": Rating Actions In 2024
We took several negative rating actions on U.S. local TV broadcasters in 2024 (see table 1), reflecting increasing credit risks as both consumers and advertisers navigate away from pay-TV. Industrywide, we expect the two primary contributors of local TV broadcasters' revenue--retransmission (the fees local TV stations receive from pay-TV distributors giving them the right to retransmit the station's broadcast content) and core advertising (excluding political)--will modestly decline over the next few years (see "Outlooks Diverge For U.S. Local TV Broadcasters As Industry Faces Secular Challenges," published April 15, 2024, on RatingsDirect).
We believe the industry will become increasingly reliant on political advertising revenue in even years. At the same time, many local TV broadcasters face refinancing upcoming debt maturities at higher interest rates in 2026 and beyond. As a result, we expect EBITDA will gradually decline and cash flow will weaken.
Table 1
Change in local TV broadcaster ratings in 2024 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Company | January 2024 | April 2024 | October 2024 | Year to date change | ||||||
Nexstar Media Group Inc. |
BB+/Stable/-- | BB+/Stable/-- | BB+/Stable/-- | Unchanged | ||||||
TEGNA Inc. |
BB+/Stable/-- | BB+/Stable/-- | BB+/Stable/-- | Unchanged | ||||||
Gray Television Inc. |
B+/Stable/-- | B+/Negative/-- | B/Negative/-- | 1 notch downgrade | ||||||
Sinclair Inc. |
B+/Stable/-- | B+/Stable/-- | B/Negative/-- | 1 notch downgrade | ||||||
E.W. Scripps Co. (The) |
B+/Negative/-- | B/Negative/-- | B-/Negative/-- | 2 notch downgrade | ||||||
CMG Media Corp. |
B/Negative/-- | B-/Negative/-- | CCC+/Negative/-- | 2 notch downgrade | ||||||
Source: S&P Global Ratings. |
"We Interrupt Our Scheduled Programming": Updated Recovery Analyses
At the same time, we updated our recovery analyses over the past several months to reflect lower anticipated recovery prospects given the secular pressures facing the sector. In particular, we lowered the EBITDA multiples we use to derive our estimated enterprise value for these companies upon emergence from a hypothetical bankruptcy (see table 2).
We now ascribe a 5.5x-6.5x EBITDA multiple range to issuers in the sector. A company's EBITDA multiple depends on our view of its business strength, including the geographic reach and quality of its TV station portfolio. These EBITDA multiples are estimated emergence multiples after a hypothetical default and not current market multiples.
Table 2
EBITDA multiples for local TV broadcasters | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBITDA multiple | Business risk | |||||||
Company | January 2024 | October 2024 | October 2024 | |||||
Nexstar | 7.0x | 6.5x | Satisfactory | |||||
TEGNA | 7.0x | 6.0x | Fair | |||||
Gray | 7.0x | 6.0x | Fair | |||||
Sinclair | 7.0x | 6.0x | Fair | |||||
E.W. Scripps | 6.5x | 5.5x | Weak | |||||
CMG | 6.5x | 5.5x | Weak | |||||
Source: S&P Global Ratings. |
In the cases of Sinclair and CMG, the reduction in gross enterprise value from lowering the EBITDA multiple resulted in a change to our expected recovery percent for secured debt holders. In the case of Gray, the company increased the percent of secured debt in its capital structure in June 2024 by issuing new secured debt to repurchase $690 million of senior unsecured notes; this led to lower recovery prospects for secured debtholders.
For Nexstar, Gray, and E.W. Scripps, the reduction in gross enterprise value from lowering the EBITDA multiple resulted in a change to our expected recovery percent for unsecured debt holders.
Table 3 shows the recovery estimates for secured and unsecured debtholders relative to the beginning of this year. (We round down our pinpoint calculation of the recovery rate to the nearest 5%.)
Table 3
Estimated debt recovery percentages | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Company | Date | Gross enterprise value (Mil. $) | Estimated senior secured debt recovery | Estimated senior unsecured debt recovery | Estimated secured debt as a percent of total debt claims at default | |||||||
Nexstar | January 2024 | 5,449 | 95% | 35% | 60% | |||||||
October 2024 | 5,270 | 95% | 30% | 60% | ||||||||
TEGNA | January 2024 | 3,613 | N/A | 65%** | 0% | |||||||
October 2024 | 3,096 | N/A | 65%** | 0% | ||||||||
Sinclair | January 2024 | 3,270 | 75% | 0% | 84% | |||||||
October 2024 | 3,008 | 70% | 0% | 84% | ||||||||
Gray | January 2024 | 4,692 | 95% | 25% | 48% | |||||||
October 2024 | 3,493 | 75%* | 0%* | 59% | ||||||||
E.W. Scripps | January 2024 | 2,759 | 95% | 35% | 73% | |||||||
October 2024 | 2,414 | 95% | 0%* | 73% | ||||||||
CMG | January 2024 | 2,136 | 75% | 0% | 71% | |||||||
October 2024 | 1,597 | 55%* | 0% | 79% | ||||||||
*Denotes a change in the recovery rating. **TEGNA does not have secured debt and unsecured debt ratings are capped. Source: S&P Global Ratings. |
"Stay Tuned": Our Expectations And Downside Risks
Of the six local TV broadcasters we rate, two have stable outlooks (Nexstar and TEGNA) reflecting stronger leverage and cash flow profiles, which we believe will support debt reduction and refinancing efforts. The remaining four have negative outlooks (Sinclair, Gray, E.W. Scripps, and CMG). These companies currently have elevated leverage and could potentially face refinancing risk if they do not use their excess cash balance and expected free operating cash flow (FOCF) toward debt repayment.
We believe the industry's concentration of debt maturities beginning in 2026 increases refinancing risk given the potential for waning lender demand leading to a shortfall in willing lenders to the sector (see chart 1).
Chart 1
Further potential downgrades to our issuer credit ratings could have negative implications for issue-level ratings (on a company's specific debt instruments) because those ratings are derived from the issuer credit rating (see table 4).
Following a review of all our rated U.S. local TV broadcasters, we don't currently envision making additional material revisions to our estimated company enterprise values. Our estimated enterprise value, used to determine recovery prospects, reflects a discount from current market enterprise values as we expect performance and valuations to decline on the path to default. However, to the extent that declines in retransmission and core advertising revenue materially exceed our current expectations, we could potentially revise our views, which could affect recovery ratings.
We believe further rating changes due to a mix shift in secured versus unsecured debt are unlikely because incremental secured debt capacity is relatively limited among those local TV broadcasters with elevated leverage.
Table 4
Recovery rating scale | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For issuers with a speculative-grade issuer credit rating | ||||||||||
Group A jurisdiction | ||||||||||
Nominal recovery expectations | ||||||||||
Recovery rating* | Recovery description | Greater than or equal to | Less than | Issue rating notches relative to ICR | ||||||
1+ | Highest expectation, full recovery | 100% | N/A | +3 notches | ||||||
1 | Very high recovery | 90% | 100% | +2 notches | ||||||
2 | Substantial recovery | 70% | 90% | +1 notch | ||||||
3 | Meaningful recovery | 50% | 70% | 0 notches | ||||||
4 | Average recovery | 30% | 50% | 0 notches | ||||||
5 | Modest recovery | 10% | 30% | -1 notch | ||||||
6 | Negligible recovery | 0% | 10% | -2 notches | ||||||
*Recovery ratings on unsecured debt issues are generally subject to caps. ICR--Issuer credit rating. N/A--Not applicable. Source: S&P Global Ratings. |
Related Research
- Nexstar Media Group Inc., Oct. 8, 2024
- The E.W. Scripps Co. Downgraded To 'B-' From 'B'; Outlook Negative, Sept. 18, 2024
- TEGNA Inc., Sept. 16, 2024
- Gray Television Inc. Downgraded To 'B' On Elevated Leverage, Outlook Negative, Aug. 26, 2024
- Sinclair Inc. Downgraded To 'B' From 'B+' On Expected Secular Pressures; Outlook Negative, Aug. 19, 2024
- CMG Media Corp. Downgraded To 'CCC+' On Elevated Refinancing Risk; Outlook Negative, July 18, 2024
- Credit FAQ: Outlooks Diverge For U.S. Local TV Broadcasters As Industry Faces Secular Challenges, April 15, 2024
- TEGNA Inc. 'BB+' Issuer Credit Rating Affirmed; Thresholds Tightened; Outlook Stable, March 28, 2024
- Gray Television Inc. Outlook Revised To Negative From Stable On Tightened Thresholds, 'B+' Rating Affirmed, March 28, 2024
- The E.W. Scripps Co. Downgraded To 'B' On Elevated Leverage, Outlook Negative, March 7, 2024
- CMG Media Corp. Downgraded To 'B-' On Elevated Leverage, Outlook Negative, Feb. 9, 2024
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Rose Oberman, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 0354; rose.oberman@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | Cody M La Grange, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 0204; cody.la.grange@spglobal.com |
Recovery Analyst: | Olen Honeyman, New York + 1 (212) 438 4031; olen.honeyman@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.