Key Takeaways
- Hurricane Milton is set to become the second major hurricane to strike the U.S. this year, following Hurricane Helene two weeks ago.
- While the scale of damage remains highly uncertain it could be substantial, potentially matching that of Hurricane Ian in 2022, which resulted in about $60 billion of insured losses.
- For our rated portfolio of U.S. property/casualty (P/C) insurers, potential losses from Hurricane Milton could fully deplete their 2024 natural catastrophe budgets, affecting underwriting margins and earnings. However, we expect capitalization will remain stable.
- We also think global reinsurers will feel the impact but we do not foresee Milton overstepping the sector's annual catastrophe budgets. In aggregate, our earnings assumptions for reinsurers should remain intact.
Potential economic and insured losses from Hurricane Milton remain highly uncertain. Much will depend on its landfall location and its magnitude. Milton could cause significant wind damage, heavy rainfall, substantial storm surges, and floods.
The U.S. National Hurricane Center predicts it will make landfall around the Tampa Bay region late on Oct. 9 or in the early hours of Oct. 10. The hurricane has fluctuated in intensity and is currently rated Category 5. This is the second major hurricane to hit the U.S. in two weeks following Hurricane Helene (see "U.S. Insurers' Earnings Could Take A Hit From Hurricane Helene," Oct. 3, 2024).
Given the uncertainty as to the magnitude of losses, we are reviewing various industry-insured-loss scenarios and their potential impact on U.S. primary insurers and global reinsurers. For reference, Hurricane Ian, which made landfall as a Category 4 hurricane in Florida in 2022, resulted in industry-insured losses of about $60 billion.
Hurricane Milton Losses Could Fully Deplete U.S. P/C Insurers' 2024 Catastrophe Budgets
As insurer of last resort, Citizens Property Insurance Corp. (not rated) will absorb a higher proportion of insured property losses relative to other insurers in the state. For our rated insurers, direct property premiums (homeowners and commercial) in Florida represent just 1.1% of total U.S. P/C premiums written in 2023. We assume our rated insurers' exposure to property business in Florida is less than 33% of their total insurance business in the state and, on average, their exposure is more to residential than to commercial. State-sponsored Citizens was Florida's largest homeowners insurer by premiums written in 2023. In the past five years, Citizens' market share in the state's personal property insurance market has jumped significantly, to 18.6% in 2023 from 5.2% in 2019, to become the tenth largest insurance writer for homeowners in the U.S.
While the magnitude of insured losses remains unknown, most rated U.S. primary P/C insurers entered 2024 with substantial capital buffers at the 99.99% confidence level under our risk-based capital adequacy model. In first-half 2024, capital and pre-tax operating incomes have mostly remained strong. Given that many primary insurers are already close to 2024 catastrophe budgets based on first-half catastrophe losses, we believe the potential losses from Hurricane Milton, combined with other weather-related losses so far, could fully exhaust their 2024 catastrophe budgets. This will affect underwriting margins and earnings, but not capitalization.
Table 1
Property lines exposure in Florida for selected rated U.S. P/C insurers | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Insurance group | FSR/outlook* | Total Florida property DPW (mil. $) | Personal property (%) | Commercial property (%) | Market share (% of total Florida property) | Total insurer’s DPW for all lines (mil. $) | Florida property DPW/Total insurer’s DPW for all lines (%) | Year-end 2023 policyholders surplus (mil. $) | ||||||||||
Citizens Property Ins Corp. | NR | 3,209 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 16.0 | 5,071 | 63.3 | 5,023 | ||||||||||
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. |
AA/Stable | 1,219 | 97.5 | 2.5 | 6.1 | 93,787 | 1.3 | 134,782 | ||||||||||
Allstate Corp. |
A+/Stable | 713 | 73.3 | 26.7 | 3.5 | 50,042 | 1.4 | 13,602 | ||||||||||
United Services Automobile Assn. |
AA+/Negative | 697 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 32,002 | 2.2 | 25,453 | ||||||||||
Progressive Corp. |
AA/Stable | 633 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 62,712 | 1.0 | 22,143 | ||||||||||
Chubb Ltd. |
AA/Stable | 578 | 72.6 | 27.4 | 2.9 | 31,873 | 1.8 | 20,722 | ||||||||||
Berkshire Hathaway Insurance Group |
AA+/Stable | 412 | 23.2 | 76.8 | 2.0 | 59,668 | 0.7 | 304,435 | ||||||||||
Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co. Ltd. |
A+/Stable | 279 | 81.4 | 18.6 | 1.4 | 11,917 | 2.3 | 12,460 | ||||||||||
Farmers Insurance Co. Inc. |
A/Stable | 258 | 99.9 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 27,221 | 0.9 | 6,180 | ||||||||||
American International Group |
A+/Positive | 251 | 78.3 | 21.7 | 1.2 | 16,077 | 1.6 | 18,691 | ||||||||||
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. |
A+/Stable | 227 | 58.2 | 41.8 | 1.1 | 19,766 | 1.1 | 18,971 | ||||||||||
Liberty Mutual Group Inc. |
A/Stable | 209 | 39.3 | 60.7 | 1.0 | 45,795 | 0.5 | 27,613 | ||||||||||
Hartford Financial Services Group Inc. |
A+/Positive | 150 | 15.6 | 84.4 | 0.7 | 15,954 | 0.9 | 15,784 | ||||||||||
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. Group |
A-/Stable | 140 | 52.8 | 47.2 | 0.7 | 16,628 | 0.8 | 7,114 | ||||||||||
Zurich Reinsurance |
AA/Stable | 125 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.6 | 18,563 | 0.7 | 6,293 | ||||||||||
QBE Insurance Group Ltd. |
A+/Positive | 97 | 88.4 | 11.6 | 0.5 | 7,560 | 1.3 | 1,854 | ||||||||||
Assurant Inc. |
A/Stable | 64 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 6,765 | 0.9 | 1,467 | ||||||||||
Travelers Cos. Inc. (The) |
AA/Stable | 61 | 46.2 | 53.8 | 0.3 | 38,597 | 0.2 | 23,888 | ||||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corp. |
A+/Stable | 37 | 97.0 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 7,456 | 0.5 | 7,294 | ||||||||||
CNA Financial Corp. |
A+/Stable | 36 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.2 | 13,741 | 0.3 | 10,946 | ||||||||||
W. R. Berkley Corp. |
A+/Positive | 20 | 89.7 | 10.3 | 0.1 | 10,049 | 0.2 | 8,777 | ||||||||||
The Hanover Insurance Group |
A/Stable | 17 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.1 | 6,286 | 0.3 | 2,652 | ||||||||||
Group total | N/A | 9,432 | 84.7 | 15.3 | 46.9 | 597,530 | 1.6 | 696,145 | ||||||||||
P/C industry | N/A | 20,113 | 85.9 | 14.1 | 100.0 | 966,700 | 2.1 | 1,042,624 | ||||||||||
*Rating represents the financial strength rating on core operating entities as of Oct. 8, 2024. DWP--Direct premiums written. P/C--Property-casualty. N.A.--Not available. NR--Not rated. N/A--Not applicable. Source: S&P Global Ratings, S&P Market Intelligence. |
Chart 1
Global Reinsurers' Losses Should Stay Within 2024 Catastrophe Budgets
Milton is poised to be a significant event for global reinsurance this year. In our view, global reinsurers face substantial exposure to the damage it could cause. The key question is whether potential losses will stay within reinsurers' annual natural catastrophe budgets or annual earnings, or whether they will escalate and become a capital event.
At this stage we think the impact from Hurricane Milton, combined with natural catastrophe losses incurred so far in 2024, could still fall within reinsurers' catastrophe budgets.
In 2024, the global insurance sector again faces a highly active natural catastrophe environment. During the first half of the year, global insured losses from natural catastrophes soared to about $60 billion, significantly higher than the 10-year average of $37 billion, as reported by Swiss Re Institute. Much of these losses, around 70%, stemmed from severe convective storms predominantly in the U.S. First-half events also included the earthquake in Japan, in January, and devastating floods in the United Arab Emirates, Europe, and Brazil.
Milton, following closely on the heels of Helene, will likely significantly increase global reinsurers' claims payouts in the second half of 2024. This period has also been marked by other notable events, including Hurricanes Beryl, Debby, and Francine, as well as wildfires and hailstorms in Canada and floods in Central and Eastern Europe (see "Central European Insurers' Financial Strength Is A Barrage Against Flood Damage," Sept. 24, 2024).
Due to structural changes in reinsurance programs and fewer tail events in 2023, the top-19 rated global reinsurers held only about 10% of the market share for global insured natural catastrophe losses. We assume a similar market share for the first half of this year. However, given Milton's potential scale, we expect this market share will approach the long-term average of around 20%. If Milton's insured losses are contained to just under $50 billion, the reinsurance sector could yet remain within its annual catastrophe budget (see chart 2).
The reinsurance sector's expected 2024 combined earnings of $44.8 billion, and its catastrophe budget of $19.2 billion, provide a substantial buffer of about $64 billion before any catastrophe losses affect its capital. While capital levels and risk appetites can vary among individual reinsurers, the sector's overall resiliency has notably increased in recent years (see "Reinsurers Show Growing Appetite For Natural Catastrophe Risks," Aug. 30, 2024).
Based on our annual natural catastrophe survey, we assess that the net exposure for the top-19 reinsurers in the exposed zone 3 for one-in-10-year to one-in-500-year return periods lies between $6 billion and $46 billion (see table 2). However, zone 3 in our annual survey includes an aggregated number for wind exposure in multiple regions including Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.
Chart 2
Table 2
The top-19 global reinsurers aggregate catastrophe exposure; this can vary among individual reinsurers | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
--Return periods for in-force book as of Jan. 1, 2024-- | ||||||||||||||||
S&P Global Ratings property catastrophe annual survey (zone 3) | 1 in 10 year | 1 in 20 year | 1 in 50 year | 1 in 100 year | 1 in 200 year | 1 in 250 year | 1 in 500 year | |||||||||
Net aggregate probable maximum loss (bil. $) | 5.9 | 10.9 | 18.7 | 26.2 | 34.5 | 37.4 | 45.8 | |||||||||
*In a few instances, when the reinsurer does not provide zonal exposure, S&P Global Ratings uses estimated figures. Zone 3: Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina; top 19 global reinsurers are: Arch, Ascot, Aspen, AXIS, China Re, Convex, Everest, Fairfax, Fidelis, Hannover Re, Hiscox, Lancashire, Lloyd's, Markel, Munich Re, RenaissanceRe, SCOR, Sirius, and Swiss Re. |
We think reinsurers are approaching their annual natural catastrophe budgets. Whether budgets are fully consumed or exceeded will depend on the development of global natural catastrophes for the remainder of the year.
Despite the challenges, we maintain our base-case earnings scenario for the reinsurance sector. We forecast a combined ratio of 92%-96%, which includes a natural catastrophe load of 8-10 percentage points, and a return on equity in the low to mid-teens in 2024-2025. We also forecast that the sector will benefit from rising investment income, with expected net investment yields of 3.5%-4.0% during this period. Furthermore, reinsurers entered 2024 with robust capitalization. In aggregate, capital adequacy for the top 19 was redundant under our risk-based capital model: 6.1% at the 99.99% confidence level at year-end 2023.
Table 3
Reinsurers' base case earnings assumptions remain unchanged | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024f | 2025f | ||||||||||
Net combined ratio | 100.6 | 100.6 | 104.7 | 96.6 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 92-96 | 92-96 | ||||||||||
(Favorable)/unfavorable reserve developments | -4.8 | -1.3 | -2.1 | -2.8 | -1.7 | -2 | (1)-(2) | (1)-(2) | ||||||||||
Net natural catastrophe losses' impact on the combined ratio | 9.7 | 7.4 | 6.1 | 9.5 | 9.2 | 4.4 | 8-10 | 8-10 | ||||||||||
Accident-year combined ratio, excluding natural catastrophe losses, reserve developments, and pandemic losses | 95.7 | 94.5 | 91.9 | 90 | 88.7 | 89.1 | 86-87 | 86-87 | ||||||||||
Return on equity | 3.1 | 9.4 | 2 | 9.3 | 2.5 | 21.4 | Low to mid teens | Low to mid teens | ||||||||||
Net investment yield | 2.6 | 3 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 3.4 | 3.5-4.0 | 3.5-4.0 | ||||||||||
The top 19 global reinsurers are Arch, Ascot, Aspen, AXIS, China Re, Convex, Everest, Fairfax, Fidelis, Hannover Re, Hiscox, Lancashire, Lloyd's, Markel, Munich Re, RenaissanceRe, SCOR, Sirius, and Swiss Re. The 2020 combined ratio included 8.8 percentage points related to COVID-19 losses. Return on equity in 2024f and 2025f will depend on investment performance. 2018-2022 data is based on GAAP and IFRS4. For 2023, 2024f, and 2025f, we used the undiscounted combined ratios for IFRS17 filers. f--Forecast. Source: S&P Global Ratings. |
Related Research
- U.S. Insurers' Earnings Could Take A Hit From Hurricane Helene, Oct. 3, 2024
- Central European Insurers' Financial Strength Is A Barrage Against Flood Damage, Sept. 24, 2024
- Insurers Focus On Underwriting To Tackle Climate Risk, Sept. 10, 2024
- Global Reinsurers Must Maintain Discipline To Cement Strong Performance Amid Casualty Risks, Sept. 3, 2024
- Record Weather-Related Losses Hit U.S. Homeowners Insurers And Pose Challenges In Estimating Catastrophe Risk Charges, Sept. 3, 2024
- Reinsurers Show Growing Appetite For Natural Catastrophe Risks, Aug. 30, 2024
- Reinsurers Dodge Severe Convective Storm Losses Amid Rising Threats, Aug. 7, 2024
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analysts: | Johannes Bender, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9196; johannes.bender@spglobal.com |
Patricia A Kwan, New York + 1 (212) 438 6256; patricia.kwan@spglobal.com | |
Taoufik Gharib, New York + 1 (212) 438 7253; taoufik.gharib@spglobal.com | |
Saurabh B Khasnis, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4554; saurabh.khasnis@spglobal.com | |
Secondary Contacts: | Charles-Marie Delpuech, London + 44 20 7176 7967; charles-marie.delpuech@spglobal.com |
Sachin Bhojani, London; sachin.bhojani@spglobal.com | |
Simon Ashworth, London + 44 20 7176 7243; simon.ashworth@spglobal.com | |
Lawrence A Wilkinson, New York + 1 (212) 438 1882; lawrence.wilkinson@spglobal.com | |
Research Contributors: | Vikas Rathore, Pune; vikas.rathore@spglobal.com |
Nadeem N Shaikh, Mumbai; nadeem.shaikh@spglobal.com | |
Ronak Chaplot, Mumbai + 02233428355; ronak.chaplot@spglobal.com | |
Media Contacts: | Jeff Sexton, New York + 1 (212) 438 3448; jeff.sexton@spglobal.com |
Russell Gerry, London + 44 20 7176 3569; russell.gerry@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.