articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240925-china-insurance-time-for-tough-medicine-13261720.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

China Insurance: Time For Tough Medicine

COMMENTS

Insurance Industry And Country Risk Assessment: Global Property/Casualty Reinsurance

COMMENTS

Insurance Brief: Flash Floods In Spain Have Limited Effect On Insurance Ratings

COMMENTS

Country Risk Assessments Update: October 2024

COMMENTS

Protection And Indemnity Clubs Opt For Rate Hikes In 2025


China Insurance: Time For Tough Medicine

image

More pain is on the way for China's insurers. The life insurance sector is already stuck paying out on guaranteed returns on some policies that are higher than current market returns. This asset-liability mismatch is set to worsen amid a larger than expected fall in interest rates and volatile market conditions.

S&P Global Ratings anticipates tough medicine will be applied to solve this and other problems in the broader industry.

To complicate matters, the operational burden for insurance management will intensify given regulatory calls to tighten risk control systems and provide more affordable insurance to the masses. Concurrently, insurers are expected to deploy funds to meet China's strategic interests and development, which potentially lower returns.

That said, the longer-term dynamics remain compelling. China's insurance market is still underpenetrated and its huge population and economic base points to significant insurance needs. We foresee a baptism of fire for the next generation of insurance company leaders, who will be grappling with much-needed improvements.

Life Insurers Can No Longer Hope To Grow Out Of Their Problems

China's slower macroeconomic settings are aggravating the life insurance sector's weak spots. These include asset liability mismatch, suboptimal risk pricing, and heightened sensitivity to capital market volatility. Specifically, the pain on small and midsize life insurers is set to intensify. Concurrently, rising unemployment could contribute to slower top-line growth and higher lapses in life insurance policies – affecting profitability of life insurers. The pain is coming from all directions.

Unfortunately, the insurance sector was underprepared for the country's rapid decline in bond yields. The sector is now grappling with a mismatch between their promised payouts and the returns they are currently making on assets. We first flagged the mounting concerns of interest rate mismatches in 2015, and turned our sector view to negative.

To avoid repeating the pitfalls of high interest guarantees, which also occurred for some years before1999, the regulator imposed tighter caps for pricing interest rates. However, we believe a lower cap is required, amid falling government bond yields.

Chart 1a

image

Chart 1b

image

To manage interest rate burdens, we expect insurers to promote life insurance products with floating returns. Such products include participating, universal life, and unit-linked policies. These policies, which involve the sharing of investment risks with policyholders, come with much-lower embedded guarantees.

While this product shift will also contribute positively to life insurers' value generation through lower liability costs, it might not be as popular with customers. Floating-return policies have an element of uncertainty. Also, sales of such products have higher mis-selling risk. Regulators could call on tighter sales process, posing higher compliance costs to insurers.

Consequently, we anticipate softer demand for such life insurance products--dampening the growth outlook. We expect life premium growth to slow to 5%-8% over the next two years, compared with 10.2% in 2023 and 13.1% in the first seven months of 2024.

Chart 2

image

Change in the making

The Chinese government's effort to push insurance as part of the social safety-net has been decades in the making, however the lure of higher investment returns from alternative wealth management products dimmed the attractiveness of insurance policies. Now, we see a change in the making.

Saving for retirement.  Concerns about adequacy of government pensions for retirement needs is prompting individuals to start saving for retirement early. Furthermore, the push out of retirement age to 63 for males (from 60) and to 55-58 for females (from 50-55) likely means later access to government pension savings. We anticipate annuities and private pensions will benefit strongly, albeit from a low base.

Providing coverage to those with pre-existing health conditions.  Regulators, in their latest guidance, reiterated the need for "inclusive insurance" that is affordable and doesn't discriminate against less-healthy individuals. While this promotes insurability, concerns of adverse selection could hit margins for insurers.

Overseas investments could diversify exposures; this will be gradual.   With China now having lower interest rates than some key markets, some Chinese insurers might increase overseas investments to boost investment yields. China's asset allocation to overseas assets will likely remain less than 5%, well below the limit of 15%. This contrasts with both Japanese and Taiwanese life insurance markets, which invested heavily in overseas markets when coping with low interest rate challenges in domestic markets.

P/C Insurance Has Similar Aches And Pains

Slowing growth in China is also a constraint on P/C insurance premium growth. A slower pace of new car sales, a reduction in construction projects (including those associated with government initiatives) and falling consumer confidence hinders the growth outlook for the sector. We expect underwriting premiums to rise 4%-5% over the next two years, versus 6.7% in 2023 and 5.1% for the first seven months of 2024.

Meanwhile, China's sharper-than-expected decline in interest rates, and volatile capital markets, have also exposed P/C insurers to earnings swings and narrowing capital buffers. Our negative credit trend on China's P/C insurance sector reflects the market pressure and added volatility on underwriting results from competitive pricing.

Underwriting in 2024 is likely to be in losses, amid increased frequency of extreme weather events (such as flooding and typhoon events). Examples include the recent Typhoon Yagi in Hainan province and Typhoon Bebinca in Shanghai, with economic losses broadly estimated at Chinese renminbi (RMB) 90 billion, and RMB6.0 billion-RMB8.0 billion in insurance losses from the catastrophe insurance pool, properties, and agriculture insurance. We expect the sector's combined ratio to sit at around 100%-102% over the next two years.

Chart 3

image

Catastrophe coverage: Balancing commercial viability and serving the masses

China's diverse and expansive landscape, which exposes the country to various perils such as flooding, earthquakes, and typhoons, will support greater demand for catastrophe insurance. Concurrently, the rapid electrification of the auto-sector points to need for new auto insurance pricing models.

Like the life sector, the government is asking the P/C insurance sector to shoulder more responsibilities to provide safety nets against catastrophes, while keeping it affordable for the masses. However, we believe the onus is on insurance companies to balance between underwriting margins and national service.

So while government-initiated programs (such as catastrophe insurance, agriculture insurance and inclusive health insurance) could offer growth opportunities, these may come with thinner margins. To cope, China's P/C insurers will likely need to refine the design of catastrophe insurance coverages, as well as working with reinsurers and the government on risk-mitigation plans. Considering the country's rapid urbanization, more frequent updates to the catastrophe models are crucial for effective risk assessment for P/C insurers.

EV insurance pricing still in trial-and-error phase

China's leading position in EV manufacturing has propelled its growth into the world's largest EV insurance market-place. That said, insurers continue to struggle with the underwriting of such risk. Amid limited historical data to support actuarial pricing, and higher repair costs than for traditional cars, a new underwriting and pricing model may be required.

To cope, P/C insurers could explore partnerships with EVs and battery manufacturers down the value chain. This cuts out the middleman-associated expenses, while getting first-hand knowledge about specific EV models. However, this learning process will be a baptism of fire for the P/C insurers. We expect the EV insurance segment to remain in underwriting losses over the next two years. Consequently, only the giants or specialized writers might be able to develop viability in this segment.

Will Insurers Make It Through The Coming Tough Patch?

In short, yes. However, things could get worse before they get better. Insurers, like many other investors, are adjusting investment strategies in search for yield. However, some need to contend with prior investment mishaps by writing down assets or realizing losses. Insurers that lack the capital and liquidity to absorb this additional risk will likely face eroding credit quality.

Likewise, a test of lasting power could see some exits from the markets. With regulators strengthening barriers to new domestic entrants, the giant insurance companies will likely cement their foothold. A focus on underwriting could come at the expense of top-line growth. Given the long-term potential for this still underpenetrated insurance market, the incentives are strong to stay in the game.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:WenWen Chen, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3559;
wenwen.chen@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Judy Chen, Hong Kong + 852 2532 8059;
judy.chen@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in