This report does not constitute a rating action.
S&P Global Ratings assigns credit ratings to local and regional governments (LRGs) based on its qualitative and quantitative analysis of financial, economic, managerial, and institutional factors. Our analytical framework for rating LRGs comprises six major components, including the institutional framework, economy, financial management, budgetary performance, liquidity, and debt burden.
Our assessment of the institutional framework is an important component of the rating. The institutional and legislative environment in which an LRG operates provides an important context for evaluating the LRG's individual credit profile. Therefore, we combine our assessment of the institutional framework and the five other factors listed above to determine an indicative credit level for an individual LRG. We then adjust this level for certain overriding factors to provide the final rating for the respective LRG (see "Methodology For Rating Local And Regional Governments Outside Of The U.S.," published July 15, 2019).
LRG Characteristics By Rating Category
Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) is the only region globally where we find the full spectrum of rating categories. This is mainly due to the region's economic diversity and the different institutional frameworks, which range from extremely predictable and supportive to very volatile and underfunded, mostly in emerging markets.
We expect European LRGs' credit quality will remain resilient as the economy gradually recovers and lending rates decline from peak levels. Although stronger economic performance supports revenue growth, a rise in expenditure due to the lagged effects of inflation and rising demand for public services will dampen a stark improvement in budgetary performance. This will increase the debt burden, particularly in weaker rating categories.
Weaker institutional settings and a decline in the quality of financial management will further constrain ratings on LRGs in speculative-grade categories. The limited predictability of financial policies and the associated uncertainty can lead to higher borrowing costs, particularly in the case of entities with limited access to deep capital markets. The availability of EU funds and investor confidence are critical for their ability to maintain sufficient liquidity.
Geopolitical risks remain a key challenge to our base-case scenario and could lead to prolonged periods of slow economic growth and higher-than-expected interest rates. In such a scenario, we anticipate budgetary performance and debt levels will deteriorate across all rating categories.
Chart 1
Chart 2
'AAA'
LRGs in the 'AAA' category are located in Germany, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland, benefit from strong economies, and operate within institutional frameworks that are extremely predictable and supportive. All LRGs have prudent financial management practices that promote detailed long-term planning and good internal and external risk management. Most LRGs within this category enjoy very good access to external liquidity to fund any unexpected short-term financial needs. Since our previous report in September 2023, we have upgraded three Swiss LRGs to the 'AAA' category from the 'AA' category. We note that we have not downgraded any LRGs in this rating category over the same period, reflecting that our ratings on LRGs in this category are very stable.
Other common characteristics of 'AAA' rated LRGs include:
- Very strong economic base. Median national GDP per capita was high at about $55,592 in 2023, with very high local GDP per capita, particularly in Switzerland.
- Strong budgetary performance. Economic recovery will support budgetary performance over the short term. Operating surpluses will remain solid, albeit slightly lower than in 2023, due to continued spending pressures from the lagged effects of inflation and investment needs. We expect small deficits after capital accounts over 2022-2026, with a median of 0.1%.
- Low but increasing debt burden. We expect median tax-supported debt will increase to an average of 40.6% of consolidated operating revenues over 2024-2026, based on higher spending pressures. Median interest payments will be very low and stable in an international comparison and remain below 1% of operating revenues.
Table 1
Assessments for European local and regional government risk indicators ('AAA' rated) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating factor assessments | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency ratings§ | Institutional framework | Economy | Financial management | Budgetary performance | Liquidity | Debt burden | ||||||||||
Germany* |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
State of Bavaria |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
State of Saxony |
AAA/Negative/A-1+ | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Norway* |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
City of Oslo |
AAA/Negative | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||
Sweden* |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
City of Helsingborg |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
City of Malmo |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
City of Stockholm |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
City of Vasteras |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Municipality of Lund |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Municipality of Nacka |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Municipality of Taby |
AAA/Stable | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Region of Skane |
AAA/Stable | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Region of Vastra Gotaland |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Switzerland* |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
Canton of Aargau |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Canton of Basel-City |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
Canton of Basel-Country |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
Canton of Solothurn |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Canton of St. Gallen |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Canton of Vaud |
AAA/Stable | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Canton of Zurich |
AAA/Stable | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
City of Zurich |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Institutional framework assessement is based on a six-point scale, where 1 is the strongest and 6 the weakest, while the other factors are based on a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being the strongest score and 5 the weakest. *Unsolicited ratings. §Issuer credit rating as of Sept. 13, 2024. |
Table 2
European local and regional government financial and economic statistics ('AAA' rated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | National GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | Operating balance (% of operating revenues) | Balance after capital accounts (% of total revenues) | Direct debt (% of operating revenues) | Tax-supported debt (% of consolidated operating revenues) | Interest (% of operating revenues) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2023a | 2023a | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | |||||||||||||||
Global median | 87,417.3 | 55,592.0 | 10.3 | 10.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 28.9 | 34.4 | 29.4 | 32.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
EMEA median | 86,045.8 | 55,592.0 | 7.4 | 6.8 | -0.5 | -0.1 | 40.8 | 46.4 | 37.8 | 40.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||
Germany | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State of Bavaria |
62,005.0 | 52,837.9 | 12.0 | 13.6 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 25.3 | 23.8 | 25.3 | 23.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||
State of Saxony |
41,244.0 | 52,837.9 | 8.9 | 11.6 | -3.5 | -0.7 | 29.4 | 28.7 | 29.4 | 28.7 | 0.2 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||
Norway | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City of Oslo |
N.A. | 88,415.4 | 4.4 | 5.9 | -7.5 | -5.3 | 84.9 | 87.0 | 84.9 | 87.0 | 2.3 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||||
Sweden | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City of Helsingborg |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 10.2 | 10.1 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 70.4 | 69.6 | 50.1 | 48.9 | 2.3 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||||
City of Malmo |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 7.1 | 6.6 | -0.5 | -0.1 | 52.2 | 59.8 | 46.2 | 53.1 | 0.8 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||||
City of Stockholm |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 9.4 | 7.0 | 1.3 | -0.2 | 100.7 | 104.3 | 82.4 | 85.6 | 2.4 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||
City of Vasteras |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 10.2 | 9.3 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 96.1 | 103.1 | 64.0 | 68.6 | 2.5 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Lund |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 5.4 | 6.0 | 5.4 | -0.8 | 77.3 | 79.0 | 72.9 | 75.4 | 2.2 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Nacka |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 7.1 | 6.5 | -4.1 | -2.6 | 26.9 | 34.4 | 25.3 | 32.3 | 0.5 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Taby |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 13.1 | 10.4 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 22.6 | 27.2 | 22.9 | 27.3 | 0.4 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||
Region of Skane |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 3.1 | 5.4 | -3.7 | -1.3 | 16.7 | 17.1 | 18.4 | 18.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||
Region of Vastra Gotaland |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 7.3 | 8.7 | 7.4 | 8.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||
Switzerland | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canton of Aargau |
74,661.4 | 98,747.9 | 7.6 | 6.6 | -0.2 | 1.9 | 12.4 | 11.4 | 18.7 | 22.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||
Canton of Basel-City |
236,785.3 | 98,747.9 | 14.0 | 10.8 | 5.6 | -0.8 | 53.3 | 58.3 | 56.3 | 62.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||
Canton of Basel-Country |
87,417.3 | 98,747.9 | 4.1 | 7.3 | -2.4 | 0.9 | 80.6 | 76.9 | 82.0 | 78.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
Canton of Solothurn |
80,730.4 | 98,747.9 | 3.2 | 5.9 | -0.6 | 1.9 | 73.9 | 67.7 | 74.3 | 68.2 | 0.9 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
Canton of St. Gallen |
95,108.2 | 98,747.9 | 1.1 | 4.5 | -3.3 | 1.2 | 12.8 | 12.3 | 21.7 | 19.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||
Canton of Vaud |
84,674.2 | 98,747.9 | 1.4 | 4.2 | -4.0 | -0.1 | 6.8 | 5.3 | 6.8 | 5.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||
Canton of Zurich |
113,532.4 | 98,747.9 | 3.2 | 4.3 | -2.2 | -1.4 | 28.9 | 31.8 | 28.9 | 31.8 | 0.3 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||
City of Zurich |
217,730.6 | 98,747.9 | 11.5 | 10.6 | -5.1 | -4.8 | 62.8 | 64.3 | 62.8 | 64.3 | 0.8 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||
Five-year averages cover 2022-2026. Data in 2023 refers to actuals whenever available, then estimates or base cases whenever available. The data and ratios above result in part from S&P Global Ratings' own calculations, drawing on national as well as international sources, reflecting S&P Global Ratings' independent view on the timeliness, coverage, accuracy, credibility, and usability of available information. The main sources are the financial statements and budgets, as provided by the issuer. N.A.--Not available. |
'AA'
The largest number of rated LRGs in EMEA are in the 'AA' category, with 44 entities in nine European countries: Austria, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the U.K. Most 'AA' rated LRGs operate within institutional frameworks that are very predictable and well-balanced, with the exceptions of the City of Brno in the Czech Republic, Spanish special status entities, and the French departments, which operate within evolving institutional frameworks.
Financial management practices promote detailed long-term planning and good internal and external risk management. In general, LRGs in this rating category have weaker credit profiles than their 'AAA' rated peers because of weaker institutional frameworks and higher debt burdens.
Since our previous publication, we have added three newly rated LRGs to the 'AA' category: Collectivité européenne d'Alsace, Région Provences-Alpes-Côté d'Azur, and Lancashire County Council.
Key economic and financial risk indicators for 'AA' rated LRGs comprise:
- Very strong economic base. Median national GDP per capita was about $55,592 in 2023, the same as in the 'AAA' category. Some 'AA' rated entities--such as Swiss cantons and cities, as well as Swedish municipalities and regions--benefit from very high local GDP per capita.
- Strong budgetary performance. 'AA' rated LRGs have sound operating surpluses and slightly higher deficits after capital accounts than 'AAA' rated entities.
- Moderate debt burden. We project median tax-supported debt will be at 88.3% of consolidated operating revenues over 2022-2026, which is more than double the level of 'AAA' rated LRGs. Median interest payments are low but will likely increase to an average of about 2.2% of operating revenues over 2022-2026. This is the highest level among investment-grade LRGs and a consequence of 'AA' rated LRGs' higher debt burden and their debt structure.
Table 3
Assessments for European local and regional government risk indicators ('AA' rated) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating factor assessments | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency ratings§ | Institutional framework | Economy | Financial management | Budgetary performance | Liquidity | Debt burden | ||||||||||
Austria* |
AA+/Positive/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
State of Burgenland |
AA/Stable/A-1+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
State of Lower Austria |
AA/Stable/A-1+ | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
State of Styria |
AA/Stable/A-1+ | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
State of Tyrol |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
State of Upper Austria |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
State of Vorarlberg |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Czech Republic* |
AA-/Stable/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
City of Brno |
AA-/Stable/A-1+ | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
France* |
AA-/Stable/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
Region of Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes |
AA-/Stable/A-1+ | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
City of Paris |
AA-/Stable/A-1+ | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||
Collectivite Europeenne d'Alsace |
AA-/Stable/A-1+ | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Communaute D'Agglomeration De Cergy Pontoise |
AA-/Stable | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
Department of Gironde |
AA-/Negative/A-1+ | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
Department of Hauts-de-Seine |
AA-/Stable/A-1+ | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
Hauts-de-France |
AA-/Stable/A-1+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
Intercity of Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines |
AA-/Stable/A-1+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||
Region of Pays de la Loire |
AA-/Stable/A-1+ | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||
Region of Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur |
AA-/Stable/A-1+ | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
Germany* |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
State of Baden-Wuerttemberg |
AA+/Positive/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
State of Hesse |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||
State of North Rhine-Westphalia |
AA/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||
Norway* |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
Municipality of Stavanger |
AA+/Positive/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Spain* |
A/Stable/A-1 | |||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of Navarre |
AA-/Stable | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Autonomous Community of the Basque Country |
AA-/Stable | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Historical Territory of Bizkaia |
AA-/Stable/A-1+ | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Sweden* |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
City of Boras |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
City of Goteborg |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
City of Uppsala |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Municipality of Huddinge |
AA+/Positive/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
Municipality of Jonkoping |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
Municipality of Linkoping |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Municipality of Norrkoping |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Municipality of Orebro |
AA+/Positive/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Municipality of Ostersund |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
Municipality of Sodertalje |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Municipality of Sundsvall |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Municipality of Vellinge |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Municipality of Norrtalje |
AA+/Positive/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Region of Stockholm |
AA+/Positive/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Municipality of Trelleborg |
AA+/Stable/A-1+ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||
Switzerland* |
AAA/Stable/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
City of Geneva |
AA-/Positive | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||
City of Lausanne |
AA-/Stable | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||
Republic and Canton of Geneva |
AA/Positive | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
U.K.* |
AA/Stable/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
Greater London Authority |
AA/Stable/A-1+ | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
Lancashire County Council |
AA-/Stable | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Institutional framework assessement is based on a six-point scale, where 1 is the strongest and 6 the weakest, while the other factors are based on a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being the strongest score and 5 the weakest. *Unsolicited ratings. §Issuer credit rating as of Sept. 13, 2024. |
Table 4
European local and regional government financial and economic statistics ('AA' rated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | National GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | Operating balance (% of operating revenues) | Balance after capital accounts (% of total revenues) | Direct debt (% of operating revenues) | Tax-supported debt (% of consolidated operating revenues) | Interest (% of operating revenues) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2023a | 2023a | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | |||||||||||||||
Global median | 39,246.4 | 53,431.2 | 10.2 | 9.7 | -3.7 | -3.4 | 103.6 | 106.2 | 98.0 | 99.0 | 2.9 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||||
EMEA median | 48,901.1 | 55,592.0 | 8.4 | 8.0 | -1.3 | -1.5 | 90.7 | 96.6 | 83.9 | 88.3 | 2.1 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||||
Austria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State of Burgenland |
39,858.2 | 56,790.8 | 7.4 | 4.8 | -4.2 | -2.3 | 30.3 | 27.7 | 46.6 | 43.7 | 1.8 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||||
State of Lower Austria |
47,852.7 | 56,790.8 | 8.9 | 7.4 | 0.5 | -0.1 | 110.8 | 111.0 | 98.3 | 98.5 | 2.0 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||
State of Styria |
50,936.3 | 56,790.8 | 6.3 | 5.7 | -11.1 | -4.5 | 81.4 | 76.2 | 83.6 | 78.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||||
State of Tyrol |
58,473.9 | 56,790.8 | 5.4 | 7.7 | -3.7 | -1.1 | 20.2 | 18.6 | 21.9 | 21.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||
State of Upper Austria |
57,902.9 | 56,790.8 | 9.8 | 9.0 | 1.0 | -0.5 | 15.6 | 17.5 | 21.5 | 24.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||
State of Vorarlberg |
66,582.6 | 56,790.8 | 7.9 | 8.3 | -2.0 | -0.5 | 21.0 | 19.9 | 22.9 | 21.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||
Czech Republic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City of Brno |
29,540.8 | 30,557.1 | 31.5 | 27.8 | 5.6 | 5.1 | 10.8 | 13.2 | 10.8 | 15.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||
France | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Region of Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes |
39,246.4 | 44,826.4 | 25.1 | 25.8 | 1.3 | -1.5 | 83.9 | 88.3 | 83.9 | 91.8 | 2.4 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||||
City of Paris |
N.A. | 44,826.4 | 8.8 | 6.3 | -4.2 | -4.9 | 96.5 | 103.0 | 97.8 | 104.0 | 2.0 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||
Collectivite Europeenne d'Alsace |
40,145.2 | 44,826.4 | 12.1 | 11.2 | -0.8 | -1.4 | 27.6 | 33.6 | 116.7 | 51.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||
Communaute d'Agglomeration de Cergy-Pontoise |
N.A. | 44,826.4 | 25.5 | 24.4 | 8.8 | -0.5 | 146.0 | 156.1 | 146.0 | 156.1 | 2.9 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||
Department of Gironde |
N.A. | 44,826.4 | -0.4 | 2.3 | -8.7 | (6) | 53.5 | 58.8 | 54.5 | 59.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||
Department of Hauts-de-Seine |
N.A. | 44,826.4 | 8.5 | 8.5 | -12.8 | -9.8 | 9.3 | 29.4 | 13.4 | 33.2 | 0.4 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||
Hauts-de-France |
32,642.0 | 44,826.4 | 8.4 | 11.6 | -3.3 | -2.5 | 118.9 | 122.9 | 121.6 | 143.6 | 3.7 | 3.6 | ||||||||||||||
Intercity of Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines |
N.A. | 44,826.4 | 25.4 | 24.3 | -1.0 | 3.2 | 126.1 | 129.4 | 131.9 | 134.9 | 3.7 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||||
Region of Pays de la Loire |
39,270.1 | 44,826.4 | 19.1 | 19.4 | -3.8 | -3.8 | 146.6 | 148.5 | 146.6 | 148.5 | 2.6 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||||
Region of Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur |
41,504.6 | 44,826.4 | 17.7 | 18.7 | -4.6 | -5.6 | 129.3 | 133.2 | 129.3 | 133.2 | 3.0 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||||
Germany | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State of Baden-Wuerttemberg |
57,839.1 | 52,837.9 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 55.9 | 56.9 | 67.4 | 68.1 | 1.8 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||||
State of Hesse |
57,577.0 | 52,837.9 | 3.1 | 5.2 | -1.7 | 0.8 | 147.5 | 142.3 | 147.5 | 142.3 | 2.3 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||||
State of North Rhine-Westphalia |
49,949.6 | 52,837.9 | 5.4 | 5.6 | -3.6 | -3.0 | 178.8 | 174.0 | 185.8 | 180.7 | 3.2 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||||
Norway | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Municipality of Stavanger |
N.A. | 88,415.4 | 5.6 | 6.6 | -6.1 | -2.9 | 78.4 | 80.5 | 84.0 | 86.8 | 2.8 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||||
Spain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of Navarre |
35,589.3 | 32,873.6 | 11.3 | 9.6 | 5.3 | 3.4 | 47.1 | 44.2 | 54.4 | 51.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of the Basque Country |
37,731.1 | 32,873.6 | 8.2 | 7.5 | -2.6 | -1.5 | 78.9 | 75.8 | 81.2 | 78.2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||
Historical Territory of Bizkaia |
41,159.7 | 32,873.6 | 27.7 | 27.4 | 0.5 | 4.8 | 80.6 | 74.6 | 115.7 | 110.5 | 2.3 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||||
Sweden | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City of Boras |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 6.4 | 5.5 | -3.5 | -2.2 | 99.8 | 107.2 | 83.0 | 89.1 | 1.8 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||||
City of Goteborg |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 7.1 | 5.6 | -2.5 | -2.5 | 109.3 | 116.4 | 85.1 | 90.6 | 2.6 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||||
City of Uppsala |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 6.7 | 5.7 | -1.0 | -3.4 | 90.7 | 98.7 | 82.3 | 87.6 | 1.5 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Huddinge |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 10.1 | 8.0 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 65.9 | 68.6 | 59.1 | 61.1 | 1.7 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Jonkoping |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 8.5 | 8.9 | -4.4 | -3.3 | 54.9 | 60.0 | 78.1 | 80.7 | 2.1 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Linkoping |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 2.2 | 2.4 | -3.5 | -2.9 | 9.5 | 78.5 | 69.2 | 77.6 | 2.2 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Norrkoping |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 6.1 | 6.4 | -0.8 | -1.9 | 123.1 | 133.4 | 104.0 | 115.9 | 5.8 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Orebro |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 131.8 | 131.4 | 111.1 | 114.8 | 3.1 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Ostersund |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 14.1 | 7.9 | 1.8 | -4.7 | 116.9 | 135.2 | 51.6 | 56.8 | 4.1 | 3.9 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Sodertalje |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 90.8 | 95.7 | 67.0 | 71.1 | 3.7 | 3.9 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Sundsvall |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 6.6 | 7.2 | -1.0 | -0.6 | 129.2 | 128.9 | 104.0 | 104.0 | 2.3 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Vellinge |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 9.0 | 9.3 | -7.3 | -6.1 | 90.7 | 97.4 | 89.8 | 96.3 | 1.5 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Norrtalje |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 12.8 | 9.3 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 69.0 | 74.3 | 68.2 | 72.0 | 2.1 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||
Region of Stockholm |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 9.2 | 9.1 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 41.1 | 38.8 | 42.8 | 40.5 | 1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||
Municipality of Trelleborg |
N.A. | 55,592.0 | 6.3 | 6.9 | -7.1 | -5.9 | 104.3 | 117.0 | 88.9 | 99.5 | 2.9 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||||
Switzerland | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City of Geneva |
130,560.6 | 98,747.9 | 11.0 | 10.1 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 124.5 | 120.2 | 124.5 | 120.2 | 2.1 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||||
City of Lausanne |
80,655.0 | 98,747.9 | 8.0 | 8.5 | -3.4 | -2.9 | 147.4 | 144.7 | 147.4 | 144.7 | 2.3 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||||
Republic and Canton of Geneva |
128,920.7 | 98,747.9 | 16.5 | 11.9 | 12.1 | 6.3 | 122.3 | 126.0 | 119.0 | 122.0 | 1.6 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||||
U.K. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greater London Authority |
71,372.6 | 49,165.6 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 0.3 | -2.2 | 102.8 | 102.0 | 160.5 | 159.7 | 2.9 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||||
Lancashire County Council |
N.A. | 49,165.6 | -9.9 | -0.2 | -7.1 | -0.9 | 48.9 | 46.3 | 48.9 | 46.3 | 2.7 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||
Five-year averages cover 2022-2026. Data in 2023 refers to actuals whenever available, then estimates or base cases whenever available. The data and ratios above result in part from S&P Global Ratings' own calculations, drawing on national as well as international sources, reflecting S&P Global Ratings' independent view on the timeliness, coverage, accuracy, credibility, and usability of available information. The main sources are the financial statements and budgets, as provided by the issuer. N.A.--Not available. |
'A'
LRGs in the 'A' category are located in Belgium, France, Latvia, Poland, and Spain. LRGs in this category typically operate within evolving institutional frameworks, and their financial management practices are usually strong. In general, institutional frameworks are less predictable and supportive than of those entities in the 'AA' category, and individual credit profiles are weaker due to less robust economies and higher debt burdens. Since our previous publication, we have added the newly rated Overseas Country of French Polynesia to the 'A' category.
'A' rated LRGs exhibit the following common characteristics:
- Sound economic base. Median national GDP per capita was about $32,874 in 2023.
- Solid budgetary performance, which is generally similar to that of 'AAA' and 'AA' rated peers. We expect the median operating balance will be about 6.2% of operating revenues, with moderate deficits after capital accounts of 0.9% over 2022-2026.
- Moderate indebtedness, which is higher than that of higher-rated peers. We expect median tax-supported debt will be 105.2% of consolidated operating revenues over 2022-2026, with median interest payments of about 2.0% of operating revenues over the same period.
Table 5
Assessments for European local and regional government risk indicators ('A' rated) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating factor assessments | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency ratings§ | Institutional framework | Economy | Financial management | Budgetary performance | Liquidity | Debt burden | ||||||||||
Belgium* |
AA/Stable/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
Region of Brussels-Capital |
A+/Stable/A-1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
France* |
AA-/Stable/A-1+ | |||||||||||||||
City of Marseille |
A+/Stable/A-1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||
Overseas Country of French Polynesia |
A/Stable/A-1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
Latvia |
A/Stable/A-1 | |||||||||||||||
City of Riga |
A/Stable/A-1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Poland* |
A-/Stable/A-2 | |||||||||||||||
City of Krakow |
A-/Stable | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||
Spain* |
A/Stable/A-1 | |||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of Andalusia |
A-/Stable | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Autonomous Community of Canary Islands |
A/Stable | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Autonomous Community of Galicia |
A/Stable/A-1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||
Autonomous Community of Madrid |
A/Stable/A-1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||
Autonomous Community of the Balearic Islands |
A-/Stable | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||
City of Barcelona |
A/Stable | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Institutional framework assessement is based on a six-point scale, where 1 is the strongest and 6 the weakest, while the other factors are based on a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being the strongest score and 5 the weakest. *Unsolicited ratings. §Issuer credit rating as of Sept. 13, 2024. |
Table 6
European local and regional government financial and economic statistics ('A' rated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | National GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | Operating balance (% of operating revenues) | Balance after capital accounts (% of total revenues) | Direct debt (% of operating revenues) | Tax-supported debt (% of consolidated operating revenues) | Interest (% of operating revenues) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2023a | 2023a | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | |||||||||||||||
Global median | 39,877.5 | 34,216.3 | 7.6 | 7.5 | -2.7 | -1.2 | 146.1 | 137.2 | 156.1 | 151.0 | 4.0 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||||
EMEA median | 34,892.2 | 32,873.6 | 7.9 | 6.2 | -2.4 | -0.9 | 100.6 | 100.2 | 100.6 | 105.2 | 1.7 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||
Belgium | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Region of Brussels-Capital |
88,588.3 | 53,744.8 | -5.0 | -2.9 | -20.5 | -16.8 | 204.6 | 214.7 | 204.6 | 214.7 | 4.9 | 5.2 | ||||||||||||||
France | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City of Marseille |
38,970.4 | 44,826.4 | 16.0 | 14.7 | 4.8 | 0.1 | 100.6 | 105.3 | 100.6 | 105.3 | 2.5 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||||
Overseas Country of French Polynesia |
21,943.0 | 44,826.4 | 19.6 | 13.1 | 4.5 | -1.4 | 75.1 | 75.6 | 74.7 | 74.3 | 1.7 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||
Latvia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City of Riga |
39,877.5 | 23,123.3 | 3.1 | 6.2 | -2.4 | -0.9 | 45.6 | 44.3 | 70.1 | 69.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||||
Poland | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City of Krakow |
36,269.7 | 22,072.0 | -10.9 | -1.6 | -22.5 | -9.9 | 87.4 | 78.8 | 88.3 | 82.9 | 4.8 | 4.4 | ||||||||||||||
Spain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of Andalusia |
22,208.8 | 32,873.6 | -2.9 | -0.5 | -6.2 | -2.5 | 124.4 | 120.8 | 126.6 | 122.8 | 1.5 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of Canary Islands |
23,485.1 | 32,873.6 | 7.9 | 6.1 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 62.9 | 61.6 | 63.5 | 62.1 | 0.7 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of Galicia |
27,279.0 | 32,873.6 | 9.6 | 9.5 | -3.0 | -0.3 | 104.0 | 100.2 | 109.2 | 105.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of Madrid |
40,472.1 | 32,873.6 | -3.3 | -0.8 | -7.7 | -5.0 | 143.3 | 139.8 | 148.7 | 145.1 | 3.2 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of the Balearic Islands |
31,172.0 | 32,873.6 | 8.4 | 6.8 | 0.8 | -0.1 | 159.6 | 153.4 | 163.3 | 156.9 | 1.3 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||||
City of Barcelona |
34,892.2 | 32,873.6 | 14.2 | 15.6 | -0.6 | 0.1 | 29.1 | 27.2 | 38.4 | 36.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||
Five-year averages cover 2022-2026. Data in 2023 refers to actuals whenever available, then estimates or base cases whenever available. The data and ratios above result in part from S&P Global Ratings' own calculations, drawing on national as well as international sources, reflecting S&P Global Ratings' independent view on the timeliness, coverage, accuracy, credibility, and usability of available information. The main sources are the financial statements and budgets, as provided by the issuer. |
'BBB'
LRGs in the 'BBB' category--the lowest category within the investment-grade segment--are in Italy, Spain, Bulgaria, Croatia, and Poland. They operate within an institutional framework that, although providing generally sufficient resources to meet their responsibilities, remains subject to potential changes. Exceptions include entities in Bulgaria and the City of Zagreb in Croatia, which operate within an unbalanced institutional framework.
Italian and Spanish LRGs in the 'BBB' category benefit from a relatively sound economic base and EU grants to sustain ambitious investment programs, which will not increase deficits after capital accounts over the medium term. Spanish regions' debt burden remains relatively high, but manageable, as they benefit from access to central government-funded liquidity facilities, which cover their entire funding needs. LRGs in Eastern Europe operate in wealthy economies and have generally modest debt burdens.
'BBB' rated LRGs share the following characteristics:
- Sound economic base. Median national GDP per capita is similar to that of 'A' rated LRGs and was about $35,547 in 2023. Nevertheless, some entities' local GDP per capita ranges between 50% and 70% of the median. Examples include the City of Stara Zagora in Bulgaria, the Campania and Sicily regions in Italy, and the Autonomous Community of Extremadura in Spain.
- Modest budgetary performance. We expect median operating balances will account for an average of 3.5% of operating revenues over 2022-2026. This is half the level of 'A' rated LRGs. Conversely, median budgetary balances after capital accounts are positive, suggesting lower investments.
- Average to high debt burden below that of 'A' rated LRGs. We project median tax-supported debt will be about 54.9% of consolidated operating revenues over 2024-2026, which somewhat balances significant differences among 'BBB' rated LRGs. We note that some LRGs have significantly higher tax-supported debt burdens. This is especially the case for rated Spanish LRGs, whose debt burdens resulted from large deficits before 2014 and a gradual budgetary consolidation since. We estimate that the median interest burden will remain stable at 0.9% of operating revenues over 2022-2026.
Table 7
Assessments for European local and regional government risk indicators ('BBB' rated) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating factor assessments | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency ratings§ | Institutional framework | Economy | Financial management | Budgetary performance | Liquidity | Debt burden | ||||||||||
Bulgaria* |
BBB/Positive/A-2 | |||||||||||||||
City of Sofia |
BBB/Positive | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
City of Stara Zagora |
BBB-/Stable | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||
Croatia* |
BBB+/Positive/A-2 | |||||||||||||||
City of Zagreb |
BBB-/Positive | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
Italy* |
BBB/Stable/A-2 | |||||||||||||||
City of Rome |
BBB/Stable | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Metropolitan City of Rome |
BBB/Stable | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
Region of Campania |
BBB/Stable | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
Region of Liguria |
BBB/Stable | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Region of Sicily |
BBB/Stable | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
Region of Umbria |
BBB/Stable | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Poland* |
A-/Stable/A-2 | |||||||||||||||
City of Lodz |
BBB+/Stable | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||
Spain* |
A/Stable/A-1 | |||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of Aragon |
BBB+/Positive | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||
Autonomous Community of Extremadura |
BBB/Stable/A-2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | |||||||||
Institutional framework assessement is based on a six-point scale, where 1 is the strongest and 6 the weakest, while the other factors are based on a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being the strongest score and 5 the weakest. *Unsolicited ratings. §Issuer credit rating as of Sept. 13, 2024. |
Table 8
European local and regional government financial and economic statistics ('BBB' rated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | National GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | Operating balance (% of operating revenues) | Balance after capital accounts (% of total revenues) | Direct debt (% of operating revenues) | Tax-supported debt (% of consolidated operating revenues) | Interest (% of operating revenues) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2023a | 2023a | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | |||||||||||||||
Global median | 25,129.3 | 27,472.8 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 24.0 | 28.2 | 31.7 | 32.4 | 0.8 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
EMEA median | 30,833.8 | 35,547.2 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 31.8 | 32.3 | 57.5 | 54.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
Bulgaria* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City of Sofia |
34,624.2 | 15,753.5 | 8.2 | 9.0 | -0.7 | -0.4 | 30.3 | 31.6 | 32.1 | 33.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||
City of Stara Zagora |
15,884.2 | 15,753.5 | 3.9 | 4.2 | -0.3 | -1.0 | 13.7 | 12.5 | 13.7 | 12.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||
Croatia* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City of Zagreb |
30,569.4 | 21,459.8 | 16.9 | 14.3 | 14.2 | 1.5 | 17.7 | 25.2 | 76.0 | 81.8 | 0.4 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||
Italy* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City of Rome |
35,710.1 | 38,220.7 | 6.0 | 2.4 | 5.2 | -0.1 | 32.8 | 33.0 | 85.6 | 81.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
Metropolitan City of Rome |
39,170.6 | 38,220.7 | 15.7 | 11.9 | 17.7 | 8.2 | 63.9 | 61.9 | 63.9 | 61.9 | 3.0 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||||
Region of Campania |
20,769.4 | 38,220.7 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 39.9 | 38.0 | 51.0 | 48.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||
Region of Liguria |
37,640.5 | 38,220.7 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 11.2 | 10.9 | 15.6 | 15.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||
Region of Sicily |
21,152.7 | 38,220.7 | 15.4 | 8.2 | 12.4 | 5.5 | 30.8 | 31.2 | 31.4 | 31.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
Region of Umbria |
31,098.3 | 38,220.7 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 15.1 | 14.5 | 15.9 | 15.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||
Poland* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City of Lodz |
27,784.5 | 22,072.0 | -1.5 | 2.1 | -19.5 | -5.8 | 92.3 | 85.0 | 99.0 | 90.1 | 5.3 | 5.1 | ||||||||||||||
Spain* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of Aragon |
32,696.7 | 32,873.6 | 2.1 | 1.3 | -3.2 | -3.1 | 165.9 | 158.2 | 168.7 | 159.4 | 2.1 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of Extremadura |
22,474.2 | 32,873.6 | -2.7 | -2.1 | -5.1 | -4.9 | 110.8 | 110.8 | 110.8 | 110.7 | 1.4 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||
Five-year averages cover 2022-2026. Data in 2023 refers to actuals whenever available, then estimates or base cases whenever available. The data and ratios above result in part from S&P Global Ratings' own calculations, drawing on national as well as international sources, reflecting S&P Global Ratings' independent view on the timeliness, coverage, accuracy, credibility, and usability of available information. The main sources are the financial statements and budgets, as provided by the issuer. |
'BB'
We rate only two LRGs in the 'BB' category. Our rating on the Municipality of Skopje (North Macedonia) is constrained by its relatively weak institutional framework, coupled with weak financial management systems and practices, but counterbalanced by sound budgetary performance and relatively low to moderate indebtedness.
The 'BB' rated Autonomous Community of Valencia differs from other rated Spanish LRGs. Although it operates within a stronger institutional framework, we view the region's financial management as weak. Additionally, it has demonstrated weak budgetary performance and suffers from a very high debt burden, which significantly exceeds those of Spanish peers. This is partly due to below-average funding from the Spanish regional financing system for normal status regions.
Table 9
Assessments for European local and regional government risk indicators ('BB' rated) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating factor assessments | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency ratings§ | Institutional framework | Economy | Financial management | Budgetary performance | Liquidity | Debt burden | ||||||||||
North Macedonia* |
BB-/Stable/B | |||||||||||||||
Municipality of Skopje |
BB-/Negative | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||
Spain* |
A/Stable/A-1 | |||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of Valencia |
BB/Positive/B | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | |||||||||
Institutional framework assessement is based on a six-point scale, where 1 is the strongest and 6 the weakest, while the other factors are based on a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being the strongest score and 5 the weakest. *Unsolicited ratings. §Issuer credit rating as of Sept. 13, 2024. |
Table 10
European local and regional government financial and economic statistics ('BB' rated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | National GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | Operating balance (% of operating revenues) | Balance after capital accounts (% of total revenues) | Direct debt (% of operating revenues) | Tax-supported debt (% of consolidated operating revenues) | Interest (% of operating revenues) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2023a | 2023a | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | |||||||||||||||
North Macedonia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Municipality of Skopje |
11,530.6 | 8,066.5 | 17.9 | 15.9 | 1.8 | -1.5 | 12.7 | 12.6 | 21.5 | 21.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||
Spain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autonomous Community of Valencia |
25,770.1 | 32,873.6 | -10.0 | -9.9 | -13.9 | -14.4 | 315.8 | 312.1 | 306.1 | 302.5 | 2.5 | 4.0 | ||||||||||||||
Five-year averages cover 2022-2026. Data in 2023 refers to actuals whenever available, then estimates or base cases whenever available. The data and ratios above result in part from S&P Global Ratings' own calculations, drawing on national as well as international sources, reflecting S&P Global Ratings' independent view on the timeliness, coverage, accuracy, credibility, and usability of available information. The main sources are the financial statements and budgets, as provided by the issuer. |
'B'
We rate the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republika Srpska in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the Region of Fergana in Uzbekistan in the 'B' category.
Our ratings on the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska are constrained by a volatile and unbalanced institutional framework that is characterized by frequent political tensions. The economy in this region is relatively poor, compared with Eastern European peers, with a median GDP per capita of $7,930 in 2023. The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina exhibits a stronger budgetary performance and lower debt burden than Republika Srpska.
The Region of Fergana operates within a weaker institutional framework than the entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina and is very volatile and centralized. The region's wealth remains low, with local GDP per capita of about $1,300 in 2023. While it maintains a minimal debt burden and stronger budgetary performance than Republika Srpska, Fergana's ability to influence its budgetary performance is limited due to central government control.
Table 11
Assessments for European local and regional government risk indicators ('B' rated) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating factor assessments | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency ratings § | Institutional framework | Economy | Financial management | Budgetary performance | Liquidity | Debt burden | ||||||||||
Bosnia and Herzegovina* |
B+/Stable/B | |||||||||||||||
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina |
B+/Stable/B | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 | |||||||||
Republika Srpska |
B/Stable | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | |||||||||
Uzbekistan* |
BB-/Stable/B | |||||||||||||||
Fergana Region |
B+/Stable | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||
Institutional framework assessement is based on a six-point scale, where 1 is the strongest and 6 the weakest, while the other factors are based on a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being the strongest score and 5 the weakest. *Unsolicited ratings. §Issuer credit rating as of Sept. 13, 2024. |
Table 12
European local and regional government financial and economic statistics ('B' rated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | National GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | Operating balance (% of operating revenues) | Balance after capital accounts (% of total revenues) | Direct debt (% of operating revenues) | Tax-supported debt (% of consolidated operating revenues) | Interest (% of operating revenues) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2023a | 2023a | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | |||||||||||||||
Bosnia and Herzegovina | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina |
8,073.2 | 8,380.3 | 7.3 | 7.9 | 4.8 | 6.7 | 111.9 | 111.3 | 97.9 | 99.4 | 3.1 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||
Republika Srpska |
7,795.7 | 8,380.3 | -0.8 | 0.0 | -6.1 | -4.1 | 109.2 | 104.9 | 112.5 | 108.2 | 3.7 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||
Uzbekistan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fergana Region |
1,380.2 | 2,469.8 | -0.4 | 0.0 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||
Five-year averages cover 2022-2026. Data in 2023 refers to actuals whenever available, then estimates or base cases whenever available. The data and ratios above result in part from S&P Global Ratings' own calculations, drawing on national as well as international sources, reflecting S&P Global Ratings' independent view on the timeliness, coverage, accuracy, credibility, and usability of available information. The main sources are the financial statements and budgets, as provided by the issuer. |
'CCC'
We only rate the City of Kyiv (Ukraine) in this category. The rating is primarily based on the effects of the Russia-Ukraine war on the sovereign and the city.
Table 13
Assessments for European local and regional government risk indicators ('CCC' rated) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating factor assessments | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency ratings§ | Institutional framework | Economy | Financial management | Budgetary performance | Liquidity | Debt burden | ||||||||||
Ukraine* |
--/--/SD | |||||||||||||||
City of Kyiv |
CCC+/Stable | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||
Institutional framework assessement is based on a six-point scale, where 1 is the strongest and 6 the weakest, while the other factors are based on a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being the strongest score and 5 the weakest. *Unsolicited ratings. §Issuer credit rating as of Sept. 13, 2024. |
Table 14
European local and regional government financial and economic statistics ('CCC' rated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | National GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | Operating balance (% of operating revenues) | Balance after capital accounts (% of total revenues) | Direct debt (% of operating revenues) | Tax-supported debt (% of consolidated operating revenues) | Interest (% of operating revenues) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2023a | 2023a | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | |||||||||||||||
Ukraine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City of Kyiv |
15,265.6 | 4,901.9 | 5.8 | 6.1 | -3.5 | -3.2 | 2.7 | 10.6 | 15.6 | 27.3 | 0.7 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||
Five-year averages cover 2022-2026. Data in 2023 refers to actuals whenever available, then estimates or base cases whenever available. The data and ratios above result in part from S&P Global Ratings' own calculations, drawing on national as well as international sources, reflecting S&P Global Ratings' independent view on the timeliness, coverage, accuracy, credibility, and usability of available information. The main sources are the financial statements and budgets, as provided by the issuer. |
National scale ratings
Of all LRGs we rate in EMEA, we only use a national scale for LRGs in Israel. Almost all Israeli LRGs operate within evolving institutional frameworks, and their financial management practices are usually average. Israeli entities benefit from solid economic growth, with manageable liquidity levels, and share the following characteristics:
- Solid economic base, with a high national GDP per capita of about $52,341 in 2023.
- Moderate to weak budgetary performance. We expect operating margins will average 2.6% over 202-2026, with a moderate deficit after capital accounts of 2.2%.
- Low debt burden. median tax-supported debt will be about 23.9% of consolidated operating revenues over 2022-2026. Median interest payments will also be very low over the same period, at 0.8% of operating revenues. This is one of the lowest ratios among rated LRGs in EMEA.
Table 15
Assessments for European local and regional government risk indicators, only rated at a national scale | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating factor assessments | ||||||||||||||||
National scale ratings§ | Institutional framework | Economy | Financial management | Budgetary performance | Liquidity | Debt burden | ||||||||||
Israel* |
A+/Negative/A-1 | |||||||||||||||
Be'er Sheva |
ilAAA/Stable/-- | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Municipality of Bnei Brak |
ilAAA/Stable/-- | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Municipality of Herzliya |
ilAAA/Stable/-- | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Municipal Association of Igudan |
ilAA+/Stable/-- | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 | |||||||||
Municipality of Raanana |
ilAAA/Stable/-- | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
Municipality of Tel Aviv |
ilAAA/Stable/-- | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
Institutional framework assessement is based on a six-point scale, where 1 is the strongest and 6 the weakest, while the other factors are based on a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being the strongest score and 5 the weakest. |
Table 16
European local and regional government financial and economic statistics, only rated at a national scale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local GDP (nominal) per capita ($) | National GDP (nominal) per capita (US$) (single units) | Operating balance (% of operating revenues) | Balance after capital accounts (% of total revenues) | Direct debt (% of operating revenues) | Tax-supported debt (% of consolidated operating revenues) | Interest (% of operating revenues) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2023a | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | 2023 | Five-year average | ||||||||||||||||||
Israel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Municipality of Be'er Sheva |
N.A. | 52,341 | 1.6 | 2.2 | -5.5 | -1.5 | 21.7 | 22.1 | 21.7 | 22.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||
Municipality of Bnei Brak |
N.A. | 52,341 | 1.2 | 1.4 | -2.7 | -2 | 18.7 | 18.4 | 18.9 | 18.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||
Municipality of Herzliya |
N.A. | 52,341 | 4.7 | 5.5 | -5 | -4.6 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Municipality of Igudan |
N.A. | 52,341 | 53.7 | 53.6 | -18.5 | -26.2 | 302.8 | 322.2 | 302.8 | 322.2 | 7.7 | 8.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Municipality of Raanana |
N.A. | 52,341 | 1.5 | 2.3 | -1.1 | 0.1 | 25.6 | 25.7 | 25.6 | 25.7 | 1 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Municipality of Tel Aviv |
N.A. | 52,341 | 2.5 | 3 | -8.4 | -2.3 | 31.3 | 31.8 | 32.1 | 32.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||
Five-year averages cover 2022-2026. Data in 2023 refers to actuals whenever available, then estimates or base cases whenever available. The data and ratios above result in part from S&P Global Ratings' own calculations, drawing on national as well as international sources, reflecting S&P Global Ratings' independent view on the timeliness, coverage, accuracy, credibility, and usability of available information. The main sources are the financial statements and budgets, as provided by the issuer. a--Actual. N.A.--Not available. |
Related Criteria And Research
- Institutional Framework Assessments For Local And Regional Governments Outside Of The U.S., July 31, 2024
- Global LRGs Rating History List, June 17, 2024
- China Local Governments: The Slow Road To Stabilization, June 13, 2024
- U.K. Local Authorities Are Bending, But Adapting, June 06, 2024
- Mexico's New Administration Faces Old Challenges, June 3, 2024
- Your Three Minutes In Argentine Provinces: Debt Restructurings Will Likely Be Case By Case, April 30, 2024
- Your Three Minutes In Spanish Regional Finance: Higher Expenditure May Limit Deleveraging, April 24, 2024
- China LRGs: Recouping Revenue Is Key To Fiscal Sustainability, March 27, 2024
- Brazil's Fiscal Recovery Programs Support Local And Regional Governments' Finances Amid Budget Rigidities, March 14, 2024
- Paris' Lean Olympics Are Unlikely To Blow Any Budgets, March 11, 2024
- Subnational Debt 2024: Fiscal Policy Differences Influence Borrowing In Developed Markets, March 4, 2024
- Subnational Debt 2024: Focus on debt sustainability, Feb. 29, 2024
- Subnational Debt 2024: Canadian Local And Regional Governments Are Running Fast To Stay In Place , Feb. 29, 2024
- Subnational Debt 2024: Chinese Governments Reach Their Limits; Other Emerging Markets Taper Borrowing, Feb. 29, 2024
- Subnational Debt 2024: Infrastructure Spending Succumbs To Economic Slowdown, Feb. 29, 2024
- Global Ratings List: International Public Finance Entities January 2024, Jan. 18, 2024
- Methodology For Rating Local And Regional Governments Outside Of The U.S., July 15, 2019
Primary Credit Analysts: | Felix Ejgel, London + 44 20 7176 6780; felix.ejgel@spglobal.com |
Didre Schneider, Frankfurt +49 69 33 999 244; didre.schneider@spglobal.com | |
Secondary Contacts: | Alejandro Rodriguez Anglada, Madrid + 34 91 788 7233; alejandro.rodriguez.anglada@spglobal.com |
Carl Nyrerod, Stockholm + 46 84 40 5919; carl.nyrerod@spglobal.com | |
Noa Fux, London + 44 20 7176 0730; noa.fux@spglobal.com | |
Stephanie Mery, Paris + 0033144207344; stephanie.mery@spglobal.com | |
Michael Stroschein, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9251; michael.stroschein@spglobal.com | |
Maxim Rybnikov, London + 44 7824 478 225; maxim.rybnikov@spglobal.com | |
Karen Vartapetov, PhD, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9225; karen.vartapetov@spglobal.com | |
Louise Morteveille, Paris; louise.morteveille@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.