articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240909-highlights-from-s-p-global-ratings-european-structured-finance-conference-2024-13241462 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Highlights From S&P Global Ratings' European Structured Finance Conference 2024

COMMENTS

Non-QM Spotlight On Short-Term Rentals

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Credit Rating Models

FULL

Servicer Evaluation: Newrez LLC

COMMENTS

ABS Frontiers: Digging Our Way To Fiber Securitizations


Highlights From S&P Global Ratings' European Structured Finance Conference 2024

S&P Global Ratings' European Structured Finance Conference in London on Sept. 5, 2024, attracted a record number of more than 420 attendees, a 40% increase compared with 2023. The prevailing sentiment at the event was one of optimism, fueled by solid issuance growth and resilience in the face of performance pressures.

Structured Finance Is In A Sweet Spot

Interest rates have peaked, inflation has normalized, and yields are returning to historical levels. If it wasn't for geopolitical uncertainties and trade tensions, European structured finance would be seeing virtually ideal conditions--a view that was reflected by both panelists and the audience at the conference's opening panel.

CLOs and RMBS have been the main beneficiaries of improving conditions, with both asset classes recording significant issuance growth, compared with 2023. That said, volumes have risen across the board, including the asset-backed securities (ABS) sector.

In terms of credit performance, the CMBS sector continues to experience the most significant stress. The recent value declines in the European retail real estate sector materially exceeded the peak-to-trough drop seen during the global financial crisis, while the slow wind-down of working-from-home arrangements only provided cold comfort to the office sector.

Chart 1

image

ABS Sector Soldiers On

Most panel and audience members expect that ABS issuance volumes, which are already booming, will extend their streak. Panelists agreed that the slight deterioration in ABS credit performance over the past 18 months constitutes a normalization, after a period of exceedingly benign conditions. Affirmations and upgrades accounted for most rating actions year to date.

ABS benefits from low unemployment rates in Europe and supportive structural features, including tight triggers and the relatively short average life of transactions. Additionally, most consumers continue to prioritize paying off debt--a trend that started during the COVID-19 pandemic and hasn't reversed since.

Risk exposure in auto ABS transactions will remain lopsided, with battery electric vehicles most exposed to residual value risk. That said, a potential decline in demand for internal combustion engine vehicles could eventually constitute an inflection point that would see residual value risk shift away from electric vehicles. Government subsidies could play a key role in this transition.

Non-traditional collateral--including data centers, solar, salary sacrifice auto schemes, and "buy now, pay later" financing--could become more prominent in the ABS market over the long term. For now, however, scarcity and regulatory restrictions prevent a more significant pick-up.

Chart 2

image

All The Stars Are Currently Aligned For CLOs

At our CLO session, panelists agreed that falling liability spreads, active third-party equity investors, and a workable supply of underlying assets have supported this year's boom in new issuance volumes. Interest across the capital structure appears to be robust, and the recent launch of the first euro CLO ETF is another positive demand-side development. Refinancing and reset activity has also picked up in the second half of this year, as spreads have returned to historical averages, giving managers more comfort to lock in new funding terms.

So what could derail the CLO train? Asset supply is likely the biggest risk. Recent reliance on amortization and the secondary loan market cannot continue forever, suggesting that, without a more substantial recovery in M&A activity, CLO managers could start to struggle constructing portfolios with functioning economics.

S&P Global Ratings expects the default rate in the wider universe of European speculative-grade corporates will peak at about 4.25% by mid-2025, which would be lower than during the COVID-19 pandemic. One panelist suggested that corporate defaults could be decorrelating, with different sectors going through widely divergent levels of stress. This could shift the focus toward credit selection and away from broader considerations of where we are in the cycle.

Light At The End Of The Tunnel For CMBS

According to panelists, there are signs that value declines are moderating across all commercial real estate (CRE) sectors. More forward-looking surveys of investor sentiment also herald improvement, and recently subdued activity means there are close to record levels of "dry powder" in CRE globally.

The U.K. market could recover faster than the rest of Europe. This is partly because value corrections materialized more quickly but also due to the better political stability from having recently installed a new government. By comparison, France and Germany, for example, are in political limbo, according to one panelist.

Logistics remains the most favored CRE sector. Data centers also attract high capital inflows. Investor interest in the office sector is polarized and strongly dependent on the nature of the tenants and the quality of the building.

One panelist was wary of investments whose future value recovery would mainly result from yield contraction, which could easily be derailed by wider macro and geopolitical risks. He argued that sectors such as last-mile logistics could be more resilient in such a scenario.

Although loan refinancing prospects have suffered from rising rates, lower valuations, and tighter lending standards, cash rental income has stabilized. In general, there have been few loan enforcements and only one of the loans backing CMBS that we rate is in special servicing.

Boring Isn't Bad In U.K. RMBS

Or as one panelist put it: "If nothing's changed in U.K. RMBS, I'm happy." Despite some headlines to the contrary, the asset class held up well over the past nine months and steered clear of major turbulence.

This has mainly been due to low unemployment rates, tight affordability regulations, consumers' considerable--albeit hard to quantify--savings buffers, wage growth, and forbearance measures, with lenders engaging early if borrower stress arises. U.K. RMBS has also benefited from consumers' prudence and prioritization of mortgage payments. Most borrowers fixed their mortgages for three years or longer when a rise in interest rates became increasingly likely.

Given the recent path of borrowing costs, long-term fixed-rate mortgages could come to the fore, enabling borrowers to lock in rates for longer than the current typical limit of five years. Panelists are also keeping an eye on the emergence of hybrid products, such as combinations of repayment and interest-only mortgages or interest-only mortgages with an equity release plan. Even though these products aren't particularly popular yet, partly because advice is thin on the ground, they are garnering increasing attention.

Chart 3

image

Editor: Kathrin Schindler.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Andrew H South, London + 44 20 7176 3712;
andrew.south@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in