articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240819-peer-comparison-top-european-food-retailers-business-strength-benefits-from-operating-resilience-13204951.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Peer Comparison: Top European Food Retailers' Business Strength Benefits From Operating Resilience

COMMENTS

Slowdown In Leisure Travel Drags Down U.S. RevPAR Growth In 2024

COMMENTS

More Cautious Than Optimistic: Lower-Rated U.S. Tech Issuers Continue To Face Ratings Pressure

COMMENTS

Medicare Advantage Can Harm Health Care Services Credit Quality

COMMENTS

BDCs Extend Private Credit Maturities As Financing Eases


Peer Comparison: Top European Food Retailers' Business Strength Benefits From Operating Resilience

S&P Global Ratings views the European food retail industry as highly competitive. In several countries, discounters have gained ground on the incumbents over the past decade, although these incumbents' market shares have started to stabilize recently. In this article, we analyze and compare four leading food retailers in Europe with strong business risk profiles and sound cash generation: Ahold Delhaize N.V., Carrefour S.A., Rewe Group, and Tesco PLC.

These key players have successfully managed to offset very high inflation through strong price increases over the past two years and are now turning their attention to volume growth. We expect volumes across the food retail industry to slowly start to pick up, as recent operational challenges due to high inflation, supply chain disruptions, and the rising cost of living have started to ease. This easing allows consumer spending to increase and retail prices to broadly stabilize.

The still tight labor markets across Europe are a mixed blessing for food retailers. On the one hand, wage increases inflate retailers' cost base, especially in the U.K., where the minimum living wage has increased for several years in a row and may continue to do so. On the other hand, higher wages mean more money in consumers' pockets, which, in turn, translates into higher spending.

Ahold Delhaize, Carrefour, Rewe, and Tesco continue to have strong credit metrics that support the current ratings (see table 1). This headroom should allow them to comfortably navigate any further potential macroeconomic pressure and changes in consumer behavior.

Table 1

Rating score snapshot

Carrefour S.A.

Ahold Delhaize N.V.

REWE Group

Tesco PLC

Rating BBB/Stable/A-2 BBB+/Stable/A-2 BBB/Stable/A-2 BBB-/Positive/A-3
Business risk profile Strong Strong Strong Strong
Corporate industry and country risk assessment Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate
Country risk Intermediate Very low Low Low
Industry risk Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate Intermediate
Competitive position Strong Strong Strong Strong
Financial risk profile Intermediate Intermediate Significant Significant
Diversification Neutral (0) Neutral (0) Neutral (0) Neutral (0)
Capital structure Neutral (0) Neutral (0) Neutral (0) Neutral (0)
Financial policy Negative (-1) Negative (-1) Neutral (0) Negative (-1)
Liquidity Strong (0) Strong (0) Adequate (0) Strong (0)
Management and governance Neutral (0) Neutral (0) Neutral (0) Neutral (0)
Comparable ratings analysis Neutral (0) Neutral (0) Neutral (0) Neutral (0)

The Four Peers Hold Significant Market Shares In Their Countries Of Operation

Ahold Delhaize, Carrefour, Rewe, and Tesco are household names in their home markets, where they hold No. 1 or No. 2 positions. Ahold Delhaize has a share of about one-third of the Dutch market; a share of slightly less than one-quarter of the Belgium market; and meaningful regional market shares in the U.S. Tesco is the clear leader in the U.K., with a market share of 27%, according to market research company Kantar Group. Carrefour and Rewe are the second-largest players in France and Germany, with 20.0% and 19.5% market shares, respectively, behind Leclerc S.A. and Edeka Zentrale AG & Co. KG.

In all these countries, discounters, such as Lidl and Aldi, play an important role and have gained substantial market shares over the past decade. However, as discounters' market share matures and weaker players scale down or exit the market, Ahold Delhaize, Carrefour, Rewe, and Tesco have successfully navigated the competitive landscape and have stabilized their market shares in recent years. In Germany, discounters have maintained strong market shares for a long time, but supermarkets have gained more market share, despite persistent price competition.

Different Geographical Footprints Create Different Macroeconomic Challenges

Following its exit from various international markets over the past decade, Tesco now has the highest geographical concentration, generating more than 90% of its revenues in the U.K. and Ireland (see chart 1). It still has a presence in Central Europe, but this remains small. Over the past year, Tesco's strong operating performance in the U.K. has offset the macroeconomic pressures on its activities in Central European countries such as Hungary.

Carrefour generates around one-half of its revenues in France, about 13% of revenues in Spain, where it is the second-largest player after Mercadona, and close to one-quarter of revenues in Brazil following the acquisition of Grupo Big (see chart 2). Carrefour's presence in Latin America provides diversification and growth opportunities but adds volatility to the group's trading performance. This is evident from the currency volatility in Argentina and macroeconomic pressures in Brazil in 2023.

Rewe has some concentration on its home market of Germany, where it generates two-thirds of its revenues (see chart 3). Internationally, Rewe is mainly present in smaller markets in Europe.

Ahold Delhaize has the largest presence outside Europe. The U.S. is its key market, representing 62% of sales in 2023 (see chart 4). Ahold Delhaize's U.S. subsidiaries are well entrenched in most of their regional markets. They also hold up well against much larger competitors, notably Walmart and Kroger. While this transatlantic position adds some currency risk, in our view, Ahold Delhaize's geographical diversification and competitive standing in the U.S. reduce its earnings dependency on Europe.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

Profitability Depends On Business Models And Competitive Pressures

Ahold Delhaize has the highest profitability of the four peers, with S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margins of around 8.0%-8.5% (see chart 5). In our view, this reflects Ahold Delhaize's dominance in affluent markets and means it has to compete less fiercely on prices. It also reflects the optimal size of Ahold Delhaize's store format (supermarkets), scale benefits, and the company's product mix, with a higher share of private-label products. Ahold Delhaize also has high exposure to the U.S. market, which accounts for around 60% of its revenues. Historically, the U.S. has delivered higher margins than the price-competitive European grocery sector.

Rewe has an adjusted EBITDA margin of about 6.5%-7.5%. We think that this is the result of tough price competition due to the high share of discounters and some margin dilution from its operations in the convenience and travel segments. Rewe has increased its offering of fresh, regional, and organic produce, which we consider could help counter the competition from discounters. Rewe has also maintained the selling prices of its own-brand products in line with those of the discounters.

Tesco's EBITDA margin is roughly similar to Rewe's, at about 6.5%-7.5%, and reached a low point of 6.3% in the fiscal year ended February 2023, before improving moderately to 6.6% in 2024. This is a result of discounters' strong growth and increasing market share in the U.K., as well as price match schemes that balance out Tesco's scale advantage and format diversity. Carrefour has the lowest EBITDA margin of all, at around 5.5%, due to fierce competition in the French market, but also to because of a high proportion of hypermarkets in its store estate, which continue to face structural challenges.

Chart 5

image

Food Retailers Favor An Omnichannel Strategy

All four players have established a clear omnichannel strategy and have identified e-commerce as one of their key growth drivers. That said, e-commerce contribution to overall sales is subject to specific local market dynamics and generally reflects lower e-commerce penetration. This is particularly the case in grocery retail in Germany and France, compared with the U.K. and the U.S.

For example, Rewe generates less than 1% of its sales online, even though it is a clear leader in online food retail in its core markets Germany and Austria. Carrefour also has a low proportion of online sales--only 5% of total revenues in 2023. This compares to shares of online sales to total revenues of close to 10% for Ahold Delhaize and 13% for Tesco, which is the market leader in the U.K. when it comes to online supermarkets sales.

However, while e-commerce is a key driver of growth and market share expansion, it puts pressure on retailers' cost bases and operational efficiency, increasing logistics and fulfillment spending. The economics of online operations and efficient capacity utilization in stores and warehouses across their sales channel mix could increasingly weigh on the companies' overall EBITDA margins.

All Four Peers Have Contained Their Leverage Metrics Despite Their Large Lease Portfolios

The companies' adjusted leverage remains comfortable at the current ratings. Rewe has the highest leverage ratio, at close to 3.0x. We expect it to remain at that level for the next two years due to Rewe's continued investments in its German real estate portfolio, which is smaller than the portfolios of many of its peers.

Tesco has historically had leverage of close to 3.0x, but fell to 2.6x in 2024 and we expect it to remain around that level over the next year, in line with the company's public financial policy. Ahold Delhaize and Carrefour have kept leverage at around 2.5x, underpinning our assessment of their financial risk profiles as intermediate.

Leases greatly affect the retail sector, but there are some differences in lease structures and their impact on leverage (see chart 6). Carrefour has the lowest proportion of leases on its balance sheet, representing close to 50% of its adjusted debt, Tesco's has close to 60%, while Rewe and Ahold Delhaize have close to 70%-80%.

Chart 6

image

Rewe's Cash Flow Generation Lags That Of Its Peers Due To High Capex

Rewe has historically reported negative free operating cash flow (FOCF) after leases, including negative €248 million in 2023. We expect this to remain negative at about €100 million-€400 million over the next two years. We estimate that more than €1 billion of the planned investments will focus on real estate and acquisitions, are therefore more opportunistic, and could be pulled back if macroeconomic conditions deteriorate.

Rewe's capital expenditure (capex) as a percentage of revenues is around 3.5%, significantly above 2.0% at Tesco and Carrefour (see chart 7). Ahold Delhaize falls in the middle, with close to 2.9%. Ahold Delhaize has the strongest FOCF after leases, at around €2 billion per year, similar to Tesco with £1.6 billion-£1.7 billion despite its higher capex.

We understand that Tesco has increased its capex guidance for the current fiscal year to around £1.4 billion from £1.3 billion previously as it increases investments in store refurbishment, automatization, and logistics. However, this is still lower than the capex of Tesco's European peers. Historically, Tesco has made some expansionary investments via store acquisitions rather than capex.

Chart 7

image

High Shareholder Returns Constrain The Four Peers' Discretionary Cash Flow

All four players' discretionary cash flow to debt remains below 10%, mainly as a result of high returns to shareholders in the form of dividends and share buybacks, even during the COVID-19 pandemic (see charts 8-11). We expect shareholder returns to remain significant, in line with the companies' generous financial policies. Total returns are close to €2 billion per year for Ahold Delhaize, £2 billion for Tesco (excluding extra returns from Tesco Bank), and about €1 billion for Carrefour.

Rewe is organized as a cooperative, and in 2023, only paid minor dividends of €31 million to the five cooperatives acting on behalf of its ultimate shareholders. That said, since we adjust the earnings of the independent retailers, the residual €376 million in dividend payments in 2023 are, in effect, payouts from the independent retailers to themselves. We expect that overall adjusted dividends will remain at a similar level over the next two years.

Leverage at Tesco remains at the lower end of its publicly stated target range of 2.3x-2.8x, which corresponds to close to 2.8x-3.3x on our adjusted basis. Ahold Delhaize and Carrefour do not have a stated leverage target, giving them flexibility in their capital-allocation policies.

Generous shareholder returns at Ahold Delhaize, Carrefour, and Tesco create uncertainty around their future leverage. This underpins our negative assessment of the financial policies of all three companies. Rewe's shareholder returns are lower than those of the others, while its leverage is already approaching its publicly stated target of close to 3.3x. We therefore see less risk of Rewe's leverage increasing beyond its current level, given its commitment to maintain the ratings.

Chart 8

image

Chart 9

image

Chart 10

image

Chart 11

image

The Four Peers Remain In A Good Position

Strong competitive pressures and a weak macroeconomic environment have tested the four food retailers over the past few years on numerous fronts. However, their leadership positions in their countries of operation--as well as their ability to withstand competition and support their profitability by implementing cost-saving initiatives, adjusting product mix and pricing strategy, and making operational improvements--have allowed them to maintain their strong market positions along with accumulating headroom under the credit metrics that support the ratings.

Financial policy and capital allocation remain key factors in our rating analysis, and we acknowledge each company's commitment to keep credit metrics steady while accommodating investment plans and shareholder distributions.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Raquel Delgado Galicia, London +44 (0) 7773131214;
raquel.delgadogalicia@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Felix Scheuenstuhl, Paris +33 (0)6 11 54 22 67;
felix.scheuenstuhl@spglobal.com
Raam Ratnam, CFA, CPA, London + 44 20 7176 7462;
raam.ratnam@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in