Key Takeaways
- Significant upward momentum in per capita spending following COVID-19 pandemic closures at U.S. regional theme parks, which have largely offset lagging attendance growth, is unlikely to persist.
- We expect still-recovering attendance and low-single-digit percent per capita spending growth in 2024 and 2025 will accelerate modest deleveraging across theme park issuers that we rate.
- Further upgrades will likely be limited by moderate scale; operational diversity compared to other rated, globally diversified leisure companies; and financial policy decision-making.
Significant Run-Up In Per Capita Spending Expected To Slow
Attendance at rated U.S. regional theme parks continues to lag 2019 levels. The highly seasonal industry is exposed to weather-related event risk during the highly important summer, which occurred with higher frequency during peak periods in 2023. The industry is also exposed to winter storms as operators attempt to diversify their calendars, although cash flow during the offseason remains comparably modest.
The recent attendance trend is also due in part to strategic changes for some operators. For example, Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (before merging with Cedar Fair L.P.) reported 2023 attendance that was about 32% below 2019. Cedar Fair's and United Parks & Resorts Inc.'s (which includes SeaWorld branded parks) attendance was about 5% lower for the same period. Six Flags' attendance recovery has lagged peers as it focused on a "premiumization strategy" by attempting to significantly increase per capita spending through increased admission prices and premium food and beverages at the expense of attendance. As a result, 2023 revenue and EBITDA still remained below those of 2019.
In addition, attendance across regional theme parks remains lower in part due to significantly decreased group and international ticket purchases compared to 2019. In its fourth-quarter earnings call, United reported that this segment was down 30%, or 1.3 million attendees, in 2023 compared to 2019.
S&P Global Ratings believes group attendance will increase across the industry in 2024. Some operators have reported solid early-season group ticket sales, though international visitation may take longer to recover. We expect regional theme park attendance growth in the 1%-2% range in 2024 and 2025 (even though overall attendance is likely to remain below pre-pandemic levels), driven by increased group visitation, higher season pass sales, and the opening of new park attractions.
Despite lagging attendance, rated regional theme parks have reported strong growth in per capita spending as parks reopened, behind pent-up demand and stimulus spending padding the wallets of consumers. As a result, significantly increased prices contributed to reported 2023 growth in per capita spending for Cedar Fair (26%), Six Flags (34%), and United Parks & Resorts (29%) versus 2019.
At the same time, operators made significant strides with cost controls, focusing on menu optimization, mobile ordering at concessions, and labor force optimization to offset the impact of seasonal labor wage increases. Accordingly, rated theme park operators enjoyed significant EBITDA growth and deleveraging on lower attendance.
Chart 1
Chart 2
We believe per capita spending will increase more in line with consumer spending through 2025. Income growth has significantly lagged spending growth since the middle of 2023, with American consumers increasingly relying on credit and savings. Excess savings are likely depleted for all but the highest income households, and delinquency rates on credit cards and auto loans now exceed pre-pandemic rates. Higher interest rates have led to soaring interest payments as a share of personal income.
We think consumers will likely rein in spending, including on leisure activity. We expect per capita spending to increase by 1%-2%, in line with our expectations for consumer spending. As attendance recovers and per capita spending at theme parks remains elevated versus 2019, we expect U.S. regional operators will continue to generate moderate EBITDA and free cash flow growth, which should support modest deleveraging.
Ratings Recover On Modest Expected Revenue Growth Through 2025
Rating actions have been positive across rated regional theme parks since closures due to the pandemic and our two-notch downgrades for Six Flags, Cedar Fair, and SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment Inc. in March 2020. We upgraded all three multiple times the past two years, as well as Herschend Entertainment Co. LLC. Overall credit metrics have recovered following park reopenings despite lower attendance levels as companies have focused on higher guest per capita spending and operating efficiencies to drive EBITDA growth and leverage reduction.
Our recent upgrade of United Parks & Resorts (formerly SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment) reflects our expectation that the company will sustain leverage below 3.75x, including potential leveraging acquisitions, development spending, or shareholder returns. We also raised our rating on Six Flags following its merger with Cedar Fair, largely due to the significant increase in scale and potential synergies.
Chart 3
Operators Face A Steeper Climb Toward Additional Upgrades
Further upgrades are unlikely in the near term. We believe rated theme park operators have limited scale and diversity of operations, which makes them more susceptible to macroeconomic headwinds than larger and geographically diversified peers.
Limited geographical diversity makes U.S. regional theme park companies operationally less flexible because they rely on a handful of parks for cash flow generation and debt service, exposing them to event risks. Weather-related disruptions across various regions of the U.S. in 2023 broadly reduced attendance year over year.
Additionally, financial policy decisions, including development spending, potential leveraging acquisitions, and shareholder returns, probably limit further ratings upside, at least over the next few years. The sector benefits from high barriers to entry due to significant capital requirements and limited land available to build new parks. Demand for regional theme parks competes with other forms of entertainment for consumer wallet share, including live events and leisure travel.
Therefore, operators must continuously reinvest in their parks to improve the guest experience and increase visitation. We expect significant growth capital expenditure to add new rides, attractions, lodging, and other amenities. To the extent that they fund new growth initiatives with debt financing, we expect leverage will likely remain above our upgrade thresholds through the development period.
While sizable acquisition opportunities are limited in the sector, we believe international expansion presents a long-term greenfield opportunity to add scale and enter new markets. Most recently, United Parks & Resorts opened its first SeaWorld branded park outside the U.S.: SeaWorld Abu Dhabi on Yas Island in the United Arab Emirates in May 2023 through international licensing agreements.
To the extent theme park operators commit to publicly articulated leverage targets, we believe they would increase leverage toward the higher end of the policy range given suitable greenfield expansions, acquisition opportunities, or shareholder returns, which would be above leverage tolerances at a higher rating.
Table 1
U.S. theme park ratings | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer | Rating/outlook | Upside trigger | Downside trigger | Base-case leverage forecast | ||||||
United Parks & Resorts Inc. |
BB/Stable | Leverage remains below 2.75x; broader scale of operations. | Leverage sustained above 3.75x. | 2.5x-3x in 2024 and 2025. | ||||||
Six Flags Entertainment Corp. |
BB/Stable | Leverage sustained below 3.5x; broader scale of operations. | Leverage remains above 4.5x. | High-4x in 2024; high-3x in 2025. | ||||||
Herschend Entertainment Co. LLC |
BB-/Stable | Sustained leverage below 3x; FFO/debt sustained over 30%. | Sustained leverage above 4x; FFO/debt sustained below 20%. | 2x-2.5x in 2024 and 2025. | ||||||
FFO--Funds from operations. |
Related Criteria
- Criteria | Corporates | General: Corporate Methodology, Jan. 7, 2024
- Criteria | Corporates | General: Methodology: Management And Governance Credit Factors For Corporate Entities, Jan. 7, 2024
- General Criteria: Environmental, Social, And Governance Principles In Credit Ratings, Oct. 10, 2021
- General Criteria: Group Rating Methodology, July 1, 2019
- Criteria | Corporates | General: Corporate Methodology: Ratios And Adjustments, April 1, 2019
- Criteria | Corporates | General: Recovery Rating Criteria For Speculative-Grade Corporate Issuers, Dec. 7, 2016
- Criteria | Corporates | General: Methodology And Assumptions: Liquidity Descriptors For Global Corporate Issuers, Dec. 16, 2014
- Criteria | Corporates | Industrials: Key Credit Factors For The Leisure And Sports Industry, March 5, 2014
- General Criteria: Country Risk Assessment Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Methodology: Industry Risk, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Principles Of Credit Ratings, Feb. 16, 2011
Related Research
- Industry Credit Outlook 2024: Key Themes, Jan. 31, 2024
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Dan Daley, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 0020; dan.daley@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | Samantha S Stone, New York + 1 (212) 438 2205; samantha.stone@spglobal.com |
Research Assistant: | Brian Conneely, Boston |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.