articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240729-2024-biannual-rating-actions-for-u-s-municipal-retail-electric-gas-and-wholesale-electric-utilities-13195769 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

2024 Biannual Rating Actions For U.S. Municipal Retail Electric, Gas, And Wholesale Electric Utilities

COMMENTS

U.S. Not-For-Profit Transportation Infrastructure 2023 Medians: Demand And Revenue Growth Improved Financial Medians To Post-Pandemic Highs

COMMENTS

The New "New Normal": Trends In U.S. Higher Education Post-Pandemic Versus Post-Recession

COMMENTS

U.S. Mortgage Revenue Bond Program Medians: Solid Foundations Underpin Strong Credit Quality

COMMENTS

Comparative Statistics: Local And Regional Government Risk Indicators: Asia-Pacific Spending Appetite Erodes Creditworthiness


2024 Biannual Rating Actions For U.S. Municipal Retail Electric, Gas, And Wholesale Electric Utilities

S&P Global Ratings maintains public ratings on 211 U.S. public power (retail electric and gas) and distribution electric cooperative utilities and 55 wholesale utility projects (across 39 wholesale electric utilities). In early 2024, we revised the U.S. public power 2024 sector outlook to negative, reflecting our opinion that financial performance of, and ratings on, U.S. public power utilities could weaken in 2024, due to a confluence of inflation, reduced consumer wherewithal to pay utility bills, the sensitivity of rate-setting bodies to economic conditions, and a developing trend of weakening financial margins. (For more information, see "U.S. Public Power And Electric Cooperative Utilities 2024 Outlook: Mandates, Rising Costs, And Diminishing Affordability," published Jan. 23, 2024, on RatingsDirect.) These credit challenges have led to rating downgrades exceeding upgrades by seven to four in the first half of the year, outpacing 2023. Putting the numbers into perspective, the downgrades represent just 3% of the rated universe, but the negative sector outlook reflects our view that these issuers are more susceptible to the above mentioned financial pressures. Apart from rating changes, we revised more outlooks to negative than to stable or positive. During the first half of 2024, 57 ratings were unchanged after review (21% of the total combined sectors).

The number of ratings on new issuances increased more than 40% the first half of 2024 compared with 2023 for U.S. public power retail, gas, and wholesale electric utilities.

Chart 1

image

image

New Issuer Credit Ratings

There were two new issuer credit ratings and two new issue-level ratings during the first six months of 2024. We assigned issuer credit ratings to Pioneer Community Energy and San Jose Clean Energy (SJCE), both community choice aggregators (CCAs) in California, and issue-level ratings to debt for Delano Municipal Utilities, Minn., and Southern Utah Valley Power System (SUVPS).

Pioneer Community Energy is a joint powers agency formed in 2017 to procure retail electric commodity on behalf of about 158,000 electric customers across 10 members in El Dorado, Placer, and Nevada counties. SJCE is an enterprise of the city of San Jose and a CCA that began operations in 2019. SJCE provides electric service to about 350,000 customers in the city of San Jose, the heart of California's Silicon Valley. With the addition of Pioneer and SJCE, S&P Global Ratings now publicly rates eight CCAs, all in California. For more information on our view of CCAs, see "California Community Choice Aggregators Provide Consumer Choice, But Not Without Risk," published Nov. 2, 2022.

Delano Municipal Utilities, located in Wright County, Minn., serves a small customer base of about 3,100 accounts and has a diverse power supply. The utility is a member of the Central Municipal Power Agency/Services. SUVPS is a wholesale utility that issued debt to acquire and construct electric transmission facilities. SUVPS' organization agreements with its five members--Spanish Fork, Springville, Payson, South Utah Valley Electric Service District, and Salem--extend through at least 2074.

Table 1

Semiannual 2024--new issuer credit ratings--U.S. municipal retail electric, gas, and wholesale electric
Utilities State To Outlook
Pioneer Community Energy CA A- Stable
Delano (electric) MN A- Stable
Southern Utah Valley Power System UT A- Stable
San Jose Clean Energy CA A Stable

Negative Rating Actions And Outlook Revisions

The seven downgrades, five negative outlooks, and one negative CreditWatch placement reflect the effects of some of the aforementioned risks. In addition, so far in 2024, total speculative-grade ratings increased to seven from only one in 2023, further emphasizing the effects. Although they make up only 3% of the rated universe, the number of speculative-grade ratings across our municipal retail electric, gas, and combined utilities is growing.

The common themes throughout the negative rating actions and outlooks include a weakened competitive and affordability position and financial performance due to elevated capital and power costs and/or large transfers out to the general fund, and insufficient or delayed cost recovery. These factors resulted in a decline in fixed-charge coverage (55% of our financial risk profile score), liquidity (25% weighting of our financial risk profile score), and/or market position (20% of our enterprise risk profile score). We believe that delayed and insufficient cost recovery reflects ratemakers' sensitivity to the economic pressures consumers face.

Five of the downgrades and one outlook revision to negative stemmed from risk management, culture, and oversight weaknesses: Alexandria, La., had insufficient cost recovery to offset elevated cost pressures, large transfers to the general fund, and remedial actions that we considered lagging. Bessemer, Ala., violated a rate covenant due to lack of effective risk management and oversight and persistently high delinquencies that were pressuring already marginal liquidity. Kennebunk Light & Power District, Maine, had delayed cost recovery resulting in weakened financial performance. Banning, Calif.'s unrestricted cash fell to a negative balance due to management's cash-spending on capital projects that depleted available liquidity, combined with a lack of rate increases and, in our view, poor internal controls. Lastly, customer dislocations in the Southwest Public Power Agency, Ariz., had eroded the revenue stream's credit quality, in our view.

We revised the New Hampshire Electric Cooperative Inc. debt rating outlook to negative because of the cooperative's ongoing use of electric system margins and debt to subsidize broadband operating losses, which highlight the risks of operating startup broadband systems. For more information on key broadband operating risks, see "Not-For-Profit Utilities' Broadband Investments Require Enhanced Risk Management" (published April 17, 2023).

Table 2

Semiannual 2024-- negative rating actions and CreditWatch placements--U.S. municipal retail electric, gas, and wholesale electric
Utilities State To From To outlook From outlook To CreditWatch From CreditWatch Reasoning
Banning (electric) CA BBB A- N.M. Stable Negative N/A In March 2024, we lowered the rating two notches due to the material deterioration in unrestricted cash due to poor financial controls, as demonstrated by its negative $8.6 million cash balance at fiscal year-end 2023. The rating was placed on CreditWatch negative related to uncertainty around the electric system's capacity to restore liquidity.
Banning (electric) CA BB BBB Negative N.M. Negative N/A In May 2024, the rating was further lowered three notches due to our view of the utility's lack of effective risk management and oversight as well as failure to implement proper financial controls. The negative outlook reflects our view that rates are not anticipated to be raised before fiscal year-end 2025.
Alexandria (electric, gas, water, and sewer) LA BBB+ A Negative Stable N/A N/A The rating action reflects that FCC was below 1.0x for fiscal years 2022 and 2022 due to insufficient cost recovery to offset elevated cost pressures, large transfers out of the utility fund, and remedial actions that we believe lagged relative to revenue shortfalls caused by multiyear collection problems. The rating could be lowered further if the remedial actions (ongoing rate studies, enforced disconnection policies, and additional meter readers) do not result in improved metrics.
Russellville (electric) AL BBB+ A- Stable Negative N/A N/A The rating action reflects that FCC was thin during the past four fiscal years, and management's projections show this trend will continue due to high transfers to the general fund, a rise in operating expenses, and weakened electric rate competitiveness.
Bessemer (electric) AL BB+ BBB N.M. Stable Negative N/A The rating action reflects a rate covenant violation was triggered in response to 0.1x debt service coverage in 2023 due to a lack of effective risk management and oversight and persistently high delinquencies that are pressuring already marginal liquidity. The CreditWatch placement reflects our view that there could be an additional rate covenant violation in 2024 due to belated adoption of a 7.25% rate increase. Bessemer has not received notification of an event of default from the paying agent.
Stillwater Utilities Authority (electric, water, sewer, and sales tax) OK A+ AA- Negative Negative N/A N/A The rating action reflects the projected decline in FCC, despite approved rate increases, due to its relatively large capital plan, which is expected to be over 70% debt funded. It also reflects the weakening of affordability given below-average incomes and pre-approved double-digit water rate increases through 2028.
Southwest Public Power Agency Inc. (SPPA) AZ BB BBB- Negative Stable N/A N/A The rating action reflects the worsening credit quality and increasing operational and financial challenges of SPPA's smaller, irrigation-concentrated members, who must pass increasing energy costs on to an extremely price-sensitive customer base. 
FCC-Fixed-charge coverage. N/A--Not available.

Table 3

Semiannual 2024--negative outlook and CreditWatch revisions--U.S. municipal retail electric, gas, and wholesale electric
Utilities State To From To outlook From outlook To CreditWatch From CreditWatch Reasoning
New Hampshire Electric Cooperative Inc. NH A A Negative Stable N/A N/A The outlook revision reflects the cooperative's ongoing need to subsidize broadband system operating losses with electric system margins and debt. It further reflects uncertainty as to whether the broadband system can realize within two years management's projected growth to break-even operations at the broadband system.
Merrimac Municipal Light Department MA A+ A+ N.M. Stable Negative N/A The outlook revision reflects the lack of timely information related to fiscal 2022 financial statements.
Kennebunk Light & Power District ME BBB+ BBB+ Negative Stable N/A N/A The outlook revision reflects financial performance that weakened as a result of its delayed implementation of rate adjustments as well as limited operational autonomy because of Maine Public Utility Commission oversight.
Burbank Water and Power CA AA- AA- Negative Stable N/A N/A The outlook revision reflects a trend of weakened FCC and liquidity, and anticipated rate increases to support its rising debt service requirements that we believe could challenge rate affordability. Additionally, environmental compliance and energy transition could result in potential cost pressures.
Southern California Public Power Authority (Magnolia Power Project A) CA AA- AA- Negative Stable N/A N/A The outlook revision follows an identical action on the City of Burbank's electric revenue bond ratings given the project rating is highly influenced by Burbank's electric system.
Southern California Public Power Authority (Tieton Project) CA AA- AA- Negative Stable N/A N/A The outlook revision follows an identical action on the City of Burbank's electric revenue bond ratings given the project rating is highly influenced by Burbank's electric system.
FCC-Fixed-charge coverage. N/A--Not applicable.

Positive Rating Actions And Outlook Revisions

There were four upgrades during the first six months of 2024. Two resulted from improved financial performance; one from improved risk management, culture, and oversight risks, including enhanced natural gas hedging; and one--Lubbock Power & Light, Texas--from the utility's shedding responsibility as a generator to provide transmission and distribution services, a lower-risk business.

Similar to the upgrades, the four outlook revisions to stable and the one revision to positive reflect improved financial performance, timely cost recovery mechanisms, and improved risk management related to generation additions and other steps to reduce exposure to market prices.

We removed one rating from CreditWatch with negative implications following receipt of sufficient information from the issuer.

Table 4

Semiannual 2024--positive rating actions--U.S. municipal retail electric, gas, and wholesale electric
Utilities State To From To outlook From outlook CreditWatch Reasoning
Dawson Public Power District NE A+ A Stable Positive N/A The upgrade reflects the robust FCC averaging 1.63x in fiscal 2020-2022, which is projected to continue, and sound liquidity at over 200 days of operating expenses that can provide a financial cushion against the district's volatile irrigation loads.
Vernon CA A- BBB+ Stable Stable N/A The upgrade reflects improved risk management practices, including natural gas hedging, which we believe will enhance future cash flow stability and predictability, especially important given the nontraditional, almost all-industrial customer base.
Central Florida Tourism Oversight District (CFTOD) FL A A- Stable Stable N/A The upgrade reflects healthy financial performance in fiscal 2023, which we believe is sustainable as the demand for CFTOD's utility services has returned to pre-pandemic levels.
Lubbock Power & Light TX A+ A Stable Developing N/A The upgrade reflects reduced operating risks as a result of its shedding its responsibility for procuring electricity in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas market on April 5, 2024, and now exclusive operations as the provider of distribution and transmission services, a lower-risk business.
FCC--Fixed-charge coverage. N/A--Not applicable.

Table 5

Semiannual 2024--positive outlook and CreditWatch revisions--U.S. municipal retail electric, gas, and wholesale electric
Utilities State To From To outlook From outlook To CreditWatch From CreditWatch Reasoning
Utah Associated Municipal Power System (Horse Butte Wind Project) UT A- A- Stable Negative N/A N/A The revised outlook to stable reflects the improved financial performance of Brigham City, Utah, which was one of the participants with the weakest credit quality within a subset of the 23 total participants.
Merrimac Municipal Light Department MA A+ A+ Stable N/A N/A Negative The CreditWatch removal reflects the receipt of Merrimac's 2022 financial audit, and with no material credit changes indicated.
Camden (electric, water, and wastewater) SC A- A- Stable Negative N/A N/A The revised outlook to stable reflects improved FCC due the utility's improved rate-setting practices and cost recovery represented by an electric rate increase and implementation of a fuel adjustment surcharge that passes through fluctuating natural gas prices to ratepayers.
Danvers Electric Division MA A+ A+ Positive Stable N/A N/A The revised outlook to positive is supported by robust coverage above 1.6x in the past two years, maintenance of ample liquidity reserves, and a minimal leverage position.
San Antonio (electric and gas) TX AA- AA- Stable Negative N/A N/A The revised outlook to stable reflects improved risk management given recent large generation additions to its portfolio, including 1,710 megawatts of baseload gas-fired generation, and other steps to reduce exposure to market prices. The outlook revision also reflects declining accounts receivable and doubtful account balances and an approved base rate increase for 2025.
Pinal County Electric District No. 2 CA A+ A+ Stable Negative N/A N/A The revised outlook to stable reflects improved financial metrics due to raised rates, which resulted in stronger FCC and cash.
FCC--Fixed-charge coverage. N/A--Not available.

Ratings Unchanged

Fifty-seven ratings were unchanged after review. Over 99% of these ratings had stable outlooks, with almost 1% on unchanged negative outlooks.

Table 6

Semiannual 2024--maintained ratings--U.S. municipal retail electric, gas, and wholesale electric
Utility State Rating Outlook
Bonneville Power Administration OR AA- Stable
Energy Northwest OR AA- Stable
Pasadena Electric CA AA Stable
Glendale CA A+ Stable
Kansas Municipal Energy Agengy KS BBB+ Stable
Franklin County Public Utility District No. 1 WA A+ Stable
Lower Colorado River Authority TX A Stable
Arkansas River Power Authority CO BBB Stable
Ellensburg WA A Stable
Lower Colorado River Authority Transmission Corp. TX A Stable
North Alabama Gas District AL AA- Stable
WPPI Energy WI A Stable
Kansas Municipal Energy Agency (Dogwood Project) KS BBB+ Stable
Kansas Municipal Energy Agency (Jameson Energy Center Project) KS BBB+ Stable
Eugene Water & Electric Board OR AA- Stable
Trinity Public Utilities District CA BB+ Stable
Bryan Rural TX A+ Stable
Bryan TX A+ Stable
Concord NC AA- Stable
Cornhusker Public Power District NE A+ Stable
Webster City IA A- Stable
Turlock Irrigation District CA AA- Stable
Turlock Irrigation District (second lien) CA AA- Stable
Fayette Gas Board AL BBB- Negative
Tacoma WA AA Stable
Floresville TX A+ Stable
Seattle WA AA Stable
Omaha Public Power District (second lien) NE AA- Stable
Omaha Public Power District (first lien) NE AA Stable
American Municipal Power Inc. OH A Stable
South Feather Water and Power Agency CA A Stable
Orlando Utlities Commission FL AA Stable
Jonesboro City Water & Light Plant AR AA- Stable
Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1 (generating system debt) WA AA Stable
Snohomish County Public Utility District No.1 (electric system) WA AA Stable
Pascoag Utility District RI A Stable
Indianapolis (thermal first lien) IN A+ Stable
Indianapolis (gas first lien) IN AA Stable
Indianapolis (gas second lien) IN AA Stable
Jonesboro City Water & Light Plant AR AA- Stable
Norway MI A Stable
Georgetown Municipal Light Department MA A+ Stable
Groveland Municipal Light Department MA A+ Stable
Southeast Alabama Gas District AL A+ Stable
Springfield (first lien) MO AA+ Stable
Springfield (second lien) MO AA Stable
Wellesley Municipal Light Plant MA AA Stable
Mason County Public Utility District No. 3 WA A+ Stable
Loveland CO A+ Stable
Templeton Municipal Light & Water Plant MA A Stable
Troy AL BBB Stable
South Hadley Electric Light Department MA AA Stable
Kittitas County Public Utility District No. 1 WA A Stable
Athens AL A+ Stable
Alameda Municipal Power CA AA- Stable
Transmission Agency of Northern California CA A+ Stable
Northern California Power Agency CA AA- Stable

The preceding tables summarize S&P Global Ratings' various biannual rating actions and outlook revisions based on "U.S. Municipal Retail Electric And Gas Utilities: Methodology And Assumptions," published Sept. 27, 2018, and "Wholesale Utilities," published May 24, 2005.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Alexandra Rozgonyi, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4824;
alexandra.rozgonyi@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Doug Snider, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4709;
doug.snider@spglobal.com
Tiffany Tribbitt, New York + 1 (212) 438 8218;
Tiffany.Tribbitt@spglobal.com
David N Bodek, New York + 1 (212) 438 7969;
david.bodek@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in