S&P Global Ratings maintains public ratings on 211 U.S. public power (retail electric and gas) and distribution electric cooperative utilities and 55 wholesale utility projects (across 39 wholesale electric utilities). In early 2024, we revised the U.S. public power 2024 sector outlook to negative, reflecting our opinion that financial performance of, and ratings on, U.S. public power utilities could weaken in 2024, due to a confluence of inflation, reduced consumer wherewithal to pay utility bills, the sensitivity of rate-setting bodies to economic conditions, and a developing trend of weakening financial margins. (For more information, see "U.S. Public Power And Electric Cooperative Utilities 2024 Outlook: Mandates, Rising Costs, And Diminishing Affordability," published Jan. 23, 2024, on RatingsDirect.) These credit challenges have led to rating downgrades exceeding upgrades by seven to four in the first half of the year, outpacing 2023. Putting the numbers into perspective, the downgrades represent just 3% of the rated universe, but the negative sector outlook reflects our view that these issuers are more susceptible to the above mentioned financial pressures. Apart from rating changes, we revised more outlooks to negative than to stable or positive. During the first half of 2024, 57 ratings were unchanged after review (21% of the total combined sectors).
The number of ratings on new issuances increased more than 40% the first half of 2024 compared with 2023 for U.S. public power retail, gas, and wholesale electric utilities.
Chart 1
New Issuer Credit Ratings
There were two new issuer credit ratings and two new issue-level ratings during the first six months of 2024. We assigned issuer credit ratings to Pioneer Community Energy and San Jose Clean Energy (SJCE), both community choice aggregators (CCAs) in California, and issue-level ratings to debt for Delano Municipal Utilities, Minn., and Southern Utah Valley Power System (SUVPS).
Pioneer Community Energy is a joint powers agency formed in 2017 to procure retail electric commodity on behalf of about 158,000 electric customers across 10 members in El Dorado, Placer, and Nevada counties. SJCE is an enterprise of the city of San Jose and a CCA that began operations in 2019. SJCE provides electric service to about 350,000 customers in the city of San Jose, the heart of California's Silicon Valley. With the addition of Pioneer and SJCE, S&P Global Ratings now publicly rates eight CCAs, all in California. For more information on our view of CCAs, see "California Community Choice Aggregators Provide Consumer Choice, But Not Without Risk," published Nov. 2, 2022.
Delano Municipal Utilities, located in Wright County, Minn., serves a small customer base of about 3,100 accounts and has a diverse power supply. The utility is a member of the Central Municipal Power Agency/Services. SUVPS is a wholesale utility that issued debt to acquire and construct electric transmission facilities. SUVPS' organization agreements with its five members--Spanish Fork, Springville, Payson, South Utah Valley Electric Service District, and Salem--extend through at least 2074.
Table 1
Semiannual 2024--new issuer credit ratings--U.S. municipal retail electric, gas, and wholesale electric | |||
---|---|---|---|
Utilities | State | To | Outlook |
Pioneer Community Energy | CA | A- | Stable |
Delano (electric) | MN | A- | Stable |
Southern Utah Valley Power System | UT | A- | Stable |
San Jose Clean Energy | CA | A | Stable |
Negative Rating Actions And Outlook Revisions
The seven downgrades, five negative outlooks, and one negative CreditWatch placement reflect the effects of some of the aforementioned risks. In addition, so far in 2024, total speculative-grade ratings increased to seven from only one in 2023, further emphasizing the effects. Although they make up only 3% of the rated universe, the number of speculative-grade ratings across our municipal retail electric, gas, and combined utilities is growing.
The common themes throughout the negative rating actions and outlooks include a weakened competitive and affordability position and financial performance due to elevated capital and power costs and/or large transfers out to the general fund, and insufficient or delayed cost recovery. These factors resulted in a decline in fixed-charge coverage (55% of our financial risk profile score), liquidity (25% weighting of our financial risk profile score), and/or market position (20% of our enterprise risk profile score). We believe that delayed and insufficient cost recovery reflects ratemakers' sensitivity to the economic pressures consumers face.
Five of the downgrades and one outlook revision to negative stemmed from risk management, culture, and oversight weaknesses: Alexandria, La., had insufficient cost recovery to offset elevated cost pressures, large transfers to the general fund, and remedial actions that we considered lagging. Bessemer, Ala., violated a rate covenant due to lack of effective risk management and oversight and persistently high delinquencies that were pressuring already marginal liquidity. Kennebunk Light & Power District, Maine, had delayed cost recovery resulting in weakened financial performance. Banning, Calif.'s unrestricted cash fell to a negative balance due to management's cash-spending on capital projects that depleted available liquidity, combined with a lack of rate increases and, in our view, poor internal controls. Lastly, customer dislocations in the Southwest Public Power Agency, Ariz., had eroded the revenue stream's credit quality, in our view.
We revised the New Hampshire Electric Cooperative Inc. debt rating outlook to negative because of the cooperative's ongoing use of electric system margins and debt to subsidize broadband operating losses, which highlight the risks of operating startup broadband systems. For more information on key broadband operating risks, see "Not-For-Profit Utilities' Broadband Investments Require Enhanced Risk Management" (published April 17, 2023).
Table 2
Semiannual 2024-- negative rating actions and CreditWatch placements--U.S. municipal retail electric, gas, and wholesale electric | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utilities | State | To | From | To outlook | From outlook | To CreditWatch | From CreditWatch | Reasoning | ||||||||||
Banning (electric) | CA | BBB | A- | N.M. | Stable | Negative | N/A | In March 2024, we lowered the rating two notches due to the material deterioration in unrestricted cash due to poor financial controls, as demonstrated by its negative $8.6 million cash balance at fiscal year-end 2023. The rating was placed on CreditWatch negative related to uncertainty around the electric system's capacity to restore liquidity. | ||||||||||
Banning (electric) | CA | BB | BBB | Negative | N.M. | Negative | N/A | In May 2024, the rating was further lowered three notches due to our view of the utility's lack of effective risk management and oversight as well as failure to implement proper financial controls. The negative outlook reflects our view that rates are not anticipated to be raised before fiscal year-end 2025. | ||||||||||
Alexandria (electric, gas, water, and sewer) | LA | BBB+ | A | Negative | Stable | N/A | N/A | The rating action reflects that FCC was below 1.0x for fiscal years 2022 and 2022 due to insufficient cost recovery to offset elevated cost pressures, large transfers out of the utility fund, and remedial actions that we believe lagged relative to revenue shortfalls caused by multiyear collection problems. The rating could be lowered further if the remedial actions (ongoing rate studies, enforced disconnection policies, and additional meter readers) do not result in improved metrics. | ||||||||||
Russellville (electric) | AL | BBB+ | A- | Stable | Negative | N/A | N/A | The rating action reflects that FCC was thin during the past four fiscal years, and management's projections show this trend will continue due to high transfers to the general fund, a rise in operating expenses, and weakened electric rate competitiveness. | ||||||||||
Bessemer (electric) | AL | BB+ | BBB | N.M. | Stable | Negative | N/A | The rating action reflects a rate covenant violation was triggered in response to 0.1x debt service coverage in 2023 due to a lack of effective risk management and oversight and persistently high delinquencies that are pressuring already marginal liquidity. The CreditWatch placement reflects our view that there could be an additional rate covenant violation in 2024 due to belated adoption of a 7.25% rate increase. Bessemer has not received notification of an event of default from the paying agent. | ||||||||||
Stillwater Utilities Authority (electric, water, sewer, and sales tax) | OK | A+ | AA- | Negative | Negative | N/A | N/A | The rating action reflects the projected decline in FCC, despite approved rate increases, due to its relatively large capital plan, which is expected to be over 70% debt funded. It also reflects the weakening of affordability given below-average incomes and pre-approved double-digit water rate increases through 2028. | ||||||||||
Southwest Public Power Agency Inc. (SPPA) | AZ | BB | BBB- | Negative | Stable | N/A | N/A | The rating action reflects the worsening credit quality and increasing operational and financial challenges of SPPA's smaller, irrigation-concentrated members, who must pass increasing energy costs on to an extremely price-sensitive customer base. | ||||||||||
FCC-Fixed-charge coverage. N/A--Not available. |
Table 3
Semiannual 2024--negative outlook and CreditWatch revisions--U.S. municipal retail electric, gas, and wholesale electric | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utilities | State | To | From | To outlook | From outlook | To CreditWatch | From CreditWatch | Reasoning | ||||||||||
New Hampshire Electric Cooperative Inc. | NH | A | A | Negative | Stable | N/A | N/A | The outlook revision reflects the cooperative's ongoing need to subsidize broadband system operating losses with electric system margins and debt. It further reflects uncertainty as to whether the broadband system can realize within two years management's projected growth to break-even operations at the broadband system. | ||||||||||
Merrimac Municipal Light Department | MA | A+ | A+ | N.M. | Stable | Negative | N/A | The outlook revision reflects the lack of timely information related to fiscal 2022 financial statements. | ||||||||||
Kennebunk Light & Power District | ME | BBB+ | BBB+ | Negative | Stable | N/A | N/A | The outlook revision reflects financial performance that weakened as a result of its delayed implementation of rate adjustments as well as limited operational autonomy because of Maine Public Utility Commission oversight. | ||||||||||
Burbank Water and Power | CA | AA- | AA- | Negative | Stable | N/A | N/A | The outlook revision reflects a trend of weakened FCC and liquidity, and anticipated rate increases to support its rising debt service requirements that we believe could challenge rate affordability. Additionally, environmental compliance and energy transition could result in potential cost pressures. | ||||||||||
Southern California Public Power Authority (Magnolia Power Project A) | CA | AA- | AA- | Negative | Stable | N/A | N/A | The outlook revision follows an identical action on the City of Burbank's electric revenue bond ratings given the project rating is highly influenced by Burbank's electric system. | ||||||||||
Southern California Public Power Authority (Tieton Project) | CA | AA- | AA- | Negative | Stable | N/A | N/A | The outlook revision follows an identical action on the City of Burbank's electric revenue bond ratings given the project rating is highly influenced by Burbank's electric system. | ||||||||||
FCC-Fixed-charge coverage. N/A--Not applicable. |
Positive Rating Actions And Outlook Revisions
There were four upgrades during the first six months of 2024. Two resulted from improved financial performance; one from improved risk management, culture, and oversight risks, including enhanced natural gas hedging; and one--Lubbock Power & Light, Texas--from the utility's shedding responsibility as a generator to provide transmission and distribution services, a lower-risk business.
Similar to the upgrades, the four outlook revisions to stable and the one revision to positive reflect improved financial performance, timely cost recovery mechanisms, and improved risk management related to generation additions and other steps to reduce exposure to market prices.
We removed one rating from CreditWatch with negative implications following receipt of sufficient information from the issuer.
Table 4
Semiannual 2024--positive rating actions--U.S. municipal retail electric, gas, and wholesale electric | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utilities | State | To | From | To outlook | From outlook | CreditWatch | Reasoning | |||||||||
Dawson Public Power District | NE | A+ | A | Stable | Positive | N/A | The upgrade reflects the robust FCC averaging 1.63x in fiscal 2020-2022, which is projected to continue, and sound liquidity at over 200 days of operating expenses that can provide a financial cushion against the district's volatile irrigation loads. | |||||||||
Vernon | CA | A- | BBB+ | Stable | Stable | N/A | The upgrade reflects improved risk management practices, including natural gas hedging, which we believe will enhance future cash flow stability and predictability, especially important given the nontraditional, almost all-industrial customer base. | |||||||||
Central Florida Tourism Oversight District (CFTOD) | FL | A | A- | Stable | Stable | N/A | The upgrade reflects healthy financial performance in fiscal 2023, which we believe is sustainable as the demand for CFTOD's utility services has returned to pre-pandemic levels. | |||||||||
Lubbock Power & Light | TX | A+ | A | Stable | Developing | N/A | The upgrade reflects reduced operating risks as a result of its shedding its responsibility for procuring electricity in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas market on April 5, 2024, and now exclusive operations as the provider of distribution and transmission services, a lower-risk business. | |||||||||
FCC--Fixed-charge coverage. N/A--Not applicable. |
Table 5
Semiannual 2024--positive outlook and CreditWatch revisions--U.S. municipal retail electric, gas, and wholesale electric | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utilities | State | To | From | To outlook | From outlook | To CreditWatch | From CreditWatch | Reasoning | ||||||||||
Utah Associated Municipal Power System (Horse Butte Wind Project) | UT | A- | A- | Stable | Negative | N/A | N/A | The revised outlook to stable reflects the improved financial performance of Brigham City, Utah, which was one of the participants with the weakest credit quality within a subset of the 23 total participants. | ||||||||||
Merrimac Municipal Light Department | MA | A+ | A+ | Stable | N/A | N/A | Negative | The CreditWatch removal reflects the receipt of Merrimac's 2022 financial audit, and with no material credit changes indicated. | ||||||||||
Camden (electric, water, and wastewater) | SC | A- | A- | Stable | Negative | N/A | N/A | The revised outlook to stable reflects improved FCC due the utility's improved rate-setting practices and cost recovery represented by an electric rate increase and implementation of a fuel adjustment surcharge that passes through fluctuating natural gas prices to ratepayers. | ||||||||||
Danvers Electric Division | MA | A+ | A+ | Positive | Stable | N/A | N/A | The revised outlook to positive is supported by robust coverage above 1.6x in the past two years, maintenance of ample liquidity reserves, and a minimal leverage position. | ||||||||||
San Antonio (electric and gas) | TX | AA- | AA- | Stable | Negative | N/A | N/A | The revised outlook to stable reflects improved risk management given recent large generation additions to its portfolio, including 1,710 megawatts of baseload gas-fired generation, and other steps to reduce exposure to market prices. The outlook revision also reflects declining accounts receivable and doubtful account balances and an approved base rate increase for 2025. | ||||||||||
Pinal County Electric District No. 2 | CA | A+ | A+ | Stable | Negative | N/A | N/A | The revised outlook to stable reflects improved financial metrics due to raised rates, which resulted in stronger FCC and cash. | ||||||||||
FCC--Fixed-charge coverage. N/A--Not available. |
Ratings Unchanged
Fifty-seven ratings were unchanged after review. Over 99% of these ratings had stable outlooks, with almost 1% on unchanged negative outlooks.
Table 6
Semiannual 2024--maintained ratings--U.S. municipal retail electric, gas, and wholesale electric | |||
---|---|---|---|
Utility | State | Rating | Outlook |
Bonneville Power Administration | OR | AA- | Stable |
Energy Northwest | OR | AA- | Stable |
Pasadena Electric | CA | AA | Stable |
Glendale | CA | A+ | Stable |
Kansas Municipal Energy Agengy | KS | BBB+ | Stable |
Franklin County Public Utility District No. 1 | WA | A+ | Stable |
Lower Colorado River Authority | TX | A | Stable |
Arkansas River Power Authority | CO | BBB | Stable |
Ellensburg | WA | A | Stable |
Lower Colorado River Authority Transmission Corp. | TX | A | Stable |
North Alabama Gas District | AL | AA- | Stable |
WPPI Energy | WI | A | Stable |
Kansas Municipal Energy Agency (Dogwood Project) | KS | BBB+ | Stable |
Kansas Municipal Energy Agency (Jameson Energy Center Project) | KS | BBB+ | Stable |
Eugene Water & Electric Board | OR | AA- | Stable |
Trinity Public Utilities District | CA | BB+ | Stable |
Bryan Rural | TX | A+ | Stable |
Bryan | TX | A+ | Stable |
Concord | NC | AA- | Stable |
Cornhusker Public Power District | NE | A+ | Stable |
Webster City | IA | A- | Stable |
Turlock Irrigation District | CA | AA- | Stable |
Turlock Irrigation District (second lien) | CA | AA- | Stable |
Fayette Gas Board | AL | BBB- | Negative |
Tacoma | WA | AA | Stable |
Floresville | TX | A+ | Stable |
Seattle | WA | AA | Stable |
Omaha Public Power District (second lien) | NE | AA- | Stable |
Omaha Public Power District (first lien) | NE | AA | Stable |
American Municipal Power Inc. | OH | A | Stable |
South Feather Water and Power Agency | CA | A | Stable |
Orlando Utlities Commission | FL | AA | Stable |
Jonesboro City Water & Light Plant | AR | AA- | Stable |
Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1 (generating system debt) | WA | AA | Stable |
Snohomish County Public Utility District No.1 (electric system) | WA | AA | Stable |
Pascoag Utility District | RI | A | Stable |
Indianapolis (thermal first lien) | IN | A+ | Stable |
Indianapolis (gas first lien) | IN | AA | Stable |
Indianapolis (gas second lien) | IN | AA | Stable |
Jonesboro City Water & Light Plant | AR | AA- | Stable |
Norway | MI | A | Stable |
Georgetown Municipal Light Department | MA | A+ | Stable |
Groveland Municipal Light Department | MA | A+ | Stable |
Southeast Alabama Gas District | AL | A+ | Stable |
Springfield (first lien) | MO | AA+ | Stable |
Springfield (second lien) | MO | AA | Stable |
Wellesley Municipal Light Plant | MA | AA | Stable |
Mason County Public Utility District No. 3 | WA | A+ | Stable |
Loveland | CO | A+ | Stable |
Templeton Municipal Light & Water Plant | MA | A | Stable |
Troy | AL | BBB | Stable |
South Hadley Electric Light Department | MA | AA | Stable |
Kittitas County Public Utility District No. 1 | WA | A | Stable |
Athens | AL | A+ | Stable |
Alameda Municipal Power | CA | AA- | Stable |
Transmission Agency of Northern California | CA | A+ | Stable |
Northern California Power Agency | CA | AA- | Stable |
The preceding tables summarize S&P Global Ratings' various biannual rating actions and outlook revisions based on "U.S. Municipal Retail Electric And Gas Utilities: Methodology And Assumptions," published Sept. 27, 2018, and "Wholesale Utilities," published May 24, 2005.
Related Research
- Your Three Minutes In Electric Power: EPA Emissions Rules Could Hamper Power Production Economics And Utility Credit Metrics, May 16, 2024
- U.S. Public Power And Electric Cooperative Utilities 2024 Outlook: Mandates, Rising Costs, And Diminishing Affordability, Jan. 23, 2024
- U.S. Public Power Retail Municipal Utilities: 10 Rated Utilities With The Highest Debt Balances, Feb. 1, 2024
- Managing Renewables Risk Is Increasingly Integral To U.S. Power Utilities Credit Quality, Oct. 9, 2023
- Cyber Risk Insights: Ongoing Preparedness Is Key To U.S. Power Utilities Keeping Attackers In The Dark, May 11, 2023
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Alexandra Rozgonyi, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4824; alexandra.rozgonyi@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Doug Snider, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4709; doug.snider@spglobal.com |
Tiffany Tribbitt, New York + 1 (212) 438 8218; Tiffany.Tribbitt@spglobal.com | |
David N Bodek, New York + 1 (212) 438 7969; david.bodek@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.