(Editor's Note: This article, originally published July 16, 2024, is being republished to provide the link to the medians interactive dashboard. )
Key Takeaways
- U.S. not-for-profit private colleges and universities faced ongoing demand pressure in fiscal 2023, with a median enrollment decline of 0.8%. However, those in the 'AAA' and 'AA' rating categories generated stable demand while enrollment decreases were concentrated in lower rating categories.
- Absent federal relief funding, enrollment decreases, increased tuition discounting, and inflation contributed to weaker operations in fiscal 2023, particularly for 'BBB' and speculative-grade institutions.
- While median cash and investments fell year over year, balance sheets remained stronger than they were before the pandemic.
- The median debt burden dropped slightly sectorwide but increased for speculative-grade issuers.
Fiscal 2023 was a tough year for U.S. not-for-profit private colleges and universities. Enrollment declines resumed, after a brief period of stabilization in fiscal 2022. With pandemic relief dollars exhausted, institutions lacked a financial buffer to overcome rising expenses and demand pressures. Deeper tuition discounting further strained net revenue growth as institutions competed for students. As a result, median operating margins became negative for the first time in at least 10 years. Financial resources and balance-sheet ratios modestly fell. Reflecting these negative trends, the sector saw more than five times the number of downgrades as upgrades between June 1, 2023, and June 1, 2024. However, credit quality continues to diverge, consistent with our bifurcated outlook, with lower-rated institutions facing heightened difficulties.
Full details of the medians are available through our interactive dashboard, by clicking here.
The following image is a preview.
Rating Distribution And Characteristics
S&P Global Ratings maintained more than 300 ratings on U.S. not-for-profit private colleges and universities as of June 1, 2024. The sample size for our private college and university median ratios for fiscal 2023 is 278 (table 1). We do not include universities and colleges that we consider specialty schools in our ratio calculations. Given the niche focus of these institutions, which include medical schools, law schools, and arts schools, certain metrics may be skewed and would not be directly comparable with those of institutions with a wider array of program offerings.
Since our last medians report published July 25, 2023, we have assigned ratings to eight new private institutions: two in the 'A' category (including a specialty school), five in the 'BBB' category, and one speculative-grade.
During that same period, rating changes included 27 downgrades and five upgrades. The number of ratings in the 'AAA' and 'AA' categories was relatively flat: one institution, Dartmouth College, moved to the 'AAA' category from the 'AA' category. We downgraded six issuers to the 'BBB' category from the 'A' category and downgraded three to speculative-grade from the 'BBB' category. One institution, Medaille University, defaulted. All other rating changes were within the same rating category.
Ratings distribution is clustered around the 'BBB' category, which has 40% of private college and university ratings (chart 1). The next largest category, 'A', has 31% of ratings (chart 2). Although the majority of ratings, 83%, have a stable outlook, we revised some outlooks to negative in the past year (chart 3). Of rated issuers, 14% have a negative outlook compared with 10% the previous year. Currently, only 3% of private colleges and universities have a positive outlook, compared with 5% last year.
S&P Global Ratings' analysis of an institution involves a holistic view of its creditworthiness, including qualitative assessments that are not captured in this article. The mean or median metrics for each rating category (table 2) should not be considered thresholds to achieving a particular rating.
Table 1
Private colleges and universities--Sectorwide fiscal 2023 ratios | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | ||||||||
Sample size | 260 | 265 | 276 | 273 | 278 | |||||||
ENROLLMENT AND DEMAND | ||||||||||||
Total FTE enrollment | ||||||||||||
Median | 3,199 | 3,174 | 3,004 | 3,069 | 3,013 | |||||||
Mean | 6,343 | 6,331 | 6,088 | 5,944 | 5,911 | |||||||
FTE enrollment change (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 0.4 | -0.3 | -2.7 | 0.3 | -0.8 | |||||||
Mean | -0.1 | -0.5 | -2.6 | 1.4 | -1.1 | |||||||
Undergraduates as a % of total enrollment | ||||||||||||
Median | 75.9 | 73.5 | 79.1 | 78.8 | 79.1 | |||||||
Mean | 74.4 | 72.7 | 77.0 | 77.0 | 76.8 | |||||||
First-year acceptance rate (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 65.5 | 66.0 | 71.4 | 74.0 | 73.2 | |||||||
Mean | 57.0 | 58.2 | 61.3 | 63.4 | 61.4 | |||||||
First-year matriculation rate (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 22.0 | 21.0 | 18.8 | 18.6 | 18.1 | |||||||
Mean | 26.1 | 25.3 | 23.1 | 24.0 | 23.6 | |||||||
Average SAT | ||||||||||||
Median | 1,213 | 1,206 | 1,192 | 1,219 | 1,230 | |||||||
Mean | 1,232 | 1,232 | 1,222 | 1,248 | 1,260 | |||||||
Average ACT | ||||||||||||
Median | 26 | 26 | 26 | 27 | 27 | |||||||
Mean | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 28 | |||||||
Retention rate (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 83.1 | 84.0 | 83.0 | 83.8 | 82.4 | |||||||
Mean | 83.3 | 83.5 | 82.2 | 82.3 | 82.0 | |||||||
Six-year graduation rate (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 70.9 | 71.4 | 71.6 | 71.3 | 72.0 | |||||||
Mean | 70.9 | 71.5 | 71.5 | 71.6 | 71.5 | |||||||
In-state students (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 52.7 | 54.5 | 54.0 | 53.0 | 53.8 | |||||||
Mean | 51.3 | 51.7 | 51.8 | 49.5 | 50.7 | |||||||
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE | ||||||||||||
Operating margin (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 1.1 | -0.1 | |||||||
Mean | 1.3 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 1.7 | -0.4 | |||||||
REVENUE DIVERSITY | ||||||||||||
Student-generated revenue (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 84 | 84 | 81.7 | 79.7 | 80.5 | |||||||
Mean | 77 | 77.1 | 74.5 | 73.6 | 74.3 | |||||||
Auxiliary revenue (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 11.4 | 9.9 | 7.6 | 10.4 | 11.3 | |||||||
Mean | 11.2 | 9.5 | 8.0 | 10.3 | 10.9 | |||||||
Grants and contracts to revenue (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 1.2 | 2.2 | 4.4 | 5.0 | 2.2 | |||||||
Mean | 3.5 | 4.3 | 6.7 | 6.3 | 4.9 | |||||||
Gifts and pledges to revenue (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 | |||||||
Mean | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.8 | |||||||
FINANCIAL AID/EXPENSE RATIOS | ||||||||||||
Financial aid burden as a percentage of expenses (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 27.6 | 28.9 | 30.0 | 29.5 | 29.3 | |||||||
Mean | 25.9 | 27 | 28.4 | 27.9 | 27.6 | |||||||
Instruction expense as a percentage of expenses (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 27.1 | 27.1 | 26.0 | 25.5 | 25.5 | |||||||
Mean | 28.3 | 28.2 | 27.1 | 26.5 | 26.7 | |||||||
Tuition discount rate (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 40.0 | 41.0 | 41.9 | 43.3 | 44.4 | |||||||
Mean | 40.1 | 41.1 | 42.8 | 44.1 | 44.8 | |||||||
FINANCIAL RESOURCES | ||||||||||||
Cash and investments ($000s) | ||||||||||||
Median | 224,553 | 225,569 | 281,617 | 257,427 | 245,849 | |||||||
Mean | 1,601,177 | 1,683,629 | 2,223,590 | 2,121,390 | 2,045,358 | |||||||
Cash and investments to operations (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 126.6 | 126.5 | 161.4 | 141.6 | 135.3 | |||||||
Mean | 196.4 | 195.4 | 256.9 | 221.3 | 208.3 | |||||||
Cash and investments to debt (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 264.1 | 245.6 | 298.3 | 281.2 | 272.3 | |||||||
Mean | 339.3 | 322.9 | 398.4 | 361.9 | 356.4 | |||||||
DEBT RATIOS | ||||||||||||
Total outstanding debt ($000s) | ||||||||||||
Median | 97,015 | 98,420 | 96,580 | 105,384 | 101,023 | |||||||
Mean | 373,862 | 421,814 | 448,459 | 467,667 | 456,574 | |||||||
Average age of plant (years) | ||||||||||||
Median | 14.4 | 14.8 | 15.1 | 15.6 | 16.2 | |||||||
Mean | 14.9 | 15.4 | 15.7 | 16.2 | 16.6 | |||||||
MADS burden (%) | ||||||||||||
Median | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.3 | |||||||
Mean | 4.6 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 4.8 | |||||||
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT RATIOS | ||||||||||||
Total debt per FTE ($) | ||||||||||||
Median | 28,964 | 31,463 | 33,207 | 34,791 | 35,053 | |||||||
Mean | 48,962 | 53,614 | 57,727 | 57,460 | 58,871 | |||||||
Endowment per FTE ($) | ||||||||||||
Median | 54,827 | 53,884 | 69,511 | 68,781 | 71,280 | |||||||
Mean | 186,869 | 185,774 | 257,903 | 225,958 | 222,961 | |||||||
FTE--Full-time-equivalent. MADS--Maximum annual debt service. Source: S&P Global Ratings. |
Table 2
Private colleges and universities--Fiscal 2023 ratios by rating category | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAA | AA | A | BBB | SG | SECTORWIDE | |||||||||
Sample size | 12 | 44 | 86 | 111 | 25 | 278 | ||||||||
ENROLLMENT AND DEMAND | ||||||||||||||
Total FTE enrollment | ||||||||||||||
Median | 10,252 | 7,994 | 3,442 | 2,481 | 2,490 | 3,013 | ||||||||
Mean | 11,403 | 11,255 | 6,780 | 3,260 | 2,647 | 5,911 | ||||||||
FTE enrollment change (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 0.2 | 0.5 | -0.9 | -1.8 | -3.6 | -0.8 | ||||||||
Mean | 0.5 | 0.3 | -1.0 | -1.5 | -2.8 | -1.1 | ||||||||
Undergraduates as a % of total enrollment | ||||||||||||||
Median | 54.4 | 70.5 | 84.7 | 77.4 | 81.7 | 79.1 | ||||||||
Mean | 60.7 | 71.9 | 81.7 | 76.1 | 79.1 | 76.8 | ||||||||
First-year acceptance rate (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 6.0 | 14.4 | 72.9 | 78.5 | 81.2 | 73.2 | ||||||||
Mean | 5.9 | 20.6 | 65.0 | 76.8 | 79.4 | 61.4 | ||||||||
First-year matriculation rate (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 63.5 | 38.4 | 17.5 | 15.0 | 14.2 | 18.1 | ||||||||
Mean | 62.5 | 39.3 | 20.0 | 17.5 | 16.8 | 23.6 | ||||||||
Average SAT scores | ||||||||||||||
Median | 1520 | 1440 | 1240 | 1145 | 1101 | 1230 | ||||||||
Mean | 1514 | 1452 | 1260 | 1172 | 1148 | 1260 | ||||||||
Average ACT scores | ||||||||||||||
Median | 34 | 33 | 27 | 24 | 20 | 27 | ||||||||
Mean | 34 | 33 | 28 | 25 | 22 | 28 | ||||||||
Retention rate (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 98.0 | 95.0 | 85.1 | 77.0 | 72.9 | 82.4 | ||||||||
Mean | 97.2 | 93.9 | 84.1 | 76.4 | 71.4 | 82.0 | ||||||||
Six-year graduation rate (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 94.5 | 91.1 | 76.2 | 64.4 | 59.2 | 72.0 | ||||||||
Mean | 94.4 | 89.8 | 74.2 | 63.2 | 55.5 | 71.5 | ||||||||
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE | ||||||||||||||
Operating margin (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 2.9 | 2.4 | 0.5 | -1.6 | -3.8 | -0.1 | ||||||||
Mean | 6.5 | 3.0 | 1.6 | -2.9 | -5.4 | -0.4 | ||||||||
REVENUE DIVERSITY | ||||||||||||||
Student-generated revenue (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 34.4 | 60.8 | 82.2 | 83.7 | 85.1 | 80.5 | ||||||||
Mean | 33.1 | 54.0 | 78.7 | 81.4 | 83.2 | 74.3 | ||||||||
Auxiliary revenue (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 3.7 | 8.5 | 11.7 | 11.3 | 13.4 | 11.3 | ||||||||
Mean | 5.8 | 8.6 | 11.5 | 11.4 | 12.5 | 10.9 | ||||||||
Grants and contracts to revenue (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 13.0 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.2 | ||||||||
Mean | 14.4 | 9.6 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 4.9 | ||||||||
Gifts and pledges to revenue (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 2.2 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.9 | ||||||||
Mean | 2.8 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 2.8 | ||||||||
EXPENSE RATIOS | ||||||||||||||
Financial aid burden as a percentage of expenses (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 14.5 | 21.7 | 30.8 | 31.0 | 31.9 | 29.3 | ||||||||
Mean | 14.2 | 18.6 | 29.5 | 30.8 | 29.8 | 27.6 | ||||||||
Instruction expense as a percentage of expenses (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 33.6 | 26.7 | 25.2 | 24.1 | 22.8 | 25.5 | ||||||||
Mean | 35.2 | 28.6 | 26.1 | 26.2 | 24.0 | 26.7 | ||||||||
Tuition discount rate (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 47.5 | 39.3 | 42.3 | 46.9 | 45.1 | 44.4 | ||||||||
Mean | 47.7 | 40.5 | 44.4 | 46.3 | 45.6 | 44.8 | ||||||||
ENDOWMENT | ||||||||||||||
Endowment market value ($000s) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 11,663,432 | 2,219,768 | 332,263 | 112,261 | 50,212 | 224,769 | ||||||||
Mean | 19,390,144 | 3,987,659 | 517,946 | 150,119 | 56,434 | 1,698,939 | ||||||||
FINANCIAL RESOURCE RATIOS ($000s) | ||||||||||||||
Cash and investments | ||||||||||||||
Median | 13,689,600 | 2,821,640 | 393,804 | 129,885 | 52,720 | 245,849 | ||||||||
Mean | 22,792,112 | 5,020,236 | 620,151 | 173,255 | 65,978 | 2,045,358 | ||||||||
Cash and investments to operations (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 796.3 | 373.7 | 159.3 | 99.7 | 58.4 | 135.3 | ||||||||
Mean | 835.5 | 397.5 | 187.3 | 114.7 | 61.9 | 208.3 | ||||||||
Cash and investments to debt (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 875.1 | 472.3 | 347.2 | 183.3 | 102.3 | 272.3 | ||||||||
Mean | 956.1 | 522.0 | 381.5 | 255.4 | 139.1 | 356.4 | ||||||||
DEBT RATIOS | ||||||||||||||
Total outstanding debt ($000s) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 1,853,394 | 612,705 | 129,836 | 66,181 | 60,756 | 101,023 | ||||||||
Mean | 2,698,590 | 1,335,470 | 244,164 | 117,592 | 69,326 | 456,574 | ||||||||
Average age of plant (years) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 13.8 | 14.7 | 16.3 | 16.5 | 17.7 | 16.2 | ||||||||
Mean | 13.8 | 15.6 | 16.5 | 17.2 | 17.8 | 16.6 | ||||||||
MADS burden (%) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 5.4 | 4.9 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | ||||||||
Mean | 5.4 | 5.4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 4.8 | ||||||||
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT RATIOS | ||||||||||||||
Total debt per FTE ($) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 174,541 | 96,779 | 35,744 | 27,321 | 27,819 | 35,053 | ||||||||
Mean | 228,062 | 127,837 | 42,284 | 32,954 | 28,411 | 58,871 | ||||||||
Endowment per FTE ($) | ||||||||||||||
Median | 1,616,986 | 446,500 | 81,236 | 41,514 | 22,835 | 71,280 | ||||||||
Mean | 1,768,247 | 504,809 | 127,308 | 60,070 | 30,941 | 222,961 | ||||||||
FTE--Full-time-equivalent. MADS-- Maximum annual debt service. SG--Speculative-grade. Source: S&P Global Ratings. |
Chart 1
Chart 2
Chart 3
Enrollment And Demand Metrics
Demand pressures continued for lower-rated institutions
The higher education sector faces increased demand pressure. Across much of the U.S., the population of graduating high school students is shrinking. This "demographic cliff" results in lower demand from traditional student populations for private colleges and universities. In addition, some high school graduates are opting to work rather than pursue higher education as wages increase in a tight labor market. For others, the benefits of higher education do not appear to outweigh the rising price tag. While many institutions are increasing efforts to attract international students, adult learners, and graduate students, gains in these populations have largely been unable to overcome decreases in traditional undergraduates. In fiscal 2023 (fall 2022), median full-time equivalent enrollment fell 0.8% after stabilizing the previous year. Related demand metrics, matriculation and retention rates, also weakened. Other enterprise metrics were relatively stable.
Demand pressures are greatest for entities rated 'A' and below. Top-rated schools in the 'AAA' and 'AA' categories recorded stable enrollment in fiscal 2023. These institutions may intentionally target flat enrollment to maintain campus culture and selectivity. They benefit from greater operating flexibility with low acceptance rates, high matriculation rates, and a higher percentage of graduate students that diversify student composition. For example, 'AAA' rated entities have a median acceptance rate of just 6.0% and 63.5% of admitted students choose to attend, indicating exceptional demand. Once at the institution, nearly all first-year students, 98.0%, return for their second year. Conversely, 'BBB' rated schools admit a much higher percentage of applicants, with a median acceptance rate of 78.5%. Just 15.0% of accepted students choose to attend and 77.0% continue to their second year. It's much more difficult to maintain a stable student population under these conditions and we expect divergence in demand factors will continue to widen as the pool of traditional college-attending students shrinks further.
Financial Metrics
Inflated expenses and deflated support led to weaker operating margins
Once pandemic-related federal relief funds were depleted, many private colleges and universities lacked a financial cushion to overcome enrollment declines, increased discounting, and inflation. For the first time in at least 10 years, median and average operating performance was negative. Median revenue mix shifted back to pre-pandemic levels, with a decreased reliance on grants and contracts and a greater share of revenue from auxiliary sources. As institutions compete for a shrinking population of potential students, tuition discounting continues to rise, with an average discount rate approaching 45%. We expect fiscal 2024 results will show continued operating pressure.
Operating performance differed greatly by rating category. Median margins for 'AAA', 'AA', and 'A' rated entities remained positive while 'BBB' and speculative-grade issuers generated deficits. Lower-rated institutions had a particularly tough year, with an average operating deficit of 3% for 'BBB' rated issuers and 5% for speculative-grade rated issuers. Higher-rated institutions typically benefit from greater revenue diversity from research or health care operations and rely less on student-generated revenues. Colleges and universities in the top rating categories also have large endowments that can support increased discounting.
Balance sheets remained stronger than they were pre-pandemic
We primarily measure balance-sheet strength using an institution's cash and investments. However, we also consider liquidity and the degree to which resources are subject to restrictions. In fiscal 2023, median cash and investments fell modestly, continuing a trend of losses in fiscal 2022, albeit at a slower pace. Many colleges and universities used cash outside of the endowment or supplemental endowment draws to support weaker operations. However, institutions generated strong investment returns in fiscal 2021 and losses over the subsequent two years have not eroded those gains. Financial resources and balance-sheet ratios remain stronger than they were in fiscal 2020 but could continue to erode due to operating pressures in fiscal years 2024 and 2025.
While cash and investments dropped on average, endowments increased slightly, with a 1.8% increase in the median market value (table 3). The negative percentage change for the 'AAA' and 'AA' categories can be attributed to the upgrade of Dartmouth College: while the college's robust $7.9 billion endowment was previously at the high end of the 'AA' category, it is below the average for 'AAA' issuers ($19.4 billion). Both the 'AAA' and 'AA' categories have relatively small sample sizes, so the addition or removal of one issuer can have a large impact.
Table 3
Private colleges and universities--Median change in endowment by rating category | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 ($000s) | % change | 2023 ($000s) | ||||||
AAA | 13,279,846 | -12.2 | 11,663,432 | |||||
AA | 2,391,304 | -7.2 | 2,219,768 | |||||
A | 316,898 | 4.8 | 332,263 | |||||
BBB | 104,416 | 7.5 | 112,261 | |||||
SG | 47,178 | 6.4 | 50,212 | |||||
Sectorwide | 220,712 | 1.8 | 224,769 | |||||
SG--Speculative-grade. Source: S&P Global Ratings. |
Median debt fell, while age of plant crept up
New debt issuance was limited in fiscal 2023, in part due to high interest rates. Sectorwide, median debt fell by a modest 4%. However, median debt of speculative-grade entities rose more than 20%. Similar to the change in endowment values, the large negative change for the 'AAA' category can be attributed to the upgrade of Dartmouth College. The college's fiscal 2023 debt burden of nearly $1.0 billion was well below the 'AAA' average debt burden of $2.7 billion.
While sectorwide debt burdens declined, average age of plant (equal to accumulated depreciation divided by depreciation expense) continued to increase, reaching a median of 16.2 years. Many institutions might need to increase debt issuance or use reserves in the coming years to finance delayed infrastructure updates or add facilities that attract students amid increasing competition.
Table 4
Private colleges and universities--Median change in debt by rating category | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 ($000s) | % change | 2023 ($000s) | ||||||
AAA | 2,496,373 | -25.8 | 1,853,394 | |||||
AA | 596,725 | 2.7 | 612,705 | |||||
A | 130,281 | -0.3 | 129,836 | |||||
BBB | 65,565 | 0.9 | 66,181 | |||||
SG | 49,683 | 22.3 | 60,756 | |||||
Sectorwide | 105,384 | -4.1 | 101,023 | |||||
SG--Speculative-grade. Source: S&P Global Ratings. |
What We're Watching
Demand pressure: While preliminary data for fiscal 2024 (fall 2023) indicate enrollment decreases have lessened, we expect demand pressures spurred by demographic trends will continue over the next few years. In addition, government delays related to Free Application for Federal Student Aid processing are likely to exacerbate negative trends for private colleges and universities. Students facing uncertainty about tuition pricing might have opted to delay pursuing higher education or to attend public institutions or community colleges. Innovative teams that are able to adapt and manage communication with prospective students could see stronger results.
Management challenges: Management teams face increased pressure as they navigate the scrutiny of investment portfolios, changes to admissions criteria, and on-campus protests. At the same time, many colleges and universities have undergone leadership transitions in the past year. As the role of college president becomes more difficult, recruiting top talent poses a greater difficulty with a longer timeline. Issues with risk management can also hinder donor relationships and student demand.
Capital requirements: With high borrowing costs and rising construction costs, many institutions have delayed capital projects in recent years. As average ages of plant increases, colleges and universities will need to make investments in campuses to maintain facilities and compete for students.
AI: Some administrators have begun to use AI for admissions, student affairs, and marketing. Institutions report using AI for chatbots to answer students' questions more quickly, to personalize outreach to prospective students based on their interests, or to identify students that require extra support. Although it's still nascent technology, we expect AI could provide a competitive edge to early adopters.
Continued credit bifurcation: We expect less-selective, regional institutions with weaker balance sheets will continue to face greater operating difficulties and an increased risk of covenant violations (see "Rising Covenant Violations Are A Symptom Of The Pressure Facing Lower-Rated U.S. Higher Education Entities," June 20, 2024). However, we expect institutions with high demand, revenue diversity, and robust financial resources will maintain or strengthen their positions.
Appendix
Table 5
Private colleges and universities--Ratings by category | ||
---|---|---|
Institution | State | Outlook |
AAA | ||
Columbia University | NY | Stable |
Dartmouth College | NH | Stable |
Grinnell College | IA | Stable |
Harvard University | MA | Stable |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology | MA | Stable |
Pomona College | CA | Stable |
Princeton University | NJ | Stable |
Rice University | TX | Stable |
Stanford University | CA | Stable |
Swarthmore College | PA | Stable |
Vanderbilt University | TN | Stable |
Yale University | CT | Stable |
AA+ | ||
Amherst College | MA | Stable |
Brown University | RI | Stable |
Bryn Mawr College | PA | Stable |
Carnegie Mellon University | PA | Stable |
Davidson College | NC | Stable |
Duke University | NC | Stable |
Northwestern University | IL | Stable |
Smith College | MA | Stable |
University of Pennsylvania | PA | Stable |
University of Richmond | VA | Stable |
Washington University | MO | Stable |
Wellesley College | MA | Stable |
Williams College | MA | Stable |
AA | ||
Colby College | ME | Stable |
Colgate University | NY | Stable |
Colorado College | CO | Stable |
Cornell University | NY | Stable |
Denison University | OH | Stable |
Emory University | GA | Negative |
Johns Hopkins University | MD | Stable |
Middlebury College | VT | Stable |
University of Southern California | CA | Stable |
Wake Forest University | NC | Stable |
Washington & Lee University | VA | Stable |
Wesleyan University | CT | Stable |
AA- | ||
Boston College | MA | Stable |
Boston University | MA | Positive |
California Institute of Technology | CA | Stable |
Case Western Reserve University | OH | Stable |
College of the Holy Cross | MA | Stable |
Haverford College | PA | Stable |
Lehigh University | PA | Stable |
New York University | NY | Stable |
Oberlin College | OH | Stable |
Pepperdine University | CA | Stable |
Reed College | OR | Stable |
Saint Louis University | MO | Stable |
Southern Methodist University | TX | Stable |
Syracuse University | NY | Stable |
Trinity University | TX | Stable |
Tufts University | MA | Stable |
University of Chicago | IL | Stable |
University of Rochester | NY | Stable |
Villanova University | PA | Stable |
A+ | ||
American University | DC | Stable |
Babson College | MA | Stable |
Bates College | ME | Stable |
Baylor University | TX | Positive |
Brandeis University | MA | Stable |
Dickinson College | PA | Stable |
Franklin & Marshall College | PA | Negative |
George Washington University | DC | Stable |
Lafayette College | PA | Stable |
Loyola University of Chicago | IL | Stable |
Rhodes College | TN | Negative |
Southern New Hampshire University | NH | Stable |
Trinity College | CT | Stable |
Tulane University | LA | Stable |
University of Dayton | OH | Stable |
University of Denver | CO | Stable |
University of Puget Sound | WA | Stable |
University of the South | TN | Stable |
Vassar College | NY | Stable |
A | ||
Barnard College | NY | Stable |
Belmont University | TN | Stable |
Buena Vista University | IA | Stable |
Centre College of Kentucky | KY | Stable |
DePaul University | IL | Stable |
Duquesne University | PA | Stable |
Fairfield University | CT | Stable |
Fordham University | NY | Stable |
Franciscan University of Steubenville | OH | Stable |
Gettysburg College | PA | Stable |
Hampden-Sydney College | VA | Stable |
Hampton University | VA | Stable |
Hofstra University | NY | Stable |
Hope College | MI | Stable |
Kenyon College | OH | Stable |
Loyola University in Maryland | MD | Negative |
Mercy College | NY | Stable |
Providence College | RI | Stable |
Randolph-Macon College | VA | Stable |
Sacred Heart University | CT | Stable |
Seattle University | WA | Stable |
St. Lawrence University | NY | Negative |
University of Portland | OR | Stable |
Worcester Polytechnic Institute | MA | Stable |
A- | ||
Adelphi University | NY | Stable |
Agnes Scott College | GA | Stable |
Allegheny College | PA | Stable |
Assumption College | MA | Negative |
Bryant University | RI | Stable |
Butler University | IN | Stable |
Calvin University | MI | Stable |
Catholic University of America | DC | Stable |
Doane College | NE | Stable |
Drake University | IA | Stable |
Earlham College | IN | Stable |
George Fox University | OR | Stable |
Georgetown University | DC | Stable |
High Point University | NC | Stable |
Hobart and William Smith Colleges | NY | Negative |
Holy Family University | PA | Stable |
Illinois Wesleyan University | IL | Stable |
Johnson & Wales University | RI | Stable |
Kettering University | MI | Negative |
Lewis & Clark College | OR | Stable |
Long Island University | NY | Stable |
Mercer University | GA | Stable |
Messiah College | PA | Stable |
Milwaukee School of Engineering | WI | Stable |
Mount St. Mary's University | CA | Stable |
New England Institute of Technology | RI | Stable |
Nova Southeastern University | FL | Stable |
Ohio Wesleyan University | OH | Stable |
Quinnipiac University | CT | Stable |
Saint John Fisher College | NY | Stable |
Saint Joseph's University | PA | Stable |
Saint Mary's College | IN | Stable |
St. Ambrose University | IA | Stable |
St. John's University | NY | Stable |
Taylor University | IN | Positive |
Transylvania University | KY | Stable |
Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico | PR | Stable |
University of Miami | FL | Stable |
University of Scranton | PA | Stable |
University of Tampa | FL | Positive |
University of Tulsa | OK | Stable |
Wofford College | SC | Stable |
York College of Pennsylvania | PA | Stable |
BBB+ | ||
Alfred University | NY | Stable |
Baldwin Wallace University | OH | Negative |
Bradley University | IL | Stable |
Concordia University Irvine | CA | Stable |
Drexel University | PA | Stable |
Emerson College | MA | Stable |
Fisher College | MA | Stable |
Flagler College | FL | Stable |
Gannon University | PA | Stable |
Goucher College | MD | Negative |
Knox College | IL | Stable |
Lycoming College | PA | Stable |
Lynchburg College | VA | Negative |
Manchester University | IN | Negative |
Manhattan College | NY | Stable |
Meredith College | NC | Negative |
Moravian College | PA | Stable |
Mount Aloysius College | PA | Stable |
Mount Vernon Nazarene University | OH | Stable |
Nazareth College of Rochester | NY | Stable |
Niagara University | NY | Negative |
Randolph College | VA | Stable |
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute | NY | Stable |
Roanoke College | VA | Stable |
Seton Hall University | NJ | Stable |
St. Bonaventure University | NY | Stable |
St. John's College | MD | Positive |
Stetson University | FL | Stable |
Stevens Institute of Technology | NJ | Positive |
The New School, A University | NY | Stable |
Washington & Jefferson College | PA | Stable |
Wayland Baptist University | TX | Negative |
BBB | ||
College of Idaho | ID | Stable |
D'Youville College | NY | Stable |
Gwynedd Mercy University | PA | Stable |
Illinois College | IL | Stable |
Iona College | NY | Stable |
Juniata College | PA | Stable |
King's College | PA | Stable |
Lake Forest College | IL | Stable |
Lenoir-Rhyne University | NC | Stable |
Lesley University | MA | Negative |
Lewis University | IL | Stable |
Lindsey Wilson College | KY | Stable |
Loyola University of New Orleans | LA | Stable |
Marian University | IN | Stable |
McDaniel College | MD | Positive |
Molloy College | NY | Stable |
Neumann University | PA | Negative |
New York Institute of Technology | NY | Stable |
Pacific University | OR | Stable |
Queen's University of Charlotte | NC | Stable |
Regent University | VA | Stable |
Saint Francis University | PA | Stable |
Seattle Pacific University | WA | Negative |
Springfield College | MA | Negative |
St. Edward's University | TX | Stable |
University of Detroit Mercy | MI | Stable |
University of Dubuque | IA | Negative |
University of Indianapolis | IN | Stable |
University of St. Thomas | TX | Stable |
Ursinus College | PA | Stable |
Washington College | MD | Negative |
Westminster College | PA | Stable |
Widener University | PA | Stable |
BBB- | ||
Arcadia University | PA | Stable |
Augustana University | SD | Stable |
Ave Maria University Inc. | FL | Stable |
Bard College | NY | Positive |
Benedictine University | IL | Negative |
Cabrini University | PA | DEVELOPING |
Capital University | OH | Stable |
Carlow University | PA | Stable |
Champlain College | VT | Negative |
Chatham University | PA | Negative |
Columbia College | IL | Negative |
Dominican University | IL | Stable |
Eastern University | PA | Stable |
Elizabethtown College | PA | Stable |
Florida Institute of Technology | FL | Stable |
Georgian Court University | NJ | Stable |
Goodwin University | CT | Stable |
Guilford College | NC | Stable |
Hendrix College | AR | Negative |
Houghton College | NY | Stable |
Houston Baptist University | TX | Stable |
Howard University | DC | Positive |
Lawrence Technical University | MI | Stable |
Lipscomb University | TN | Stable |
Lubbock Christian University | TX | Negative |
Masters University | CA | Stable |
Merrimack College | MA | Stable |
Oklahoma City University | OK | Stable |
Pace University | NY | Stable |
Saint Mary's College | CA | Stable |
Sarah Lawrence College | NY | Stable |
Seton Hill University | PA | Stable |
Simmons University | MA | Negative |
Southwest Baptist University | MO | Negative |
St. Michael's College | VT | Stable |
Stevenson University | MD | Stable |
Tiffin University | OH | Stable |
University of Evansville | IN | Stable |
University of Findlay | OH | Stable |
University of New Haven | CT | Stable |
University Of Northwestern Ohio | OH | Stable |
Western New England University | MA | Stable |
Westminster College | UT | Stable |
Wilkes University | PA | Stable |
Wingate University | NC | Stable |
Yeshiva University | NY | Stable |
BB+ | ||
Alvernia University | PA | Stable |
Barton College | NC | Stable |
Bethel University | MN | Stable |
Chaminade University | HI | Stable |
Marymount University | VA | Stable |
Marywood University | PA | Stable |
Mount St. Mary's University | MD | Stable |
Sweet Briar College | VA | Stable |
University of Hartford | CT | Negative |
BB | ||
Albion College | MI | Negative |
Anna Maria College | MA | Stable |
Hartwick College | NY | Stable |
Hawaii Pacific University | HI | Stable |
Hiram College | OH | Negative |
Lasell College | MA | Negative |
Mercyhurst University | PA | Negative |
Methodist University | NC | Stable |
Pacific Lutheran University | WA | Negative |
Rider University | NJ | Negative |
Saint Elizabeth University | NJ | Negative |
Saint Leo University | FL | Negative |
Southeastern University | FL | Stable |
University of the Sacred Heart | PR | Stable |
BB- | ||
Harrisburg University of Science and Technology | PA | Negative |
La Salle University | PA | Stable |
Table 6
Glossary of ratios and terms | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Metric or ratio | Definition | |||
ENROLLMENT AND DEMAND | ||||
Average ACT scores | Average ACT scores for entering first-year students | |||
Average SAT scores | Average combined math and reading SAT scores for entering first-year students | |||
First-year acceptance rate (%) | Number of students accepted/total number of completed first-year applications | |||
FTE enrollment | Total students enrolled on a full-time-equivalent basis | |||
In-state students (%) | Students enrolled who come from within the state/total students enrolled | |||
Matriculation rate (%) | Total number of enrolled students/total number of accepted students | |||
Retention rate (%) | First-year students who matriculated for sophomore year/total students who completed their first year | |||
Six-year graduation rate (%) | Students who graduate from the university within six years/total students in the first-year cohort | |||
Undergraduate students (%) | Total number of undergraduate students/total students | |||
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE | ||||
Operating margin (%) | Adjusted net operating income/total adjusted operating expense | |||
REVENUE DIVERSITY | ||||
Gifts and pledges (%) | Gifts and pledges/total adjusted operating revenue | |||
Grants and contracts (%) | Government grants and contracts/total adjusted operating revenue | |||
Investment and endowment income (%) | Endowment spending income and investment income/total adjusted operating revenue | |||
Student-generated revenue (%) | (Gross tuition and fees + auxiliary revenues)/total adjusted operating revenue | |||
FINANCIAL AID/EXPENSE RATIOS | ||||
Financial aid burden (%) | Total financial aid expense/total adjusted operating expense | |||
Instruction (%) | Instructional expense/total adjusted operating expense | |||
Tuition discount rate (%) | Total financial aid expense/gross tuition revenue | |||
ENDOWMENT | ||||
Endowment market value ($000s) | Market value of endowment as of fiscal year end | |||
FINANCIAL RESOURCE RATIOS | ||||
Cash and investments to expenses (%) | Cash and investments/total adjusted operating expenses | |||
Cash and investments to debt (%) | Cash and investments/total debt | |||
DEBT RATIOS | ||||
Average age of plant | Accumulated depreciation/depreciation expense | |||
MADS burden (%) | Maximum annual debt service/total adjusted operating expense | |||
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT RATIOS | ||||
Endowment per FTE ($) | Market value of endowment/FTE | |||
Total debt per FTE ($) | Total debt/FTE | |||
DEFINITIONS | ||||
Cash and investments | Cash, unrestricted and restricted financial investments | |||
Total adjusted operating expense | Total operating expenses + institutionally funded financial aid + interest expense | |||
Total adjusted operating revenue | Total operating revenues + institutionally funded financial aid + endowment spending - realized and unrealized gains/losses | |||
FTE--Full-time equivalent. |
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Megan Kearns, Englewood (1) 303-721-4643; megan.kearns@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Laura A Kuffler-Macdonald, New York + 1 (212) 438 2519; laura.kuffler.macdonald@spglobal.com |
Jessica L Wood, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7004; jessica.wood@spglobal.com | |
Research Contributors: | Akshata Shekhar, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai |
Nitya Harlalka, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai | |
Additional Contact: | Travis Nauert, Gulfport 6628043336; travis.nauert@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.