articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240715-brazilian-low-to-mid-tier-homebuilders-continue-to-thrive-amid-government-housing-program-changes-and-rising-13160310.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Brazilian Low- To Mid-Tier Homebuilders Continue To Thrive Amid Government Housing Program Changes And Rising Demand

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Corporate And Infrastructure Finance Criteria

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Festive Will The Holiday Season Be For Retailers In The U.S. And Europe?

COMMENTS

Retail Brief: European Retailers Set Out Their Stalls For The Golden Quarter

COMMENTS

Record-High Health Care Defaults Will Moderate In 2025, Though Higher Than Normal


Brazilian Low- To Mid-Tier Homebuilders Continue To Thrive Amid Government Housing Program Changes And Rising Demand

Chart 1

image

Recent MCMV Changes Should Continue To Bolster Operations In 2024

Housing starts among low- to mid-tier developers jumped by approximately 40% in 2023, while net sales increased by 32%. This stemmed from higher housing demand due to MCMV changes, which expanded potential homebuyers' access to the program. We expect housing starts to increase by 15% in 2024 and 9% in 2025 as homebuilders manage inventories and net sales. We forecast the latter to rise by 14% and 9% for both years, respectively.

These projections incorporate the latest amendments to the MCMV program, including the changes in the FGTS Futuro and the RET. In March 2024, the Severance Indemnity Fund for employees (Fundo de Garantia do Tempo de Serviço [FGTS]) Curator Council approved the FGTS Futuro. This program allows families with monthly incomes of up to R$2,640 to use the future FGTS monthly deposits for the settlement, amortization, or payment of MCMV's mortgage installments, enhancing access to home financing and boosting demand in the segment. Additionally, the Federal Revenue Service reduced the Special Taxation Regime (Regime Especial de Tributação [RET]) from 4% to 1% for home sales falling within the MCMV's Group 1.

Among the homebuilders we rate, MRV Engenharia e Participacoes S.A. (MRV) and Construtora Tenda S.A. (Tenda) have the largest portfolios in this program segment. Approximately 30% and 60% of their recent gross sales, respectively, fall within Group 1. We believe these changes should benefit companies heavily concentrated in this program segment, resulting in higher margins, demand, and cash generation.

For more details about the MCVM program, please see "Recent Developments Signal Favorable Trends For Brazilian Homebuilders", July 25, 2023.

Profitability And Cash Generation To Jump In 2024

The cost of construction materials skyrocketed in 2021 and the first half of 2022, given work stoppages due to the pandemic and supply-chain disruptions. As a result, homebuilders' EBITDA margins dropped by an average of 6 percentage points in 2022 and 2023.

However, given that a significant portion of projects affected by supply-chain pressures was delivered between fourth-quarter 2023 and the first half of 2024, we believe credit metrics will improve gradually from 2024 onward. We expect a 6-percentage-point increase in EBITDA margins in 2024, driven by companies recognizing the results of more profitable housing starts in 2023, and a 1.5-percentage-point margin rise in 2025. Additionally, the reduction in the SELIC rate (expected to reach 10% by the end of 2024 in our macroeconomic base line), lower cash exposure due to benefits from associative credit and home sales through the MCMV program, and a high volume of deliveries of mid-tier homes should boost cash generation starting in 2024. We project an average operating cash flow of R$121 million in 2024 and R$206 million in 2025 among the six rated low- to mid-tier homebuilders, compared with the loss of R$8 million in 2023 (excluding MRV).

Chart 2

image

Operating Improvements Should Help Reduce Leverage Amid Expectations Of Debt Refinancing In 2025

Approximately 60% of the debt among these rated homebuilders consist of debentures and other corporate debt instruments. The remaining portion is related to construction credit lines, which in addition to being directed towards each company's production, are linked to unit transfers to banks through real estate credit.

Chart 3a

image

Chart 3b

image

Out of the total corporate debt outstanding among the six rated low- to mid-tier developers, around 25% will mature in 2025, representing R$2.1 billion. Considering the expected cash generation in 2024, the cash-flow benefits from the MCMV program and associative credit, we believe that these companies will use cash to cover some of the amortization to reduce leverage.

However, a significant portion of corporate debt will likely need refinancing, prompting homebuilders to tap capital markets and financing from banks. Additionally, with the likely growth in housing starts, despite the slower pace than in 2023, we believe homebuilders will seek financing from capital markets to execute projects and acquire land. Therefore, given better operating metrics, coupled with the slower rise in housing starts, we expect companies reduce their leverage, resulting in average FFO to adjusted debt of 32.6% and adjusted debt to capital of 55.8% in 2024. This is in comparison with 20.6% and 60.6% averages, respectively, in 2023.

Regulatory Changes Facilitate Capital Raising At More Attractive Rates

The introduction of Resolution CMN 5,118 on Feb. 1, 2024, restricted the eligible collateral for the issuance of Real Estate Receivables Certificates (CRIs). The primary objective of this change is to prioritize the allocation of funds raised through CRIs to companies in the real state sector. As a result, the pool of potential issuers has significantly narrowed. In our view, this should reduce competition for financing, enabling companies focused on real estate to raise capital at more attractive rates.

Sao Paulo's Housing Program Will Strengthen Cash Flow

The city's Pode Entrar housing program, announced in 2023, aims to simplify access to financing for potential homebuyers, reduce the housing deficit, and address the demand previously met by the MCMV program. While home sales under the Pode Entrar program may yield lower gross margins than for those in private markets, the dilution of general and administrative expenses, along with lower marketing expenses, should raise homebuilders' EBITDA margins. Additionally, the program's subsidies covering 15% of the home value, along with payment flows up to delivery of keys, prevent homebuilders' cash burn during construction.

Furthermore, in case of mortgage delinquency for homes sold through the program for more than three months, companies have the right to cancel the agreement, retaining 20% of the payments made by the government, and sell the home under the MCMV program in the private market. This ensures companies won't face cash flow shortages, securing receivables even in case of delinquency from the city hall.

In 2023, Plano & Plano Desenvolvimento Imobiliario S.A. (not rated) sold 66% of homes through the Pode Entrar program, followed by Direcional (18%), MRV (12%), and Tenda (4%). Collectively, they sold 5,496 residential units, representing a PSV of R$1 billion. From our perspective, this arrangement will benefit companies' operational cash flow in the upcoming periods.

Potential Macroeconomic Risks for Low-tier Homebuilders

Despite the latest news mitigating potential macroeconomic risks for low-tier sector, a consistent and long-lasting increase in inflation may harm margins and cash flows of companies focused on the low-tier segment.

Potential Financing Shortage Despite The Government's Plans Supplement The 2024 Budget

Given the changes in the MCMV program carried out in 2023, demand for housing through the government program has shown signs of overheating since the beginning of 2024. Demand has surged that if it continues at this pace, it will require a budget increase in the second half of the year. The government has signaled that it will do so. Otherwise, we believe that new financing for purchase and construction of housing under MCMV could be frozen at the end of 2024, denting home sales.

INCC At Controlled Levels

The National Index of Construction Cost (INCC-M) increased 0.93% in June 2024, as a result of higher inflation of inputs, services, and labor in the construction sector. Nevertheless, the trend seems to point to a stabilization in construction costs, as indicated by the accumulated rate in 12 months of 3.77%, which remains close to the 3.68% in May 2024. These levels are much lower than 4.29% in June 2023. Although most of the rated companies in this sector have some cushion in their budgets to absorb possible increases in inflation, we believe that a substantial increase in this index may eat into margins of companies' projects with a higher percentage of completed sales, given difficulties in updating the monthly payments through the MCMV program.

Notes

MCMV.  A Brazilian social housing program that aims to provide affordable housing to low- and mid-tier families in Brazil.

Low-tier homebuilder.  Developers that sell homes that qualify under the MCMV program.

Mid-tier homebuilder.  Developers that sell homes that do not qualify under the MCMV program.

FGTS.  FGTS is a Brazilian fund created to protect employees dismissed without just cause. It consists of monthly deposits made by employers on behalf of their employees.

FGTS Futuro.  A program approved by Brazil's FGTS Curator Council. It allows families with monthly incomes up to R$2,640 to use future FGTS deposits for MCMV's loan payments.

RET.  The Regime Especial de Tributação (RET) is a special taxation regime in Brazil. It reduces tax rates for certain sectors, such as real estate, to stimulate economic activity.

Associative credit.  The Associative Credit is a financing model aimed at residential properties still in the project phase, which uses resources from the FGTS. Companies, when planning a new venture, seek a minimum number of buyers, which allows the release of credit by the financial institution. As the construction progresses and contracts with consumers are formalized, the bank provides the construction company with financial resources proportional to the constructive progress made during that period.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Valeria R Marquez, Sao Paulo 55 (11) 3039-4843;
valeria.marquez@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Wendell Sacramoni, CFA, Sao Paulo + 55 11 3039 4855;
wendell.sacramoni@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in