Key Takeaways
- The U.S. CMBS overall delinquency and special servicing rates continue to trend upward, with office leading both categories. Rating actions have been biased heavily toward downgrades, and this trend will likely continue through year end.
- Overall issuance rose considerably to $26 billion in the second quarter versus $18 billion in the first quarter. Conduit issuance increased slightly to approximately $7 billion from $6 billion, while SASB issuance increased to nearly $19 billion from $12 billion. Conduit leverage, deal sizes, and loan counts all increased in the second quarter, but, on average, their levels remained lower compared with the 2021-2022 transactions.
- We declined to give rating feedback on 18 of the 50 single-borrower offerings priced in the first- and second quarters: most because they were not covering debt service on day one, based on our cash flow analysis and the current SOFR level, and some due to tenant concentration.
S&P Global Ratings' quarterly review of the U.S. commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) market reflects credit and issuance conditions, including delinquency and special servicing rates, for conduit and single-borrower transactions as of second-quarter 2024.
Delinquency And Special Servicing Rates Increased; Office Leads Both
The overall 30-plus day delinquency (DQ) rate for U.S. CMBS transactions was 4.8% as of June 2024--a 40 basis points (bps) increase quarter over quarter. The office DQ rate increased 100 bps quarter over quarter to 7.3% and is now the highest among the major property types. The lodging and retail DQ rates were also higher quarter over quarter, but they have improved considerably to 5.5% and slightly above 6.0%, respectively, after peaking at about 22.0% and 17.0% in 2020. Rounding out the five major property types, multifamily remained flat at 3.2%, while industrial continued to outperform with a 0.5% DQ rate.
These DQ rates have all benefitted from reperforming loans: a certain segment of loans that were previously delinquent but subsequently resolved and reclassified, including loans that failed to pay off at maturity and were extended by the servicer. To that end, we began tracking metrics associated with modified loans in our monthly credit report (see "SF Credit Brief: U.S. CMBS Delinquency Rate Rose 22 Bps To 4.8% In June 2024; Updates Provided On Modification Rate By Property Type," published July 1, 2024).
The overall special servicing rate increased approximately 80 bps in the second quarter to 7.3% as of June. For perspective, the recent peak was 9.5% in September 2020. The office and retail sectors lead with special servicing rates of 11.0% and 10.3%, respectively.
Surveillance And Rating Actions In Focus
Office sector stress has led to most of the CMBS downgrades over the past 12 months, as well as some realized losses.
S&P Global Ratings downgraded 344 CMBS classes and raised one class in the 12 months ended June 2024 due to credit tenant lease linkage (see chart 1). We believe this trend is unlikely to change amid higher-for-longer interest rates, the distress within the office sector, and the challenges associated with finding loan-term refinancing capital for certain malls. As a result, we also expect U.S. CMBS rating actions to remain biased heavily toward downgrades for the remainder of this year.
The Appendix below provides line-by-line detail on the most recent quarterly rating actions on U.S. CMBS, including transaction and class names, CUSIPs, property type, transaction type, and current and previous ratings. For greater transparency, we also include the rating affirmations.
Chart 1
We continue to see transaction-specific variations on the rating actions on single asset single borrower (SASB) office transactions, but the trend is overwhelmingly negative, given the considerable distress the sector faces. Factors driving the severity of the rating actions include the magnitude of changes in occupancy and the prospects for retenanting (recent market vacancy and subleasing trends), land value and location, lease rollover and maturity profile, etc. Downgrades have affected classes across the capital stack, including 'AA (sf)' and 'AAA (sf)' rated classes.
As a reminder, a rating committee's view of temporary versus longer-term impairment may determine how far up the capital stack ratings actions will go. Our ratings reflect timely interest and ultimate principal, and the servicer advancing mechanism provides some support to timely interest in the speculative-grade ('BB+' and below) and low-investment-grade ('BBB' and 'A') rating categories. A loan modification does not automatically trigger a downgrade. But loan modifications don't typically occur for "credit positive" reasons and, therefore, may trigger a review, which can result in a downgrade if we believe the risk profile has changed since our last review or the initial rating.
New Issuance Forecast Raised; SASB Is Booming
By the first-half of 2024, the $44 billon in conduit and single-borrower new issuance had already exceeded the $40 billion priced in full-year 2023. The issuance mix was approximately 70% SASB and 30% conduit as of June 2024. The conduits were a mix of the relatively newer five-year product and the more traditional 10-year transactions. Despite the challenges on the surveillance front, private-label CMBS issuance totaled about $26 billion in second-quarter 2024, excluding $1 billion in commercial real estate (CRE) collateralized loan obligations (CLOs).
We recently raised our full-year 2024 CMBS forecast to the $60 billion-$70 billion range. We also believe there is more upside potential to the forecast if the SASB market's torrid issuance pace continues.
Eight Conduits Priced
The second quarter saw eight new conduit CMBS transactions totaling about $7.5 billion, an increase from $6.0 billion in the first quarter (see table 1). We rated four of the transactions. The eight offerings had an average of 43 loans apiece, and an average deal size of $931 million. The high-level observations include the following:
- Overall loan-to-value (LTV) ratios rose 280 bps quarter over quarter, though the first-half 2024 and full-year 2023 levels are significantly lower than the 2021 and 2022 levels. The lower overall leverage reflects DSC ratio constraints. Average transaction sizes (and loans per transaction) increased quarter over quarter, but the transactions remained somewhat smaller and more concentrated compared to 2021 and 2022 levels.
- DSC ratios have generally been lower with the "higher-for-longer" benchmark interest rates, the average DSC fell modestly quarter over quarter. Cash flow and value variance levels have been stable to improving versus 2023 levels, and considerably better versus the 2021 and 2022 metrics.
- Interest-only (IO) percentages remained very high at 87.1% of pool volumes in the second quarter, though the full-term IO percentage decreased 5.7% from its first-quarter 2024 peak of 92.8%.
Table 1
Summary of conduits reviewed by S&P Global Ratings(i) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weighted averages | ||||||||||||||||
Q2 2024 | Q1 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||
No. of transactions reviewed | 8 | 7 | 26 | 24 | 30 | 28 | 52 | |||||||||
No. of transactions rated | 4 | 4 | 13 | 10 | 22 | 14 | 36 | |||||||||
Average deal size (mil. $) | 931 | 808 | 752 | 950 | 1008 | 888 | 926 | |||||||||
Average no. of loans | 43 | 36 | 31 | 49 | 60 | 44 | 50 | |||||||||
S&P Global Ratings' LTV (%) | 83.4 | 80.6 | 82.6 | 94.3 | 96 | 93.7 | 93.5 | |||||||||
S&P Global Ratings' DSC (x) | 1.45 | 1.51 | 1.50 | 2.07 | 2.41 | 2.39 | 1.93 | |||||||||
Final pool Herf/S&P Global Ratings' Herf | 22.7/30.2 | 20.9/36.6 | 19.5/27.4 | 25.1/34.3 | 27.7/32.5 | 24.1/33.1 | 27.7/33.7 | |||||||||
% of full-term IO (final pools) | 87.1 | 92.8 | 84.3 | 77 | 71.5 | 70.7 | 61.6 | |||||||||
% of partial IO (final pools) | 6.9 | 2.9 | 6.5 | 10.1 | 16.1 | 17.9 | 21.4 | |||||||||
S&P Global Rating's NCF haircut (%) | (14.2) | (14.0) | (14.0) | (15.5) | (16.0) | (15.8) | (13.4) | |||||||||
S&P Global Ratings' value variance (%) | (31.0) | (31.2) | (34.2) | (39.6) | (41.6) | (40.0) | (36.0) | |||||||||
(i)Market statistics within the table represent every transaction priced within a selected vintage or quarter, not just the ones we analyzed. LTV--Loan-to-value. DSC--Debt service coverage. Herf--Herfindahl-Hirschman Index score. IO--Interest-only. NCF--Net cash flow. CE--Credit enhancement. |
Property Type Exposures: Retail Continues To Lead
Property-type compositions in conduit transactions continue to evolve with market conditions. Retail remains the clear leader in property type exposures, at 31.0% of total conduits in the second-quarter. Meanwhile, office bounced back a bit to slightly below 20.0% after declining the previous two consecutive quarters, and multifamily decreased 3.0% to 16.0% but remained elevated compared with 2023. We note that conduits have become a vital source of capital for office borrowers as other sources remain difficult to access.
The government agencies' (Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae) pull back on multifamily lending volumes due to DSC and other constraints has allowed private-label conduits to increase their share of multifamily volume. Industrial exposures increased to 11.0% from 9.0% and remained elevated from a historical standpoint, while lodging exposures remained steady in the low double digits. The "other" category (about 4.0% overall exposures) mostly consisted of mixed-use properties, with a slight increase in self-storage exposures during the past three quarters.
Chart 2
Single-Borrower CMBS
Thirty-four transactions totaling almost $19 billion priced in second-quarter 2024, up from $12 billion in the first quarter and $12 billion in the second half of 2023 (see table 2). We reviewed 24 of the 34 transactions and rated six: three were backed by hotels, two by multifamily properties, and one by a mixed-use property.
In the second quarter, we declined to provide rating feedback on eight transactions, compared with 10 (of 16 total) transactions in the first quarter. In previous quarters where we didn't provide preliminary ratings feedback, the main concern was typically high leverage. For the most recent period(s), we have declined feedback if the transaction did not cover debt service (on an S&P Global Ratings' cash flow and current SOFR basis) on day one. Though less frequent, we have also declined to provide ratings feedback for certain credit concerns, including single-tenant concentration.
Table 2
Summary of SASB transactions reviewed by S&P Global Ratings | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 2024 | Q1 2024 | Q4 2023 | Q3 2023 | Q2 2023 | Q1 2023 | Q4 2022 | Q3 2022 | Q2 2022 | ||||||||||||
No. of transactions reviewed | 24 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 6 | |||||||||||
No. of transactions rated | 6 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
Average deal size (mil. $) | 554 | 762 | 547 | 598 | 628 | 712 | 450 | 841 | 1740 | |||||||||||
S&P Global Ratings' LTV (%) | 89.2 | 90.4 | 80.2 | 86.8 | 87.3 | 75.1 | 93.2 | 107.1 | 108.2 | |||||||||||
S&P Global Ratings capitalization rate (%) | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.4 | 7.7 | 8.0 | 8.4 | 7.1 | 7.8 | 8.4 | |||||||||||
S&P Global Rating's NCF haircut (%) | (14.9) | (15.9) | (13.5) | (14.4) | (13.1) | (14.1) | (11.9) | (16.7) | (19.1) | |||||||||||
S&P Global Ratings' value variance (%) | (33.3) | (32.4) | (32.7) | (36.1) | (32.6) | (34.6) | (44.5) | (41.5) | (45.5) | |||||||||||
Primary markets (%) | 45.7 | 65.3 | 39.5 | 75.0 | 60.1 | 27.2 | 53.7 | 37.1 | 54.1 | |||||||||||
Secondary markets (%) | 35.9 | 17.6 | 44.6 | 6.7 | 27.7 | 35.8 | 24.5 | 26.1 | 40.3 | |||||||||||
Tertiary markets (%) | 18.4 | 17.1 | 15.9 | 18.3 | 12.2 | 37.0 | 21.7 | 36.8 | 5.6 | |||||||||||
Fixed rate (%) | 50.0 | 33.3 | 44.4 | 75.0 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||
Floating rate (%) | 50.0 | 66.7 | 55.6 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 40.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||||||||||
Note: The statistics, aside from average deal size, reflect only the transactions reviewed by S&P Global Ratings. SASB--Single-asset single borrower. LTV--Loan-to-value. NCF--Net cash flow. |
Hotels And Industrial Lead SASB Property Type Exposures
Hotels and industrial properties remain the most popular collateral for SASB transactions (see chart 3). Multifamily SASB issuance increased to over 10.0% in the second quarter, despite some pockets of declining rent growth (namely in the "Sun Belt"). Office SASB transactions have been less common, though a few were priced in the first half of the year. Data centers (which is categorized the "other" category), retail, and storage accounted for minor percentages of both first- and second-quarter offerings.
Chart 3
Appendix
Appendix: Recent rating actions--second-quarter 2024 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating | |||||||||
Date | Issuer | CUSIP | Class | Amount (mil. $) | Rating action | Current | Prior | Deal type | Asset type |
06/26/2024 | GSMSC 2018-3PCK | 36255YAA9 | A | 68.7 | Downgrade | AA- (sf) | AA (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
06/26/2024 | GSMSC 2018-3PCK | 36255YAE1 | B | 44.2 | Downgrade | BBB (sf) | A- (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
06/26/2024 | GSMSC 2018-3PCK | 36255YAG6 | C | 33.1 | Downgrade | BB (sf) | BBB- (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
06/26/2024 | GSMSC 2018-3PCK | 36255YAL5 | D | 40.9 | Downgrade | B- (sf) | BB- (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
06/26/2024 | GSMSC 2018-3PCK | 36255YAQ4 | E | 39.0 | Downgrade | CCC (sf) | B (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
06/26/2024 | GSMSC 2018-3PCK | 36255YAC5 | X-A | 68.7 | Downgrade | AA- (sf) | AA (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
06/26/2024 | GSMSC 2018-3PCK | 36255YAJ0 | X-C | 33.1 | Downgrade | BB (sf) | BBB- (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
06/26/2024 | GSMSC 2018-3PCK | 36255YAN1 | X-D | 40.9 | Downgrade | B- (sf) | BB- (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
06/26/2024 | GSMSC 2018-3PCK | 36255YAS0 | X-E | 39.0 | Downgrade | CCC (sf) | B (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
06/26/2024 | JPMCC 2018-ASH8 | 46649JAA6 | A | 94.6 | Affirmation | AA- (sf) | AA- (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
06/26/2024 | JPMCC 2018-ASH8 | 46649JAG3 | B | 31.7 | Downgrade | BBB- (sf) | A- (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
06/26/2024 | JPMCC 2018-ASH8 | 46649JAJ7 | C | 25.7 | Downgrade | BB (sf) | BBB- (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
06/26/2024 | JPMCC 2018-ASH8 | 46649JAL2 | D | 32.3 | Downgrade | B+ (sf) | BB- (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
06/26/2024 | JPMCC 2018-ASH8 | 46649JAN8 | E | 51.1 | Downgrade | CCC (sf) | B- (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
06/26/2024 | JPMCC 2018-ASH8 | 46649JAQ1 | F | 42.7 | Affirmation | CCC- (sf) | CCC- (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
06/26/2024 | JPMCC 2018-ASH8 | 46649JAE8 | X-EXT | 184.4 | Downgrade | B+ (sf) | BB- (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
06/14/2024 | BBCMS 2018-CHRS | 05491VAA4 | A | 65.0 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
06/14/2024 | BBCMS 2018-CHRS | 05491VAE6 | B | 53.9 | Affirmation | AA- (sf) | AA- (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
06/14/2024 | BBCMS 2018-CHRS | 05491VAG1 | C | 50.6 | Affirmation | A- (sf) | A- (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
06/14/2024 | BBCMS 2018-CHRS | 05491VAJ5 | D | 62.1 | Affirmation | BBB- (sf) | BBB- (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
06/14/2024 | BBCMS 2018-CHRS | 05491VAL0 | E | 38.4 | Affirmation | BB (sf) | BB (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2018-BOP | 61768FAA8 | A | 61.5 | Downgrade | A- (sf) | AA (sf) | Large loan floater | Office |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2018-BOP | 61768FAG5 | B | 19.0 | Downgrade | BB (sf) | BBB+ (sf) | Large loan floater | Office |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2018-BOP | 61768FAJ9 | C | 14.3 | Downgrade | B (sf) | BB+ (sf) | Large loan floater | Office |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2018-BOP | 61768FAL4 | D | 17.5 | Downgrade | CCC (sf) | B+ (sf) | Large loan floater | Office |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2018-BOP | 61768FAE0 | X-EXT | 50.8 | Downgrade | CCC (sf) | B+ (sf) | Large loan floater | Office |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YBT8 | A-3 | 160.0 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YBU5 | A-4 | 194.8 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YBX9 | A-S | 52.6 | Downgrade | AA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YBS0 | A-SB | 20.3 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YBY7 | B | 32.7 | Downgrade | A- (sf) | A+ (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YBZ4 | C | 31.9 | Downgrade | BB+ (sf) | BBB (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YAC6 | D | 37.1 | Downgrade | B- (sf) | BB- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YAL6 | E | 18.1 | Downgrade | CCC (sf) | B (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YAE2 | E-1 | 9.0 | Downgrade | CCC (sf) | B+ (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YAG7 | E-2 | 9.0 | Downgrade | CCC (sf) | B (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YAU6 | EF | 25.0 | Affirmation | CCC (sf) | CCC (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YBC5 | EFG | 37.0 | Affirmation | CCC- (sf) | CCC- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YAS1 | F | 6.9 | Affirmation | CCC (sf) | CCC (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YAN2 | F-1 | 3.4 | Downgrade | CCC (sf) | B- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YAQ5 | F-2 | 3.4 | Affirmation | CCC (sf) | CCC (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YBA9 | G | 12.1 | Affirmation | CCC- (sf) | CCC- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YAW2 | G-1 | 6.0 | Affirmation | CCC (sf) | CCC (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YAY8 | G-2 | 6.0 | Affirmation | CCC- (sf) | CCC- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YBV3 | X-A | 375.1 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YBW1 | X-B | 85.3 | Downgrade | A- (sf) | A+ (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/24/2024 | MSC I Trust 2016-BNK2 | 61690YAA0 | X-D | 37.1 | Downgrade | B- (sf) | BB- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
05/23/2024 | JPMCC 2018-PTC | 46649GAN4 | E | 9.8 | Downgrade | D (sf) | CCC- (sf) | Large loan floater | Office |
05/23/2024 | Natixis 2018-FL1 | 63874MAL6 | C | 32.0 | Downgrade | D (sf) | CCC- (sf) | Large loan floater | Retail mall |
05/23/2024 | GSMSCT 2018-RIVR | 36255WAA3 | A | 110.8 | Downgrade/Watch Neg | BB+ (sf) | AA- (sf) | Single borrower | Office/lodging |
05/23/2024 | GSMSCT 2018-RIVR | 36255WAC9 | B | 26.1 | Downgrade/Watch Neg | CCC- (sf) | BBB+ (sf) | Single borrower | Office/lodging |
05/23/2024 | GSMSCT 2018-RIVR | 36255WAE5 | C | 19.6 | Downgrade/Watch Neg | CCC- (sf) | BB+ (sf) | Single borrower | Office/lodging |
05/23/2024 | GSMSCT 2018-RIVR | 36255WAG0 | D | 24.0 | Downgrade/Watch Neg | CCC- (sf) | B- (sf) | Single borrower | Office/lodging |
05/23/2024 | COMM 2018-HCLV | 20048KAL1 | F | 33.2 | Downgrade | D (sf) | CCC- (sf) | Single borrower | Office/retail |
05/02/2024 | SFAVE 2015-5AVE | 78413MAA6 | A-1 | 181.1 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Single borrower | Retail |
05/02/2024 | SFAVE 2015-5AVE | 78413MAC2 | A-2A | 300.0 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Single borrower | Retail |
05/02/2024 | SFAVE 2015-5AVE | 78413MAE8 | A-2B | 450.0 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Single borrower | Retail |
05/02/2024 | SFAVE 2015-5AVE | 78413MAL2 | B | 107.5 | Affirmation | AA- (sf) | AA- (sf) | Single borrower | Retail |
05/02/2024 | SFAVE 2015-5AVE | 78413MAN8 | C | 135.4 | Affirmation | A- (sf) | A- (sf) | Single borrower | Retail |
05/02/2024 | SFAVE 2015-5AVE | 78413MAQ1 | D | 76.0 | Affirmation | BBB (sf) | BBB (sf) | Single borrower | Retail |
05/02/2024 | SFAVE 2015-5AVE | 78413MAG3 | X-A | 931.1 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Single borrower | Retail |
04/24/2024 | CSMC Trust 2017-CHOP | 12651QAA7 | A | 50.1 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
04/24/2024 | CSMC Trust 2017-CHOP | 12651QAG4 | B | 69.0 | Affirmation | AA- (sf) | AA- (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
04/24/2024 | CSMC Trust 2017-CHOP | 12651QAJ8 | C | 51.2 | Affirmation | A- (sf) | A- (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
04/24/2024 | CSMC Trust 2017-CHOP | 12651QAL3 | D | 67.8 | Affirmation | BBB- (sf) | BBB- (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
04/24/2024 | CSMC Trust 2017-CHOP | 12651QAN9 | E | 81.5 | Affirmation | B+ (sf) | B+ (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
04/24/2024 | CSMC Trust 2017-CHOP | 12651QAQ2 | F | 119.9 | Affirmation | CCC (sf) | CCC (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
04/24/2024 | CSMC Trust 2017-CHOP | 12651QAE9 | X-EXT | 50.1 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Single borrower | Lodging |
04/22/2024 | COMM 2013-LC13 | 12626GAR4 | C | 10.1 | Downgrade | BBB (sf) | A- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
04/22/2024 | COMM 2013-LC13 | 12626GAT0 | D | 49.8 | Downgrade | B- (sf) | BB- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
04/16/2024 | WFCMT 2016-BNK1 | 95000GAX2 | A-2 | 228.6 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Conduit | Various |
04/16/2024 | WFCMT 2016-BNK1 | 95000GAY0 | A-3 | 267.0 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Conduit | Various |
04/16/2024 | WFCMT 2016-BNK1 | 95000GBA1 | A-S | 67.2 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Conduit | Various |
04/16/2024 | WFCMT 2016-BNK1 | 95000GAZ7 | A-SB | 15.6 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Conduit | Various |
04/16/2024 | WFCMT 2016-BNK1 | 95000GBD5 | B | 44.5 | Downgrade | A (sf) | AA- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
04/16/2024 | WFCMT 2016-BNK1 | 95000GBE3 | C | 39.3 | Downgrade | BBB- (sf) | A- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
04/16/2024 | WFCMT 2016-BNK1 | 95000GBB9 | X-A | 511.2 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Conduit | Various |
04/16/2024 | WFCMT 2016-BNK1 | 95000GBC7 | X-B | 150.9 | Downgrade | BBB- (sf) | A- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
04/12/2024 | JPMCC 2019-FL12 | 46651QAA5 | A | 43.0 | Affirmation | A- (sf) | A- (sf) | Large loan floater | Office |
04/12/2024 | JPMCC 2019-FL12 | 46651QAE7 | EYT1 | 7.3 | Downgrade | BB (sf) | BB+ (sf) | Large loan floater | Office |
04/12/2024 | JPMCC 2019-FL12 | 46651QAG2 | EYT2 | 9.9 | Downgrade | B (sf) | B+ (sf) | Large loan floater | Office |
04/12/2024 | JPMCC 2019-FL12 | 46651QAC1 | X | 43.0 | Affirmation | A- (sf) | A- (sf) | Large loan floater | Office |
04/11/2024 | GSMSC 2013-PEMB | 36197VAA6 | A | 152.2 | Downgrade | A- (sf) | A (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
04/11/2024 | GSMSC 2013-PEMB | 36197VAC2 | B | 33.8 | Downgrade | BB- (sf) | BB (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
04/11/2024 | GSMSC 2013-PEMB | 36197VAE8 | C | 25.4 | Downgrade | B- (sf) | B (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
04/11/2024 | GSMSC 2013-PEMB | 36197VAG3 | D | 31.1 | Affirmation | CCC (sf) | CCC (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
04/11/2024 | GSMSC 2013-PEMB | 36197VAJ7 | E | 17.5 | Affirmation | CCC- (sf) | CCC- (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
04/05/2024 | JPMCC 2013-LC11 | 46639YAW7 | C | 47.7 | Downgrade | CCC- (sf) | B- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
04/05/2024 | JPMCC 2013-LC11 | 46639YAX5 | D | 52.6 | Downgrade | D (sf) | CCC- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
04/05/2024 | JPMCC 2013-LC11 | 46639YAT4 | X-B | 139.8 | Downgrade | CCC- (sf) | B- (sf) | Conduit | Various |
04/05/2024 | CG-CCRE 2014-FL2 | 12528PAP7 | COL2 | 12.9 | Downgrade | D (sf) | CCC- (sf) | Large loan floater | Retail |
04/05/2024 | BWAY 2015-1740 | 05604LAA0 | A | 0.0 | Downgrade | D (sf) | CCC- (sf) | Single borrower | Office |
04/05/2024 | DBJPM 2016-SFC | 23312RAA3 | A | 150.0 | Downgrade | D (sf) | B+ (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
04/05/2024 | DBJPM 2016-SFC | 23312RAE5 | B | 35.0 | Downgrade | D (sf) | CCC (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
04/05/2024 | DBJPM 2016-SFC | 23312RAG0 | C | 59.6 | Downgrade | D (sf) | CCC (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
04/05/2024 | DBJPM 2016-SFC | 23312RAJ4 | D | 62.3 | Downgrade | D (sf) | CCC- (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
04/05/2024 | DBJPM 2016-SFC | 23312RAC9 | X-A | 185.0 | Downgrade | D (sf) | CCC (sf) | Single borrower | Retail mall |
04/05/2024 | GSMSC 2018-TWR | 36251SAS7 | F | 21.4 | Downgrade | D (sf) | CCC- (sf) | Single borrower | Office |
04/05/2024 | COMM 2016-667M | 12636GAA9 | A | 116.7 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Single borrower | Office |
04/05/2024 | COMM 2016-667M | 12636GAE1 | B | 25.9 | Downgrade | A+ (sf) | AA- (sf) | Single borrower | Office |
04/05/2024 | COMM 2016-667M | 12636GAG6 | C | 24.8 | Downgrade | BBB (sf) | A- (sf) | Single borrower | Office |
04/05/2024 | COMM 2016-667M | 12636GAJ0 | D | 30.5 | Downgrade | BB (sf) | BBB- (sf) | Single borrower | Office |
04/05/2024 | COMM 2016-667M | 12636GAL5 | E | 16.1 | Downgrade | B (sf) | BB- (sf) | Single borrower | Office |
04/05/2024 | COMM 2016-667M | 12636GAC5 | X-A | 116.7 | Affirmation | AAA (sf) | AAA (sf) | Single borrower | Office |
Related Criteria
- SF Credit Brief: U.S. CMBS Delinquency Rate Rose 22 Bps To 4.8% In June 2024; Updates Provided On Modification Rate By Property Type, July 1, 2024
- CMBS Global Property Evaluation Methodology, Sept. 5, 2012
- Rating Methodology And Assumptions For U.S. And Canadian CMBS, Sept. 5, 2012
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Senay Dawit, New York + 1 (212) 438 0132; senay.dawit@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Rachel Buck, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4928; rachel.buck@spglobal.com |
James C Digney, New York + 1 (212) 438 1832; james.digney@spglobal.com | |
Cathy C de la Torre, New York + 1 (212) 438 0502; cathy.de.la.torre@spglobal.com | |
Global Structured Finance Research: | James M Manzi, CFA, Washington D.C. + 1 (202) 383 2028; james.manzi@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.