articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240708-hong-kong-retail-property-survival-of-the-fittest-13171786 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Hong Kong Retail Property: Survival Of The Fittest

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Will Emerging Markets Shape Global Growth?

COMMENTS

Credit Trends: U.S. Corporate Bond Yields As Of Oct. 23, 2024

COMMENTS

Mexican Structured Finance Market Update: Spotting Opportunities Amid Economic Challenges

COMMENTS

Cyber Risk Brief: U.K. Public Sector Is Increasingly Under Threat


Hong Kong Retail Property: Survival Of The Fittest

Difficult times call for difficult measures. Even as retail sales are falling in Hong Kong, the city's major landlords will spend more to attract footfall. S&P Global Ratings thinks the investments will be manageable for rated landlords and should pay off.

Revamps are needed because the profile of shoppers is changing. Hong Kong is still not drawing the level of mainland Chinese visitors it did prior to the pandemic. Given the pie is not growing, major landlords need to attract footfall from rival shopping areas and online retail.

So far, this is working. The vacancy rates of for rated retail landlords are less than 5%. This compares with more than 20% for some of the traditional high street properties, including Granville Road in Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon or Jaffe Road on Hong Kong Island.

Tough Conditions For Hong Kong's Retail Sales

We anticipate that Hong Kong's retail sales will be under pressure this year, after declining 6% year-on-year for the first five months. The weakness will span both ordinary and luxury spending. Even supermarket sales are a bit cautious (see chart 1).

In our view, this malaise won't be lifted overnight.

Hong Kong residents are increasingly heading overseas.   Overseas travel has fully recovered after several years of severe restrictions on mobility. As of end-June 2024, outbound travel by Hong Kong residents exceeded 2018 levels on an annualized basis.

Tourist arrivals haven't recovered.  At the end of last year they were only 52% of 2018 levels. Moreover, the spending power of same-day tourists from mainland China has dropped sharply. On a per-capita basis, it's 40% lower than the 2018 level.

The ratio of Hong Kong resident outbound travel to visitors arrival to Hong Kong is currently 2.3x; this ratio was 1.4x in 2018 (see chart 2).

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

An unfavorable wealth effect.  A faltering property market--with prices down a quarter the since peak in 2021--hurts consumption. We expect Hong Kong's home prices to decline a further 5% to 10% in 2024.

More online shopping.   This retail trend has been steadily growing in recent years. Online sales represented 8.7% of the city's total retail sales in May 2024, exceeding the average of 8.1% during 2020-2022.

Chart 3

image

The Tourist-Zone High Streets Will Be Hit The Hardest

Weak patronage and spending is most apparent in the tourist-zones. We expect the shopping malls operated by rated property companies will continue to gain market share from high street and individual strata-title retail properties.

This is because high street and strata-title property lack the flexibility to attract foot traffic through operational improvements such as enhancing assets, reshuffling tenant mixes, and offering loyalty programs or free parking etc.

Malls that are solely owned by one operator have more control over the offerings, amenities and the capital to invest in refurbishments and renovations that meet changing shopping habits.

Sun Hung Kai Properties has shifted its tenant mix while maintaining occupancy at 95%.  It has accelerated marketing; for instance, with a campaign to introduce mainland Chinese brands to domestic shoppers and international brands for visitors from across the border. It introduced a pet friendly area in its YOHO Mall. New Town Plaza recently reconfigured the mall's rooftop as a dinosaur-themed outdoor playground. Since its opening in October 2023, this 35,000-square-foot park has boosted the mall's traffic and customer base, according to the company.

Link Real Estate Investment Trust, Hong Kong's largest mass-market retail landlord, will focus a touch more on food and beverage to improve performance.  Some 29% of tenants are in this segment, up from 27.6% a year ago. The trust has managed tenant sales growth of 0.4% in the fiscal year that ended in March, even as sales for supermarkets declined 5.1%. This is partly because food and beverage sales expanded 4.6% over the period.

Hongkong Land Holdings will upgrade its Landmark luxury retail malls in Central.  This will include widening floor areas for key tenants--all international fashion houses that collectively will invest US$600 million in the US$1 billion project. Hongkong Land will fund the remainder. We think such initiatives will continue to pay off. The vacancy rates of rated landlords have stayed below 5%. Whereas high street property in core areas reached vacancy rates of 12.8% in the first quarter of 2024 (see table 1).

Chart 4

image

Rated landlords' rental rates are also outperforming. Link REIT and Hongkong Land's average monthly rent per square feet declined by 5% and 13% respectively from their peak in 2018, whereas high street rents were 70% below 2018 level, according to real estate consultancy JLL.

Rated Landlords Can Absorb Our Base Case And Downside Scenario

We expect rental reversions for retail-space leases will range from flat to a 5% decline in 2024. This is manageable for the rated landlords. They can also manage a 10% negative rental reversion, based on stress tests we conducted.

Our assumptions in brief:

We forecast adjusted EBITDA will increase 1%-5% this year for rated landlords.  Drivers are company-specific but include new completion of investment properties, and recognition of development projects. A diversified property portfolio of rated landlords will support a stable financial profile. However, there are downside risks to performance across all property types. Our base case also includes a forecast of a 5% to 10% decline in home prices (see "Hong Kong's Easing Property Policy Isn't A Quick Fix For Developers," March 6, 2024) and 5% decline in grade-A office rents (see "Capping The Cap Rates: How Hong Kong Office Landlords Are Managing," Feb. 26, 2024) in 2024. Hong Kong retail rental typically accounts for 13%-55% of their total revenue (see table 2).

In a modest downside scenario, EBITDA could decline by 0.4 to 1.6 percentage points from our base case.  This assumes 10% negative rental reversions, or more than double our base-case range of flat to negative 5%, maintaining our base-case assumptions for home price and office rentals for Hong Kong.

Upgrades will remain a driver of capex.   As one example, we recently increased our capex estimates for Hongkong Land after the company announced a revamp of its luxury Landmark mall. The upgrade will cost the company US$400 million and also disrupt rental flows over the three-year life of the project. Link REIT plans to spend HK$640 million enhancing assets over the coming few years, after spending HK$230 million (about US$82 million) for such projects in 2023.

Even so, leverage for rated players will likely remain stable. These capital outlays will be spread out and account for 5%-10% of their annual rental income, based on our estimates.

Table 2

Hong Kong retail landlords tend to have diversified exposures
Among Rated Landlords, Link REIT has biggest exposure to retail HKL IFC Link REIT SHKP Hang Lung Properties Hysan Swire Properties Wharf REIC Champion REIT
Rating and outlook A/Stable/-- A/Stable/-- A/Stable/-- A+/Stable/-- Not rated Not rated Not rated Not rated Not rated
Business risk profile

Strong

Strong Strong Excellent NA NA NA NA NA
Competitive position Strong Strong Strong

Excellent

NA NA NA NA NA
As of fiscal period ended 23-Dec 23-Jun 24-Mar 23-Dec 23-Dec 23-Dec 23-Dec 23-Dec 23-Dec
Hong Kong retail income as a % of total revenue 13-14* 25.9 55.2 13.7 19.5 47.8§ 16.7 54.9 31.7
Hong Kong office income as a % of total revenue 38-39* 48.9 1.6 8.9 10.7 45.9§ 37.3 23.3 61
Other income as a % of total revenue 48-49* 25.1 43.2 77.5 69.8 6.4 46 21.8 10.2
Target markets of Hong Kong retail portfolio Luxury, local spending Luxury, tourist and local spending Non-luxury, local spending Mixed Non-luxury, tourist and local spending Luxury, tourist and local spending Mixed Luxury, tourist spending Non-luxury, tourist and local spending
Other businesses Office, retail, residential, and hotel properties in Singapore, mainland China, and Southeast Asia Hotel and serviced apartments in Hong Kong Hong Kong retail, office, car parks and related business; mainland China retail, office and logistics properties; international retail and office properties Residential, office, retail properties and hotel businesses in Hong Kong, mainland China and Singapore, telecommunications, transport infrastructure and logistics, data center operations and others Residential properties in Hong Kong, and office, retail, and hotel properties in mainland China Residential properties in Hong Kong, and office and retail properties in mainland China Office and retail properties in mainland China, residential properties in Hong Kong, and overseas properties Hotel, retail, and office properties, and industrial parks in Hong Kong, mainland China, and Singapore Limited

See table 3 for full names of companies cited. *Estimated. §Including mainland China portfolio. NA--Not applicable. Source: Company financials and S&P Global Ratings.

Can Landlords Afford The Capex In These Softer Times?

Yes, we think they can. In our view, it would be costlier, in the long run, if landlords did not adjust to changing consumer spending habits and market trends. We think the recent and planned upgrades and retail marketing should help the major retail landlords generate stable rental income and hone their competitive positions. This will help them attract "flight to quality" tenants as well as a bigger share of local footfall.

Table 3

Companies cited in the report
Full name Abbreviation Issuer credit rating

Hongkong Land Holdings Ltd.

HKL A/Stable/--

IFC Development Ltd.

IFC A/Stable/--

Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.

SHKP A+/Stable/--

Link Real Estate Investment Trust

Link REIT A/Stable/--

Swire Pacific Ltd.

Swire Pacific A-/Stable/--

Hysan Development Co. Ltd.

Hysan Unrated
Wharf Real Estate Investment Co. Ltd. Wharf REIC Unrated
Champion Real Estate Investment Trust Champion REIT Unrated
Fortune Real Estate Investment Trust Fortune REIT Unrated
Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Writer: Cathy Holcombe

Digital design: Evy Cheung

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Wilson Ling, Hong Kong +852 25333549;
wilson.ling@spglobal.com
Fan Gao, CFA, Hong Kong + (852) 2533-3595;
fan.gao@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Edward Chan, CFA, FRM, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3539;
edward.chan@spglobal.com
Lawrence Lu, CFA, Hong Kong + 85225333517;
lawrence.lu@spglobal.com
Research Assistant:Dengyu Yang, HANGZHOU

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in