articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240627-creditweek-how-will-ai-transform-the-healthcare-industry-13153767.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Will AI Transform The Healthcare Industry?

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Corporate And Infrastructure Finance Criteria

COMMENTS

Retail Brief: European Retailers Set Out Their Stalls For The Golden Quarter

COMMENTS

Private Credit Could Bridge The Infrastructure Funding Gap

COMMENTS

The Opportunity Of Asset-Based Finance Draws In Private Credit


CreditWeek: How Will AI Transform The Healthcare Industry?

(Editor's Note: CreditWeek is a weekly research offering from S&P Global Ratings, providing actionable and forward-looking insights on emerging credit risks and exploring the questions that matter to markets today. Subscribe to receive a new edition every Thursday at: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/creditweek-7115686044951273472/)

AI's recalibration of the healthcare industry is having an increasingly direct impact on health outcomes, with improvements to the efficacy and efficiency of treatments underpinned by new business models, the emergence of non-traditional actors, and the creation of novel medicines and approaches to expanding healthcare capacity. The resulting shifts in market dynamics will affect issuers' competitive positions and could affect credit quality.

What We're Watching

AI-based technologies' ability to process complex inputs and provide meaningful outputs has already proven its worth across many sectors, spanning real estate to digital publishers and beyond. As adoption accelerates, the healthcare industry stands out as one of the sectors most in need of (and best positioned for) transformation—considering its complexity, the wealth of data it offers, and the significant opportunity for both better health and cost outcomes.

The healthcare sector faces many long-term challenges, including: increasing demand due to growing and aging populations; the unsustainable growth of healthcare costs; increasing physician and nursing shortages; a lack of interconnectivity between patient and medical data; the high medical error rate; health inequalities; the constant need for innovation in pharmaceuticals and medical devices; and the complexity of navigating healthcare systems.

Many of these issues are underpinned by the industry's ongoing reliance on manual processes, which have proven resistant to—but remain ripe for—disruption through automation and innovation. S&P Global Ratings believes generative AI will accelerate the provision of solutions to these challenges. And this view is shared by the industry, as seen in its increasing investment in AI and the widespread application of the technology.

image

What We Think And Why

We expect AI will disrupt existing healthcare market dynamics by shifting the existing power balance, changing risk-reward calculations for investments and acquisitions, and driving consolidation.

In our view, the first major effects of AI on the healthcare industry will materialize in healthcare services and health insurance. Health insurance is likely to see a reduction in the administrative burden, quicker turnaround on adjudications, and improved healthcare quality. AI promises to benefit healthcare services by creating cost savings and efficiency gains that could significantly augment physicians' capacity, decrease burnout and turnover, improve physician-patient interactions, improve patient satisfaction, and reduce medical errors.

Larger, data-rich healthcare companies will, overall, have an initial advantage in securing these positive outcomes, which could initially widen the competitive gap between companies.

The medical devices, life sciences, and diagnostics subsector could see advances in identifying illnesses, next-generation sequencing, surgery effectiveness, and remote patient monitoring. Meanwhile, pharma and biotech are likely to enjoy enhancements in drug discovery and operating efficiency.

Such technological advancements have already facilitated greater precision in healthcare, with machine learning enabling medical practitioners to leverage data to reveal new treatment approaches and tailor decisions to individual patients.

Those gains also create synergies between biology's wealth of data and AI's input requirements—the combination of which is providing new opportunities for beneficial innovation. At the cutting edge of such outcomes are new capabilities for emerging and innovative research and development.

For example, the application of synthetic biology, known as synbio—a relatively new field of science concerned with reading (sequencing), editing (synthesizing), and writing (printing) DNA to create new entities—is already changing manufacturing, pharmacology, and agriculture. Its influence will continue to spread as genetic innovations and inventions give rise to new applications across renewable energy, healthcare, foods, and crops. Still, such innovation comes with risks, too: AI's ability to automate, accelerate, and scale synbio has the potential to expedite and magnify many of the dangers associated with gene editing.

What Could Change

From a ratings perspective, the medium- and long-term effects of AI on healthcare organizations and, ultimately, credit quality remain uncertain.

In the medium-term, the pace of AI adoption will differ across the healthcare subsectors, including insurers, government payors, service providers, pharmaceutical companies, medical device makers, and life sciences companies. Over the long-term, the acceleration of AI disruption could weaken some companies' competitive positions and lead to downgrades—particularly in the case of companies that fail to implement a cohesive AI strategy and a governance framework that is aligned with their business strategy.

On the biotech front, the combination of AI and scientific developments like synbio are likely to accelerate and deepen the potential for disruption over the next five years or less. AI's implications for the growth of industrial biomanufacturing, support of the circular economy, and expansion of big data in biology will all be key factors to watch.

Writer: Molly Mintz

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Miriam Fernandez, CFA, Madrid + 34917887232;
Miriam.Fernandez@spglobal.com
Arthur C Wong, Toronto + 1 (416) 507 2561;
arthur.wong@spglobal.com
Sudeep K Kesh, New York + 1 (212) 438 7982;
sudeep.kesh@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Alexandra Dimitrijevic, London + 44 20 7176 3128;
alexandra.dimitrijevic@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in