articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240625-ai-in-healthcare-a-path-to-long-term-immunity-13148790 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

AI In Healthcare: A Path To Long-Term Immunity?

COMMENTS

Private Markets Monthly, December 2024: Private Credit Trends To Watch In 2025

COMMENTS

Sustainable Finance FAQ: The Rise Of Green Equity Designations

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Will COP29 Agreements Support Developing Economies?


AI In Healthcare: A Path To Long-Term Immunity?

A Perfect Match

The healthcare industry, which struggles with high spending levels and labor shortages, is in dire need of disruption--and AI has the potential to do just that.   Healthcare is facing many challenges, including increasing demand due to a growing and aging population, unsustainable growth of healthcare costs, physician and nursing shortages, lack on interconnectivity of patient and medical data, an alarmingly high medical error rate, health inequality, the constant need for innovation in pharmaceuticals and medical devices, and the increasing complexity of navigating healthcare systems, especially in the U.S. Given that the healthcare industry is a such a large and increasing contributor to countries' GDPs, with more than 17% in the U.S., AI would have a far-reaching effect, especially in an industry that has such a direct impact on human lives and is seen by many as a basic human right. In this article, we explore how major healthcare subsectors that will likely benefit from AI implement the new technologies and what, if any, credit implications they will face over the near term.

AI increases physicians' treatment capacity.   Growing healthcare demand and the increasing complexity of healthcare systems increased administrative burdens, led to burnouts among physicians and nursing staff, and resulted in a shortage of trained medical personnel. This has significantly reduced treatment capacities and led to longer wait times, higher expenses, and more patient dissatisfaction. Several studies have shown that administrative tasks, such as paperwork regarding medical notes, insurance claims, and prior authorization requests, now account for almost 50% of doctors' and 33% nurses' time. The use of AI, such as GPT-4, would increase medical staff's capacity to treat and interact with patients, as well as reduce burnout and turnover rates within the industry. The continued development of AI tools to help physicians navigate and use patient records could reduce the administrative burden, allow more time for patient care, and improve efficiencies.

AI leads to more efficient operations and reduces costs for providers.   In light of labor and inflationary pressures, AI's potential capability to cut costs and reduce the administrative burden becomes ever more relevant. Providers, such as hospitals, increasingly use AI in corporate and administrative functions, such as scheduling optimization, patient interaction, supply chain efficiency, clinical documentation, and revenue cycle management. Additionally, generative AI can increase retention rates and improve the recruitment of patients, expanding a provider's capacity for high-acuity procedures and lowering usage rates of higher-cost temporary staffing.

Clinical AI-based improvements could lead to changes in business models and reimbursements.   Hospitals and physicians use AI in diagnostics and imaging, patient monitoring, predictive analytics, and collaborative learning and information sharing, with encouraging results when it comes to early detection and treatment outcomes. The use of AI could lead to the proactive, rather than reactive, diagnosis and treatment of diseases and conditions. This could lead to earlier treatments, result in lower costs and healthier patients, and preserve hospital capacity to treat more serious cases.

Multiple use cases

AI has increased its footprint in the healthcare industry in the past few years.   The pace of AI adoption accelerated as its capabilities and uses expanded. Among others, AI can reduce medical errors, enhance early detection capabilities, improve productivity, shorten product development cycles, improve patient access, reduce overall healthcare system costs, and, overall, drastically reshape many healthcare subsectors' existing market structures. However, the pace of adoption differs among the various subsectors, which include insurers, government payors, service providers, pharmaceutical companies, medical device makers, and life sciences companies. We expect AI will disrupt existing market dynamics by shifting the existing power balance, changing risk-reward calculations for investments and acquisitions, and driving consolidation in the industry. Based on a survey conducted by 451 Research, more companies are planning to further focus on implementing AI into their operations.

Table 1

Potential effects of AI on major healthcare subsectors
Subsector Potential effects of AI
Health insurance Reduction in the administrative burden, quicker turnaround on adjudications, improved healthcare quality.
Healthcare services Cost savings and efficiency gains can potentially double the capacity of physicians, decrease the number of burnout cases and turnover, improve physician-patient interactions and patient satisfaction, and reduce medical errors.
Medical devices, life sciences, and diagnostics Advances in diagnostics, next-generation sequencing, surgery effectiveness, and remote patient monitoring.
Pharma and biotech Enhancements in drug discovery and operating efficiency.

image

AI could affect ratings

These shifts in existing market dynamics will affect competitive positions and potentially result in rating changes.   We believe the pace of AI adoption in the healthcare industry is accelerating, and with newer, broader-based tools such as GPT-4, the effect is increasing. It is becoming critical that individual companies have an AI strategy and invest to implement, as AI is creating competitive advantages, especially for larger, more established companies, which have sufficient financial capacity to develop or acquire AI capabilities. This has negative rating implications for smaller issuers that cannot leverage the benefits from AI as quickly and could therefore suffer a competitive disadvantage. For smaller companies that implement AI strategies effectively, AI can have a leveling effect, where smaller and more agile companies with superior algorithms could expand rapidly and outpace current industry leaders, particularly in low-margin, highly fragmented areas. We expect the adoption of AI will lead to substantial fixed costs and margin improvements.

AI In Healthcare Services

image

AI is critical for the healthcare services sector because it can help reduce costs and improve patient outcomes.   For example, acute-care hospitals--key components of the U.S. healthcare services sector that make up a large portion of the issuers we rate in this subsector--tend to be expensive and very labor-intensive, at a time when healthcare labor, due to shortages and employee burnout, is at a premium. AI tools can help offset some of these higher expenses by lowering certain administrative costs while also improving efficiencies for organizations and clinicians. Over time, healthcare service entities and clinicians are also likely to incorporate AI with patient data, technology, and other tools to improve patient care and outcomes.

AI systems could assist clinicians across different patient interactions.   The potential ability of AI to be a supplemental tool and improve physician-patient interactions could improve the quality of healthcare, increase patient satisfaction, and reduce the burden on clinicians. Ambient listening and other AI tools, which help clinicians with patient responses and other patient interactions, could help with clinician burnout, while improving efficiency and quality. AI, such as GPT-4, can also integrate data from different sources, such as patient intake forms and medical records, and reveal insights about patients' health. Clinicians can then properly fill out prior authorization requests and speed up the process.

We expect healthcare services providers' AI adoption rates will vary, depending on technology advancements, data availability, regulations, reimbursements, and clinical research.   Consequently, we expect the effect of AI on rated issuers' credit quality will differ. Healthcare services providers with a track record of investing in clinical and operational transformation will likely be early adopters of AI, for example through internal investments and partnerships. Over time, however, some of these technologies and applications will trickle down to other providers.

Table 2

Potential AI use cases for healthcare services providers
Services AI use cases
Resource allocation Streamlines patient intake by collecting forms before the appointment and verifying information and insurance coverage.
Simplifies documentation, coding, and billing by recording conversations with patients and organizing clinical notes, linking notes with a procedure and code, and billing the patient.
Streamlines patient communication by drafting the first response to patients asking for medical advice.
Reduces clinical staff's administrative burden, which gives doctors more time to interact with patients, reduces burnout cases, and decreases turnover.
Patient collections Improves electronic health record maintenance, addresses duplicate profiles, mails paper copies if necessary, and updates inaccurate mailing addresses that prevent patients from paying bills on time.
Call-center optimization Decreases necessity for call centers as generative AI, coupled with rules-based and robotic processes, can improve patient interactions.
Provider/patient analytics Improves efficiencies and use as AI could help in managing bed capacity, operating room time, and staffing.
Generative AI agents Provide real-time care support and ensure patient compliance.

AI In Health Insurance

image

We consider health insurers, while still in the early stages of incorporating AI technologies in their corporate strategies and operational infrastructure, are best placed to benefit from AI, at least initially.   They have access to vast healthcare and demographic datasets, including member and claims data. Additionally, health insurers can obtain clinical information because many of them provide care delivery services and have in-house pharmacy benefit management operations. Moreover, the industry has the long-term strategic and financial flexibility to invest in AI, given relatively high barriers to entry and strong cash flows.

Insurers have begun to leverage generative AI to reduce costs and improve risk management and member engagement, with the overall goal of offering higher-quality coverage at lower costs.   From a credit perspective, AI has the potential to solidify a company's competitive position over the short term by enhancing member and provider engagement, increasing retention rates, and simplifying administrative processes. The industry initially focused on AI-enabled customer service interactions and claim management processes--including prior authorization--to cut labor costs, shorten customer wait times, and reduce processing errors. Over the long term, we expect insurers will increasingly use AI to create meaningful competitive advantages in areas such as pricing strategy and product design, medical outcomes and costs, and operating efficiencies. AI can help accelerate the adoption and success of value-based care models by improving predictive analytics, clinical decision-making, and personalized care plans for members.

Health insurers have two key advantages when it comes to AI adoption.   Firstly, their investment horizon is long-term because of their ample capitalization and, secondly, they can test and validate AI-enabled services and tools due to the significant amounts of data they have access to. Smaller health insurers could level the playing field by working collaboratively with peers or forming strategic partnerships with technology companies, such as Google, Microsoft, and Databricks, which focus on the healthcare sector as a key growth area.

Table 3

Potential AI use cases for health insurers
Services AI use cases
Claims processing, provider search, and payment integrity Resolves more complex problems, for example via virtual chats.
Supports call center associates by summarizing the reason for the call, providing information, and suggesting next steps. AI can also help train call center associates.
Personalizes provider search by using simple language and claims data.
Updates provider directories.
Manages records by summarizing interactions with payors and patients, and between providers and patients, thus improving operating efficiency.
Interprets unstructured data, including physicians' notes.
Ensures payment integrity by detecting fraud, excess spending, and abuse.
Creates medical appeal letters.
Value-based care Improves health management by identifying at-risk patients and helping schedule preventative care visits.
Reduces administrative costs through auto-adjudication and pre-authorization.
Improves patient experiences and education, leading to an increase in interactions and patient compliance.
Medical and clinical insights Improves visit efficiency and clinical decision-making by leveraging digital capabilities, for example via AI-enabled digital wound management solutions that help clinicians capture wound details with a simple picture. This reduces wound heal times and the number of readmissions.
Reduces administrative costs through auto-adjudication and pre-authorization.
Increases time efficiencies by summarizing data across different datasets.
Non-core insurance, including pharmacy benefit management, pharmacological services, and care delivery Automates underwriting and client contracting.
Automates pharmacists’ workflows.
Improves safety.
Streamlines patient onboarding by helping summarize cases.

AI In Medical Devices, Life Sciences, And Diagnostics

image

AI in the medical devices, life sciences, and diagnostics realm is more widespread than in other healthcare subsectors, given the narrow focus of its application. However, as broader-based AI tools are used, their effect will increase.

Diagnostics and life sciences

AI has the potential to improve lives when used in diagnostics and early detection.   For instance, unsupervised AI models can be trained to uncover hidden patterns in data that the human eye would not be able to spot. In other words, AI is more effective than humans at detecting anomalies and can do so more quickly and at lower costs.

Generative AI is starting to make a mark in diagnostics.   For instance, U.S.-based biomedical cancer research center City of Hope created an oncology-specific large language model that can summarize and answer questions, structure data, and match patients to clinical trials, based on billions of words extracted from clinical, radiology, and pathology notes.

AI integration is relatively advanced in radiology and medical imaging.   Radiology accounted for 87% of approved AI medical algorithms in the U.S. in 2022, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. AI already improves patient care by assisting physicians in identifying conditions more quickly, while predictive analytics are integrated into magnetic resonance imaging technologies. The latter results in better analysis and image diagnostics, more efficient workflows, and improved patient outcomes. AI is also becoming a regular feature in X-ray, computed tomography (CT) scans, and other imaging exams, resulting in improved accuracy and increased efficiency.

AI can help physicians synthesize imaging data with data from other sources.   As such, AI can determine treatments and potentially identify more effective options, based on an individual patient's likely response. GE HealthCare recently announced that its AI models can predict a patient's response, such as an adverse reaction, to immunotherapies with a 70%-80% accuracy. This enhances clinicians' ability to provide precision care.

Given the need to provide more accurate and faster diagnoses, the demand for more automation in laboratories has increased.   AI can drive digitalization in laboratories. The combination of AI with patient data, such as age and gender, and data that is gathered through routine lab tests could inform disease-specific predictive models and support physicians in their diagnoses.

AI-predictive models help clinicians diagnose cancer more quickly and accurately, while supporting the delivery of effective treatments.   AI and machine learning algorithms can automate and optimize many aspects of next-generation sequencing (NGS), which makes DNA and RNA sequencing more efficient. NGS data analysis, which can be complex and time consuming, improves the detection of gene variations by making the process faster, more efficient, and more accurate.

Table 4

Examples of AI in diagnostics and life sciences
Company AI-based solution Benefits
Phillips Spectral CT 7500 Delivers high-quality spectral images, cuts diagnosis times by 34%, reduces rescans by 25%, and decreases follow-up scans by 30%.
Siemens Healthineers AI-Rad Companion Provides an immediate analysis of imaging datasets.
GE HealthCare SIGNA Champion Makes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans faster and more precise.
Point-of-care ultrasound systems that capture higher-quality cardiac images.
Venue family
Medtronic GI Genius Endoscopy module that uses AI to identify pre-cancerous and cancerous colorectal polyps during a colonoscopy.
Hologic Genius Digital Diagnostics System Helps identify pre-cancerous lesions and cervical cancer cells.
Surgery planning and robotics

Robotics have been used in complicated surgeries since the 1980s and are now involved in over 644,000 surgeries in the U.S. annually, according to the U.S. National Institutes of Health.   Several companies aim to implement AI-based tools that analyze past surgeries and can improve the outcomes of future procedures. AI in surgery planning will provide guidance to surgeons, individualize implants based on patients' anatomy, and improve post-operative evaluations.

Table 5

Examples of AI in surgery planning and robotics
Company AI-based solution Benefits
Stryker Mako SmartRobotics Insightful Data Analytics Uses data on implant positioning from past procedures to provide pre-operative guidance, including identifying the correct implant type for patients, based on their anatomy and the movement of their joints.
Smith & Nephew Expansion of the CORI Surgical System Supports the planning process for knee replacement surgeries and improves decision-making.
Partnership between DePuy Synthes (a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary) and Zebra Medical Vision 3D imaging system Create 3D models of patients from X-ray images.
DePuy Synthes Advance Case Management Improves surgical accuracy and customizes products, based on surgeons' preferences.
Patient monitoring

Recent technology advancements enabled physicians to monitor patients' health remotely and in real time.   This significantly enhanced their ability to detect and treat problems early, while increasing the amount of data available for analysis. Remote patient monitoring supports outpatient services and can free up limited and expensive hospital beds. The integration of AI can not only enhance patient care through continuous data collection and analysis but also supports early intervention. Despite the benefits and potential of AI-based remote patient monitoring, however, the technology is far from widespread adoption. In 2022, a survey by the Medical Group Management Association showed that just 25% of polled practices used remote patient monitoring. This highlights a significant sales growth potential for monitoring devices, including wearable devices and implants.

AI algorithms can analyze vast amounts of patient data--including vital signs, such as heart rate or blood pressure--in real time.   The data are collected by wearable devices or sensors, which can detect deviations and flag any deteriorations that otherwise might have gone unnoticed--particularly if the deviations for an individual are within the normal ranges for the broader population. The early detection of patterns and anomalies can help healthcare providers intervene promptly and improve treatments.

Table 6

Examples of AI in medical devices and patient monitoring
Company AI-based solution Benefits
Philips, hospital monitoring division Monitoring ecosystem that can also be connected to non-Philips devices Enables clinicians to access and monitor cerebral oxygenation, anaesthetic sedation, and patient respiratory performance from the same monitor.
Medtronic AccuRhythm AI Reduces false alerts in hearth rhythm monitoring and enables clinicians to better prioritize their time.
Zimmer Biomet Tool for tracking post-surgery recovery patterns on knee implants Alerts physicians about deviations from the expected recovery path.

AI In Pharma And Biotech

image

AI can enhance pharma companies' drug discovery, increase their success rate, accelerate development and approval processes, and reduce overall development costs.   Patients could benefit from health improvements, resulting from new drugs, and potentially lower drug prices, while pharma companies could increase the number of approved products and improve their research and development spending. The largest biopharma companies currently require more than 10 years and spend more than $2 billion to bring a new drug to the market, according to the most recent Deloitte study published in 2024. AI, combined with a substantial amount of qualitative data, can enhance molecule selection by improving insights, predicting protein-drug interactions, and optimizing existing compounds. For example, Moderna used AI to release the first clinical-grade batch of its Spikevax COVID-19 vaccine 65 days after the virus sequencing. AI-driven tools help pharmaceutical researchers "fail intelligently," an evolution of the older "fail fast, fail often" approach. Additionally, they improve cost and time allocations.

AI and machine learning could lead to new successful novel compounds, which would accelerate the discovery of new drugs.   Supervised machine learning could be trained to automate medical image analysis and diagnosis, which enables healthcare professionals to dedicate more time to more significant tasks. Beyond that, AI could help predict regulatory queries, thus cutting the regulatory approval times by months and reducing repetitive back and forth between companies and regulators.

AI could lead to better target selection and faster development times.   However, drug development failure rates remain high and development costs continue increasing. Against this background, the use of AI could result in major improvements over the near to medium term. Moreover, advances in cell and gene therapy and in mRNA-based treatments, such as personalized vaccines, can increase the use of AI in identifying treatment plans with the highest likelihood of success.

AI will affect all companies in the pharma drug development chain, from contract research organizations (CROs) and contract development and manufacturing organizations (CDMOs) to big pharma companies.   Leading clinical research organizations are actively adopting various AI technologies, whether by developing them in-house or through partnerships, to streamline various aspects of the clinical trial process, such as patient recruitment, data analysis, pattern recognition, and identification of potential adverse events. For example, by analyzing patients' data--including genetics--past medical histories, and other relevant factors, AI can make clinical trials more efficient and reduce the time and cost it takes to bring a drug to the market. CROs' and CDMOs' AI advancements can help smaller biopharma companies take advantage of AI, without them having to invest heavily in the technology. The widespread adoption of AI by big pharma companies creates risks to the continued outsourcing of noncore services, particularly in clinical research and drug development and manufacturing.

As is the case in other healthcare subsectors, AI in the pharma industry particularly benefits larger companies that have better access to data and financial resources than smaller companies.   Even so, we think AI will create a level playing field as open-source AI, which is provided by companies such as Merck, enables smaller companies to compete through partnerships and outsourcing. Generative AI, which enables pattern recognition and helps develop new molecules, has led to several new biotech startups and potential new competitors.

Table 7

Examples of AI in drug development
Company AI-based solution Benefits
Lonza Group AG Uses AI and machine learning in drug design, while machine learning algorithms and automated solutions are used for retrosynthesis and synthetic route optimization, toxicological assessments of new chemical entities, and formulation design Reduces biotechs' time to market and concentrates their efforts on screened molecules.
Partnership between Pfizer and CytoReason Simulated model of the immune system Increases understanding of diseases, helps create tailor-made novel medicines, and could predict which patients respond best to certain treatments.
Merck AIDDISON Generative AI-powered drug discovery platform that uses ligand-based and structure-based drug design to assist in the creation of novel molecules and to accelerate drug discoveries.
IQVIA Uses AI and natural language processing, which analyzes complex and unstructured patient data to provide insights into patient care and disease states Helps clinicians identify and screen at-risk patients and enables targeted intervention.
Partnership between Charles River Laboratories and Valo Health AI-enabled platform Makes drug discoveries and pre-clinical developments more efficient and economical.

AI Raises More Questions Than It Answers

The medium- and long-term effects of AI on healthcare organizations and, ultimately, credit quality remain uncertain. For example, allegations of automated claim denials in the insurance industry give a foretaste of the significant challenges issuers could face when AI becomes an important component of healthcare decisions. We also note that untransparent algorithms prevent quick resolutions, delay widespread adoption, and will likely result in legal challenges for early adopters. Additionally, intellectual property challenges regarding the use of AI in product development, including its use in training AI models, are likely to rise as the commercial effects of AI become more meaningful.

image

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Patrick Bell, New York (1) 212-438-2082;
patrick.bell@spglobal.com
James Sung, New York + 1 (212) 438 2115;
james.sung@spglobal.com
Marc Bertrand, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7116;
marc.bertrand@spglobal.com
Ihsane Mesrar, Paris (33) 1-4075-2591;
ihsane.mesrar@spglobal.com
Ryan Gilmore, Washington D.C. + 1 (212) 438 0602;
ryan.gilmore@spglobal.com
Matthew D Todd, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 2309;
matthew.todd@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Arthur C Wong, Toronto + 1 (416) 507 2561;
arthur.wong@spglobal.com
Suzie R Desai, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7046;
suzie.desai@spglobal.com
Sarah Kahn, Washington D.C. + 1 (212) 438 5448;
sarah.kahn@spglobal.com
Tuomas E Ekholm, CFA, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9123;
tuomas.ekholm@spglobal.com
Paloma Aparicio, Madrid + 34 696 748 969;
paloma.aparicio@spglobal.com
Alice Kedem, Boston + 1 (617) 530 8315;
Alice.Kedem@spglobal.com
Francesca Massarotti, Frankfurt + 49 69 3399 9130;
francesca.massarotti@spglobal.com
Brian Rubin, New York + 212-438-1773;
brian.rubin@spglobal.com
Hitesh Lohar, Toronto;
hitesh.lohar@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in