Key Takeaways
- Over the past 18 months, S&P Global Ratings has observed more loans structured with debt service coverage (DSC) near 1.0x, especially those backing single-borrower deals; these loans appear to be banking on rising net cash flow and declining interest rates to increase DSC levels.
- Revenue growth projections are slowing for most property types. At the same time, interest rates, while projected to decline somewhat from current levels, are likely to remain high for a while--certainly higher than the low figures prevalent in 2019-2021.
- Loans with DSCs that dropped below 1.0x during their terms had significantly higher default rates than those that maintained more robust coverage levels.
Interest rates have increased significantly from the unprecedented low levels that prevailed in the decade after the Great Recession. This suggests that leverage in the commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) sector might be too high to attain prudent debt service coverage on newly originated or refinanced loans. Yet in the past 18 months, many commercial mortgage loans backing CMBS--particularly on the single-borrower side--have been structured with DSCs close to or even below 1.0x. Borrowers have been trying to refinance debt at existing loan balances, with the expectation that rising net cash flow and declining interest rates will eventually increase DSC levels.
However, revenue growth projections for almost all property types have moderated from the robust rates of recent years. In addition, inflation remains at levels where expense growth could mirror or even outpace revenue growth in the near term. Given our view that net cash flow (NCF) growth could be finite in the near term and because coupons might not moderate to levels of the recent past, we examined legacy CMBS performance of loans where DSC fell below 1.0x during their term. Loans with a DSC below 1.0x have had significantly higher default rates--almost five times higher than those of loans with more robust coverage levels.
The Rise Of CMBS Conduit Coupons
From 1997-2024, average U.S. conduit CMBS loan coupons ranged between a low near 3.7% and a high of about 8.5%, with a long-term mean of about 6.0%. Some of the lowest market rates (approximately 3.7%-4.5%) were in 2019-2022 amid quantitative easing and the COVID-19 pandemic. However, conduit coupons have averaged closer to 7.0% for the last year and a half, which is closer to the 6.6% average for 1997-2008. While most market participants are expecting both short- and long-term interest rates to decrease over the next few years, they may remain elevated compared to recent history for a longer period. To wit, our U.S. chief economist currently forecasts that the 10-year Treasury yield will average 4.22% in 2024, 3.64% in 2025, 3.36% in 2026, and 3.47% in 2027 (with the fed funds rate averaging 5.31%, 4.60%, 3.27%, and 2.90%, respectively, for those same periods). Therefore, while lower than current levels, the 10-year Treasury yield forecasted levels remain well above the sub 2% (and even sub 1%) levels that prevailed for the second half of 2019 through early 2022.
Chart 1
Commercial Property Revenue Growth Is Moderating
Some third-party revenue projections for each of the major commercial property types generally indicate that revenue growth will be modest over the next four years. The industrial sector has projected revenue growth of over 4% in each of the next four years, but other sectors aren't expected to be as strong. Revenue for multifamily, lodging, and retail is projected to grow by about 3.5% or less each year through 2028. Moreover, office rental growth will likely continue its negative trajectory for some time. Nevertheless, there are certain cases where rents (and hence NCF) are likely to improve in the near term, such as a property with below-market rents and near-term rollover into a low-vacancy, high-rent environment or a newly constructed or significantly renovated property that is still stabilizing. In such cases, we wouldn't expect a low DSC to persist over the long term.
However, we're generally skeptical that average revenue growth will be enough to substantially improve many of the low starting DSCs we've seen on many mortgage loans over the last several months. Unfavorable trends in operating expenses--particularly for labor costs, property insurance, and property taxes--have simultaneously eroded cash flows across all property types and could offset a portion of any revenue gains.
Chart 2
Historical Performance Shows Increased Risk For Low-DSC Loans
An analysis of historical data of the CMBS conduit universe has shown that loan defaults increase sharply when DSC drops below 1.0x. In our analysis, we calculated the number of loans within our sample (which includes over 110,000 conduit loans from the 1997-2024 vintages) with a DSC that dropped below a 1.0x (distressed loans) at some point during their loan term. We found that of the loans whose DSC fell below 1.0x at some point during their term (about 37% of all loans), about 27% ultimately defaulted, which we define as having gone 60 or more days delinquent. This compares to only a 6% default rate for loans with DSC that remained above 1.0x during their term.
Loans secured by hotels have a higher propensity (62%) to fall below a 1.0x DSC than the other property types. However, a large number of these hotel loans (1,977 loans; 35% of the hotel loans that fell below 1.0x) fell below a 1.0x DSC between 2020 and 2022 due to the lack of travel during the pandemic. Nevertheless, of the lodging loans with a DSC that fell below 1.0x at some time during their loan term, 35% ultimately defaulted, the highest of the major property types.
The office sector had the next highest propensity to default subsequent to DSC falling below 1.0x, at 29%, but we expect that figure to increase given the headwinds facing the sector. Industrial and multifamily had the lowest default rates (21% and 24%, respectively) even though their percentage of low-DSC loans was comparable to that of the other property types (except hotels).
Default rates by property type for loans with DSCs below 1.0x | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lodging | Office | Multifamily | Industrial | Retail | Total | |||||||||
Total loans below 1.0x DSC | 5,605 | 8,325 | 13,402 | 2,940 | 11,859 | 42,131 | ||||||||
Total defaulted loans below 1.0x DSC | 1,961 | 2,435 | 3,167 | 604 | 3,285 | 11,452 | ||||||||
Total loans | 9,054 | 20,620 | 36,329 | 9,252 | 37,577 | 112,832 | ||||||||
Percentage of total loans that fell below 1.0x DSC (%) | 61.9 | 40.4 | 36.9 | 31.8 | 31.6 | 37.3 | ||||||||
Default rate for loans that fell below 1.0x DSC (%) | 35.0 | 29.2 | 23.6 | 20.5 | 27.7 | 27.2 | ||||||||
Default rate for loans that didn't fall below 1.0x and defaulted (%) | 10.9 | 7.4 | 4.9 | 5.5 | 6.1 | 6.1 | ||||||||
Sources: S&P Global Ratings and Trepp. |
Favorably, on the conduit side at least, issuer DSCs for 2023 and 2024 transactions appear to be averaging in the 1.65x-1.75x range. While significantly below the over 2.0x DSCs for 2019-2022, these levels are generally much stronger than the DSCs we have seen for single-borrower loans.
Single-Borrower Deals Are Feeling The Impact Of Rising Rates
The impact of higher rates has been particularly acute in the single-borrower sector. Of the approximately 180 single-borrower transactions we rate, 20 (11% of rated deals) are currently flagged as either performing or non-performing matured balloons (maturity defaults). Many borrowers are simply unable to refinance in the current rate environment due to some combination of low DSC ratios (DSCRs) and high loan-to-value ratios, as loan coupons have spiked and commercial property values have come down across the board. Borrowers need to refinance, but DSCRs at the existing loan balances are no longer workable without a simultaneous borrower paydown. The office sector is clearly in the eye of this storm, but refinancing difficulties have manifested across all property types (the April 2024 delinquency rate was up to 4.7%). In addition, special servicers have had their hands full (the April special servicing rate was up to 7.2%) as they work with borrowers to resolve these problem loans.
On the new issue side, single-borrower deal activity has been robust, but many of the transactions that we've reviewed in 2023 and into 2024 have very low DSCRs. In many cases, the DSCR on the most recent NCF is at or below 1.0x. To achieve a minimum 1.0x-1.1x DSCR on the actual cash flow, the loans are relying on either an in-the-money SOFR interest rate cap for floating-rate deals or loan coupon buydowns for fixed-rate deals. While these financial instruments reduce default risk during the loan term, much of that risk is simply pushed to the loan's maturity date. If interest rates aren't meaningfully lower in the future, or if revenue growth hasn't meaningfully outpaced expense growth, these new transactions could have a very difficult time refinancing, particularly because they're all interest-only, with no principal amortization.
In certain cases, we've declined to provide preliminary rating feedback on single-borrower transactions when DSCRs are very low and prospects for significant NCF growth are limited, thus raising refinancing concerns. As noted in our most recent quarterly reports, in first-quarter 2024, we declined to provide preliminary ratings feedback on 10 of the 16 single-borrower transactions that priced in the quarter and on four of the 13 transactions that priced in fourth-quarter 2023. Our primary reason was either high leverage or debt service constraints based on our NCF and current rates. The analysis of a single-borrower deal is primarily recovery-based, and high investment-grade tranches should be mostly insulated. But as we've seen in our surveillance book, principal recovery and timely interest become increasingly more uncertain once a single-borrower deal backing a loan with a DSC below 1.0x defaults, new lower appraisals come in, and servicers decide whether and how much to advance to bondholders.
We would like to thank Mark Jacobs for his contribution to this article.
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Natalka H Chevance, New York + 1 (212) 438 1236; natalka.chevance@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | James M Manzi, CFA, Washington D.C. + 1 (202) 383 2028; james.manzi@spglobal.com |
James C Digney, New York + 1 (212) 438 1832; james.digney@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.