(Editor's Note: Private Markets Monthly is a research offering from S&P Global Ratings, providing insightful interviews with subject matter experts on what matters most across private markets. Subscribe to receive a new edition every month: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/private-markets-monthly-7119712776024928256/)
Borrowers across many countries have increasingly sourced credit from outside the traditional banking system over the last decade, funded by nonbank financial institutions (or NBFIs) that have raised substantial capital from a variety of market participants. Private credit is a relatively small but quickly growing segment of nonbank financial assets, mostly in the U.S. and in certain areas of corporate lending.
As investors increasingly allocate capital across private markets, evolving macro-credit and financial conditions may require a need for greater transparency. In this edition of Private Markets Monthly, Global Head of Private Markets Analytics Ruth Yang interviews S&P Global Ratings' Nicolas Charnay, managing director and sector lead for financial institutions ratings in Europe, and Brendan Browne, managing director and sector lead for financial institutions in North America—about the growth, risks, and opportunities that nonbank finance and private credit bring to markets and financial stability.
Could you give us a sense of the growth in nonbank financial assets in recent years, and how big of a role private credit played in that story?
Nicolas Charnay, Sector Lead for Financial Institutions Ratings in Europe: The past decade has certainly been shaped by growth in assets held by NBFIs—these now represent around half of global financial assets. Within this broad category, we focus on a subset of institutions which participate in credit intermediation activities. These nonbank credit providers also saw a rapid growth in their asset base. At the end of 2022, they held approximately $63 trillion in financial assets in major global jurisdictions, representing 78% of global GDP—demonstrably up from the $28 trillion and 68% of global GDP seen in 2009.
Brendan Browne, Sector Lead for Financial Institutions Ratings in North America: At the same time, the private finance sector is estimated to equate to around 5% of total NBFI assets and 2% of total financial assets, at around $10 trillion-$12 trillion. Private equity makes up most of that, while private credit has an estimated size of about $1.3 trillion globally.
What role does nonbank credit intermediation play in shaping markets and financial stability?
Nicolas Charnay: Overall, nonbank credit providers play an important role in many countries by providing a meaningful alternative to bank financing. They can offer solutions to fund long-term assets with matching liabilities. They also improve the efficiency and depth of financial systems by holding assets with maturity structures and credit characteristics that may be unattractive to traditional lenders.
Brendan Browne: Regarding private credit, alternative asset managers (through the private credit funds they raise) and business development companies (which are mostly under external management) are significant and growing competitors—particularly for commercial speculative-grade and structured credit, by positioning themselves as options for funding sources beyond the broadly syndicated loan market and the high-yield debt markets. Facing limited prudential regulation, they compete on terms, structure, and execution, and can offer one-stop solutions to many borrowers. They've taken on a variety of assets, most notably leveraged loans alongside various types of senior and subordinated, secured and unsecured, uni-tranche, distressed, and highly structured and complex assets.
Private credit providers also add to the competition banks face. Consider how large banks in the U.S. originate and distribute most broadly syndicated loans: When private credit funds take share from the broadly syndicated loan market, they also eat into the fees that banks would've earned from origination and distribution. They additionally compete directly with banks for certain types of credit assets that banks sometimes hold on their balance sheets. Some banks in the U.S. have responded by expanding their asset management businesses, which may include private credit strategies, or by holding small amounts of private credit assets on their balance sheets. Rather than competing directly with the private credit funds, banks also have extended additional credit to asset managers, usually on a collateralized basis.
What are the main risks to watch for nonbank credit providers in general and private credit funds in particular?
Nicolas Charnay: Nonbank credit providers face risks that are largely similar to those at banks: credit risk, liquidity risk, and leverage. Overall, we believe that they are not immune to the interest rate and economic cycles, and that the risks they face are on the rise amid tighter financing conditions.
That said, there is great heterogeneity in the nonbank credit space, so we need to assess the level of risk for each firm. While many can operate in markets without adding significant incremental risk, others can have elevated leverage, structural liquidity mismatches, and/or heavy credit exposures to potentially more risky borrowers. Given their relevance in certain regions or economic sectors, difficulties and/or deleveraging by some nonbank credit providers can also have ripple effects on the broader economy and financial system—Chinese shadow banks and their involvement in financing real estate projects is one prime example.
This growing relevance of nonbank credit intermediation, together with the fact that these institutions do not have access to emergency central bank funding in times of stress, in our view largely explain the increased scrutiny from banks and regulators.
Brendan Browne: As for private credit funds, we have seen low rates, the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing, and a search for yield help these funds and business development companies raise capital. But now, the full effects of monetary tightening may not have yet materialized, and market volatility and a slowing economy could put pressure on the public and private debt and equity markets in 2024.
Private credit funds and business development companies have added dynamism and depth to commercial credit markets, and their permanent capital, long-term funding, and low leverage have helped alleviate liquidity, market, and systemic risks. At the same time, these entities contributed to the high leverage that many middle-market and large corporate borrowers have reported over the past several years, and their growing heft and limited transparency could pose a threat beyond their own investors and to the wider market.
Writer: Molly Mintz
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analysts: | Nicolas Charnay, Frankfurt +49 69 3399 9218; nicolas.charnay@spglobal.com |
Brendan Browne, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 7399; brendan.browne@spglobal.com | |
Global Head of Private Markets and Thought Leadership: | Ruth Yang, New York (1) 212-438-2722; ruth.yang2@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.