articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240425-creditweek-how-could-megatrends-influence-credit-materiality-13085494 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Could Megatrends Influence Credit Materiality?

COMMENTS

Data Centers: U.S. Not-For-Profit Electric Utilities Explore Ways To Mitigate Risks From Load Growth

COMMENTS

Retail Brief: European Retailers Set Out Their Stalls For The Golden Quarter

COMMENTS

Private Credit Could Bridge The Infrastructure Funding Gap

COMMENTS

The Opportunity Of Asset-Based Finance Draws In Private Credit


CreditWeek: How Could Megatrends Influence Credit Materiality?

(Editor's Note: CreditWeek is a weekly research offering from S&P Global Ratings, providing actionable and forward-looking insights on emerging credit risks and exploring the questions that matter to markets today. Subscribe to receive a new edition every Thursday at: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/creditweek-7115686044951273472/)

S&P Global Ratings believes global megatrends can become material to its credit ratings if they affect factors that contribute to its assessment of creditworthiness. Some megatrends have already led to credit rating changes and, depending on how they evolve, may do so in the future.

What We're Watching

Global megatrends—including climate change, increasing digitalization, geopolitical risks, aging populations, and disruptive technologies—are gradually reshaping our world in often unpredictable ways. With the power to transform societies and economies, megatrends can bring financial, economic, environmental, and other risks (alongside offering opportunities) across regions and sectors. The impacts of some risk trends may take several years to unfold, while others may emerge suddenly.

Our credit rating methodologies provide the analytical approach to capture factors linked to megatrends that can materially affect the creditworthiness of industries or specific issuers—or, in other words, the path to credit materiality.

We are mindful that a megatrend's path to credit materiality is not the same for all rated entities in all sectors and geographies. In our analysis, we take a forward-looking view of risks or opportunities that can alter the trajectory of the credit factors underpinning our ratings.

image

What We Think And Why

In our recent whitepaper, we detail how the potential impacts of megatrends are considered in our credit analysis. A multi-step process helps us monitor the potential evolution of megatrends, understand the key tipping points, and assess the likely impact on our credit ratings now and in the future.

First, we estimate the potential severity and likelihood (or magnitude) of the megatrend's potential implications for creditworthiness, irrespective of how or when such impacts might materialize.

Next, we assess how megatrends' effects could be transmitted to credit factors—such as competitive position, revenue, expenses, investment needs, access to funding, tax base, and jurisdictional factors. Credit impact transmission channels indicate how the megatrend could influence an entity's ability and/or willingness to repay its financial obligations. Our sector-specific credit analysis already reflects longer-term risks and opportunities emanating from the megatrend in situations where there is sufficient clarity about credit impact transmission channels. Conversely, there is likely to be no credit rating impact based solely on a megatrend in sectors and geographies where there is uncertainty regarding how risks and opportunities from that megatrend might affect creditworthiness.

For the sectors and geographies we consider to be typically most exposed to the megatrend, we subsequently define plausible scenarios involving relevant credit factors to conduct sensitivity analyses or stress tests for analytical purposes.

Armed with analytical insight and extensive data, we then conduct and evaluate the results of those analyses to determine the potential impacts of the megatrend on those sectors and geographies likely to be most exposed. These analyses and assessments would affect factors from our sector-specific rating methodology; be complemented by information identified from our interactions with issuers and other market participants; and could also entail deeper assessments of sectors or market dynamics.

Finally, we determine (where possible) the potential future rating impact on entities in sectors or geographies identified as highly exposed—with outcomes dependent on the scenarios used, sector's characteristics, time frame, applicable sector-specific rating methodology, and each entity's specific circumstances and business model.

What Could Change

It is inherently difficult to predict how, where, and when megatrends may develop; the severity and distribution of their impacts; or precisely how and when creditworthiness might be affected. Regarding the effects of megatrends, we recognize that the path to credit materiality is often not linear; can develop over different time frames; and may affect sectors and regions differently.

For example, we may determine that a megatrend's path to credit materiality may not emerge for at least the next five years for most rated entities, and that uncertainty remains significant after that horizon. But we also may envision rating pressure for some entities beyond that time frame if specific scenarios materialize. In this instance, we'd incorporate our view of how each rated entity is likely to manage the risks or opportunities posed by the megatrend—considering its financial situation, governance, technological and product flexibility, shareholders, and the legal and regulatory framework it operates in, among other factors. When making assessments over the medium- and long-term, we also make assumptions on potential mitigants an entity might put in place and their potential effectiveness.

Overall, the increasing availability of data and research can enhance market participants' understanding of how megatrends may affect factors relevant to our assessment of creditworthiness and our credit ratings.

Writer: Molly Mintz

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Lapo Guadagnuolo, London + 44 20 7176 3507;
lapo.guadagnuolo@spglobal.com
Gregg Lemos-Stein, CFA, New York + 212438 1809;
gregg.lemos-stein@spglobal.com
Hans Wright, London + 44 20 7176 7015;
hans.wright@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Alexandra Dimitrijevic, London + 44 20 7176 3128;
alexandra.dimitrijevic@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in