articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240411-your-three-minutes-in-climate-disclosure-benefits-and-limitations-of-the-green-asset-ratio-for-eu-banks-13067588 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In Climate Disclosure: Benefits And Limitations Of The Green Asset Ratio For EU Banks

COMMENTS

Navigating Regulatory Changes: Assessing New Regulations On Brazil's Financial Sector

Global Banks Outlook 2025

COMMENTS

Sustainability Insights: Five Takeaways From The IIF Annual Membership Meetings

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: How Are North American Banks Using Significant Risk Transfers?


Your Three Minutes In Climate Disclosure: Benefits And Limitations Of The Green Asset Ratio For EU Banks

From 2024, EU banks must disclose a Green Asset Ratio (GAR), showing the share of EU Taxonomy-aligned assets in selected financial assets, in their Pillar 3 reports.   The GAR's primary goal is to enhance the understanding of banks' contribution to the EU's environmental and climate objectives. However, due to methodological limitations and the GAR's complexity, it is challenging to form a clear view without qualitative information.

What's Happening

The European Banking Authority's (EBA's) GAR takes effect this year.   This ratio shows the proportion of banks' on-balance-sheet financing of activities (via loans, debt, and equity investments) that are environmentally sustainable according to the EU Taxonomy (see chart). The GAR's numerator and denominator exclude exposures to sovereigns, central banks, supranational entities, and banks' trading books. Importantly, EU regulation has not set a minimum GAR requirement.

image

Why It Matters

Although the GAR increases transparency, its design brings limitations.   The GAR is a positive step toward greater transparency, may encourage growth of sustainable bank financing, and could enhance banks' standing among certain stakeholders. Yet, it provides only a limited view of banks' efforts to finance the transition and how these compare with other banks.

The GAR's denominator includes nonfinancial corporations based outside the EU, and those based in the EU but not subject to the NFRD (Non-Financial Reporting Directive), while the numerator does not.   This means the maximum GAR a bank can achieve depends on exposures subject to the NFRD (see chart "maximum structural GAR"). For instance, banks with high exposures to small and midsize enterprises (SMEs) will likely produce a lower GAR because the NFRD applies only to companies with more than 500 employees and at least €20 million of assets or €40 million in revenue. Therefore, financing to counterparties not subject to the NFRD is excluded from the GAR's numerator even if they support low-carbon projects. Public disclosure also allows the calculation of the share of EU Taxonomy-aligned assets in total assets subject to the NFRD (see chart "Adjusted GAR").

The average GAR of European global systemically important banks (GSIBs) is a low 2.8% as of Dec. 31, 2023.   So far this year, only EU GSIBs and a few other EU banks have published Pillar 3 reports. We expect the average GAR to increase over time since the scope of the EU taxonomy will likely increase.

What Comes Next

Legislative and regulatory initiatives may enhance banks' GAR in the medium term.   Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which supersedes the NFRD, all in-scope companies must report according to the European Sustainability Reporting Standards, based on a dual materiality framework defined in the legislation. The CSRD will apply to a wider range of companies than the NFRD. The European Commission estimates that companies in scope will increase to roughly 50,000 from about 11,600. Listed SMEs not subject to the NFRD will need to meet CSRD disclosure requirements, but only from 2026.

The coming Banking Book Taxonomy Alignment Ratio (BTAR) will overcome some of the GAR's limitations, since its numerator will include both EU- and non-EU non-NFRD exposures.   However, the BTAR is voluntary and applies only from June 2024.

The Basel Committee's proposed requirements on disclosing climate-related financial risks could also complement the GAR.  These include banks' disclosure of forecasts and data on how climate risks could affect credit quality and liquidity, in addition to exposure to sectors vulnerable to transition risks, physical risks, and financed emissions (already disclosed in EU banks' Pillar 3 reports). A final draft is expected by end-2024.

The EBA's proposed "Guidelines on the management of ESG risks" include requirements for processes, ESG risk management, and disclosure of risk-mitigation plans.   The proposal includes new indicators, such as portfolio alignment metrics showing to what extent sector exposures align with achieving the applicable climate, legal, and regulatory objectives, and the share of income from sectors considered high contributors to climate change. If adopted, this information will help improve disclosure of banks' climate exposure and risk-mitigation plans.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Francesca Sacchi, Milan + 390272111272;
francesca.sacchi@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Emmanuel F Volland, Paris + 33 14 420 6696;
emmanuel.volland@spglobal.com
Nicolas Charnay, Frankfurt +49 69 3399 9218;
nicolas.charnay@spglobal.com
Additional Contact:Financial Institutions EMEA;
Financial_Institutions_EMEA_Mailbox@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in