Key Takeaways
- The European economy remains on track for activity to improve and employment growth to moderate. However, uncertainty over productivity trends and slow implementation of the Next Generation EU recovery package may cause the rebound in growth to be weaker than we expected. We have revised our 2025 GDP growth forecast down to 1.3% from 1.5%.
- Record high labor costs are limiting the scope for disinflation. We have slightly increased our inflation forecasts to 2.1% in 2025 and 1.9% in 2026, reflecting prolonged high wage growth against a backdrop of sluggish productivity.
- We expect the European Central Bank (ECB) to cut rates three times in 2024, starting in June. The potential for further rate cuts in 2025 seems more limited than we thought. The deposit facility rate could bottom out at 2.5% in 2025 instead of the 2.0% we considered previously.
The key changes to our forecasts are a weaker growth rebound in the medium term, less room for disinflation, and fewer rate cuts in 2025. The eurozone economy is on the verge of a soft landing. Developments in GDP, inflation, real wage growth, and employment over the past quarter confirm this, in our view. As a result, we have trimmed our short-term forecasts. We now expect modest GDP growth this year in the region of 0.7%, compared with 0.8% in our previous forecast. The major part of this revision comes from a weaker carry-over effect from 2023 GDP.
We continue to believe that the medium-term outlook is brighter than the short-term outlook. We are less convinced, however, that the rebound in growth will be strong. As such, we forecast GDP growth of 1.3% next year, compared with 1.5% in November 2023. We have also revised down our 2026 figure to 1.3% from 1.4%. Our projections are close to the consensus of private forecasters and international institutions (see table 1).
Table 1
Eurozone GDP growth forecasts 2024 and 2025 are in close range | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDP growth expectations | Current forecasts | Difference from previous forecasts | ||||||||||
2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | ||||||||
IMF (January 2024) | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.7 | (0.3) | (0.1) | |||||||
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (February 2024) | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.3 | (0.3) | (0.2) | |||||||
European Commission (February 2024) | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.5 | (0.4) | (0.1) | |||||||
Bloomberg consensus (mean estimate, March 18, 2024) | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.4 | (0.2) | (0.1) | |||||||
S&P Global Ratings (March 2024) | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.3 | (0.1) | (0.2) | |||||||
Note: Previous forecasts in the Bloomberg consensus are dated November 2023. Sources: IMF, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, European Commission, Bloomberg, and S&P Global Ratings. |
As far as consumer prices are concerned, the speed of disinflation in recent months has prompted us to revise our forecast for 2024 downward, to 2.6% from 2.9%. But we don't believe that disinflation will continue at such a pace (see chart 1). On the contrary, prolonged high wage growth against a backdrop of sluggish productivity and trade developments has prompted us to revise our medium-term inflation forecasts upward, to 2.1% from 2.0% for 2025, and to 1.9% from 1.7% for 2026. Most of the upward revision stems from labor market developments.
Chart 1
Higher inflation over the medium term will mean the ECB has less scope than we previously expected to continue its rate-cutting cycle through to 2025. We see the current deposit rate of 4.0% falling to 2.5% by the end of 2025, compared with 2.0% in our previous forecasts. We haven't changed our view that the ECB will cut rates three times in 2024, starting from June.
Another change in our forecasts concerns our assumption of long-term interest rates. The ECB's new operational framework is much the same (see section below titled "The ECB's Unchanged Operating Framework Keeps Quantitative Tightening At Bay"). Consequently, an acceleration in the pace of the ECB's balance sheet reduction is less likely than we previously thought to exert upward pressure on the term premium of long-term bond yields. And considering our less upbeat medium-term growth forecasts, we are lowering our projections for benchmark 10-year German government bond yields this year to 2.4% from 2.9%.
The Next Six Months Should See A Boost In Activity And A Dip In Employment Growth
Forward-looking indicators suggest a moderate improvement in activity over the next six months. Both the European Commission's Economic Sentiment Indicator and S&P Global Market Intelligence's Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI), as well as the Center for European Economic Research (ZEW) and Sentix surveys of investor confidence, improved at the start of the year. The European Commission's survey indicates that household confidence is recovering slowly as inflation recedes, wages accelerate, and employment rises.
The PMI survey shows that the manufacturing recession is easing, with new manufacturing orders climbing. This benefits services as companies need business services to manufacture goods. Sentix and ZEW suggest that most investors expect growth to improve over the next six months (see table 2).
Table 2
The eurozone economy continued to stagnate over the final quarter of 2023. Business investment made the largest positive contribution, while inventories and net trade held back GDP growth, and household consumption remained largely unchanged. The share of productive investment in eurozone GDP is high by historical standards (see chart 2).
Chart 2
This may bode well for future growth, but it also reflects the constraints on household spending due to high inflation over recent years. We expect this demand pattern to rebalance somewhat this year in favor of consumption, as real wage growth has turned positive and higher interest rates in real terms may dampen investment.
Activity will accelerate in the coming quarters, but employment will moderate, in our view. Employment was strong in the fourth quarter of 2023. Hiring in the service sector helped drive a rise of 0.3% in the final quarter of 2023, while wage growth was 4.4%, well above productivity growth (-1.2% year on year). Soaring unit labor costs are now better absorbed by falling unit profits, allowing inflation to recede (see chart 3). This rebalancing of income distribution in favor of wages and away from profits suggests that the hiring cycle will weaken further. Real-time data on job postings confirm this: they now show a plunge at a similar pace across most areas (see chart 4).
Chart 3
Chart 4
The question is no longer whether the unemployment rate will rise this year, but by how much it will rise. We except the unemployment rate to be 6.7% at the end of this year compared with 6.4% in January 2024. A few key reasons explain why we don't expect a more pronounced upturn in the unemployment rate, namely:
- Subdued demographic growth;
- Job vacancies still represented 2.7% of the labor force at the end of last year, down from a peak of 3.4% in the second quarter of 2022; and
- The manufacturing recession appears to have had little effect on GDP and employment (see chart 5). The rise in energy costs has led European industry to either stop or outsource low value-add activities, but has not significantly damaged its core business--at least at this stage.
We continue to see labor market developments as a key point in our soft-landing narrative.
Chart 5
The Medium-Term Rebound May Be Weaker Than We Expect
Two key reasons explain why we are less convinced about the strength of the rebound to come in 2025 and 2026.
First, the implementation of the European Commission's plan to foster the green and the digital transition--Next Generation EU--through public investment and reforms has fallen behind schedule. The European Investment Bank (EIB) estimates the fulfilment of only 44% of milestones and targets that were due for completion by the third quarter of 2023 in the Recovery and Resilience Facility, the largest Next-Gen EU facility (see the EIB Investment report 2023/2024). This represents a gap of €127 billion below the target for public spending, that is, 0.7% of 2023 EU GDP.
It remains to be seen whether governments will be able to make up for the delay--which would be positive for medium-term GDP growth--or request an extension beyond 2026. We believe that the second option has become more likely (see: "EU RRF At Half-Time: Italy And Spain Will Likely Need Extra Time To Spend Their Funds," published on RatingsDirect on July 19, 2023).
Second, uncertainty surrounds potential growth after the pandemic and energy price shock. Productivity has recently fallen below the long-term trend (see chart 6), and it is premature to say whether the decline is cyclical or structural. These productivity losses may continue. The terms of trade have not yet fully recovered from the energy price shock, and China is increasingly challenging Europe's trade advantage, particularly in the automotive sector.
Chart 6
Despite the German economy's record trade surplus of €27.5 billion in January, the rebalancing of the terms-of-trade shock is ongoing. What's more, the shrinking working-age population is likely to reduce potential growth by 0.5% to 0.6% per year over the next five years, according to the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs' demographic projections (see chart 7). At the same time, the positive net immigration shock that the war in Ukraine has triggered in several European countries could reverse these gloomy projections.
Chart 7
The recent fall in inflation will be short-lived, in our view. We continue to believe that inflation will not return to 2% before mid-2025. Inflation largely comes from its domestic components, especially services, with labor costs setting the pace. Unit labor costs have hit record highs due to strong wage growth and weakness in productivity. Marginal wage growth has barely slowed, and remains at 4% according to real-time data (see chart 8). This is well above the rebound we expect in productivity and therefore does not provide much scope for a rapid return of core inflation to 2%.
Chart 8
Inflation fell over the past three months, from 2.9% in October to 2.6% in February. This is more disinflation than we had anticipated. The reasons for this are a sharp decline in energy prices in the fourth quarter of 2023 and a moderation in core inflation to 3.1% in February from 4.2% in October.
Moreover, geopolitical developments continue to hamper trade in the Red Sea, forcing ships to take longer routes, which inflates costs. Our colleagues Jack Kennedy and Chris Rogers at S&P Global Market Intelligence estimate that transits via the Cape of Good Hope add at least 10 days to the usual route and more than 15% to shipping costs. At the same time, they assess that 8.6% of total Asia/Gulf imports come to Europe by sea.
All in all, European companies appear to be coping with the higher cost burden. But as shipping costs are generally fixed by long-term contracts, most of which run for 12 months, their impact on final consumer prices is likely to become more evident early next year (see chart 9 and "Red Sea Maritime Risks Likely To Extend Beyond Israel-Hamas War, Alternative Routes Entail Economic Or Operational Compromises," published by S&P Global Market Intelligence, Dec. 21, 2023).
Chart 9
ECB: Three Rate Cuts In 2024 And Three More In 2025
The door will open to a first rate cut in June, and the rate-cutting cycle will be gradual, barring another external shock. We base these forecasts on statements over the past three months by ECB president Christine Lagarde and other ECB board members. We continue to forecast three 25 basis point (bp) rate cuts over 2024 (probably in June, September, and December), with the ECB basing each cut on new growth and inflation projections and updated data for wages.
By contrast, we no longer expect the ECB to accelerate its rate-cutting cycle next year. We now forecast only three 25 bp rate cuts in 2025, compared with five previously, so that the deposit facility rate will bottom out at 2.5% instead of 2.0%. Indeed, in our soft-landing base case, where inflation falls less than we expect in 2025 and 2026, and GDP growth picks up to the level of potential growth, a modified Taylor rule approach to monetary policy does not suggest greater scope for rate cuts in 2025 (see chart 10 and the box below on the Taylor rule). Admittedly, the uncertainty about potential growth that we highlighted earlier inevitably has an impact on our ECB rate forecasts.
Chart 10
A Rule Approach To Monetary Policy Backs A Very Gradual Rate-Cutting Cycle
The Taylor rule, attributed to American economist John Taylor, originally linked the Federal Open Monetary Committee's setting of the target for the federal funds rate in real terms to the gap between actual inflation and the central bank's target, and to the gap between actual and potential GDP, plus a neutral rate. In his initial reasoning, Taylor considered that the Federal Reserve would raise the federal funds rate by the same amount for a similar deviation in inflation and GDP. He also considered the neutral rate to be 2% (see "Discretion versus policy rules in practice," John B. Taylor, 1993).
This rule is clearly a simplification of central bank behavior, but economists and central bankers have recognized it as a useful tool that has reliably explained past central bank rate decisions, sometimes after modifying the explanatory variables, and not just for the Federal Reserve (see "The Taylor Rule: A Benchmark for monetary policy?," Ben Bernanke, 2015).
Here, we apply a modified Taylor rule to explain how the ECB sets its main refinancing rate. The results are pretty conclusive. Potential GDP figures come from AMECO. The inflation target is that of the ECB, derived from the official strategy that prevailed during the relevant period. We use one-year inflation and one-year growth rates derived from ECB surveys and our own estimates to be forward-looking. We express the policy rate in dynamic terms as the arithmetic first difference of X, rather than in level terms as per the standard Taylor rule. This is in keeping with how Athanasios Orphanides and Volker Wieland have suggested modifying the Taylor rule for the ECB (see "Complexity and Monetary policy," Orphanides and Wieland, 2013). We have chosen to present a single specification of the modified Taylor rule for illustrative purposes, while recognizing that there are many variants, particularly in terms of the coefficients and variables used.
The ECB's Unchanged Operating Framework Keeps Quantitative Tightening At Bay
We see three key takeaways from the announcement of the ECB's new operational framework, that is, the way the central bank steers monetary policy and injects liquidity into banks (see "Eurozone Banks: ECB's Operational Framework Review Backs The Status Quo," published March 14, 2024).
The new framework does not tighten the conditions for access to central bank liquidity. The ECB will continue to fully service eurozone banks against the same pool of collateral assets. Long-term refinancing operations (so-called structural operations) might resume at a later stage.
It does not imply any acceleration in the reduction of the Eurosystem's balance sheet. The unwinding of targeted long-term refinancing operations and the passive run-off of current bond portfolios will probably remain the driving forces of the balance sheet reduction. Accordingly, the Eurosystem's balance sheet is likely to total about €5,000 billion by the end of 2026, compared with €6,800 billion today (see chart 11). Beyond that, the ECB will consider establishing a structural bond portfolio, probably once the current asset purchase programs and pandemic emergency purchase programs have run to maturity. The ECB has yet to decide on the most important details, namely the size, composition, and duration of this portfolio. This ambiguity has the power to contain a rise in European bond yields in the near future, as it suggests that the balance sheet could increase again from 2026.
Chart 11
The spread between the main refinancing rate and the deposit facility rate will fall. From Sept. 18, 2024, it will fall to 15 bps from 50 bps (see chart 12). Such a record narrowing of the spread aims to limit volatility on money market rates, and, along with the continuation of the full allotment procedure, is likely to prevent any strong resurgence in money market transactions.
Chart 12
Risks To Our Macroeconomic Outlook Are A Squeeze On Growth And Rise In Inflation
The unemployment rate could rise more than we expected this year. Companies and households have drawn down the financial reserves they accumulated during the pandemic, which now limits the potential rebound in demand. With underlying inflation remaining high, central banks may be slow to cut rates.
The main risk is for less disinflation than we expect due to historically high labor costs and higher refinancing costs for businesses, and to a lesser extent, the trade situation in the Red Sea. Moreover, political decisions arising from the elections in the U.S. and EU in 2024 will not be taken before 2025. The eurozone is aiming for a soft landing, but factors remain that could derail it.
Table 3
S&P Global Ratings' European economic forecasts (March 2024) | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | Eurozone | Germany | France | Italy | Spain | Netherlands | Belgium | Switzerland | U.K. | |||||||||||
GDP | ||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 3.5 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 4.1 | 5.8 | 4.4 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 4.3 | |||||||||||
2023 | 0.5 | -0.1 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.1 | |||||||||||
2024 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.3 | |||||||||||
2025 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | |||||||||||
2026 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.7 | |||||||||||
2027 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | |||||||||||
CPI inflation | ||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 8.4 | 8.7 | 5.9 | 8.7 | 8.3 | 11.6 | 10.3 | 2.9 | 9.1 | |||||||||||
2023 | 5.5 | 6 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 3.4 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 7.3 | |||||||||||
2024 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 3 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 3 | |||||||||||
2025 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 2.3 | |||||||||||
2026 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 2.1 | |||||||||||
2027 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 2.0 | |||||||||||
Unemployment rate | ||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 6.7 | 3.1 | 7.3 | 8.1 | 12.9 | 3.5 | 5.6 | 4.3 | 3.9 | |||||||||||
2023 | 6.5 | 3.0 | 7.3 | 7.6 | 12.1 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 4 | |||||||||||
2024 | 6.6 | 3.3 | 7.7 | 7.5 | 11.5 | 3.8 | 5.5 | 4.4 | 4.3 | |||||||||||
2025 | 6.6 | 3.2 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 11.4 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 4.3 | 4.3 | |||||||||||
2026 | 6.5 | 3 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 11.3 | 3.9 | 5.5 | 4.1 | 4.2 | |||||||||||
2027 | 6.4 | 3.1 | 7.4 | 7.4 | 11.2 | 3.8 | 5.4 | 4.0 | 4.2 | |||||||||||
10-year government bond (yearly average) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 2.3 | |||||||||||
2023 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 3.9 | |||||||||||
2024 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.8 | |||||||||||
2025 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 3.4 | |||||||||||
2026 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 3.3 | |||||||||||
2027 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 3.2 | |||||||||||
Eurozone | U.K. | Switzerland | ||||||||||||||||||
Exchange rates | US$ per € | US$ per £ | € per £ | CHF per US$ | CHF per € | |||||||||||||||
2022 | 1.05 | 1.23 | 1.17 | 0.96 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
2023 | 1.08 | 1.24 | 1.15 | 0.90 | 0.97 | |||||||||||||||
2024 | 1.1 | 1.28 | 1.16 | 0.88 | 0.97 | |||||||||||||||
2025 | 1.14 | 1.37 | 1.2 | 0.90 | 1.03 | |||||||||||||||
2026 | 1.17 | 1.38 | 1.19 | 0.91 | 1.06 | |||||||||||||||
2027 | 1.18 | 1.37 | 1.16 | 0.91 | 1.07 | |||||||||||||||
Eurozone (ECB) | U.K. | Switzerland (SNB) | ||||||||||||||||||
Policy rates (end of year) | Deposit rate | Refinance rate | Bank rate | |||||||||||||||||
2022 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 3.25 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||
2023 | 4.00 | 4.50 | 5.25 | 1.75 | ||||||||||||||||
2024 | 3.25 | 3.40 | 4.50 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||
2025 | 2.50 | 2.65 | 3.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||
2026 | 2.50 | 2.65 | 2.75 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||
2027 | 2.50 | 2.65 | 2.75 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||
CHF--Swiss franc. ECB--European Central Bank. SNB--Swiss National Bank. |
Related Research
- Eurozone Banks: ECB's Operational Framework Review Backs The Status Quo, March 14, 2024
- EU RRF At Half-Time: Italy And Spain Will Likely Need Extra Time To Spend Their Funds, July 19, 2023
This report does not constitute a rating action.
EMEA Chief Economist: | Sylvain Broyer, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9156; sylvain.broyer@spglobal.com |
Economists: | Aude Guez, Frankfurt 6933999163; aude.guez@spglobal.com |
Sarah Limbach, Paris + 33 14 420 6708; Sarah.Limbach@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.