articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240314-health-care-it-improves-cash-flow-and-visibility-rating-pressure-persists-13031815.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Health Care IT Improves Cash Flow And Visibility; Rating Pressure Persists

COMMENTS

Private Markets Monthly, December 2024: Private Credit Trends To Watch In 2025

COMMENTS

Sustainable Finance FAQ: The Rise Of Green Equity Designations

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Will COP29 Agreements Support Developing Economies?


Health Care IT Improves Cash Flow And Visibility; Rating Pressure Persists

Revenue Growth Prospects Appear Solid

In 2024, S&P Global Ratings expects healthy, organic revenue growth of mid-single-digit percentages or higher for most health care information technology (IT) issuers. This is primarily due to the essential and high value nature of their services, improving forecasts among hospital and provider clients, and the return of patient volumes and acuity.

Health care IT firms typically provide services via recurring subscription models, creating revenue stability, and they are relatively insulated from macroeconomic concerns. We also expect them to expand via annual price increases and selling of additional capabilities and services to current customers. Health care software vendors provide productivity gains and lower operational costs for labor-intensive and low-margin health care providers. While supply chain and labor related pressures are easing somewhat, labor costs will likely remain heightened and continue to exert operating pressure.

We expect cost-cutting and efficiency initiatives among health care providers, as well as a focus on ensuring cyber security and exploring artificial intelligence (AI) use cases, to make for generous IT budgets. We think IT will also be a key lever in managing through persistent doctor and nurse shortages, allowing medical staff to spend more time treating patients and less time on administrative tasks.

Software sales were mostly resistant to macroeconomic concerns in 2023, reflecting the essential role they play in health care providers' operations, storing and transmitting customers' proprietary information and protected health, financial, and other personal patient information. Last year's persistent growth also reflects the procedure volume normalizing as well as the strength and stability of the recurring subscription model and high switching costs.

Timing Of Demand May Be Volatile

While these dynamics support solid long-term growth prospects for IT vendors, a combination of economic and industry specific factors could constrain or delay demand for individual providers or the sector as a whole. Health care providers' increasing IT budgets may face challenges in worsening economic conditions, leading to deferred large projects and resistance to upselling. Even with stable macroeconomic conditions, we expect health care providers to become increasingly selective in IT budget allocation, pushing decision-making up the chain of command and elongating decision cycles as they look to rationalize vendors and manage costs. Customers will likely be increasingly discriminating with their investments, raising the bar for expected value, requiring additional revenue capture or lower costs.

Perhaps equally important, customers must hire and retain talent in a persistently tight labor market to ensure the proper internal governance and change management structures necessary to support deployments and upgrades. A lack of talent to implement new systems and processes could hold up IT investments or the efficiencies they promise. We also expect health care providers will continue to seek to consolidate software spending with fewer vendors and that constrained staffing will lengthen implementation times.

Finally, while we expect providers to invest in technological advancements, some have reported lower customer churn than usual, associating it with economic uncertainty. Churn is generally unusual in this industry, given the hesitance of health care providers due to the sensitive nature of data. Changing vendors is expensive and time-consuming, though not unusual when providers switch from legacy vendors to those with greater capabilities. Low churn could pressure the ratings on companies that are relying on market share expansion to expand into their capital structures.

We expect providers to continue to move their workloads to the cloud, with software vendors encouraging on-premises customers to transition to software-as-a-service (SaaS) delivery. In doing so, providers can more easily scale applications, get quicker access to the latest updates, and have more predictable software expenditure. Upfront costs are lower and implementations less complex with SaaS, making future purchase decisions easier.

RCM Companies May Be Set For Higher Growth

While electronic health records software companies may have predictable revenue streams with subscription-based contracts, there may be upside in 2024 for revenue cycle management (RCM) companies with contracts based on a percentage of collections. In addition to being increasingly essential for providers facing financial pressures, we expect RCM vendors with contracts tied to collections to benefit from medical inflation, increasing utilization, and reimbursement rate increases. According to an annual KFF survey, medical care prices and overall health spending, which typically outpace growth in the rest of the economy, increased slower than for many consumer goods and services, which have increased unusually fast. We expect medical costs to rise more rapidly in 2024.

Additionally, in recent earnings calls, insurers emphasized that in addition to the unprecedented increases in medical cost trends, they assume a significant uptick in the utilization trend will persist throughout 2024. According to Humana Inc., the increase was predominantly driven by inpatient utilization and outpatient trends, especially for physician office visits and surgeries. UnitedHealth Group Inc. stated elevated activity was led by outpatient care for seniors. We expect vendors operating in these settings with contracts tied to collections or percentage of savings for their customers will benefit from the increasing utilization. We expect the increase in reimbursement and procedure volume should outpace the growth of expenses at RCM firms. The continued migration of procedures to outpatient settings and ambulatory surgical centers will also provide tailwinds to health care IT providers serving those markets.

While many RCM companies have a percentage-of-collection fee structure, some have contracts structured on a fixed-fee basis, thus not tied to a dollar amount or transaction volume. We expect fixed-fee models may be more difficult to sell during economic uncertainty than the percentage-of-collections alternative, which advertises its risk-sharing nature.

The Feb. 21, 2024, cyber attack on Change Healthcare Holdings Inc. could have a mixed impact for RCM peers. While some providers may reenter the RCM market and seek new vendors for certain products, Change maintains a strong market share causing a widespread backlog of claims to be sent to payors. Many RCM vendors have customers that also utilize Change, so we expect that as payers eventually start working through the backlog of claims from Change and providers enter the normal cycle of getting paid, cash for providers and their IT vendors could be moving between quarters. Longer term, we also expect providers that have been consolidating vendors may opt to retain some diversification of vendors in case one is affected by a cyber event. We expect vendors to continue to invest in cyber security, which hospitals will likely scrutinize.

AI tools could contribute to revenue growth in the next three to five years, but can be expensive to develop. We expect AI capabilities to support the growth of the industry and stimulate mergers and acquisitions (M&A). IT vendors are looking for opportunities to enhance health care providers' worker productivity for physician notes, coding and billing, and over time, patient clinical outcomes. We expect them to also look to AI for their own cost optimization through greater automation. Overall, we expect an increase in AI-related investments by vendors and health care providers over the coming years to tackle labor pressures and other challenges.

Cash Flow Turns A Corner, But Rating Downside Pressure Persists For Some

Higher interest rates have significantly pressured the free cash flow of and ratings on many health care IT companies, which in general is a very highly leveraged group. Many of these issuers have significant variable-rate term loan structures that made them ill-prepared for the rapid and significant interest cost increases over the past 18 months. Health care is often viewed as a less cyclical, less risky sector, and many of these companies were capitalized in a different interest rate environment with strong growth expectations. As such, leverage is especially high and the burden of higher interest expense is more pronounced.

While we expect the onerous interest burden to ease over time, many companies will need to execute their growth strategies to expand into their highly leveraged capital structures or face restructuring. We expect several to not produce cash flow in 2024 and only minimal cash flow in 2025. With negative outlooks on 40% of the portfolio, we expect further downgrades if companies have difficulty executing their growth strategies. See the Appendix for our downside and upside triggers (table 1).

For others with lower leverage, financial policy will play a more important role in determining ratings and outlooks. With competition remaining fierce and providers gaining more interest in worker productivity, consumer engagement, monetization of data, and use cases of AI, we believe there is pent-up demand for deal-making after a quiet year. An end to interest rate hikes will likely increase M&A through 2024 and sellers slowly conceding to lower market valuations. We expect more debt-funded acquisitions will likely limit the sector rating upside.

Chart 1

image

IT Providers Have Pushed Off Maturities

Many issuers have been quick to take advantage of the recent capital markets access to refinance and push off maturities, despite many generating cash flow deficits in 2023. This has differentiated the companies with cash flow deficits that are likely to turn positive in the next two years versus companies which may take longer.

Chart 2

image

For those that have not yet pushed off maturities, some with material cash flow deficits, near-term revenue growth and cost-cutting becomes essential to allow for capital market access, and sufficient liquidity will become increasingly important. If elevated borrowing costs are more prolonged, refinancing risk will increase, potentially leading to more debt restructuring, defaults, or exchanges, repurchases, or term amendments that could be considered tantamount to default.

Appendix

Table 1

Health care information technology sector liquidity breakdown
Company Rating Outlook Liquidity Downside trigger Upside trigger

Athenahealth Group Inc.

B- Negative Adequate We could lower our ratings over the next 12-18 months if the company struggles to execute its growth trajectory and produce strengthening cash flow trending toward 2%-3% free operating cash flow (FOCF) to debt (to cover payment-in-kind interest as well), likely due to slower-than-expected bookings growth, prolonged decision cycles, and higher costs related to new product investments. This would lead us to conclude that cash flow will remain depressed and its capital structure is unsustainable, such that it could pursue subpar debt exchanges or struggle to refinance its February 2027 maturities. We could revise the outlook to stable over the next 12 months if the company executes its growth plans via stronger utilization and market share expansion and expands EBITDA margins 300-400 basis points, leading us to believe it can produce sustainable free cash flow that covers fixed costs, including amortization.

Azalea TopCo Inc.

B- Negative Adequate We could lower our rating if the company's FOCF cannot cover fixed charges, including debt amortization on a sustained basis. We believe this could occur due to an unexpected setback in integrating its recent large acquisitions or an erosion of the company's market share, materially weakening performance than our current base case. We could revise the outlook to stable if the company successfully integrates its recent acquisitions in line with our expectations and improves profitability by generating sustained positive FOCF sufficient to cover its fixed charges, including debt amortization.

Buccaneer Intermediate Holdco Ltd.

B- Negative Adequate We could consider lowering the rating if cash flow generation is persistently negative, weakness in bookings continue that we expect would have a long term negative impact on EBITDA, and lack of visibility into its ability to generate cash flow continues on an ongoing basis. We could also lower the rating if liquidity weakens such that we no longer believe Buccaneer has a sufficient cushion to weather temporary setbacks. We could revise the outlook to stable if bookings and clinical trial starts increase, leading us to expect sustainable cash flow.

Elevate PFS Parent Holdings Inc.

CCC+ Negative Less than adequate We could lower the rating if volume demand is further delayed and cash outflow worsens, leading to increased use of the line of credit and liquidity pressures rising, such that we believe the company cannot meet commitments and potentially defaulting over the next 12 months. We could revise our outlook to stable if revenues and free cash flow generation increases, improving liquidity. However, given the extended sales cycle and uncertainty surrounding the timing and strength of the return of volume demand, the revision to stable would likely be beyond 2023.

Ensemble RCM LLC

B Stable Adequate We could consider lowering our rating if we expect it to sustain S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA of more than 7x and FOCF to debt of less than 3%. This could occur due to the loss of several customers or because of a significant debt-funded dividend or acquisition. We could consider raising our rating if it further attracts and retains a more diversified client base and we expect its S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA to generally remain in the 5x area or below. However, we view this as unlikely due to its track record and financial-sponsor ownership.

FinThrive Software Intermediate Holdings Inc.

CCC Negative Less than adequate We could lower the rating if we expect a debt restructuring, default, or bankruptcy in the near term. We could raise the rating if it improves operating performance, with new bookings flowing through to cash flow, such that liquidity increases and the likelihood of further repurchases of debt at below par decreases.

Gainwell Holding Corp.

B- Negative Adequate We could lower our ratings over the next 12-18 months if the company struggles to execute its cost-saving plan, preserving margins in fiscal 2024 and expanding margins 350-400 basis points in fiscal 2025. This would lead us to conclude that cash flow will remain depressed and that its capital structure is unsustainable such that it could pursue subpar debt exchanges or struggle to refinance its October 2025 maturity. We could revise the outlook to stable over the next 12 months if Gainwell stabilizes its Medicaid Enterprise System implementations and achieves cost savings, such that we expect that it can produce sustainable FOCF to debt of about 2%.

GHX Ultimate Parent Corp.

B- Stable Adequate We could revise the outlook or lower the rating if the company cannot refinance upcoming maturities or the closing terms are materially worse than expected. We could also lower the rating if longer-term operating challenges result in minimal or negative FOCF. We could raise the rating if we see evidence of FOCF to debt sustained above 3%, supported by the solid execution of growth plans.

Goldcup Holdings Inc.

B- Stable Adequate We could lower our rating if we expect it to sustain free cash flow deficits or anticipate that it will have difficulty covering its debt amortization payments, which would cause us to view its capital structure as unsustainable. This could occur due to elevated expenses and difficulty retaining staff, intensifying competition, or unexpected material reputational issues relating to IT security. An upgrade is unlikely within the next year given our expectation that leverage will remain very high and its financial policy will continue to be aggressive under its financial-sponsor ownership. However, we could consider raising our rating if we expect the company will likely sustain annual adjusted FOCF to debt over 3%.

Netsmart LLC

B- Stable Adequate We could lower the rating if cash flow and liquidity position worsen, likely due to continued operational issues. We could also lower the rating if lower bookings or stronger competition cause us to believe the business's competitive position is eroding, resulting in sustained negligible FOCF. We could raise our rating if Netsmart resolves its working capital usage and increases receivables, allowing it to generate sustainable FOCF to debt above 3% despite higher interest rates. Under this scenario, we expect the company would commit to maintaining S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage below 8x.

PointClickCare Technologies Inc.

B Stable Adequate We could consider a lower rating in the next 12 months if we expect a more aggressive pace of acquisitions or weakening operating performance to result in S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA above 9x; and free cash flow to debt below 3%. We would view this as a deviation from the company's stated financial policy. We do not expect to raise the rating over the next 12 months. However, we could consider it if we expect S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA to remain below 5x and the company to demonstrate a commitment and track record of operating at lower leverage.

Project Ruby Parent Corp.

B- Stable Adequate We could lower our rating if it fails to increase revenue and EBITDA by introducing next-generation product lines or because of significant customer attrition, leading to negative FOCF and weaker liquidity. We could raise our rating if it increases revenue and EBITDA such that FOCF to debt rises to 3% or more and it sustains leverage of less than 7x.

R1 RCM Inc.

B+ Stable Adequate We could lower our rating if we expect it will sustain leverage of more than 5x. This could occur if the company becomes more aggressive in its pursuit of debt-financed acquisitions, EBITDA growth underperforms our expectations, or it faces difficulty in realizing expected synergies from Cloudmed and Acclara or generating EBITDA from recent contract wins. We could also lower our rating if a shift in IT service outsourcing trends leads hospitals to bring these services back in-house or opt for point products over end-to-end contracts. We are less likely to lower our rating solely due to temporary expenses to bring onboard new large customers, which could increase leverage slightly above our current expectations, absent an underperformance. We could consider raising our rating if we believe it will sustain S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage below 4x and its sponsors plan to relinquish control over the medium term. We would also require continued contract wins and further reductions in its customer concentration before raising our rating.

Symplr Software Intermediate Holdings Inc.

CCC+ Negative Less than adequate We could lower our ratings in the next 12 months if liquidity deteriorates further and it cannot finance its operations over the next 12 months, which could occur due to a slower-than-expected improvement in EBITDA improvements. We could also lower the rating if we foresee an increased likelihood it will engage in a restructuring transaction that we would consider tantamount to a default. We could revise our outlook to stable if it materially improves liquidity without taking on incremental debt and we expect it will generate sustainably positive FOCF. The company could generate sustainably positive FOCF if it decreases restructuring and other operating costs and passes through ongoing inflationary pressures with higher prices.

Thrive Merger Sub LLC

B- Negative Adequate We could lower our ratings over the next 12 months if free cash flow deficits increase incrementally, requiring the company to use up its revolving credit facility; revenue growth slows, such that EBITDA is insufficient to cover fixed charges, resulting in EBITDA interest coverage sustained below 1x; or the company pursues acquisitions that could weaken liquidity and/or covenant headroom. We could revise our outlook to stable over the next 12-24 months if free cash flow turns and remains positive for several consecutive quarters, perhaps from strong revenue growth and/or profitability improvement toward a 25% S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margin, or we believe the company is pursuing relatively disciplined mergers and acquisitions that support sustained deleveraging.

Cotiviti Inc.

B Stable Adequate We could lower the rating if leverage increases above 8x and FOCF decreases below $75 million on a sustained basis. This could occur if the company pursues debt-funded acquisitions or dividends. It could also occur amid customer attrition (possibly the loss of certain large health care payers) or competition increases, pressuring EBITDA margins. We could raise our rating if we expect it will sustain S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA below 6x, with FOCF to debt of 5% or above. Under this scenario, we would expect the business to continue strengthening its market position through organic growth while maintaining healthy EBITDA margins.

Waystar Technologies Inc.

B- WatchPos Adequate We intend to resolve the CreditWatch upon IPO pricing, when we can quantify the proceeds applied to debt repayment and assess the company's future financial policy. We will also reassess our recovery ratings on Waystar's senior secured debt once we confirm debt reduction. We could consider a higher rating of one or more notches to the extent it uses proceeds for debt repayment and the financial policy supports sustained lower leverage.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Sarah Kahn, Washington D.C. + 1 (212) 438 5448;
sarah.kahn@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Matthew D Todd, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 2309;
matthew.todd@spglobal.com
Arthur C Wong, Toronto + 1 (416) 507 2561;
arthur.wong@spglobal.com
Contributor:Ameel A Musani, Pune;
ameel.musani@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in