articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240227-sovereign-debt-2024-asia-pacific-central-government-borrowing-stabilizes-at-close-to-us-4-trillion-13009511.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Sovereign Debt 2024: Asia-Pacific Central Government Borrowing Stabilizes At Close To US$4 Trillion

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

CEE Brief: Growth Will Decelerate, But The Outlook Isn't Bleak

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: How Would China Fare Under 60% U.S. Tariffs?

COMMENTS

LGFV Brief: China's RMB10 Trillion Debt-Swap Scheme Is A Good Start


Sovereign Debt 2024: Asia-Pacific Central Government Borrowing Stabilizes At Close To US$4 Trillion

This report does not constitute a rating action.

After climbing since the outbreak of COVID-19, Asia-Pacific sovereign borrowing should stabilize in 2024. S&P Global Ratings expects the region's long-term commercial borrowing to amount to US$3.9 trillion this year, after an estimated US$4.1 trillion in 2023. Smaller 2024 issuances out of Japan account for much of the decline.

Australian and Korean governments are among the major sovereigns that we anticipate will borrow less than in 2023. Pakistan and Sri Lanka, currently under IMF programs, should also borrow less than in 2023.

Most other sovereigns will increase borrowing this year. We expect China to increase borrowing by the most, rising by about US$110 billion. Thailand and the Philippines are also likely to see significant increases in borrowings.

We project Asia-Pacific commercial government debt will increase by US$1.7 trillion, bringing the year-end total to US$20.6 trillion. The total commercial debt stock of governments in the region declined in both 2022 and 2023 despite net long-term borrowing amounting to more than US$1 trillion in each year. In large part, the drops were due to the significant depreciations of the Japanese yen and Chinese renminbi vis-à-vis the U.S. dollar over these two years. This caused a decline in the amount of debt owed by the Chinese and Japanese governments, as measured in U.S. dollars.

Smaller Japanese Issuance Drags Down Overall Asia-Pacific Borrowing

We believe Japanese government debt issuance will drop sharply this year. In our estimation, compared with fiscal 2023 (ending March 31, 2024), Japanese borrowing will fall by more than US$250 billion on the back of a slightly smaller budget deficit and a large decline in refinancing needs. This will bring borrowing down to US$1.4 trillion, from US$1.6 trillion in fiscal 2023. Japanese government borrowing may come in higher than our estimates if the government implements a supplementary budget later in the year that increases planned borrowing.

Even with a supplementary budget, Japan is unlikely to top the list of government borrowers in Asia-Pacific this year. In 2024, we expect the Chinese government to borrow more than other governments in the region. We estimate China will borrow US$1.7 trillion this year, up from US$1.6 trillion in 2023. It will account for about 44% of total Asia-Pacific long-term government commercial borrowing. This reflects our view that the budget deficit will remain close to 3% of GDP to support the recovery of the Chinese economy with fiscal transfers to weaker local governments.

Another reason for the growing Chinese borrowing, compared with Japan, is the widening gap between the sizes of their respective GDP, measured in U.S. dollars. By this measure, the Chinese economy is about 25% larger in 2023 than in 2019. The Japanese economy, mainly due to yen weakness, has shrunk by about 18% in the same period.

Other major Asia-Pacific governments are also likely to borrow more in 2024. As a share of GDP, however, we project their fiscal deficits to fall relative to 2023. Most economies in the region should still have healthy growth. And inflation has become less of a burden. Consequently, we expect budgetary performances to improve for most governments.

A few Asia-Pacific governments may see lower borrowing this year. With the budget of the Australian central government returning to a surplus position, we anticipate a sharp decline in borrowing needs in 2024. In Korea, despite an increase in the government deficit, issuances should be lower due to the reduced repayment of maturing long-term debt this year. In the case of Pakistan and Sri Lanka, the IMF programs they are undergoing will likely bring down new borrowing by the two governments.

Chart 1

image

By our estimates, Asia-Pacific sovereigns will use nearly 75% (or US$2.9 trillion) of their gross long-term commercial borrowings in 2024 to refinance maturing long-term debt (with an original maturity of above one year). Net long-term commercial borrowings come close to US$1 trillion this year (see tables 1-3 and chart 1).

Projected issuance this year will raise the Asia-Pacific sovereign commercial debt stock to an equivalent of US$20.6 trillion by the end of 2024, up by US$1.68 trillion from 2023. If we include bilateral and multilateral debt, the total stock in 2024 will reach US$21.1 trillion, US$1.72 trillion above that in 2023. The share of noncommercial official debt (bilateral and multilateral) in total long-term sovereign debt will likely be approximately 2.2%.

Asia-Pacific central governments that we rate as investment grade owe almost all sovereign commercial debts in the region. In part, that's because the biggest economies in the region are where sovereigns are rated investment grade.

The two largest speculative-grade sovereigns by economic size in the region-- Bangladesh and Vietnam--account for just 0.5% and 0.6% of total Asia-Pacific central government commercial debt, respectively. Pakistan, the next largest, owes much more than that, accounting for 0.9%. The share of debt in the rating category of 'BB' or below is set to account for 2% of total commercial debt in 2024.

Chart 2

image

At the end of this year, we project the share of commercial sovereign debt rated 'AAA' at 7.3% of total commercial debt. This is a slight decrease from the 7.6% share in 2023. The decline mainly reflects the drop in Australian debt levels (see chart 2).

Table 1

Sovereign commercial issuance and debt
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023e 2024f
(Bil. US$)
Gross long-term commercial borrowing 2,835.0 2,826.8 2,672.2 2,412.1 3,103.6 3,258.2 3,417.8 4,054.4 3,908.1
Of which amortization of maturing long-term debt 2,175.6 2,190.9 2,116.6 1,573.2 1,731.4 1,914.4 2,250.9 2,917.2 2,923.9
Of which net long-term commercial borrowing 659.4 635.9 555.6 833.2 1,372.2 1,343.8 1,166.8 1,137.2 984.2
Total commercial debt stock (year end) 14,025.6 15,249.6 16,150.8 16,645.7 19,644.9 19,950.9 18,970.4 18,918.8 20,597.4
Of which short-term debt 1,670.1 1,667.6 1,678.6 1,847.6 3,011.8 3,035.8 2,576.3 2,663.4 2,884.6
Of which debt with original maturity greater than one year 12,355.5 13,582.0 14,472.1 14,798.0 16,633.1 16,915.2 16,394.1 16,255.4 17,712.8
(%GDP)
Gross long-term commercial borrowing (% GDP) 11.1 10.3 9.0 7.9 10.2 9.3 9.8 11.6 10.6
Of which amortization of maturing long-term debt (% GDP) 8.5 8.0 7.1 5.2 5.7 5.5 6.5 8.3 7.9
Of which net long-term commercial borrowing (% GDP) 2.6 2.3 1.9 2.7 4.5 3.9 3.4 3.2 2.7
Total commecial debt stock (year end) (% GDP) 54.9 55.4 54.3 54.8 64.7 57.2 54.5 54.1 55.6
Of which short-term debt (% GDP) 6.5 6.1 5.6 6.1 9.9 8.7 7.4 7.6 7.8
Of which debt with original maturity greater than one year (% GDP) 48.4 49.4 48.7 48.7 54.8 48.5 47.1 46.4 47.8
e--Estimate. f--Forecast. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Most Asia-Pacific Governments Face Higher Borrowing Costs

Japan's debt-rollover ratio (including short-term debt) should decline to 60.8% of GDP in 2024, from nearly 62% a year earlier (see chart 3). One reason is the government's efforts to reverse the shortened maturity of Japanese government bond (JGB) issuances in recent years.

In fiscal 2020 (ending March 31, 2021), the government increased short-term issuances sharply to fund its large fiscal response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This cut the average maturity of Japanese government bond issuance to six years and eight months, from nine years in fiscal 2019. It has been increasing longer-term issuances to replace the short-term debt in subsequent years. In fiscal 2024, it plans to raise the average maturity of JGB issuances by another six months, from a year ago, to eight years and seven months.

Chart 3

image

By the end of 2023, the weighted average maturity of outstanding Japanese debt had risen to nine years and six months. It had fallen to eight years and 11 months in fiscal 2020. The recovery in average maturity of outstanding debt is important as interest rates in Japan have continued to rise in 2023.

Across the yield curve, Japanese interest rates have increased over the past year. Currently, government bond yields for maturities above a year are all positive. This contrasts with the situation before 2021, when even the 10-year yield was often below zero.

This means that interest payments will increasingly weigh on the Japanese central government budget. Fiscal 2023 could be the second year since fiscal 2015 that government spending on debt interest payment increases. The relatively long average maturity of Japanese government debt will temper the interest burden even if interest rates rise further.

Most other Asia-Pacific governments are also facing higher interest rates this year. However, in most cases where financing costs are higher, the increases are modest. The exceptions are Bangladesh and Pakistan, where short-term interest rates in January this year are more than 3 percentage points higher compared with a year earlier.

The relatively light Bangladeshi debt burden, coupled with a large share of long-dated multilateral debt, meant that the higher interest rates have little impact on its rollover ratio. For Pakistan, where debt levels are higher at more than 70% of GDP, the impact is larger. Nevertheless, support from multilateral financial institutions and a relatively low share of short-term debt also limit the increase in the rollover ratio.

Table 2
Gross commercial long-term borrowing
(Bil. US$) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023e 2024f Share of 2024f total commercial borrowing (%)
Australia 75.0 61.1 47.2 43.6 87.0 77.2 73.5 54.5 18.2 0.5
Bangladesh 8.0 11.7 12.7 8.5 15.1 17.4 14.7 14.2 18.0 0.5
China 460.1 590.7 556.9 617.1 1,037.1 1,061.8 1,442.7 1,588.2 1,698.7 43.5
Cook Islands 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Fiji 1.7 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0
Hong Kong 3.7 0.1 2.5 3.6 6.2 15.2 10.4 24.4 27.0 0.7
India 107.0 86.7 77.6 124.3 178.7 240.6 268.0 278.2 278.3 7.1
Indonesia 31.0 58.1 49.6 57.3 72.2 54.9 66.3 60.2 73.6 1.9
Japan 1,918.4 1,755.1 1,693.5 1,272.8 1,299.2 1,337.0 1,123.4 1,614.6 1,359.0 34.8
Korea (the Republic of) 87.1 89.2 88.5 87.3 149.3 159.2 154.4 171.8 152.6 3.9
Malaysia 22.3 26.5 28.6 29.7 35.6 39.9 39.0 40.6 41.9 1.1
Mongolia 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
New Zealand 5.4 5.7 6.2 6.7 30.2 28.2 13.1 18.3 23.6 0.6
Pakistan 37.1 39.1 18.3 48.0 33.0 35.8 55.9 49.8 43.6 1.1
Papua New Guinea 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.2 0.0
Philippines 9.0 16.0 11.5 15.0 37.4 46.8 42.9 29.8 40.0 1.0
Singapore 26.8 36.2 16.1 36.7 37.5 44.5 38.9 37.5 42.1 1.1
Sri Lanka 7.3 7.9 10.1 11.0 9.9 10.2 8.4 22.1 6.9 0.2
Taiwan 3.7 3.0 3.4 3.0 15.7 22.0 5.2 7.8 11.1 0.3
Thailand 22.9 32.9 38.2 32.1 42.0 51.7 45.4 24.3 55.1 1.4
Vietnam 7.5 5.4 9.5 15.1 16.3 14.8 14.7 16.9 16.7 0.4
(Bil. US$) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023e 2024f Share of 2024f total commercial borrowing (%)
AAA 101.8 97.3 63.3 80.2 124.6 121.7 112.3 92.0 60.3 1.5
AA 100.0 98.0 100.6 100.6 201.5 224.6 183.0 222.4 214.3 5.5
A 2,400.7 2,372.4 2,278.9 1,919.6 2,371.9 2,438.7 2,605.1 3,243.3 3,099.6 79.5
BBB 170.0 193.6 176.8 228.6 330.2 394.0 422.6 392.5 447.0 11.5
BB 15.5 17.1 22.2 23.6 31.4 32.2 29.4 31.1 34.7 0.9
B 2.6 1.5 2.1 0.5 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.7 0.0
CCC 37.1 39.1 18.3 48.0 33.0 35.8 55.9 49.8 43.6 1.1
SD 7.3 7.9 10.1 11 9.9 10.2 8.4 22.1 6.9 0.2
e--Estimate. f--Forecast. N.A.--Not available. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Table 3

Total commercial debt at year-end (long- and short-term)
(Bil. US$) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023e 2024f Share of 2024f total commercial debt (%)
Australia 378.0 409.2 400.6 374.8 469.6 642.8 616.7 589.9 582.4 2.8
Bangladesh 30.9 39.7 39.5 56.2 68.0 78.1 78.4 83.7 94.4 0.5
China 1,711.5 2,057.4 2,294.0 2,389.7 3,176.1 3,626.6 3,671.9 3,935.5 4,432.4 21.5
Cook Islands 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Fiji 2.5 1.8 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.9 0.0
Hong Kong 15.2 16.4 16.5 14.9 16.0 29.8 28.1 51.2 53.3 0.3
India 874.5 984.1 1,284.7 1,311.3 1,398.7 1,607.0 1,690.9 1,944.9 2,079.7 10.1
Indonesia 199.6 243.1 257.8 292.4 375.0 421.6 430.1 464.3 492.6 2.4
Japan 9,188.9 9,617.0 9,929.9 10,213.9 11,700.0 10,868.6 9,476.1 8,775.6 9,464.7 46.0
Korea (the Republic of) 490.1 586.1 583.0 528.2 676.7 720.5 813.9 832.3 940.2 4.6
Malaysia 143.1 167.7 177.7 192.4 217.9 233.5 243.7 248.7 286.0 1.4
Mongolia 5.7 6.6 5.1 4.4 4.2 4.1 3.0 2.8 3.5 0.0
New Zealand 53.3 59.8 55.3 52.9 85.9 105.7 100.7 109.9 117.7 0.6
Pakistan 143.3 151.2 149.2 141.9 169.8 203.9 194.4 176.6 183.3 0.9
Papua New Guinea 4.7 3.4 3.5 4.3 4.0 6.5 8.0 8.5 9.2 0.0
Philippines 105.9 116.3 120.4 133.1 176.6 201.0 205.6 223.2 253.2 1.2
Singapore 297.3 364.6 389.2 466.3 522.5 564.3 793.2 837.0 909.4 4.4
Sri Lanka 48.3 53.5 51.4 54.8 63.2 66.2 52.1 65.4 71.9 0.3
Taiwan 165.6 181.0 176.7 178.7 198.6 205.7 186.6 180.5 190.0 0.9
Thailand 117.0 144.6 164.2 187.6 232.0 266.0 277.0 278.2 309.8 1.5
Vietnam 50.2 46.2 49.9 45.8 87.7 96.5 97.4 107.9 121.0 0.6
Breakdown by foreign currency rating category*
(Bil. US$) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023e 2024f Share of 2024f total commercial debt (%)
AAA 675.3 773.8 789.8 841.2 992.1 1,207.1 1,409.9 1,427.0 1,491.8 7.3
AA 724.2 843.3 831.5 774.6 977.3 1,061.7 1,129.2 1,173.9 1,301.2 6.3
A 11,043.5 11,842.0 12,401.6 12,796.0 15,093.9 14,728.8 13,391.7 12,959.8 14,183.0 69.1
BBB 1,296.9 1,488.1 1,827.1 1,924.3 2,182.2 2,495.5 2,603.5 2,910.5 3,135.2 15.3
BB 81.1 85.9 89.4 102.0 155.7 174.6 175.8 191.6 215.4 1.0
B 13.0 11.8 10.8 10.9 10.6 13.1 13.7 14.0 15.6 0.1
CCC 143.3 151.2 149.2 141.9 169.8 203.9 194.4 176.6 183.3 0.9
SD 48.3 53.5 51.4 54.8 63.2 66.2 52.1 65.4 71.9 0.3
e--Estimate. f--Forecast. N.A.--Not available.

Table 4

Central government rollover ratios and debt structure (% of total debt, including bi-/multilateral)
2023e 2024f
Commercial debt (% of total) Short-term debt (% of total) Foreign currency debt (% of total) Long-term fixed-rate debt (% of total debt) Inflation-indexed debt (% of total) Bi-/Multilateral debt (% of total) Rollover ratio (% of total debt) Rollover ratio (% of GDP)
Australia 100.0 3.0 0.0 92.6 4.4 0.0 7.0 2.4
Bangladesh 60.7 0.2 46.2 92.8 0.0 39.3 3.9 1.1
China 99.2 20.4 1.2 79.7 0.0 0.8 53.1 11.3
Cook Islands 0.0 0.0 37.1 19.3 0.0 100.0 6.1 1.8
Fiji 63.3 2.7 36.7 80.1 0.0 36.7 8.0 6.0
Hong Kong 100.0 1.7 38.9 62.0 0.0 0.0 20.5 2.6
India 94.9 9.8 3.2 84.6 0.0 5.1 15.1 7.8
Indonesia 88.0 8.0 28.0 78.2 0.0 12.0 17.8 6.6
Japan 100.0 15.6 0.0 82.6 1.0 0.0 28.6 60.8
Korea (the Republic of) 100.0 0.0 1.1 99.4 0.6 0.0 11.6 5.5
Malaysia 99.7 1.7 2.6 98.3 0.0 0.3 9.7 5.6
Mongolia 31.4 0.0 99.2 81.6 0.0 68.6 6.7 2.8
New Zealand 100.0 7.0 4.4 82.2 10.8 0.0 17.5 7.6
Pakistan 77.8 14.3 35.0 44.4 0.0 22.2 25.5 15.7
Papua New Guinea 52.3 24.2 49.1 75.8 0.0 47.8 29.9 14.4
Philippines 85.8 2.6 31.5 86.6 0.0 14.2 11.1 6.0
Singapore 100.0 11.5 0.0 88.5 0.0 0.0 15.3 25.0
Sri Lanka 72.8 17.7 44.9 82.3 0.0 27.2 22.1 22.0
Taiwan 100.0 0.5 0.0 99.5 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.6
Thailand 100.0 9.1 1.4 77.3 3.1 0.0 19.2 10.0
Vietnam 70.8 20.0 30.0 53.6 0.0 29.2 27.7 9.2
Breakdown by foreign currency rating category*
2023e 2024f
Commercial debt (% of total) Short-term debt (% of total) Foreign currency debt (% of total) Long-term fixed-rate debt (% of total debt) Inflation-indexed debt (% of total) Bi-/Multilateral debt (% of total) Rollover ratio (% of total debt) Rollover ratio (% of GDP)
AAA 100.0 8.0 0.0 90.2 1.8 0.0 12.0 7.7
AA 100.0 0.8 2.9 96.2 1.4 0.0 11.2 4.1
A 99.7 16.8 0.4 82.0 0.7 0.3 35.9 20.1
BBB 93.4 8.8 9.6 83.0 0.3 6.6 15.6 7.5
BB 66.0 10.6 37.7 72.2 0.0 34.0 16.4 5.2
B 47.3 13.7 62.5 78.0 0.0 52.7 19.5 9.5
CCC 77.8 14.3 35.0 44.4 0.0 22.2 25.5 15.7
SD 72.8 17.7 44.9 82.3 0.0 27.2 22.1 22.0
e--Estimate. f--Forecast. N/A.--Not applicable. Source: S&P global Ratings.

Table 5

Sovereign ratings
Local currency ratings Foreign currency ratings*

Australia

AAA/Stable/A-1+ AAA/Stable/A-1+

Bangladesh

BB-/Negative/B BB-/Negative/B

China

A+/Stable/A-1 A+/Stable/A-1

Cook Islands

B+/Stable/B B+/Stable/B

Fiji

B+/Stable/B B+/Stable/B

Hong Kong

AA+/Stable/A-1+ AA+/Stable/A-1+

India

BBB-/Stable/A-3 BBB-/Stable/A-3

Indonesia

BBB/Stable/A-2 BBB/Stable/A-2

Japan

A+/Stable/A-1 A+/Stable/A-1

Korea (the Republic of)

AA/Stable/A-1+ AA/Stable/A-1+

Malaysia

A/Stable/A-1 A-/Stable/A-2

Mongolia

B/Stable/B B/Stable/B

New Zealand

AAA/Stable/A-1+ AA+/Stable/A-1+

Pakistan

CCC+/Stable/C CCC+/Stable/C

Papua New Guinea

B-/Stable/B B-/Stable/B

Philippines

BBB+/Stable/A-2 BBB+/Stable/A-2

Singapore

AAA/Stable/A-1+ AAA/Stable/A-1+

Sri Lanka

CCC+/Stable/C --/--/SD

Taiwan

AA+/Stable/A-1+ AA+/Stable/A-1+

Thailand

A-/Stable/A-2 BBB+/Stable/A-2

Vietnam

BB+/Stable/B BB+/Stable/B
Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Methodological Note

The debt-rollover ratios for infrequent issuers, such as the Cook Islands, with small but lumpy debt obligations, can be very low if they have little or no debt maturing in the year, or if those issuers do not have much short-term debt. The rollover ratios of sovereigns that have a higher proportion of official debt tend to be lower, because official debt typically has longer maturities than commercial debt.

These projections only account for the 21 Asia-Pacific sovereigns rated by S&P Global Ratings (see ratings list in table 5). Our estimates focus on debt that is issued by a central government (or a government that we rate using our sovereign rating methodology) in its own name, and in most cases exclude local government and social security debt as well as debt issued by other public bodies and government-guaranteed obligations. In terms of commercial debt instruments, our estimates for long-term borrowing include bonds with maturities of more than one year issued either on publicly listed markets or sold as private placements, as well as commercial bank loans.

In addition to commercial debt, some of the estimates we use in this study include official bilateral and multilateral debt. We do not include government debt issued by central banks for monetary policy purposes. All reported forecast figures are our own estimates, and do not necessarily reflect the issuers' projections. Our estimates are based on our expectations regarding central government deficits, our assessment of governments' potential extra-budgetary funding needs, and our estimates of debt maturities. Estimates that we express in dollars are subject to exchange rate variations.

Editor: Lex Hall

Related Research

Primary Credit Analyst:KimEng Tan, Singapore + 65 6239 6350;
kimeng.tan@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in