Key Takeaways
- U.S. commercial real estate (CRE) struggles to get back on its feet, with the ailing office sector dampening the ratings outlook.
- Difficult conditions for refinancing loans could put the resilience of commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) to the test, while real estate investment trusts (REITs) might face a decline in credit quality.
- CRE financing companies (fincos) continue to focus on maintaining liquidity over new loan originations as they face deteriorating asset quality, rising credit loss reserves, and an increase in underperforming loans.
- With banks remaining the largest source of funding for CRE, and CRE delinquencies rising, most banks maintain manageable exposures to office loans. We closely monitor banks with the highest CRE exposures.
S&P Global Ratings' webinar "CRE Credit Outlook: CMBS, REITs, and Banks Update" on Feb. 14, 2024, made clear that CRE in the U.S. is not out of the woods yet. A replay is available here.
Slowing economic growth and the cooling labor market will likely weaken demand for CRE, reduce occupancy rates, and cap rent increases, Ana Lai, CFA and Managing Director for U.S. REITs, warned. Price discovery was pushed to the back burner in 2023, with transaction activity remaining well below pre-pandemic levels. Already strained asset valuations will suffer from upcoming refinancing needs that will cause forced asset sales at discount prices, lead to an increase in distressed sales, and widen cap rates.
Slightly Higher Issuance In CMBS But Headwinds Abound
Private-label CMBS issuance will climb to $50 billion this year, from $39 billion in 2023. Banks' retreat from lending could spell opportunity for CMBS and increase their market share. Conduits should keep pace with single borrower deals, especially with the newer five-year product seemingly gaining acceptance.
One key consideration in the medium term for CMBS is a potential rise in event risk. It remains to be seen if lower-leveraged loans can outweigh the risks associated with increasingly concentrated CMBS pools. The large number of refinancings, versus acquisitions, and lackluster transaction volumes could pose additional questions, especially in light of high interest rates and low asset values.
The credit picture is challenging, with CMBS delinquencies climbing by 173 basis points (bps) year-on-year to 4.3% in January 2024. At just over 6%, the office sector experienced the highest late payment rate, ahead of retail, lodging, multifamily, and industrial delinquencies.
Unsurprisingly, the ratings outlook on CMBS took a turn for the worse over the past 12 months (see chart 1), with the spike in downgrades in November 2023 resulting from the revision of our capitalization rate assumptions for class B office assets. "Overall, we expect downgrades will continue in 2024, as will the increase in delinquency and special servicing rates," James Manzi, CFA and Managing Director for Structured Finance Research, said.
Chart 1
Offices Put A Drag On REITs
REIT downgrades far outpaced upgrades in 2023, a trend that continued into early 2024 (see chart 2). Credit quality will weaken modestly in 2024, with 26% of ratings either with negative outlooks or on CreditWatch negative as of Feb. 6, 2024. In contrast, ratings with positive indicators only accounted for 4%.
"The negative rating bias largely results from our continued negative view on office REITs," Michael Souers, Director for U.S. REITs, said. "40% of our ratings on U.S. office REITs are now speculative-grade, compared with about 20% of ratings in the North American REIT universe."
Office REITS could suffer from muted job growth, low tenant retention rates--which are still 10% below pre-pandemic levels--and high vacancy rates. The valuations of office assets, which declined sharply over the past two years, could remain stressed until the Fed starts to cut rates in the second half of 2024.
On the plus side, office utilization increased modestly in recent weeks, capital market conditions improved, and lease expirations are generally manageable. "We expect occupancy rates for our rated office REITs will weaken modestly in 2024, with some looking at a 2% to 3% contraction from year-end 2023," Mr. Souers said.
Chart 2
CRE Fincos Center On Liquidity
Downward rating pressure remains. In 2023, we downgraded two of the six companies we rate and revised our rating outlook on one company to negative. Currently, the rating outlook on four of the six CRE fincos we rate is stable, one is negative, and one positive. Similar to other CRE sectors, CRE fincos are not immune to high interest rates, which increase cap rates and reduce property valuations. Unsurprisingly, office real estate remains under intense pressure as the more permanent adoption of hybrid work is slowing the recovery from low office utilization (see chart 3).
"While rated CRE fincos' office loan exposure has declined since 2020 as lenders focused on originating loans for other property types, the existing office loan book continues to remain under pressure," Gaurav Parikh, CFA and Director for Non-Bank Financial Institutions, said.
A further deterioration in office loan portfolios remains likely, especially for companies that are exposed to dense markets, such as New York and San Francisco. CRE fincos, which are typically well versed in dealing with troubled properties, will also have to decide how to handle stressed or defaulted loans--be it by maturity extensions, partial loan paydowns, or foreclosures.
CRE fincos primarily depend on secured repurchase facilities to fund their portfolio. This, together with a deterioration in asset quality, could result in margin calls on these facilities. In the current market, they prioritize liquidity over new loan originations, with some companies also having reduced their quarterly dividends because of the expected decline in property valuations and the potential for margin calls. While some facilities allow for collateral to be marked based on market interest rates and credit spreads, many other facilities only allow for marks based on credit valuation adjustment events.
Chart 3
Size Matters For Banks' CRE Exposures
Banks remain the largest source of funding for CRE and accounted for about 50% of the total CRE debt outstanding in the third quarter of 2023 (see chart 4). About 60% of these loans are in the hands of banks with less than $50 billion in assets.
"The size of the bank matters," Stuart Plesser, Managing Director for U.S. Banks, said. "In the case of banks with over $100 billion in assets, CRE loans only account for 12.5% of the total loan book but represent roughly 38% for banks with less than $10 billion in assets." Some of these smaller banks, which are typically not rated, could feel the repercussions of their high CRE exposures over the medium term.
Even so, CRE delinquency rates remain low, compared with those in the CMBS market. Part of the reason is building owners' ability to stay current on loans until leases come due. More importantly, the CRE sector is diversified enough to cope with the poor performance of some property types, including offices.
Mr. Plesser warned against tarring all CRE loans with the same brush. "Each property may behave differently from a cash flow standpoint, so making sweeping comments on banks' CRE portfolios can be misleading." A thorough case-by-case evaluation is still the way to go.
Chart 4
Appendix
Our bank CRE stress test indicates how well banks can handle further CRE stress
To evaluate the possible effect of CRE losses on the capital position of the banks we rate, we performed a stress test. According to our stress test, rated banks with a CRE-loans-to-total-loans ratio of more than 30% would experience a 28% decline in tier 1 capital in the case of a 10% loss rate for all CRE loans. The same stress test would result in a 4% decline in tier 1 capital if we only considered office exposure (see chart 5).
While the decline in capital is not significant for the aggregate set of rated banks with high CRE exposure, capital declines would be more significant for banks with the highest CRE exposures within this subset. So far, however, these banks' CRE portfolios are holding up.
Even so, a rise in CRE losses could result in deposit outflows and customer attrition. While most of our outlooks on U.S. bank ratings are currently stable, negative rating actions could ensue for banks with the highest exposure to CRE, particularly if it becomes apparent that more significant CRE losses will materialize.
Chart 5
Related Research
- Replay and slides of the "CRE Credit Outlook: CMBS, REITs and Banks Update" webinar from Feb. 14, 2024
- U.S. CMBS Overall Delinquency Rate Rose 21 Bps To 4.3% In January 2024; Office Saw The Highest Increase, Jan. 31, 2024
- Declining Asset Quality And Funding Obstacles Follow U.S. Finance Companies Into 2024, Jan. 23, 2024
- U.S. Bank Outlook 2024: Facing A Slower Economy, Tighter Regulation, And A Potential Drop In Rates, Jan. 11, 2024
- Industry Credit Outlook 2024: Real Estate, Jan. 9, 2024
- Sixty Ratings From 11 U.S. CMBS Deals Placed On CreditWatch Negative Following Revised Capitalization Rate Assumptions, Oct. 12, 2023
- Uneven Global Office Recovery Is Squeezing Credit Quality, Oct. 3, 2023
- Guidance On Global CMBS Property Evaluation Methodology Updated, Sept. 27, 2023
- Credit FAQ: What Declining Commercial Real Estate Values Could Mean For U.S. Banks, June 5, 2023
- Stressful Conditions For U.S. Commercial Real Estate Are Raising Refinancing Risks, June 5, 2023
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analysts: | Ana Lai, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 6895; ana.lai@spglobal.com |
James M Manzi, CFA, Washington D.C. + 1 (202) 383 2028; james.manzi@spglobal.com | |
Michael H Souers, Princeton + 1 (212) 438 2508; michael.souers@spglobal.com | |
Gaurav A Parikh, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 1131; gaurav.parikh@spglobal.com | |
Stuart Plesser, New York + 1 (212) 438 6870; stuart.plesser@spglobal.com | |
Secondary Contact: | Osman Sattar, FCA, London + 44 20 7176 7198; osman.sattar@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.