articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240215-default-transition-and-recovery-u-s-speculative-grade-corporate-default-rate-to-hit-4-75-by-december-2024-13002273 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Default, Transition, and Recovery: U.S. Speculative-Grade Corporate Default Rate To Hit 4.75% By December 2024 After Third-Quarter Peak

COMMENTS

Credit Trends: U.S. Corporate Bond Yields As Of Dec. 11, 2024

COMMENTS

Default, Transition, and Recovery: Global Speculative-Grade Corporate Default Rate To Decline To 3.5% By September 2025

COMMENTS

Default, Transition, and Recovery: Defaults On Track To Close The Year Below 2023 Levels

COMMENTS

Default, Transition, and Recovery: 2023 Annual Mexican Structured Finance Default And Rating Transition Study


Default, Transition, and Recovery: U.S. Speculative-Grade Corporate Default Rate To Hit 4.75% By December 2024 After Third-Quarter Peak

image

S&P Global Ratings Credit Research & Insights expects the U.S. trailing-12-month speculative-grade corporate default rate to reach 4.75% by December 2024, from 4.5% in December 2023 (see chart 1).   In our base case, we expect the default rate to finish the year higher than it is currently. This may however, include a peak default rate earlier in the year as we anticipate this year to see a continuation of the trends seen last year. This includes more defaults, a high proportion of distressed exchanges, and higher contributions from sectors with a consumer-reliant nature or those with currently weak cash flow and high debt such as media and entertainment, consumer products, and health care.

We expect interest rates to ease, but do not anticipate the Federal Reserve to cut rates before mid-year, keeping interest burdens high through most of 2024. On the positive side, economic growth has been more resilient than anticipated and should remain just above long-term potential this year, although we expect it to slow. This should help support revenue enough to ward off more elevated default rates ahead.

Chart 1

image

In our optimistic scenario, we forecast the default rate could fall to 3.25%.   In this scenario, economic growth would surprise to the upside once again while inflation and interest rates fall. If consumers remain resilient, this would result in a "soft landing" for the economy and financial markets.

The last time the U.S. saw a soft landing was in the mid-1990s, when the default rate peaked at 4%--roughly the same level as through December 2023. This scenario would give the Fed space to lower rates prior to mid-2024. The earlier interest rates decline, the more debt in need of refinancing will be able to avoid the current elevated interest rates. Still, taking risks with the timing of interest rate cuts will only save borrowers so much and comes with plenty of downside risks.

In our pessimistic scenario, we forecast the default rate could rise to 6.75%.   In this scenario, economic growth would slow to a crawl, or possibly enter recession. While we anticipate core inflation to fall this year, stickier or higher levels would be a considerable obstacle for borrowers if the Fed keeps rates elevated, providing a double challenge to firms' ability to service debt. For now, we view a recession as less likely, but not out of the range of possibilities, and consumer finances--while still arguably healthy in aggregate--are starting to weaken.

image

image

Deepening Divergence: Improved Market Sentiment, But Stretched Borrowers

Market sentiment has clearly improved since the start of fourth-quarter 2023, with spreads falling and issuance resuming among even the lowest rungs of speculative-grade--'CCC/C' bonds saw $1.5 billion in issuance in December and January (see chart 2). Although only across two issuers, these deals saw an average coupon rate of 7.9%--less than the 8.3% average 'B' yield currently in secondary markets.

Chart 2

image

Recent issuance trends mark an improvement relative to the last two years, and much of recent activity has been used for refinancing.

This has helped reduce the amount of speculative-grade debt coming due in the next year or two (see chart 3). But while issuers have been able to find funding for existing debt, the cost to maintain it has risen since 2022.

Chart 3

image

Higher interest rates will remain a challenge for issuers. Despite the boost in market sentiment, credit fundamentals remain strained. This is particularly true for the weakest ratings, which are starting to represent more of the speculative-grade population (see table 1).

Issuers rated 'B-' and below have had very low free operating cash flow on average and low interest coverage. We expect these measures to improve this year, but lingering effects from 2022 and 2023 may keep the default rate elevated around current levels for most of this year.

Table 1

Although weak, we expect key credit metrics to improve this year
FOCF/Debt
(%) 2022a 2023* 2024e # issuers
BB category 12.3 13.6 16.0 416
B+ 6.7 7.8 8.9 195
B 3.7 5.0 6.4 295
B- 0.4 1.2 2.9 350
CCC/C (3.3) (1.2) 0.6 200
EBITDA interest coverage
(%) 2022a 2023* 2024e # issuers
BB category 6.6 5.5 5.9 416
B+ 3.9 3.3 3.5 195
B 2.9 2.3 2.4 295
B- 1.8 1.5 1.7 350
CCC/C 1.2 1.1 1.3 200
Table presents medians. All ratios adjusted by S&P Global Ratings. FOCF--Free operating cash flow. a--Actual. e--Estimates. *2023 figures are a mix of actual and estimates. Source: S&P Global Ratings Credit Research & Insights.

Risk Tolerance Returns

Speculative-grade bond spreads recently dipped below 300 basis points (bps), reflecting increased optimism and risk appetite among investors as growth remains strong and inflation gradually descends. Credit spreads can be a major contributor to future defaults because of the marginal pressure on cash flow when an issuer needs to refinance maturing debt.

The U.S. speculative-grade corporate spread indicates future defaults based on a roughly one-year lead (see chart 4). At 298 bps in December 2023, the speculative-grade bond spread implies a much lower default rate by December 2024. Even loan spreads--at 490 bps at the end of December--remain relatively favorable given the large percentage of leveraged loans in the U.S. rated 'B' and 'B-'.

Chart 4

image

The speculative-grade spread is a good indicator of broad market stress, but the corporate distress ratio is a more targeted indicator of future defaults across credit and economic cycles, especially during periods with more accommodative funding. The distress ratio shows a similar relationship to the speculative-grade spread, but with a nine-month lead. The 6% distress ratio in December would roughly correspond to a 2.4% default rate for September 2024 (see chart 5).

Chart 5

image

Bond Spreads May Still Be Too Optimistic

Using the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), the ISM Purchasing Managers' Index, and components of the money supply, we estimate that in December 2023, the average speculative-grade bond spread in the U.S. was about 202 bps below the implied level (see chart 6).

Market volatility remains relatively low, particularly compared with 2022, which supports a lower spread estimate. On the other hand, certain economic activity continues to slow, particularly in the manufacturing sector, which supports a wider estimated spread. The net effect seems to indicate that current spreads are historically optimistic given similar past circumstances.

Chart 6

image

Improving Market Conditions Clash With Weaker Fundamentals

Recent market signals may appear rather bullish, but many other credit and economic indicators have been deteriorating, if slowly (see table 2). Bank lending conditions continue to tighten, the yield curve remains inverted after over a year, corporate profits declined last quarter, and the ratio of downgrades and weakest links remain elevated. (Weakest links are issuers rated 'B-' or lower by S&P Global Ratings with negative outlooks or ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications.)

We expect credit risk to build over the next 12 months. While speculative-grade maturities appear manageable in 2024, they are notably higher in 2025 and beyond. Credit conditions will remain restrictive as refinancing risk climbs entering 2024. We also don't expect the Fed to cut rates until around June, implying little relief for borrowers in the near term.

Table 2

Markets swing positive, fundamentals still stressed
U.S. unemployment rate (%) Fed survey on lending conditions Industrial production (%chg. YoY) Slope of the yield curve (10yr - 3m; bps) Corporate profits (nonfinancial; %chg. YoY) Equity market volatility (VIX) High yield spreads (bps) NA CDX Interest burden (%) S&P distress ratio (%) S&P Global U.S. SG neg. bias (%) Ratio of downgrades to total rating actions* (%) Proportion of SG initial issuer ratings B- or lower (%) U.S. weakest links (#)
Q1 2019 3.8 2.8 0.6 1.0 4.7 13.7 385.2 349.3 9.0 7.0 19.8 73.3 40.8 150.0
Q2 2019 3.6 -4.2 -0.7 -12.0 3.7 15.1 415.6 324.2 9.0 6.8 20.3 67.4 41.7 167.0
Q3 2019 3.5 -2.8 -1.5 -20.0 7.2 16.2 434.1 350.2 9.0 7.6 21.3 81.5 37.7 178.0
Q4 2019 3.6 5.4 -2.0 37.0 4.8 13.8 399.7 280.5 8.8 7.5 23.2 81.0 39.6 195.0
Q1 2020 4.4 0.0 -5.0 59.0 -6.2 53.5 850.2 657.9 9.0 35.2 37.1 89.9 54.8 316.0
Q2 2020 11.0 41.5 -10.7 50.0 -16.9 30.4 635.9 516.4 9.2 12.7 52.4 94.6 72.1 429.0
Q3 2020 7.9 71.2 -6.5 59.0 7.5 26.4 576.9 409.3 7.9 9.5 47.5 63.3 46.2 390.0
Q4 2020 6.7 37.7 -3.8 84.0 -2.8 22.8 434.4 293.2 8.1 5.0 40.4 50.0 57.9 339.0
Q1 2021 6.1 5.5 0.5 171.0 20.4 19.4 390.8 308.0 7.6 3.4 29.9 30.6 49.5 265.0
Q2 2021 5.9 -15.1 8.7 140.0 45.5 15.8 357.3 273.5 7.2 2.3 20.6 24.1 42.2 191.0
Q3 2021 4.8 -32.4 3.4 148.0 7.0 23.1 357.1 301.9 7.2 2.6 16.0 27.3 36.5 155.0
Q4 2021 3.9 -18.2 3.0 146.0 18.0 17.2 350.8 291.9 7.1 2.6 14.1 34.6 33.3 131.0
Q1 2022 3.6 -14.5 4.4 180.0 4.0 20.6 346.1 375.5 7.1 2.7 12.5 36.0 30.4 121.0
Q2 2022 3.6 -1.5 3.2 126.0 4.5 28.7 546.1 578.4 6.6 8.3 13.8 46.9 44.2 127.0
Q3 2022 3.5 24.2 4.5 50.0 7.9 31.6 481.4 608.7 6.1 7.9 16.7 57.8 50.0 144.0
Q4 2022 3.5 39.1 0.6 -54.0 7.1 21.7 414.8 484.9 5.6 7.3 19.1 76.0 71.4 195.0
Q1 2023 3.5 44.8 0.2 -137.0 3.6 18.7 414.9 463.4 5.2 9.2 20.2 61.0 75.0 203.0
Q2 2023 3.6 46.0 -0.4 -162.0 -4.1 15.9 356.0 429.7 4.6 7.2 19.8 63.4 56.7 207.0
Q3 2023 3.8 50.8 -0.2 -96.0 -2.1 20.4 344.0 480.6 3.8 6.5 21.7 60.2 37.5 229.0
Q4 2023 3.7 33.9 1.0 -152.0 12.5 297.9 356.2 5.9 21.7 66.0 48.6 228.0
Note: Fed survey refers to net tightening for large firms. S&P Global's negative bias is defined as the percentage of firms with a negative bias of those with either a negative, positive, or stable bias. CHYA--Change from a year ago. Bps--Basis points. YoY--Year-over-year. *Speculative-grade only. Sources: Economics and Country Risk from IHS Markit, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US), Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Chicago Board Options Exchange's CBOE Volatility Index, S&P Global Ratings Credit Research & Insights, S&P Global Fixed Income Research, and S&P Global Market Intelligence's CreditPro®.

Negative Rating Momentum To Hit Some Sectors More Than Others

Negative rating actions have remained moderate, but we expect them to increase. Speculative-grade credit quality has proven largely resilient thus far, but the buildup of 'B-' rated issuers, many with significant floating-rate debt, adds to downside risk. This could contribute to a sharper deterioration in our speculative-grade ratings if rates remain high for an extended period (see chart 7).

Chart 7

image

In the fourth quarter, just three sectors had a positive net bias, and all but four sectors had negative net rating actions (see chart 8). (We define net bias as the share of issuers with ratings that have positive bias, meaning those with positive outlooks or ratings on CreditWatch positive, minus the share of ratings that have negative bias.)

Chart 8

image

Four sectors combined account for nearly 69% of speculative-grade issuers with a negative bias and over 73% of weakest links.

The health care sector led weakest links in 2023 with 40 issuers, slightly outpacing the consumer/service sector--which previously led--with 39. Health care is more vulnerable to cash flow disruptions amid higher interest rates and inflation given its larger share of weaker-rated issuers (those rated 'B-' and below) with floating-rate debt.

These highly leveraged companies have struggled to generate adequate sustained free cash flow, with particular focus on labor costs, given persistent shortages of health care personnel. We expect default activity to remain elevated in the sector as many of our rated companies face 2025 maturities amid refinancing challenges.

The consumer/service sector had the second highest number of weakest links and potential downgrades through the fourth quarter (potential downgrades are issuers rated by S&P Global Ratings with a negative outlook or a rating on CreditWatch negative). Consumer-reliant sectors accounted for 51% of defaults in the U.S. in 2023, and the state of the consumer continues to be the biggest wild card right now. Similar to health care, the consumer/service sector will likely continue to face strained cash flow given higher for longer interest rates.

Media and entertainment had the third-highest number of weakest links through the fourth quarter and led defaults in the U.S. in 2023. Here again, refinancing and elevated financing costs remain the key risks, especially among lower-rated companies. While some companies extended maturities last year, there remains a high volume of upcoming maturities in 2025 and 2026.

As rates stay higher for longer, we expect weakening consumer balance sheets to squeeze consumer spending on discretionary items (like streaming services) in 2024. Further, persistently high interest rates put refinancing pressure on lower-rated companies with near-term maturities, as many are unable to survive with higher interest burdens.

That said, there is divergence in the media and entertainment sector. Some issuers are underpinned by improved fundamentals amid the continued normalization of social activities, such as hotels, gaming, and leisure. Others, such as legacy media, continue to suffer from increasing dependence on digital platforms and digital distribution after the pandemic.

However, after a long quiet period, we expect advertising in legacy media to improve in the second half with the upcoming presidential election in the U.S. In addition, the resolution of the writers and actors strikes also bodes well for the sector, though they have caused the industry to reevaluate its content spending. While likely to improve this year, spending will take several months to normalize.

Chart 9

image

Chart 10

image

As downgrades of speculative-grade issuers have increased since the outbreak of the pandemic, the share of issuers rated 'CCC' to 'C' has grown (see chart 11). More recently, the proportion of 'CCC to 'C' ratings has continued to increase while the proportion of 'B-' ratings have been falling. These lowest-rated issuers have historically had a much higher default rate, and we expect them to remain stressed over the next few quarters.

Chart 11

image

How We Determine Our U.S. Default Rate Forecast

Our U.S. default rate forecast is based on current observations and on expectations of the likely path of the U.S. economy and financial markets.   In addition to our baseline projection, we forecast the default rate in optimistic and pessimistic scenarios. We expect the default rate to be 3.25% in December 2024 (55 defaults in the trailing 12 months) in our optimistic scenario and 6.75% (114 defaults in the trailing 12 months) in our pessimistic scenario.

We determine our forecast based on various factors, including our proprietary analytical tool for U.S. speculative-grade issuer defaults.   The main components of the analytical tool are economic variables (the unemployment rate, for example), financial variables (such as corporate profits), the Fed's senior loan officer opinion survey on bank lending practices, the interest burden, the slope of the yield curve, and credit-related variables (such as negative bias).

In addition to our quantitative frameworks, we consider current market conditions and expectations.   Factors we focus on can include equity and bond pricing trends and expectations, overall financing conditions, the current ratings mix, refunding needs, and negative and positive developments within industrial sectors. We update our outlook for the U.S. speculative-grade corporate default rate each quarter after analyzing the latest economic data and expectations.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Ratings Performance Analytics:Nick W Kraemer, FRM, New York + 1 (212) 438 1698;
nick.kraemer@spglobal.com
Brenden J Kugle, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4619;
brenden.kugle@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Vaishali Singh, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in