articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240201-china-industrials-are-making-do-with-less-12985618 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

China Industrials Are Making Do With Less

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Corporate And Infrastructure Finance Criteria

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Festive Will The Holiday Season Be For Retailers In The U.S. And Europe?

COMMENTS

Retail Brief: European Retailers Set Out Their Stalls For The Golden Quarter

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research


China Industrials Are Making Do With Less

image

China's industrial landscape remains marked by macro headwinds and overcapacity. Most companies are adjusting to these conditions by various means such as cutting costs, selecting projects more stringently, switching up their product mixes, or growing export sales.

Policy is another key factor shaping the sector's outlook. The central government's tighter control on public-private-partnership (PPP) projects is positive for engineering and construction (E&C) players, given likely lower capital spending and faster working capital turnover over the next three to five years. Equipment makers supplying the coal-fired power sector, on the other hand, will see further momentum on continued policy support.

The key industrial sectors we cover in China are auto and auto parts, E&C, and capital goods. S&P Global Ratings believes most of the rated industrials should be able to absorb industry volatility even as external conditions change, though some could see thinning financial buffers.

Auto: Price War To Persist Amid Moderating Sales Growth

The rated auto OEMs are industry leaders and should be able to steer past the wreckage of price wars and oversupply in domestic light vehicle market. We expect financial metrics to be largely steady or modestly improve despite the industry headwinds.

Our estimates put this year's expansion of domestic light vehicle sales in China at 0%-2%. This follows a stronger-than-expected increase of 5.6% last year, in part due to major discounts and promotions. We view price wars as the new norm, with carmakers eager to expand volume and take share amid overcapacity. A few auto OEMs have already slashed prices in January 2024 to stimulate sales ahead of the Chinese New Year in early February.

Domestic auto OEMs are more optimistic than us, targeting ambitious growth (see table 1). Also embedded in their targets is the expectation for higher exports, which offer additional growth opportunities and higher margin.

Table 1

Carmakers are aiming high in 2024
2023 sales 2024 sales
Company target (mil. units) Actual (mil. units) Target completion rate (%) YoY change (%) Company target (mil. units) YoY change (%)
Rated carmakers
China FAW Group Co. Ltd. (A/Stable/--) n.a. 3.4 n.a. 5.1 3.5 3.1
Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. Ltd (BBB-/Negative/--) n.a. 2.8 n.a. 20.0 n.a. n.a.
Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. (BBB-/Negative/--) 1.7 1.7 102.2 17.7 1.9 12.7
Beijing Automotive Group Co. Ltd. (BBB/Stable/--) 1.7 1.7 100.4 17.6 n.a. n.a.
Nonrated carmakers
Chongqing Changan Automobile Co. Ltd. 2.5 2.6 100.9 8.8 2.8 9.7
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. Ltd. 2.7 2.5 93.6 2.9 2.8 10.0
Dongfeng Motor Group Co. Ltd. 3.0 2.1 69.6 -15.3 2.7 29.3
Great Wall Motor Co. Ltd. 1.6 1.2 76.9 15.3 1.9 54.4
N.a.--Not applicable. YoY--Year on year. Sources: Company data. China Association of Automobile Manufacturers. Wind. and S&P Global Ratings.

We think China's export of passenger vehicles could hit a speed bump in 2024, following an increase of 66% to 4.4 million units last year. Growth in key export destinations such as Russia is set to slow, after Chinese carmakers swiftly occupied the market post the pull-out of international players.

Chinese auto makers including BYD (nonrated) and SAIC Motor (nonrated) are speeding up the establishment of production facilities overseas. This is necessary to avoid rising trade hurdles. Nonetheless, the process will take time and hence their overseas exposure will be small at this stage.

Meanwhile, domestic sales of electric vehicles (EV) look set to grow by 15%-20% in 2024-2025, lifting EV penetration to 35%-40%. With the launch of new and upgraded models at short intervals and the entrance of new players, the competitive landscape is ever-shifting in China's EV market. BYD and Tesla are the best EV sellers in the country but will have to stay vigilant to safeguard their market share.

Chart 1

image

Our quick credit take on rated automakers and suppliers: 

Our negative rating outlook on Geely Auto and Zhejiang Geely reflects uncertainty that they can restore margins over the next 12-24 months.  As the two most aggressive players in electrification in the rated universe, their margins eroded the most relative to peers in 2022-2023. Our base case factors in a slight improvement in their EBITDA margins over 2024 (see chart 2). This is despite rising EV sales and takes into consideration of higher operating efficiency, lower battery cost, and continuous improvement in product portfolio. That said, risk is tilted toward the downside given the demand uncertainty and price pressure.

Chart 2

image

We see reasonable rating headroom for China FAW and Beijing Auto.  The two companies have been slower in electrification and their profitability has been steadier. We expect margins to slightly contract in 2024 on modestly higher EV sales. Yet, mild volume growth and stable capital spending will support positive free operating cash flows and steady leverage during the period. Their EV progress will have growing importance on their market position and business strength over the next three to five years.

Table 2

Net rating outlook remains negative on Chinese carmakers

Beijing Automotive Group Co. Ltd.*

China FAW Group Co. Ltd.

Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. Ltd.†

Issuer credit rating BBB/Stable/-- A/Stable/-- BBB-/Negative/--
Downgrade trigger
EBITDA margin (%) n.a. <8§ <6
Debt/EBITDA (x) n.a. Approaching 1.0 >2.0‡
FFO/debt (%) <12 n.a. n.a.
FOCF/revenue (%) n.a. <=3 n.a.
S&P forecasts (2023-2025)
EBITDA margin (%) n.a. 13.2 -13.7 5.5 -7.5
Debt/EBITDA (x) n.a. Net cash 1.6 -2.4
FFO/debt (%) 20.0-25.0 Net cash 21.5-41.5
FOCF/revenue (%) n.a. 5.0 -6.0 n.a.
Note: We only included financial triggers in the downgrade trigger. *BAIC Motor Co. Ltd. (BBB/Stable/--) is a core subsidiary of Beijing Automotive Group. The rating is equalized to that of the parent. §FAW's EBITDA excludes the sales company of Toyota. †Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. (BBB-/Negative/--) is a core subsidiary of Zhejiang Geely Holding Group. The rating is equalized to that of the parent. ‡Zhejiang Geely Holding Group's EBITDA is with proportionate consolidation of Polestar since 2022. FFO--Funds from operations. FOCF--Free operating cash flow. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Auto suppliers: 

Contemporary Amperex Technology will further strengthen its credit profile in 2024.  Growing battery demand and better economies of scale will underpin a moderate improvement in the company's profitability, despite intensifying market competition in China. Increasing operating cash flow and steady capital expenditure should deepen the company's net cash position.

Johnson Electric will stay in good financial shape.  Competitive products, continued efficiency gain, and disciplined capital spending will buttress sustained positive free operating cash flow and low leverage for Johnson Electric.

Yanfeng International's tactical structure changes will help it manage tough industry conditions.  The company's consolidation of the seating and safety business from its direct parent has boosted the rating buffer. This is thanks to improved product offerings, enlarged operating scale and stronger balance sheet of the combined business, leaving the company sufficient financial room to absorb adversities as needed.

Table 3

Rated auto suppliers to maintain solid credit profile

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd.

Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.

Yanfeng International Automotive Technology Co. Ltd.

Issuer credit rating BBB+/Positive BBB/Stable BBB-/Stable
Downgrade trigger
Debt/EBITDA Approaching 1.5x >1.5x >1.5x
EBITDA margin <11% Materially deteriorates on a sustained basis <6%§
S&P forecasts (2023-2025)
Debt/EBITDA net cash <1.0x* <1.0x
EBITDA margin 17.0%-17.5% 14.0%-14.5%* 8.5%-9.0%§
We only included financial triggers in the downgrade trigger. *The forecast of Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd. are for fiscal 2024-2026 (year ending March 31). §The EBITDA margin trigger and forecasts of Yanfeng International Automotive Technology Co. Ltd. are the parent company's numbers. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Engineering And Construction: Slower Top Line But Margins Will Hold

A number of factors will weigh on topline growth in 2024 for rated E&C firms.

China's infrastructure investment is likely to moderate this year, after rising 8.2% in 2023, in view of more disciplined local government spending. Investment in PPP projects will become more measured because Beijing has tightened supervision to rein in high leverage at local governments. The State Council will review PPP projects on an individual basis and only user-paid projects with investment returns will be approved. This will lead to shrinking new contracts from PPP projects, which rated issuers in general have 10%-20% revenue exposure to.

Demand for housing construction is unlikely to meaningfully improve, given the weak sentiment in the property market. Our rated E&C companies also obtain 4%-14% of their revenue from property development and the segment may continue to downsize.

New orders have already slowed down over the past 12-18 months, which points to moderating expansions for rated E&C companies. Their order backlog remain healthy, however, normally at over 3x annual revenue, and this provides good visibility for their revenue growth in the next one to two years.

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

We expect stable or slightly improving EBITDA margins for rated E&C companies in 2024, with more stringent cost controls. Debt growth is likely to decelerate in the next few years, partly because exposure will gradually decline to investment-linked projects which require heavy upfront spending. Overall, we expect healthy earnings growth to support stable credit profiles for most of these firms.

One vulnerability is cash collection, which is clouded by worsening funding conditions at some of the project owners, including the local governments. Downside risk will heighten if receivables turnover days materially lengthen without signs of improvement.

Chart 5

image

Most rated E&C companies have sufficient financial headroom and will maintain stable leverage ratios in 2024. We typically use the EBITDA interest coverage ratio to assess the financial risk of these E&C companies. This considers their refinancing record and wide funding channels thanks to their state-owned enterprise status.

Chart 6

image

Our quick credit take on selected rated E&C entities: 

Power Construction Corp. of China and Beijing Construction Engineering Group have tight rating headroom.  Our scenario analysis indicates that they will likely breach the downgrade triggers if EBITDA margins underperform our base case by 0.5-1.0 percentage points in 2023-2024. Such downside pressure will also heighten if their working capital turnover is materially slower than our expectation, due to prolonged cash collection cycle.

China State Construction International has been solidifying its balance sheet and cash flows.  Its continuous shift to government targeted repurchase projects with much shorter receivable cycles in mainland China should help the company further deleverage over the next 12 months.

Shanghai Construction Group is on track to restore its financial strength.  It has recovered notably from pandemic-related disruptions to operations, posting 21% year-on-year revenue growth in the first nine months in 2023. Profit growth and disciplined financial management will beef up its financial metrics in 2024.

Table 4

E&C issuers' credit profile to remain largely stable
Company Issuer credit rating Downgrade trigger (x) S&P Global Ratings forecasts 2023-2025 (x)

China State Construction Engineering Corp. Ltd.

A/Stable EBITDA/interest <3.0 3.7-4.5

CSCEC International Construction Co. Ltd.

A-/Stable EBITDA/interest <3.0* 3.7-4.5*

China State Construction International Holdings Ltd.

BBB/Stable EBITDA/interest <3.0 4.4-5.0

China Railway Construction Corp. Ltd.

A-/Stable FFO/debt <12% or EBITDA/interest ~3.0 FFO/debt: 14.0%-15.0%; EBITDA/interest: 4.0-4.5

China Metallurgical Group Corp.

BBB+/Stable EBITDA/interest <2.0§ 4.0-5.5§

Metallurgical Corp. of China Ltd.

BBB+/Stable EBITDA/interest <2.0§ 4.0-5.5§

Power Construction Corp. of China

BBB+/Stable EBITDA/interest <2.0 2.0-2.2

Beijing Construction Engineering Group Co. Ltd.

BBB/Stable EBITDA/interest <2.0 1.8-2.4

Shanghai Construction Group Co. Ltd.

BBB/Stable Debt/EBITDA>4.0 2.5-3.5
We only included financial triggers in the downgrade trigger. *Trigger and forecasts for CSCEC International Construction Co. Ltd. are the parent company's numbers. §China Metallurgical Group Corp. is a core subsidiary of China Minmetals Corp. (BBB+/Stable/--). Its rating is equalized to the parent company's rating. Trigger and forecasts for China Metallurgical Group Corp. and Metallurgical Corp. of China Ltd. are China Minmetals Corp.'s numbers. FFO--Funds from operations. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Capital Goods: Earnings Growth And Investment Appetite Drive Ratings

Following a reopening-led recovery last year, rated capital goods names are coming into the new year in better shape. Profit growth and investment discipline will drive ratings.

Coal-fired power equipment will see buoyant demand in 2024, thanks to government policy support. To strengthen the national power security and ensure adequate supply in peak seasons, the Chinese government accelerated project approvals since 2022 and guided to start construction of 165 gigawatts (GW) coal-fired power capacity in 2022-2023. This has led to surging new orders for coal-fired power equipment.

The government also aims to install at least 80 GW of coal-fired power capacity this year, compared with 45 GW in 2022 and 58 GW in 2023. This implies meaningful growth opportunities for equipment producers over the next 12 months.

As a leading thermal power equipment supplier, Shanghai Electric Holdings Group Co. Ltd. will benefit from the industry's tailwinds.  We anticipate its revenue will grow by mid-to-high single-digits over the next two years, riding on solid order backlogs for its key products. Its profitability should also gradually improve with the company continuing to optimize its business mix.

In our view, Shanghai Electric has been moving away from debt-funded expansion and reducing its investment appetite. More cautious capital spending, together with profit growth, should improve cash flows and lower leverage over the next 12-24 months. We expect the company's ratio of debt to EBITDA to trend down to 7.0x-8.0x in 2024 from our projected 8.0x-9.0x in 2023.

Demand for railway equipment should find support from passenger ridership, which should stay strong during the year, after more than doubled in 2023 year-on-year post the removal of pandemic-related travel restrictions.

Volatility would emerge, however, if China State Railway Group Co. Ltd. (CSRG), the national railway operator, doesn't make up for the under investment during the COVID period. This is especially the case after CSRG unveiled its 2024 priority, in which it only targets to launch over 1,000 kilometers of new railway lines, compared with the 3,637 kilometers in 2023.

That said, improving maintenance needs and gradual expansion of its new industry business should support CRRC Corp. Ltd. to deliver steady revenue in 2024.  Solid operating profit and prudent capital spending should help the company to continue to generate positive free operating cash flow and maintain a net cash position over the next one to two years.

Table 5

Rating buffers vary among rated capital goods producers

Shanghai Electric Holdings Group Co. Ltd.*

CRRC Corp. Ltd.

Issuer credit rating BBB/Negative A+/Stable
Downgrade trigger
Debt/EBITDA (x) Deviates materially from our base case >1.5§
EBITDA interest coverage (x) <2.0 n.a.
S&P Global Ratings forecasts (2023-2025)
Debt/EBITDA (x) 7.2-8.7 <1.5§
EBITDA interest coverage (x) 1.9-2.1 n.a.
We only included financial triggers in the downgrade trigger. *Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd. (BBB/Negative/--) is a core subsidiary of Shanghai Electric Holdings Group Co. Ltd. Its rating is equalized to the parent company's rating. §Trigger and forecasts for CRRC Corp. Ltd. are the parent company's numbers. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Claire Yuan, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3542;
Claire.Yuan@spglobal.com
Stephen Chan, Hong Kong + 852 2532 8088;
stephen.chan@spglobal.com
Torisa Tan, Shanghai + 86 21 3183 0642;
Torisa.Tan@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Danny Huang, Hong Kong + 852 2532 8078;
danny.huang@spglobal.com
Boyang Gao, Beijing + 86 (010) 65692725;
boyang.gao@spglobal.com
Crystal Ling, Hong Kong +852 25333586;
crystal.ling@spglobal.com
Research Assistant:Rhett Wang, Beijing

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in