articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/231213-credit-faq-abs-frontiers-the-c-pace-space-explained-12943764.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: ABS Frontiers: The C-PACE Space Explained

COMMENTS

JHF RMBS Performance Watch October 2024: Delinquency Rise Will Be Negligible

COMMENTS

U.S. BSL CLO Obligors: Corporate Rating Actions Tracker 2024 (As Of Oct. 25)

COMMENTS

Mexican Structured Finance Market Update: Spotting Opportunities Amid Economic Challenges

COMMENTS

European CMBS Monitor Q3 2024


Credit FAQ: ABS Frontiers: The C-PACE Space Explained

The Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy market, commonly known as "C-PACE," is an alternative financing source for new construction, renovation, and standalone energy projects within the commercial real estate market. In this Credit FAQ, S&P Global Ratings provides a recent snapshot of the sector by addressing frequently asked questions related to market size(s), an overview of credit risks, and more.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is C-PACE?

To begin, property owners can finance a variety of climate and environment-related projects including, renewable energy, climate resiliency, and energy and water efficiency improvements via C-PACE financing. Per the U.S. Department of Energy, state legislative authority must exist and local governments must setup energy financing districts in order to operate commercial PACE programs. Third-party administrators are appointed to run the PACE program within the district and typically finance the up-front costs of improvements. Therefore, C-PACE programs do not require public funding. The C-PACE assessments are secured by the property on which the improvement is made, and property owners repay the PACE assessment as a line item on their property tax bills. Differences in the enabling C-PACE legislation may exist among states, which may introduce legal risk (more details on that below).

C-PACE financings are generally super-priority liens akin to real estate taxes, senior to most other debt on the property, and typically repaid in the form of an assessment on the building owner's property tax bill over a period of 10-30 years (which typically relates to the useful life of the improvement). Mortgage holder consent is required before PACE applications are approved and assessments are placed. They are transferrable; if the building is sold during the PACE repayment period, the lien securing the assessments remains on the property and becomes an obligation of the new building owner. Similar to real estate taxes, CPACE assessments do not accelerate upon a default. Therefore, only the past due amount is payable.

How are C-PACE financings typically structured? What is the current market size?

Chart 1 is an example of a typical C-PACE financing structure.

Chart 1

image

In some states, property owners may also obtain C-PACE financing retroactively for any eligible work completed. The time period since completion of the project in which PACE financing is available may also vary by state. The size of the investment market as of the end of 2022 was just over $5 billion, growing by 43% year over year within that annual period (see chart 2). Some 20 states account for over $50 million of investment, with California far and away the leader at over $1.2 billion. Ohio ($682 million), Texas ($407 million), Minnesota ($263 million), and Utah ($251 million) round out the top five.

Chart 2

image

Unlike Residential Property Assessed Clean Energy (R-PACE) assessments, which are filed at the time of project completion, C-PACE liens are typically filed when the financing terms are agreed to at closing. On the closing date, the notice of assessment is immediately recorded in the applicable county's official real property records and remains in effect until the assessment is paid in full.

Can you further compare and contrast C-PACE and R-PACE?

Table 2 summarizes the differences between C-PACE and R-PACE.

Table 2

Comparison of C-PACE and R-PACE(i)
R-PACE C-PACE
Market size $8.5 billion (2022) $5.2 billion (2022)
Availability California, Florida, and Missouri 38 states, including D.C.
Lender consent Not required Typically required, though not in all jurisdictions
Typical assessment amount $20,000-$30,000 $500,000-$20 million+
Prepayment premium Not included Typically start at 5% and step-down through first 15 years
Seller/servicer buyback risk Limited Relatively higher, mostly due to contractor intermediation
Lien filing At project completion At financing closing
Third-party technical review Not included Completed for each project to validate eligible measures and energy savings
Pass-through ability Not included Property owners can pass payments through to tenants under certain lease structures
(i)As stated earlier in this paper, terms can vary by state. Source: S&P Global Ratings. R-PACE--Residential Property Assessed Clean Energy. C-PACE--Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy.
What risk factors would S&P Global Ratings look at when analyzing credit risk within this sector?

In order to analyze credit risk within the C-PACE space, S&P Global Ratings would consider many factors that can be grouped in a few major categories. We go into detail below.

Priority 

PACE assessments are billed and collected by the county together with ad valorem taxes. The funds may be commingled with amounts collected by the county prior to disbursement of the funds to the issuer/servicer of the securitization.

Construction 

Many states/underwriters permit the use of C-PACE assessments to finance new construction. Underwriting of construction loans is challenging as project timing may be delayed, costs may be higher than anticipated, or the project may not be completed according to the specifications agreed upon. As a result, the borrower may have limited property cash flow to repay the loan if construction hits a snag, and tenants aren't able to take occupancy and start paying rent according to their lease terms. Some of this risk may be mitigated by the use of escrow accounts, agreed upon timelines for project completion, and disbursement schedules.

Appraisal difficulty  

C-PACE assessments are generally limited to a specified percentage (our observations indicate that the 25%-35% range is common) of the market value of the property. Determination of the market value may be challenging. Appraising green buildings is not necessarily straightforward and requires specific training, as appraisers must be able to assess the potential efficacy of the renovation and its impact on market value. Disclosure and transparency issues may complicate the task further.

Property transfer 

C-PACE assessments run with the property; as such, subsequent property owners may not be re-underwritten. Subsequent property owners may have different (more or less creditworthy) profiles than the initial borrower. As a result, repayment of the PACE assessment may be negatively impacted.

Limited performance history 

C-PACE programs are relatively new; thus, they have a limited performance history. Data on payments, delinquencies, collections, and foreclosure rates are therefore limited. For example, we understand that some local authorities either have tax certificates sales by the respective county tax collector or a judicial foreclosure process to recover delinquent amounts. For example, in California and Florida, legal and tax infrastructure is in place to protect investors against potentially delinquent C-PACE assets. However, we would look for historical data to determine recovery, if any.

Legal/structural 

Rules may differ by state/county, introducing further complication. A recent case in New York, reported in the July 28 "Commercial Mortgage Alert," provided one such example, as "Foreclosure proceedings on a Lower Manhattan office tower undergoing redevelopment are highlighting what many see as a major flaw in the city's commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy program: It does not create liens on properties that receive such financing." Further, properties may be subject to other debt on the property, and lienholders may have disputes over how to resolve future issues related to the property.

What is the size and current status of C-PACE with regard to the securitization market?

The securitization market for C-PACE is quite new, with the first deal priced in late 2021. At least three deals were done in 2023, bringing total issued (securitized) debt to just under $800 million. On the other hand, the PACE sector is a bit older, with deals going back as far as 2014. Our database from 2019 on includes the offerings listed in the following table.

Table 3

Deal offerings since 2019
Deal ticker Issuer Type Amt (mil. $) Pricing date
GOODG 2019-1A Goodgreen Trust PACE 225 Jan-19
E3 2019-1 Energy Efficient Equity Inc. PACE 165 Jun-19
GOODG 2019-2 Goodgreen Trust PACE 315 Oct-19
HERO 2020-1 Renovate America PACE 54 Mar-20
PACEF 2020-1 Pacefunding PACE 103 Jun-20
GOODG 2020-1 Goodgreen Trust PACE 318 Jul-20
FORTI 2021-1A FortiFi PACE 125 Mar-21
HERO 2021-1 Renovate America PACE 64 Mar-21
RENEW 2021-1A Renew America PACE 157 Mar-21
GOODG 2021-1 Goodgreen Trust PACE 346 Apr-21
CPACE 2021-1 PACEWell LLC Commercial PACE ABS 2021-1 C-PACE 173 Dec-21
GOODG 2022-1 GoodGreen 2022-1 PACE 344 Mar-22
CPACE 2022-1 Nuveen Green Capital Commercial PACE ABS 2022-1 C-PACE 135 Nov-22
CPACE 2023-1 Nuveen Green Capital Commercial PACE ABS 2023-1 C-PACE 257 Mar-23
FORTI 2023-1 FortiFi Pace ABS Bonds 2023-1 PACE 119 Jun-23
CIC 2023-1 Calvert Impact Climate ABS 2023-1 C-PACE 30 Jun-23
RENEW 2023-1 Renew Financial Group PACE ABS 2023-1 PACE 194 Jul-23
BPACE 2023-1A Bayview Commercial Pace ABS 2023-1A C-PACE 170 Nov-23
C-PACE--Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy.
What will the future bring for C-PACE securitization?

The growth in total investment portends growth for this sector, although it is clearly not without challenges and growing pains, based on the aforementioned risks. This is manifested in the securitization totals, which show some increase in the number of transactions overall (including a few C-PACE offerings), while not yet posting a $1 billion year. That said, we have seen recent increases in sector volumes, which may be attributable, at least in part, to the bank pullback in lending volume and higher interest rates/cost of capital for alternative financing sources.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Contacts:James C Digney, New York + 1 (212) 438 1832;
james.digney@spglobal.com
Deborah L Newman, New York + 1 (212) 438 4451;
deborah.newman@spglobal.com
James M Manzi, CFA, Washington D.C. + 1 (202) 383 2028;
james.manzi@spglobal.com
Winston W Chang, New York + 1 (212) 438 8123;
winston.chang@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in