articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/231204-emerging-markets-which-ems-are-better-positioned-to-outperform-in-2024-12935655 content esgSubNav
In This List
NEWS

Emerging Markets: Which EMs Are Better Positioned To Outperform In 2024?

Take Notes - The Rise Of U.S. CLO ETFs

COMMENTS

Calendar Of 2025 EMEA Sovereign, Regional, And Local Government Rating Publication Dates

COMMENTS

Sustainable Finance FAQ: The Rise Of Green Equity Designations

Covered Bonds Uncovered


Emerging Markets: Which EMs Are Better Positioned To Outperform In 2024?

(Editor's Note: In this series of articles, we answer the pressing Questions That Matter on the uncertainties that will shape 2024—collected through our interactions with investors and other market participants. The series is aligned with the key themes we're watching in the coming year and is part of our Global Credit Outlook 2024.)

Many emerging markets (EMs) are bound to navigate the challenging global macroeconomic backdrop in 2024 better than their peers. Structural trends that will allow these EMs to mitigate the impact from global headwinds are nearshoring (Mexico, India, and Vietnam) and energy transition (Indonesia, Chile, and the Philippines, among others).

How This Will Shape 2024

EMs will face tough global macroeconomic conditions in 2024.  A soft landing in the U.S. (with an elevated risk of a hard landing), persistent weakness in the eurozone, soft Chinese demand, and two major wars (Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Hamas) will act as a drag on growth in EMs. All of these dynamics are taking place amid global interest rates that are likely to remain high. Therefore, we expect most EMs to grow below trend next year, with risks mostly on the downside.

There are bright spots in EMs' complex panorama.   Many EMs are noticeably better positioned than their peers to thrive despite these challenges. Structural trends, such as nearshoring, will allow them to offset some the impact from global economic woes. In the medium term, energy transition will also benefit many EMs that produce or hold large reserves of key metals.

What We Think And Why

Supply-chain relocation will remain a key trend that could benefit many EMs.   Nearshoring and friendshoring have gained attention as supply-chain disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic made a case for manufacturers to diversify locations of their operations to minimize production disruptions. Tensions between the U.S. and China, especially over technology, may have also encouraged companies to move some manufacturing production out of China. Mexico's long-standing manufacturing linkages with, and access to, the U.S. market make it an obvious potential beneficiary for nearshoring. Since then, the nearshoring activity in Mexico has picked up, as seen in the strong construction pace of industrial parks in the northern part of the country, as well as an uptick in foreign direct investment (FDI) so far this year (see chart 1). Given high external financing costs, having strong FDI inflows will be particularly important for external account stability.

Chart 1

image

Vietnam has also been a key beneficiary of changing trade dynamics and supply-chain relocation.   The country's trade ties with the U.S. have been quickly increasing expanding even before the pandemic. Vietnam's exports to the U.S. have jumped fourfold since 2013 (see chart 2), and accelerated following the Trump administration's imposition of tariffs on China in 2018. The country has recently become the sixth-largest trading partner of the U.S. Vietnam will remain one of the fastest growing EMs in the next three years, supported by policies that favor global trade integration to foster domestic economic growth. Nevertheless, maintaining a strong global supply-chain presence will require sustained investments and reforms. Vietnam confronts significant challenges, considering its infrastructure, labor, and resource constraints. Insufficient expansion of power generation capacity means that the country could face electricity shortages especially during summer seasons.

India is set to become the third-largest economy by 2030.  And we expect it will be the fastest growing major economy in the next three years (see chart 3). A paramount test will be whether India can become the next big global manufacturing hub, an immense opportunity. Developing a strong logistics framework will be key in transforming India from a services-dominated economy into a manufacturing-dominant one. Unlocking the labor market potential will largely depend upon upskilling workers and increasing female participation in the workforce. Success in these two areas will enable India to realize its demographic dividend. A booming domestic digital market could also fuel expansion in India's high-growth startup ecosystem in the next decade, especially in financial and consumer technology. In the automotive sector, India is poised for growth, building on infrastructure, investment, and innovation.

Overall, Mexico is not the only EM that could benefit from the reconfiguration of global-supply chains. Countries with strong and stable trade ties with the U.S., such as Vietnam and India, are also gaining attention inin this area. Outside of Asia, EMs with wide access to the eurozone market and with included manufacturing sectors, such as Poland, are also bound to benefit from that trend.

Charts 2 and 3

image

The energy transition will position some key EMs in the spotlight.   Ongoing global efforts to accelerate energy transition and the achievement of sustainable development goals will boost the demand for key metals. In particular, copper, cobalt, nickel, and lithium are critical in electrical vehicle (EV) and battery production and performance. Currently, the leaders in mining and processing these metals are mostly EMs, including China (copper, cobalt, nickel, and lithium), Chile (copper and lithium), and Indonesia (nickel; see charts 4 and 5). However, there are initiatives across advanced economies to ensure supply diversification and strategic access to these metals, which will likely boost investments in other EMs with large reserves of these metals. This is a major opportunity for key EMs such as Chile, Peru, Mexico, Indonesia, Argentina, The Democratic Republic of Congo, and the Philippines, which hold some of the world's largest reserves of these metals. Particularly, we view Indonesia's substantial reserves of nickel, a key material needed to make EV batteries, as well placed to turn its EV battery manufacturing into a major export industry. The Indonesian government's supportive policies (ranging from lower value-added tax on EVs to labor liberalization and reduction in corporate tax) foster a more favorable landscape for foreign investors.

Charts 4 and 5

image

What Could Go Wrong

Many EMs will hold elections in 2024. Low levels of policy predictability can undermine investor sentiment and derail existing investment potential. EMs that will have elections next year include Indonesia, India, South Africa, and Mexico, among many others. EMs, about which we discussed above, still have work to do to reap a bonanza from the abovementioned structural opportunities. For instance, enhancing policy visibility will be critical in attracting investments into these developing trends.

Structurally high interest rates, in the absence of structurally greater growth expectations, will constrain investment growth. A sharp rise in investments will be hard to justify amid higher average cost of capital and interest rate burden--as interest rates are likely to remain higher than normal for some time--and without larger average expected returns (growth).

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

S&P Global Ratings, part of S&P Global Inc. (NYSE: SPGI), is the world's leading provider of independent credit risk research. We publish more than a million credit ratings on debt issued by sovereign, municipal, corporate and financial sector entities. With over 1,600 credit analysts in 27 countries, and more than 150 years' experience of assessing credit risk, we offer a unique combination of global coverage and local insight. Our research and opinions about relative credit risk provide market participants with information that helps to support the growth of transparent, liquid debt markets worldwide.

Head of Credit Research, Emerging Markets:Jose M Perez-Gorozpe, Madrid +34 914233212;
jose.perez-gorozpe@spglobal.com
Chief Economist Emerging Markets:Elijah Oliveros-Rosen, New York + 1 (212) 438 2228;
elijah.oliveros@spglobal.com
Head of Credit Research, Asia-Pacific:Eunice Tan, Singapore +65-6530-6418;
eunice.tan@spglobal.com
Senior Economist, Asia-Pacific:Vishrut Rana, Singapore + 65 6216 1008;
vishrut.rana@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in