Overview
As of Oct. 15, 2023, S&P Global Ratings maintained 23 ratings on Arizona charter schools. In 1994, Arizona became the 11th state in the nation to enact a charter school law, and today there are about 550 charter schools in the state serving more than 230,000 students. According to the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, approximately 21% of the state's K-12 public school students attend charter schools, which means Arizona has the nation's second-highest percentage of charter school enrollment, behind Washington, DC.
Chart 2
Current Arizona charter school ratings span from 'BB-' to 'BBB' and represent everything from large networks to single-site schools. Only 22% of our ratings on Arizona charter schools are investment grade, which is modest when compared with about 45% for the sector. While many of our rated Arizona charter schools have experienced recent robust enrollment growth, their median financial metrics, though improving, have historically lagged the sector, resulting in lower ratings. We believe this is primarily due to many schools undertaking expansions, resulting in lighter financial operations and higher debt loads. In addition, Arizona's funding levels have historically trailed the nation despite increases in recent years.
In 2018, Arizona created a state public school credit enhancement program, allowing qualifying schools to obtain favorable financing at a lower cost of capital for guaranteed bonds carrying a 'AA-' rating. For more information, please see "Arizona Public School Credit Enhancement Program" published March 9, 2021, on RatingsDirect. In 2021, the program reached its total enhancement capacity of $350 million, with 16 loans made to nine charter school borrowers, with underlying ratings maintained on seven of these schools. We understand there is no additional capacity planned for the enhancement program but will monitor for changes.
Authorizer Framework
- There are three authorizing options for charter schools in Arizona: the state board of education, the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools (ASBCS), or higher education institutions--such as a university under the jurisdiction of the Arizona board of regents or a community college district. The ASBCS is the state's largest independent authorizer and oversees more than 550 public charter schools. Currently, the state board of education has a self-imposed moratorium on charter authorizing, so the ASBCS oversees all schools approved by both state boards.
- The ASBCS was created through legislation in 1994 to grant charter status to qualifying applicants and to oversee public charter schools. All of our rated charter schools in Arizona are authorized by the ASBCS.
- Arizona charter schools are authorized for longer terms than other states, with an initial 15-year charter term, and a maximum renewal length of 20 years. The state board of education may approve any charter school's transferring of charter to a different authorizer, which we view favorably, as it provides flexibility. Authorizers are still required to review schools at five-year intervals.
- Arizona charter law provides general guidance on the process for authorization, renewal, revocation, and appeals. The law requires charter sponsors to review a charter school at five-year intervals using performance framework adopted by the sponsor. This includes an academic performance expectation, operational performance expectation, and financial performance expectation set forth in the performance framework.
- The ASBCS financial framework focuses on various financial metrics, including days' cash on hand, adjusted net income, average daily membership, lease-adjusted debt service coverage, and a review of audit disclosures. Schools are evaluated on each measure, which then roll up to an overall performance rating. The ASBCS was granted authority to close schools based on financial performance through legislation passed in 2018. A charter school that falls below standard on any of the measures is subject to a financial intervention process, which provides the board the authority to revoke or terminate contracts if the school does not demonstrate improved performance.
Credit Fundamentals
Table 1
Fiscal 2022 Arizona charter school medians | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBB/BBB- | BB+ | BB | BB- | Arizona medians | ||||||||
Number of ratings | 5 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 23 | |||||||
Enrollment fall 2021 | 1,083 | 1,788 | 888 | 3,414 | 1,511 | |||||||
Enrollment fall 2022 | 1,141 | 1,701 | 831 | 3,482 | 1,514 | |||||||
Percentage change year over year (%) | 5.4 | (4.9) | (6.4) | 2.0 | 0.2 | |||||||
Waitlist as % of enrollment | 56 | 12 | 18 | 0 | 11.6 | |||||||
Student retention rate (%) | 88 | 89 | 85 | 87 | 87 | |||||||
Lease-adjusted MADS coverage (x) | 2.01 | 1.59 | 1.75 | 1.45 | 1.61 | |||||||
Lease-adjusted MADS burden (% total revenues) | 8.70 | 12.90 | 11.35 | 14.90 | 12.7 | |||||||
Days' unrestricted cash on hand | 196 | 130 | 108 | 76 | 111.3 | |||||||
Unrestricted cash & investments to debt (%) | 40 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 17.5 | |||||||
Total revenue ($000) | 14,364 | 18,578 | 15,394 | 32,560 | 17,371 | |||||||
Total debt per student ($000) | 14,863 | 19,984 | 20,106 | 25,879 | 19,789 | |||||||
Total revenue per student ($000) | 11,496 | 10,390 | 12,150 | 9,537 | 11,031 | |||||||
MADS--Maximum annual debt service. N.A.--Not available. |
Median financial metrics have improved during the past few years, which we believe can be attributed to increased state funding as well as the recent substantial level of federal stimulus funds schools and the continued maturation of operating profiles.
More than half of our rated schools are networks with multiple campuses, while the rest are stand-alone operators. Given the favorable population trends, many of the charter schools we rate are rapidly expanding and have incurred substantial debt to finance this growth. There are five higher-rated Arizona charter school ratings at the 'BBB-' and 'BBB' ratings. Despite the state's average financial metrics that have been weaker compared to the national medians, these higher rated schools stand out, primarily given their longer operating histories and consistent track record of sound financial performance.
Chart 3
We view Arizona as a charter friendly state, given its above-average charter authorization length, lack of a cap on charter school growth, and rising enrollment trends that are among the strongest in the nation. Enrollment levels for our rated schools in the state, particularly for the large networks undertaking expansions, have been generally solid, supported by healthy demographic and population trends. Approximately 87% of our rated charter schools and networks are in Maricopa County, where the school-age population base is healthy, with a 1.7% increase projected over the next five years. As shown in chart 3, the state's charter school enrollment has grown during the past decade, while traditional school district enrollment has softened.
What We're Watching
Empowerment Scholarship Accounts (ESAs). While ESAs were originally created in 2011, legislation expanded the program in 2022. This now universal "voucher" program allows qualified students to use state funds (estimated at $7,000 per student) toward education expenses that can include private school tuition, educational supplies, home education, and more. This program remains a hot topic due to the growing number of students participating and its potential costs. The state's current governor has been a critic of the expanded voucher program due to its potential fiscal implications and has called for more transparency and accountability for both the program and charter schools. We believe this expansion of school choice further heightens competition for students among all schools, including charters, but we have not observed significant enrollment pressure to charter schools within our rated universe.
Steady state funding. Unlike Arizona's traditional public schools, charter schools are not funded by local property taxes. Instead, base funding is calculated according to formula similar to the one used to calculate traditional public school funding, but charters also receive 'additional assistance' on a per-pupil basis. Charter schools are eligible for supplemental results-based funding if a school provides at least 200 days of instruction and/or if standardized test scores place a school in the top 10% of the state. Overall, funding has increased steadily in recent years, with base-level funding growing 2.9% in fiscal 2024, following increases of more than 8% in fiscal 2023, and 2% in fiscal 2022.
Healthy demographics. The state's population continues to grow due to net migration from other states, given its increased job prospects and affordable housing prices (particularly when compared to California). For more information, please see "State Brief: Arizona," published March 28, 2023, on RatingsDirect. Maricopa County led the nation in population increases from 2021 to 2022 and is the among the 10 most populous counties in the nation, with continued projected growth in the minor/school-age population. We expect favorable demographics will support enrollment at rated charter schools with solid student demand, although we believe there is heightened competition for students, given the many educational options available. In addition, with greater work-from-home options post-pandemic, schools have reported some enrollment shifts as parents who may have commuted are opting for closer schools. We will monitor enrollment trends at our rated schools and the state.
Teacher shortages. The state has long experienced teacher shortages, a challenge that was exacerbated by the pandemic. In our view, a shortage of skilled teachers could impair academic outcomes for schools in our rated universe, as there are a high level of vacancies and unfilled positions. While there have been recent efforts to stem the losses by increasing teacher pay across the state, many continue to leave the profession. We will monitor both the trend of a shrinking number of teachers and increasing salaries on school budgets and operating performance.
Long-term use of one-time funds. Charter school operating budgets have been cushioned in recent years by the substantial level of federal stimulus funding allocated through the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief fund. Many schools have used these funds to offset various expenses to address learning loss, hire additional staff, or certain eligible capital expenses, such as HVAC upgrades. When use of these funds expires in September 2024 (fiscal 2025), schools could face budgetary challenges if they used these federal funds to support recurring operating expenses.
ASBCS financial framework. The Arizona Attorney General's office recently completed an audit on the ASBCS and issued a recommendation that it update its financial framework to better account for student enrollment changes that can lead to financial challenges. The report also recommended that the board track financial health over multiple years. We will monitor any updates to the board's framework and how this might improve transparency, oversight, and accountability of charter schools.
Table 2
Arizona charter schools: Rating list | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Charter School | Rating | Outlook | Charter Contract expiration | |||||
Center for Academic Success Inc. |
BBB | Stable | June 30, 2031 | |||||
GreatHearts Arizona* |
BBB | Stable | June 30, 2025 | |||||
Ball Charter Schools* |
BBB- | Stable | June 30, 2027 | |||||
Candeo Schools Inc. |
BBB- | Stable | June 30, 2038 | |||||
Villa Montessori Inc. |
BBB- | Stable | June 30, 2041 | |||||
Academies of Math and Science* |
BB+ | Stable | June 30, 2028 | |||||
American Charter Schools Foundation* |
BB+ | Positive | June 30, 2036 | |||||
Arizona Agribusiness & Equine Center Inc.* |
BB+ | Stable | June 30, 2025 | |||||
Arizona School for the Arts* |
BB+ | Stable | July 31, 2031 | |||||
Freedom Academy |
BB+ | Stable | June 30, 2042 | |||||
Horizon Community Learning Center* |
BB+ | Stable | June 30, 2029 | |||||
Legacy Traditional Schools* |
BB+ | Positive | June 30, 2026 | |||||
Paradise Schools |
BB+ | Stable | June 30, 2032 | |||||
Vista College Preparatory |
BB+ | Stable | June 30, 2028 | |||||
Arizona Autism Charter School |
BB | Positive | June 30, 2029 | |||||
BASIS Schools Inc.* |
BB | Stable | June 30, 2025 | |||||
Berean Academy |
BB | Stable | June 30, 2037 | |||||
Choice Academies Inc. |
BB | Stable | June 30, 2024 | |||||
Kaizen Education Foundation* |
BB | Stable | June 30, 2026 | |||||
Noah Webster Basic Schools Inc.* |
BB | Negative | June 30, 2029 | |||||
Edkey Inc.* |
BB- | Stable | June 30, 2028 | |||||
Odyssey Preparatory Academy |
BB- | Positive | June 30, 2024 | |||||
Pensar Academy Inc. |
BB- | Stable | June 30, 2031 | |||||
*For these schools with more than one charter contract, we list the earliest charter contract expiration date |
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Amber L Schafer, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4238; amber.schafer@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Jessica L Wood, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7004; jessica.wood@spglobal.com |
Avani K Parikh, New York + 1 (212) 438 1133; avani.parikh@spglobal.com | |
Research Assistant: | Yash Chandak, Pune |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.