articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/231031-north-american-refining-sector-credit-quality-can-withstand-some-margin-pressure-12877350.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

North American Refining Sector Credit Quality Can Withstand Some Margin Pressure

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Corporate And Infrastructure Finance Criteria

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Festive Will The Holiday Season Be For Retailers In The U.S. And Europe?

COMMENTS

Retail Brief: European Retailers Set Out Their Stalls For The Golden Quarter

COMMENTS

Record-High Health Care Defaults Will Moderate In 2025, Though Higher Than Normal


North American Refining Sector Credit Quality Can Withstand Some Margin Pressure

The confluence of events that caused the North American refining sector to experience the strongest refining margins and operating performance in decades may be ending. However, S&P Global Ratings expects independent refiners' creditworthiness to remain resilient to some weakness in demand and other possible headwinds as we approach the end of 2023 and look to 2024.

With third-quarter earnings results quickly approaching, we await the narrative that will develop around recent weakness in gasoline cracks and some softening in refining margins more broadly. We are eager to know if management teams intend to stick to the financial policies of the past 18 months by holding high cash balances and maintaining ample liquidity, as well as their current thoughts on rewarding shareholders.

Are Lofty Refining Margins Coming Down To Earth?

The recent correction in gasoline cracks raises questions about whether the precipitous decline--the Nymex crack peaked in late summer at about $40 per barrel (bbl) and is now below $10/bbl--is mainly due to the usual drop in seasonal demand as refiners switch from summer to winter grade gasoline, or something structural.

Before we address possible causes for the recent weakness in gasoline cracks, we note the WTI 3-2-1 indicative crack has fallen below the five year average of about $19/bbl to roughly $17/bbl, but is still above the pre-COVID average of $13.60/bbl.

Chart 1

image

The steep drop in gasoline cracks could be an overcorrection partly due to seasonality, but may also reflect weakened demand as a result of inflationary pressures generally, slower economic growth, the extreme weather that occurred on the East Coast that limited driving in September, and fewer miles driven as the summer driving season winds down. The fall season also brings scheduled maintenance and turnarounds for the industry, and if lower gasoline cracks persist we could see refiners start reducing utilization earlier than usual as gasoline cracks prove uneconomical. We expect average refinery utilization to decline to the high-80% area nationally, from the very robust mid-90% area the industry maintained through the summer.

Chart 2

image

Chart 3

image

Gasoline inventory levels have risen since the beginning of September as a result of some of the demand weakness, but we expect the independent refiners we rate to limit gasoline production or switch to more distillate runs, although this can also put downward pressure on distillate margins. Another headwind North American refiners are dealing with is a narrower heavy-light differential. Gulf Coast refiners will see margins impacted by the smaller Brent-Maya spread, which has narrowed from a high of $19.23 per barrel in the first quarter of 2023 to $8.72 in the third quarter. The Brent-WCS spread has shown a similar contraction from about $17/bbl in the beginning of 2023 to about $9.75/bbl.

Chart 4

image

While there is a pullback in gasoline demand, the same cannot be said for demand for diesel and jet fuel. Distillate demand remains steady, and inventory levels for both diesel and jet fuel are at the bottom end of the five-year range. U.S. demand for jet fuel, based on average passanger count from the U.S. Transportation Security Adminstration, indicates strong passenger levels in September and October, with overall passenger count tracking 2019 levels. All of these data, while not definitive indicators, supports the continuation healthy refining margins going into the traditionally slower fourth quarter period.

Chart 5a

image

Chart 5b

image

Lower RIN Values Are Pressuring Margins

The price of renewable identification numbers (RINs) has also declined recently, which will have mixed effects on the refiners we rate. We believe the price of the D6 RIN--the ethanol RIN value used for gasoline blending--is already factored into the gasoline price and refining margin, therefore a lower RIN value will also reduce margins. The value of this RIN has dropped about 50 cents to roughly 90 cents per gallon from the beginning of September to mid-October, or about 5 cents per gallon in the price of gasoline (gasoline contains a 10% ethanol blend). While this has also put downward pressure on gasoline margins, it provides some relief for refiners that have significant RIN obligations, which reduces that balance sheet liability. While we do not impute debt for these obligations as many refiners historically have received small refinery exemptions from the EPA, we could change our view if these obligations become due.

The D4 RIN value, used for bio-massed based diesel, has also decreased by almost 45% over the same time period to about $1, mainly due to the ramp-up of renewable diesel production and favorable blending economics. While the lower RIN value will pressure margins, we believe the benefits of refiners converting a portion of their capacity to renewable fuels outweigh the risks. Renewable fuels will reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and also provide refiners incentives of $1 per gallon under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), as well as low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS) credits that should enhance returns. Many of the refiners we rate are producing renewable fuels and we expect that production will reach about 4.1 billion gallons by the end of 2024.

Table 1

Renewables
Asset In-service Millions Gallons/Year

CVR Energy Inc.

Wynnewood 2022 100

HF Sinclair Corp.

Artesia/Cheyenne/Sinclair 2022 383

Marathon Petroleum Corp.

Martinez JV 2023 730

Montana Renewables LLC

Great Falls Refinery 2023 184

Par Petroleum LLC

Washington Co-Feed/Hawaii SAF 2023/2025 TBD

PBF Holding Co. LLC

St Bernard JV 2023 320

Phillips 66

Rodeo 2024 767

Valero Energy Corp.

DGD Port Arthur SAF 2025 235
DGD JV 2013 1,200

Vertex Energy Inc.

Mobile Refinery 2024 215
Source: Company reports

Historically Strong Credit Quality To Remain Strong

Despite the recent pullback and mixed signals exhibited by refining margins, demand for refined products is comparable to pre-pandemic levels and is still above historical mid-cycle levels. We expect margins to continue to be credit-supportive given low inventory levels and tight product supply. Continuing on the back of a strong fiscal 2022, the North American refiners we rate achieved higher-than-average margins in the first half of 2023, albeit lower than the unprecedented levels achieved in the first half of 2022. We expect U.S. refiners will benefit from their relative advantage over most global sources of supply, including lower energy costs, favorable feedstock flexibility, and refinery complexity.

Chart 6

image

Chart 7

image

Credit quality remains among the strongest we've seen as refiners remain disciplined, carrying large cash balances in addition to strong liquidity profiles and conservative capital structures. The potential inflationary risk and energy transition risks could pressure these issuers going forward, but we expect companies will maintain their credit quality despite the near-term headwinds from inflation and economic uncertainty, and the longer-term risk from the evolution to alternatives to hydrocarbon-based fuels.

Table 2

U.S. refinery credit quality to remain strong in 2023
Issuer Issuer credit rating Business risk Financial risk Liquidity Reported debt FY Dec. 31, 2022 Net debt/EBITDA Downgrade triggers
12/31/22 (Mil. $)† Adjusted debt/EBITDA‡ FY23 forecast** Debt/EBITDA; FFO/debt

Flint Hills Resources LLC

A+/Stable/A-1 Satisfactory Minimal Adequate N/A N/A 0.1x > 1.0x

Phillips 66

BBB+/Stable/A-2 Satisfactory Intermediate Strong 18,217.0 1x 1.0x-1.5x > 3.0x

Valero Energy Corp.

BBB/Stable/-- Satisfactory Significant Strong 12,722.0 0.7x 1.0x-1.20x > 3.0x

Marathon Petroleum Corp.

BBB/Stable/A-2 Satisfactory Significant Strong 27,909.0 0.8x 1.25x-1.75x > 4.0x

Motiva Enterprises LLC*

BBB+/Stable/A-2 Fair Intermediate Strong 2,234.0 0.3x 0.1x - 0.5x > 2.5x

HF Sinclair Corp.

BBB-/Stable/-- Fair Intermediate Strong 3,681.0 0.5x 0.5x-1.0x > 3.0x

Deer Park Refining L.P.*

BBB-/Stable/A-3 Fair Significant Adequate 0.0 N.M. < 1.0x Tied to PEMEX

PBF Holding Co. LLC

BB/Positive/-- Fair Intermediate Strong 2,538.5 0.2x 0.1x - 0.5x > 2.0x

Delek US Holdings Inc.

BB-/Positive/-- Fair Significant Strong 3,225.7 2.9x 2.50x-2.75x > 3.5x

CVR Energy Inc.

B+/Stable/-- Weak Aggressive Adequate 1,631.0 1.1x 1.40x-2.00x > 5.0x

Par Petroleum LLC

B+/Stable/-- Weak Significant Adequate 872.0 1.2x 1.5x-2.0x > 4.5x

Vertex Energy Inc.

B/Stable/-- Vulnerable Significant Adequate 284.0 3.8x 1.5x-2.0x > 2.0x

CITGO Holding Inc.§

B-/Stable/-- Fair Intermediate Strong 3,635.1 0.5x 0.1x-0.5x Included in PDVSA bankruptcy

CITGO Petroleum Corp.§

B-/Stable/-- Fair Intermediate Strong 2,275.0 0.5x 0.1x-0.5x Included in PDVSA bankruptcy

Montana Renewables LLC§§

B-/Stable/-- Weak Highly leveraged Adequate 441.2 60.2x 8x Tied to Calumet
Total debt 79,666.0    
*Ratings uplift from strategic link to parent. Deer Park ('bb-' SACP; linked to Petroleos Mexicanos (BBB/Stable/--), Motiva ('bb+'; linked to Saudi Aramco). §Ratings constrained (CITGO SACP 'bb') due to link with Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA). PDVSA ratings were withdrawn due to the lack of timely information on June 12, 2019. †2022 Reported debt includes consolidated debt of the refiner and its operating subsidiaries, including operating/financing leases. ‡Represents group consolidated leverage metrics. Cash is not netted against debt for companies with a business risk profile of weak or lower. **Revised forecast for 2023. §§Montana Renewables (SACP 'b-') is 100% owned by Calumet Specialty Products Partners L.P. (B-/Stable/--).
Capital allocation is not threat to credit quality

Refiners are flush with cash, providing them with considerable flexibility around financial policy, and their allocating capital to shareholders is not harming credit quality in our view. The rated portfolio repaid the debt borrowed during the pandemic downturn in 2021, and credit metrics are the strongest they have been in years, with substantial cushion in coverage and financial leverage ratios. We generally view share buybacks done at management's discretion as more supportive of credit quality than those done under a predetermined plan, because management can turn it off if cash flow or liquidity declines. The table below shows that refiners still believe share buybacks are an important way to return value to shareholders and a good use of excess cash.

Table 3

Share buybacks prove an effective use of cash
As of June 30, 2023 (in mil. $)
Cash Share Buybacks Dividends DCF

Valero Energy Corp.

5,075.0 5,078.0 1,699.0 3,053.3

Phillips 66

3,029.0 3,556.0 2,091.0 2,373.0

PBF Holding Co. LLC*

1,496.8 267.6 1,658.8 795.9

HF Sinclair Corp.

1,614.6 1,508.9 443.6 227.4

CVR Energy Inc.

751.0 N/A 762.0 (146.0)

Delek US Holdings Inc.

821.6 169.3 109.9 (439.5)

Marathon Petroleum Corp.

11,454.0 12,593.0 2,484.5 (2,236.5)
All figures are adjusted for the last 12 months. Discretionary cash flow (DCF)=Operating cash flow minus capex, dividends and share repurchases. *Share repurchases at parent PBF Energy Inc. N/A--Not applicable.

Valero, Phillips, HF Sinclair, and PBF all bought back shares while also maintaining positive free discretionary cash flow. Marathon has been very clear with investors that its preferred method of returning value to equity holders is through its share repurchase program and has been very aggressive in its approach, with more than $12.5 billion of shares repurchased during the 12 month period ending June 30. Marathon recently announced a 10% dividend increase for the third quarter 2023 and an additional $5 billion share repurchase program, which is in addition to its previous program, which still has about $4.3 billion remaining as of September 30. We balance Marathon's announcement with our expectations of it continuing to hold a significant cash balance and our expectations of consolidated debt to EBITDA coming in at the lower end of our 1.25x-1.75x range for year-end 2023.

We still believe the North American refining industry is well positioned as 2023 winds down. Industry performance and credit quality resiliency in the next 12-18 months depends on the usual external factors beyond companies' control, including economic activity, demand patterns, crude differentials, inflation, and commodity prices. However, we think creditworthiness will depend heavily on financial discipline if the industry enters a low point in the cycle, and whether management remains true to the financial policies that put them in their current position of strength. Third-quarter earnings could begin to shed light on this.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Michael V Grande, New York + 1 (212) 438 2242;
michael.grande@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Sheryl Fernandes, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in