Banks across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) will remain broadly resilient to tightening financing conditions and high interest rates over the next 12 months. Lending growth is set to decelerate further in many European markets, but S&P Global Ratings considers that banks' earnings will remain solid and cover higher credit costs. The increase in net interest margins continues to provide tailwinds, and banks should be able to preserve their solid capitalization and funding profiles.
A robust labor market and accelerating wage growth will support real disposable income next year, easing income constraints for households and supporting consumption. However, European economic growth will remain fragile. Our GDP growth forecasts for the eurozone remain unchanged at 0.6% for 2023 and 0.9% for 2024. We now forecast inflation of 5.6% this year and 2.7% in 2024.
We therefore expect EMEA banks to face weakening asset quality over the next year, particularly when it comes to small-to-midsize enterprise (SME) loans, unsecured consumer credit, and commercial real estate (CRE) exposures. However, the impact should be manageable, with provisions normalizing rather than spiking. While we consider that EMEA banks will perform resiliently over the coming quarters, we see three main risks to our baseline assumptions:
- Market turbulence and financial instability due to more restrictive financing conditions. The European Central Bank (ECB) may accelerate the reduction of its balance sheet, shrinking banking system liquidity more quickly than we currently expect. Financial institutions with weaker funding profiles, especially nonbank financial institutions with high refinancing needs, will be more vulnerable. Increased market turbulence could also expose banks to higher counterparty credit risks. Emerging market banks, especially those that rely heavily on external debt, will also remain under pressure.
- A protracted, painful recession. This would undermine the financial health of corporates and households, thus further weakening banks' asset quality and business prospects.
- Banks' failure to achieve commercially and operationally resilient business models. This could occur if banks fail to tackle inefficiencies, further digitalize their businesses, and bolster their protection against cyber risks. Banks that work with third-party service providers that might have subpar cyber security standards compared to the banking sector are also at risk.
Nevertheless, our rating actions on EMEA banks in 2023 continue to have a pronounced positive net bias and ratings have a stable outlook bias. This reflects our view of a likely resilient performance in 2023-2024.
At the same time, tail risks from the Russia-Ukraine war remain a concern, as we now assume that the active phase of the war will extend into next year. The recent eruption of war between Hamas and Israel exacerbates already elevated global geopolitical risks.
European Markets Face Some Deleveraging, In Contrast To Many Emerging Markets
Tight funding conditions will support some deleveraging in many European markets. Several emerging markets in EMEA recovered quickly from the pandemic, enjoying relatively strong lending growth over the past two years. However, even there, tight credit conditions due to high inflation and interest rates and domestic liquidity constraints will restrict lending growth. For a few emerging markets, such as Nigeria, local-currency depreciation in 2023 contributed to nominal lending growth due to the currency revaluation of the sizable share of foreign-currency loans in the lending book.
Chart 2
Banking Systems Should Be Resilient To Severe Asset Quality Deterioration And Market Shocks
The results of the ECB/European Banking Authority stress test show that although EU banks would see capital depletion of about 459 basis points (bps) on average in a stress scenario, the majority would see their common equity tier 1 ratios remain comfortably above 10%. Only three banks would face a drop in capital below the regulatory requirement, while a further 34 banks would have to cut distributions to shareholders and holders of additional tier 1 instruments in a stress scenario. The stressed macro assumptions were harsher than in the 2021 stress test exercise, resulting in higher modelled losses.
Banks' Earnings Should Be Sufficient To Absorb Increasing Credit Losses
Although higher interest rates have boosted bank's margins, we expect the positive effects to peak this year. At the same time, the persistence of elevated rates increases the pressure on household and corporate borrowers, leading to further rises in credit costs. We estimate that credit costs for Western European banks will average 20-30 bps over 2023-2024. Although this is a deterioration from 2021-2022 levels, we view it as a normalization rather than an indicator of significant asset quality problems. Overall, we expect that banks should be able to manage higher credit costs as rising interest rates benefit their net interest margins and capital remains robust.
We believe that the strong European labor markets will support the performance of banks' mortgage portfolios. Unsecured consumer borrowers will be under greater pressure, similar to corporate borrowers (primarily SMEs) with tighter debt and affordability metrics. Negative price trends in the CRE segment could also expose banks to losses.
The Orderly Repayment Of Longer-Term Refinancing Operation (TLTRO) Borrowings Continues
TLTRO borrowings dropped by more than 70% to just below €500 billion at the end of September 2023 from €2.2 trillion in January 2022. At the same time, excess reserves that eurozone banks hold at the ECB remain high, at €3.6 trillion.
Warning Signs In The CRE Segment Could Spell Asset Quality Pressure For Some Banking Sectors
While we believe that the CRE segment performed resiliently during the pandemic-related stress in 2020-2022, it could become a source of credit risk for banks over the next few years. During the pandemic, hotels and retail properties were under the greatest pressure. This time round, the stress will likely come from a longer-term structural shift in the sector, with many corporate businesses implementing more flexible and hybrid working patterns. This could lead to a gradual decline in the demand for office space in the medium-to-long term, weighing on asset valuations and curbing cash flows. Lenders could see loan losses rise as a result.
The tighter financing conditions that we expect to continue throughout 2024 will only add to the pressure on CRE borrowers. European markets with the highest share of CRE lending in total loan book--such as Germany, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway--are most exposed to the growing risk.
Geopolitical Instability In The Middle East Could Weaken Some Banking Sectors' Performance
The eruption of war between Hamas and Israel in the Middle East puts further upward pressure on our global assessment of geopolitical risk that we already view as elevated and worsening. This compounds the strain on international relations caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the tense relationship between China and the U.S. For now the economic and credit impact is largely being contained to Israel, Gaza, Egypt, and Jordan, even though recent developments present a real threat to stability in the wider Middle East and add to already heightened geopolitical concerns globally. This could eventually negatively impact the business growth and profitability of some banking sectors in the region, as well as increase their funding risks.
Key Banking Sector Risks In EMEA
The table below presents S&P Global Ratings' views about the key risks and risk trends affecting the banking sectors in EMEA where we rate banks. For more detailed information, please refer to the latest Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment (BICRA) on a given country. According to our methodology, BICRAs fall into groups from '1' to '10', ranging from what we view as the lowest-risk banking systems (group '1') to the highest-risk (group '10').
Selected Research
We recently published several articles highlighting our views on EMEA banking sectors:
- Outlooks On Israeli Banks Revised To Negative On Increased Geopolitical Risk; Ratings Affirmed, Oct. 31, 2023
- Sector And Industry Variables | Criteria | Financial Institutions | Banks: Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment Update: September 2023, Sept. 28, 2023
- Various Rating Actions On Italian Banks On Balance Sheets' Resilience To Economic Cycles, Oct. 25, 2023
- Highlights From The European Financial Institutions Conferences 2023,Oct. 19, 2023
- Metro Bank's Rescue Deal Has No Direct Consequence For Rated U.K. Banks, Oct. 9, 2023
- The Resolution Story For Europe's Banks: Making The Regime Fit For Purpose, Oct. 4, 2023
- Tech Disruption In Retail Banking: Country-By-Country Analysis 2023: Leaders And Laggards Emerge, Sept. 27, 2023
- Large French Banks' Net Interest Income Should Pick Up From Mid-2024, Sept. 26, 2023
- SLIDES: European G-SIBs Monitor H2 2023: Rising Rates Don't Float All Boats, Sept. 20, 2023
- Swiss Public Liquidity Backstop Has Limited Implications For Hybrid Ratings, Sept. 18, 2023
- Tech Disruption In Retail Banking: Irish Banks Are Working With, Not Against, Fintechs, Sept. 14, 2023
- As Their Funding Evolves, U.K. Banks Have Flexibility, Sept. 14, 2023
- Credit FAQ: What An Acceleration Of Quantitative Tightening Could Mean For Eurozone Banks, Sept. 13, 2023
- Various Rating Actions Taken On Portuguese Banks Due To Positive Sovereign Outlook And Prospects Of Easing Economic Risk, Sept. 12, 2023
- Banks In Major GCC Economies Remain Resilient To Less Supportive Operating Conditions, Sept. 12, 2023
- Outlooks On 12 Nigerian Banks Revised To Stable After Same Action On Sovereign; Several National Scale Ratings Raised, Aug. 11, 2023
- EU Banks Resist Tough Assumptions In Latest Stress Tests, Aug. 01, 2023
- Credit FAQ: How Owner Support And Intent Influence European Bank Hybrids, July 27, 2023
- Cyber Risk Insights: Attack On Vulnerable Software Highlights Outsourcing Risk For Banks, July 21, 2023
- SLIDES: Global Banks Midyear Outlook 2023: Resilience Will Be Tested, July 20, 2023
- Credit FAQ: A Closer Look At Insulated Entities In Financial Services, July 18, 2023
- Swiss Public Liquidity Backstop For Banks Comes With Strings Attached, July 17, 2023
- SLIDES: Banks Face Rising Losses Amid Growing Risks, July 13, 2023
- Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment Quarterly Monitor: 2Q 2023, July 12, 2023
- Latest BoE Stress Test Signals U.K. Banks' Resilience To A Severe Downturn, July 12, 2023
- The Global Sukuk Market Is Showing Pockets Of Opportunity, July 12, 2023
- Sector And Industry Variables | Criteria | Financial Institutions | Banks: Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment Update: June 2023, June 30, 2023
- European Banks: Protecting Liquidity Will Come At An Increasing Cost, June 29, 2023
- Rating Actions On Three Polish Banks Reflect Differing Provisioning Needs Following ECJ Ruling, June 27, 2023
- Comparative Statistics: U.K. Banks Compete Strongly As Rates Climb, June 16, 2023
- Nigeria National Scale NOHC Ratings Affirmed After Criteria Review; Removed From Under Criteria Observation, June 15, 2023
- Credit FAQ: Key Risks For Banks In Select EMEA Emerging Markets, May 23, 2023
Economic, Sovereign, And Other Research
- Operational Resilience Is Key To Global FMIs’ Rating Strength, Oct. 4, 2023
- Economic Research: Which Emerging Markets Are More Vulnerable To A Further Increase In Energy Prices?, Oct. 4, 2023
- Future Of Banking: AI Will Be An Incremental Game Changer, Oct. 3, 2023
- SLIDES: Uneven Global Office Recovery Is Squeezing Credit Quality, Oct. 3, 2023
- Credit Cycle Indicator Q4 2023: Risks Could Intensify Before The Cycle Turns, Sept. 28, 2023
- Uneven Liquidity And Strained Valuations Are Pushing Some Funds Toward Debt, Sept. 28, 2023
- Credit Conditions Europe Q4 2023: Resilience Under Pressure Amid Tighter Financial Conditions, Sept. 26, 2023
- Credit Conditions Emerging Markets Q4 2023: High Interest Rates Sour The Mood, Sept. 26, 2023
- Emerging Markets Real Estate Issuers Stand Their Ground, Sept. 20, 2023
- Top 200 Banks: Capital Ratios Continue To Normalize After Pandemic Peaks, Sept. 18, 2023
- Global Bank Exposures To Commercial Property Are Top Of Worry List For Investors, Webcast Polls Show, Aug. 3, 2023
- Global Emerging Markets: Common Themes, Individual Circumstances, July 20, 2023
- Key Rating Metrics For Global Financial Market Infrastructure Companies (July 2023), July 6, 2023
- Economic Outlook Eurozone Q3 2023: Short-Term Pain, Medium-Term Gain, June 26, 2023
- Economic Outlook Emerging Markets Q3 2023: A Slowdown Ahead After Beating Expectations, June 26, 2023
BICRA Changes
Over the past quarter, we made the following changes to our BICRAs.
Egypt
We have revised our BICRA for Egypt to Group '10' from Group '9' and our economic risk score to '10' from '9'. The lack of progress on key monetary and structural reforms has exacerbated imbalances in the currency market, deteriorating the net foreign asset position of systemic banks and delaying the disbursements of IMF and other multilateral and bilateral financing, which in our view are critical to cover Egypt's high external funding. In addition, we view the government's high debt servicing costs as a potential challenge to debt sustainability, given rising social pressure, and limited spending capacity after interest payments. With the aforementioned change to the economic risk score, we have also revised our economic risk trend for Egypt to stable from negative.
We have also revised our industry risk score for Egypt to '9' from '8'. Banks have increased their reliance on external funding due to the lack of sufficient foreign currency in the economy. Absent Central Bank of Egypt intervention in the market to provide foreign currency liquidity, commercial banks are liquidating foreign assets and increasing borrowing from abroad, at increasing costs, to face high demand for foreign currency via official channels from households and companies.
Hungary
We have revised our economic risk trend for Hungary to stable from negative. This reflects that credit losses for Hungarian banks are likely to be lower than we originally expected, supporting banks' resilience amid the economic slowdown. Despite rising interest levels and a material increase in the cost of living stemming from high inflation, we see no material deterioration in households' credit risk. This is largely because of government measures to support the private sector, including small and midsize enterprises. Hungarian banks experienced a slight decline in nonperforming loans to 3.0% in first-quarter 2023 from 3.2% at year-end 2021. In our base case, we expect no material weakening in banks' asset quality.
Ireland
We have revised our BICRA for Ireland to group '3' from group '4', and our economic risk score to '3' from '4'. We expect Ireland to enjoy domestic economic growth of about 2.0% in 2023--outperforming many countries in the eurozone--as well as low unemployment, which, in our view, will bolster the Irish banking sector. We also anticipate that Irish banks will be broadly on track to reduce nonperforming loans to their publicly stated target levels by year-end 2023 and keep asset quality metrics around those levels. Furthermore, we project that the current high interest rate environment--as well as banks' focus on costs and their greater scale thanks to the consolidation of the domestic banking sector--will boost the resilience of domestic banks' overall creditworthiness.
Israel
We have revised our economic risk trend for Israel to negative from stable. The negative trend reflects the high level of uncertainty surrounding the negative effects of the conflict on the sector. Israeli banks have navigated several military escalations over recent decades, but current developments could be of a greater magnitude. In our view, Israeli banks might face heightened economic risks if geopolitical risks escalate further. We see a risk that banks might face protracted effects from revised macroeconomic prospects and credit conditions with a potential decline in revenue and substantial increase in credit losses.
Italy
We have revised our economic risk score for Italy to '5' from '6' and our economic risk trend to stable from positive. We expect Italian banks and, particularly, their asset quality to be more resilient than in the past to future downturns, thanks to improved underwriting, tighter risk controls, and active management of problem loans paired with historically low legacy nonperforming exposures.
Malta
We have revised our economic risk trend for Malta to stable from negative. In our opinion, sound economic fundamentals in the country are easing the risks of a sharp real estate price correction for local banks. We anticipate that Malta's economy will continue growing in the coming quarters, and that its slowdown in 2023 will be milder than peers' and its rebound more robust in 2024. We expect real GDP growth of over 3% in both 2023 and 2024, versus an average of below 1% in the euro area, largely due to tourism and gaming industry resiliency.
Oman
We have revised our economic risk trend for Oman to positive from stable. We see stronger economic resilience for Oman's banking system. Favorable oil sector dynamics coupled with higher non-hydrocarbon sector output will likely sustain the country's real economic growth over 2023-2026 and support domestic demand and the performance of key sectors such as tourism, transportation (mainly shipping), and utilities. Structural reforms such as reorganizing Oman's government-related entities have brought operational efficiencies and strengthened the financial profiles of these entities.
Poland
We have revised our industry risk trend for Poland to stable from negative. Higher interest rates have boosted operating profitability at domestic banks and reinforced their ability to absorb higher costs. The European Court of Justice ruling on June 15, 2023, indicates potentially higher provisioning needs for Polish banks with legacy mortgage loan portfolios denominated in foreign currencies. We expect that most banks can absorb these provisioning needs, given their strong operating profitability and available excess capital. Banks would have time to restore their capital positions if needed.
Portugal
We have revised our economic risk trend for Portugal to positive from stable. This reflects the country's improving budgetary and external positions. Supported by tourism and investments under large EU funds, as well as prudent policymaking, the government's fiscal policy will see net debt to GDP decline to an expected 87% at year-end 2026 from 107% at year-end 2022--one of the steepest reductions in Europe. At the same time, Portugal's overall external position continues to improve, thanks to contained import growth and booming tourism. We therefore expect that the current account balance will return to a surplus in 2023, at just over 1% of GDP. We also expect external deleveraging to continue.
Switzerland
We have revised our economic risk score for Switzerland to '1' from '2'. We expect Swiss households and corporates to maintain credit strength despite the worsening economic outlook. The labor market has been very resilient, with the unemployment rate near 20-year lows (2.2% in 2022), supporting household resilience. At the same time, we consider Swiss corporate balance sheets as healthy overall and do not project a material worsening of their credit metrics, given the high share of equity financing compared with international peers. To date, we have not seen any notable increase in insolvencies due to adverse shocks and deem the sector flexible, competitive, and well positioned to withstand the negative effects of a persistently strong Swiss franc.
We have also revised our industry risk score for Switzerland to '3' from '2'. In May 2023, the Swiss parliament commissioned an inquiry into the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) and the Swiss Federal Council to examine the failure of Credit Suisse. Following the outcome of the parliamentary commission (expected next year), we believe further legislative changes could ensue, for example related to capital ordinance, FINMA's early intervention powers, the Swiss National Bank's role as lender of last resort, and resolution. While general regulation in Switzerland remains strong, we now regard the Swiss institutional framework as comparable with that of global peers including Austria, Germany, New Zealand, and the U.S.
Table 2
Rating component scores: Top 50 European banks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Institution | Operating company long-term ICR/outlook | Anchor | Business position | Capital and earnings | Risk position | Funding and liquidity | CRA adjustment | SACP/ GCP | Type of support | Number of notches support | Additional factors | |||||||||||||
Austria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Erste Group Bank AG |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Strong/Strong (+1) | 0 | a | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Raiffeisen Bank International AG |
A-/Negative | bbb+ | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Strong/Strong (+1) | 0 | a- | None | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Belgium | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Belfius Bank SA/NV |
A/Stable | a- | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
KBC Bank N.V. |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Denmark | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Danske Bank A/S |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | ALAC | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Nykredit Realkredit A/S |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | ALAC | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Finland | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nordea Bank Abp |
AA-/Stable | a- | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a+ | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
France | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
BNP Paribas |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Very Strong (+2) | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
BPCE |
A/Stable | bbb+ | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Credit Mutuel Group |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Credit Agricole S.A. |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
La Banque Postale |
A+/Negative | bbb+ | Adequate (0) | Moderate (-1) | Moderate (-1) | Strong/Strong (+1) | 0 | bbb | Group | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Société Générale |
A/Stable | bbb+ | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb+ | ALAC | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Germany | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commerzbank AG |
A-/Stable | bbb+ | Moderate (-1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb | ALAC | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Cooperative Banking Sector Germany |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Strong/Strong (+1) | 0 | a+ | None | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Deutsche Bank AG |
A-/Positive | bbb+ | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb | ALAC | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Volkswagen Bank GmbH |
BBB+/Stable | bbb+ | Constrained (-2) | Very Strong (+2) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb+ | None | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Greece | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alpha Bank S.A. |
BB-/Stable | bb | Adequate (0) | Constrained (-1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bb- | None | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Eurobank S.A. |
BB-/Positive | bb | Adequate (0) | Constrained (-1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bb- | None | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Piraeus Bank S.A. |
B+/Positive | bb | Adequate (0) | Constrained (-1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | b+ | None | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Ireland | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
AIB Group PLC§ |
A/Stable | bbb+ | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb+ | ALAC | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Bank of Ireland Group PLC§ |
A/Stable | bbb+ | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb+ | ALAC | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Israel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank Hapoalim B.M. |
A/Negative | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | Sov | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Bank Leumi le-Israel B.M. |
A/Negative | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | Sov | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Italy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA |
BBB/Stable | bbb- | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb+ | None | 0 | -1 | |||||||||||||
Mediobanca SpA |
BBB/Stable | bbb- | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb | None | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Iccrea Banca SpA |
BB+/Positive | bbb- | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Constrained (-2) | Strong/Strong (+1) | 0 | bb+ | None | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
UniCredit SpA |
BBB/Stable | bbb | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb+ | None | 0 | -1 | |||||||||||||
Netherlands | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABN AMRO Bank N.V. |
A/Stable | bbb+ | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | -1 | bbb+ | ALAC | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
ING Bank N.V. |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Norway | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
DNB Bank ASA |
AA-/Stable | a- | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a+ | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Spain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. |
A/Stable | bbb | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Banco de Sabadell S.A. |
BBB/Positive | bbb | Moderate (-1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb- | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Banco Santander S.A. |
A+/Stable | bbb | Very Strong (+2) | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
CaixaBank S.A. |
A-/Stable | bbb | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb+ | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Sweden | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB |
A+/Stable | a- | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Svenska Handelsbanken AB |
AA-/Stable | a- | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a+ | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Swedbank AB |
A+/Stable | a- | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Switzerland | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
UBS Group AG§ |
A+/Stable | a- | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Raiffeisen Schweiz Genossenschaft |
AA-/Stable | a- | Adequate (0) | Very Strong (+2) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a+ | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Zuercher Kantonalbank |
AAA/Stable | a- | Strong (+1) | Very Strong (+2) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Strong (0) | 0 | aa- | GRE | 3 | 0 | |||||||||||||
U.K. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Barclays PLC§ |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | ALAC | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
HSBC Holdings PLC§ |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Strong/Adequate (0) | 0 | a | ALAC | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Lloyds Banking Group PLC§ |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | ALAC | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Nationwide Building Society |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | ALAC | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC (NatWest Group PLC)§ |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | ALAC | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Standard Chartered PLC§ |
A+/Stable | bbb+ | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Strong/Strong (+1) | 0 | a- | ALAC | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Source: S&P Global Ratings; data as of Oct. 31, 2023. In the "Type of Support" column, "None" includes some banks where ratings uplift because of support factors may be possible but none is currently included. For example, this column includes some systemically important banks where systemic importance results in no rating uplift. §Holding company; the rating reflects that on the main operating company. ICR--Issuer credit rating. GRE--Government-related entity. SACP--Stand-alone credit profile. Sys. Imp.--Systemically important. ALAC--Additional loss-absorbing capacity. GCP--Group credit profile. CRA--Comparative Ratings Adjustment. N/A--Not applicable. Sov--government support. |
Table 3
Rating component scores: Top 20 banks in Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Institution | Operating company long-term ICR/outlook | Anchor | Business position | Capital and earnings | Risk position | Funding and liquidity | CRA adjustment | SACP/ GCP | Type of support | Number of notches support | Additional factors | |||||||||||||
Bahrain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ahli United Bank B.S.C. |
BBB/Positive | bb+ | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb | None | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Arab Banking Corp. B.S.C. |
BBB-/Stable | bb+ | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb- | None | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Jordan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arab Bank PLC |
B+/Stable | bb | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Moderate (-1) | Strong/Strong (+1) | 0 | bb+ | None | 0 | -3 | |||||||||||||
Kuwait | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Bank of Kuwait S.A.K. |
A/Stable | bbb | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | Sov | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Qatar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qatar National Bank (Q.P.S.C.) |
A+/Stable | bbb- | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb | GRE | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||||
The Commercial Bank (P.S.Q.C.) |
A-/Stable | bbb- | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb- | Sov | 3 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Oman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
BankMuscat S.A.O.G. |
BB+/Stable | bb | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bb+ | None | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Saudi Arabia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Saudi National Bank |
A-/Stable | bbb | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | None | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Al Rajhi Bank |
A-/Stable | bbb | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | a- | None | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Riyad Bank |
A-/Stable | bbb | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb+ | Sov | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Banque Saudi Fransi |
A-/Stable | bbb | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb | Sov | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Arab National Bank |
A-/Stable | bbb | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb | Sov | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||
The Saudi Investment Bank |
BBB/Positive | bbb | Moderate (-1) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb- | Sov | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||
United Arab Emirates | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mashreqbank |
A/Stable | bbb- | Adequate (0) | Strong (+1) | Adequate (0) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb | Sov | 3 | 0 | |||||||||||||
First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC |
AA-/Stable | bbb- | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate/Strong (0) | 0 | a- | GRE | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC |
A/Stable | bbb- | Strong (+1) | Strong (+1) | Moderate (-1) | Adequate/Adequate (0) | 0 | bbb | GRE | 3 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Source: S&P Global Ratings; data as of Oct. 31, 2023. In the "Type of Support" column, "None" includes some banks where ratings uplift because of support factors may be possible but none is currently included. For example, this column includes some systemically important banks where systemic importance results in no rating uplift. §Holding company; the rating reflects that on the main operating company. ICR--Issuer credit rating. GRE--Government-related entity. SACP--Stand-alone credit profile. Sys. Imp.--Systemically important. ALAC--Additional loss-absorbing capacity. GCP--Group credit profile. CRA--Comparative Ratings Adjustment. N/A--Not applicable. Sov--government support. |
Table 4
Recent rating actions: EMEA banks | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of action | Bank | Country | To | From | ||||||
31/10/2023 | Israel Discount Bank Ltd. | Israel | BBB+/Negative/A-2 | BBB+/Positive/A-2 | ||||||
31/10/2023 | Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd. | Israel | A-/Negative/A-2 | A-/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
31/10/2023 | Bank Hapoalim B.M. | Israel | A/Negative/A-1 | A/Stable/A-1 | ||||||
31/10/2023 | Bank Leumi le-Israel B.M. | Israel | A/Negative/A-1 | A/Stable/A-1 | ||||||
25/10/2023 | Iccrea Banca SpA | Italy | BB+/Positive/B | BB+/Stable/B | ||||||
25/10/2023 | Muganbank OJSC | Azerbaijan | NR | B-/Stable/B | ||||||
24/10/2023 | Commercial International Bank (Egypt) S.A.E. | Egypt | B-/Stable/B | B/Stable/B | ||||||
24/10/2023 | Banque Misr (S.A.E.) | Egypt | B-/Stable/B | B/Stable/B | ||||||
24/10/2023 | National Bank of Egypt (S.A.E) | Egypt | B-/Stable/B | B/Stable/B | ||||||
23/10/2023 | Bank Alliance JSC | Ukraine | CCC+/Stable/C | CCC/Developing/C | ||||||
20/10/2023 | Central Bank of Savings Banks Finland | Finland | A-/Stable/A-2 | A-/Negative/A-2 | ||||||
06/10/2023 | L-Bank | Germany | AA+/Positive/A-1+ | AA+/Stable/A-1 | ||||||
05/10/2023 | BankMuscat | Oman | BB+/Stable/B | BB/Positive/B | ||||||
05/10/2023 | Bonum Bank | Finland | BBB/Positive/A-2 | BBB/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
03/10/2023 | Dexia Crediop SpA | Italy | NR | BBB/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
25/09/2023 | Bank of Valletta | Malta | BBB-/Stable/A-3 | BBB-/Negative/A-3 | ||||||
21/09/2023 | Europe Arab Bank PLC | United Kingdom | BB/Stable/B | BB+/Negative/B | ||||||
19/09/2023 | Crelan S.A | Belgium | A-/Stable/A-2 | BBB+/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
12/09/2023 | Ravnaq Bank | Uzbekistan | NR | CCC-/Negative/C | ||||||
12/09/2023 | Banco Comercial Portugues S.A. | Portugal | BBB-/Stable/A-3 | BB+/Positive/B | ||||||
12/09/2023 | Banco Santander Totta S.A. | Portugal | BBB+/Positive/A-2 | BBB+/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
07/09/2023 | Credit Suisse (Schweiz) AG | Switzerland | A+/Stable/A-1 | A/Developing/A-1 | ||||||
30/08/2023 | Hamkorbank | Uzbekistan | BB-/Stable/B | B+/Positive/B | ||||||
29/08/2023 | Ameriabank CJSC | Armenia | BB-/Stable/B | B+/Positive/B | ||||||
24/08/2023 | Freedom Finance Global PLC | Kazakhstan | B/Watch Neg/B | B/Stable/B | ||||||
24/08/2023 | Freedom Finance JSC | Kazakhstan | B/Watch Neg/B | B/Stable/B | ||||||
11/08/2023 | Access Bank PLC | Nigeria | B-/Stable/B | B-/Negative/B | ||||||
11/08/2023 | Ecobank Nigeria Ltd. | Nigeria | B-/Stable/B | B-/Negative/B | ||||||
11/08/2023 | First Bank of Nigeria Ltd. | Nigeria | B-/Stable/B | B-/Negative/B | ||||||
11/08/2023 | Fidelity Bank PLC | Nigeria | B-/Stable/B | B-/Negative/B | ||||||
11/08/2023 | First City Monument Bank | Nigeria | B-/Stable/B | B-/Negative/B | ||||||
11/08/2023 | Guaranty Trust Bank Ltd. | Nigeria | B-/Stable/B | B-/Negative/B | ||||||
11/08/2023 | Stanbic IBTC Bank PLC | Nigeria | B-/Stable/B | B-/Negative/B | ||||||
11/08/2023 | Standard Chartered Bank Nigeria Ltd. | Nigeria | B-/Stable/B | B-/Negative/B | ||||||
11/08/2023 | United Bank for Africa PLC | Nigeria | B-/Stable/B | B-/Negative/B | ||||||
11/08/2023 | Zenith Bank PLC | Nigeria | B-/Stable/B | B-/Negative/B | ||||||
26/07/2023 | Ardshinbank CJSC | Armenia | B+/Positive/B | B+/Stable/B | ||||||
25/07/2023 | African Bank | South Africa | B/Positive/B | B/Stable/B | ||||||
21/07/2023 | Kapitalbank | Uzbekistan | B/Stable/B | B-/Positive/B | ||||||
21/07/2023 | Jyske Bank | Denmark | A+/Stable/A-1 | A/Stable/A-1 | ||||||
20/07/2023 | Mizrahi Tefahot Bank | Israel | A-/Stable/A-2 | A-/Positive/A-2 | ||||||
20/07/2023 | CACEIS Investor Services Bank | Luxembourg | A+/Stable/A-1 | A+/Watch Neg/A-1 | ||||||
19/07/2023 | VP Bank | Liechtenstein | A-/Stable/A-2 | A/Negative/A-1 | ||||||
18/07/2023 | My Money Bank | France | BBB-/Negative/A-3 | BBB-/Watch Neg/A-3 | ||||||
18/07/2023 | Bank CenterCredit JSC | Kazakhstan | BB-/Stable/B | B+/Stable/B | ||||||
17/07/2023 | Fincraft Group LLP | Kazakhstan | B/Stable/B | B+/Negative/B | ||||||
17/07/2023 | Xalq Bank | Uzbekistan | B/Watch Neg/B | B+/Stable/B | ||||||
12/07/2023 | Saudi Investment Bank | Saudi Arabia | BBB/Positive/A-2 | BBB/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
07/07/2023 | Dexia Credit Local | France | BBB/Watch Neg/A-2 | BBB/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
07/07/2023 | Dexia Crediop SpA | France | BBB/Watch Neg/A-2 | BBB/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
03/07/2023 | Landshypotek Bank AB | Sweden | A/Negative/A-1 | A/Stable/A-1 | ||||||
29/06/2023 | S-Bank PLC | Finland | BBB/Positive/A-2 | BBB/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
29/06/2023 | Bank of Aland | Finland | BBB+/Negative/A-2 | BBB+/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
28/06/2023 | Socram Banque | France | BBB/Stable/A-2 | BBB/Negative/A-2 | ||||||
27/06/2023 | Alior Bank S.A. | Poland | BB+/Stable/B | BB/Stable/B | ||||||
27/06/2023 | mBank S.A. | Poland | BBB/Stable/A-2 | BBB/Developing/A-2 | ||||||
21/06/2023 | Cajamar Caja Rural S.C.C. | Spain | BB+/Stable/B | BB/Positive/B | ||||||
21/06/2023 | Banco de Credito Social Cooperativo S.A. | Spain | BB+/Stable/B | BB/Positive/B | ||||||
15/06/2023 | Permanent TSB PLC | Ireland | BBB+/Stable/A-2 | BBB/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
15/06/2023 | Permanent TSB Group Holdings PLC | Ireland | BB+/Stable/B | BB-/Stable/B | ||||||
15/06/2023 | Bank of Ireland | Ireland | A/Stable/A-1 | A-/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
15/06/2023 | Bank of Ireland Group PLC | Ireland | BBB/Stable/A-2 | BBB-/Stable/A-3 | ||||||
15/06/2023 | Allied Irish Banks PLC | Ireland | A/Stable/A-1 | A-/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
15/06/2023 | AIB Group PLC | Ireland | BBB/Stable/A-2 | BBB-/Stable/A-3 | ||||||
12/06/2023 | Credit Suisse Group AG | Switzerland | NR | A-/Negative/-- | ||||||
12/06/2023 | Credit Suisse Group AG | Switzerland | A-/Negative/-- | BBB-/Watch Pos/-- | ||||||
12/06/2023 | Credit Suisse (Schweiz) AG | Switzerland | A/Developing/A-1 | A-/Watch Pos/A-2 | ||||||
09/06/2023 | National Bank of Fujairah | United Arab Emirates | BBB+/Stable/A-2 | BBB/Stable/A-2 | ||||||
02/06/2023 | Aegon Bank | Netherlands | A-/Stable/A-2 | A/Watch Neg/A-1 | ||||||
NR--Not rated. |
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Natalia Yalovskaya, London + 44 20 7176 3407; natalia.yalovskaya@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Elena Iparraguirre, Madrid + 34 91 389 6963; elena.iparraguirre@spglobal.com |
Mohamed Damak, Dubai + 97143727153; mohamed.damak@spglobal.com | |
Nicolas Charnay, Frankfurt +49 69 3399 9218; nicolas.charnay@spglobal.com | |
Additional Contact: | Financial Institutions EMEA; Financial_Institutions_EMEA_Mailbox@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.