articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/231024-research-update-israel-outlook-revised-to-negative-on-geopolitical-risks-aa-ratings-affirmed-12892616 content esgSubNav
In This List
RESUPD

Research Update: Israel Outlook Revised To Negative On Geopolitical Risks; 'AA-' Ratings Affirmed

COMMENTS

U.S. Municipal Water And Sewer Utilities Navigate A New Environment As Performance Drops

NEWS

Bulletin: Valencia's Credit Quality Unlikely To Suffer After Floods, Thanks To Central Government Funding

COMMENTS

Ticketing Companies Win Big From Funflation In Live Entertainment

COMMENTS

SF Credit Brief: U.S. CMBS Delinquency Rate Rose 10 Bps To 5.3% In October 2024; Office Rate Surged Past 9.0%


Research Update: Israel Outlook Revised To Negative On Geopolitical Risks; 'AA-' Ratings Affirmed

Overview

  • Our baseline scenario assumes that the Israel-Hamas war will remain centered in Gaza, but there are risks that it could spread more widely with a more pronounced impact on the economy and security situation in Israel.
  • We now forecast the Israeli economy will contract by 5% in the fourth quarter of 2023 compared with the third, before rebounding in early 2024. The contraction will stem from security-related disruptions and reduced business activity; the drafting of a large number of reservists; the foreign tourism sector shutdown; and a broader confidence shock.
  • Meanwhile, we expect that additional budgetary measures to support households and businesses, as well as an increase in defense spending, will increase the average general government deficit to 5.3% of GDP in 2023-2024, compared with 2.3% of GDP in our previous forecast.
  • We therefore revised the outlook on Israel to negative from stable and affirmed the 'AA-/A-1+' ratings.

Rating Action

On Oct. 24, 2023, S&P Global Ratings revised the outlook on its 'AA-' long-term foreign and local currency ratings on Israel to negative from stable. At the same time, we affirmed the 'AA-/A-1+' long- and short-term foreign and local currency sovereign credit ratings.

As sovereign ratings (as defined in EU CRA Regulation 1060/2009 "EU CRA Regulation"), the ratings on Israel are subject to certain publication restrictions set out in article 8a of the EU CRA Regulation, including publication in accordance with a pre-established calendar (see "Calendar Of 2023 EMEA Sovereign, Regional, And Local Government Rating Publication Dates: Midyear Update," published July 6, 2023, on RatingsDirect). Under the EU CRA Regulation, deviations from the announced calendar are allowed only in limited circumstances and must be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the reasons for the deviation. In this case, the reason for the deviation is the significant increase of geopolitical and security risks around Israel, which materially affects our projections for Israel's economic and fiscal performance. The next scheduled ratings review for Israel is on Nov. 10, 2023.

Outlook

The negative outlook reflects the risk that the Israel-Hamas war could spread more widely or affect Israel's credit metrics more negatively than we expect. We currently assume the conflict will remain centered in Gaza and last no more than three to six months.

Downside scenario

We could lower the ratings on Israel if the conflict widens materially, increasing the security and geopolitical risks that Israel faces. We could also lower the ratings in the next 12-24 months if the impact of the conflict on Israel's economic growth, fiscal position, and balance of payments proves more significant than we currently project.

Upside scenario

We could revise the outlook to stable if the conflict is resolved, resulting in a reduction in regional and domestic security risks without a material longer-term toll on Israel's economy and public finances.

Rationale

The outlook revision primarily reflects the material escalation in geopolitical and security risks that Israel faces following the attack by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023, when militants crossed the border from the Gaza Strip, taking hostages and killing both military and civilian citizens. Since then, rockets have continued to be fired from Gaza into Israel. Israel has responded with aerial and artillery strikes on Gaza, where casualties have also been reported, and appears to be preparing a ground offensive in Gaza.

Although it is difficult to predict the direction of events, our base case assumes the conflict will remain centered in Gaza. We do not expect the conflict to spread more widely. Several countries in the region are trying to mediate, while U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and President Joe Biden have also held a series of meetings with Israeli and key regional Arab country officials in recent days. The U.S. has also deployed some of its military forces closer to Israel with the likely goal of deterring other regional governments from entering the conflict.

Over previous decades Israel has experienced several military escalations around Gaza, but we consider the current developments to be of a greater magnitude, and the risks of the conflict widening in the region remain. Iran and Hezbollah (a Lebanese Islamist group with close ties to Iran) have openly stated that, depending on developments in Gaza, they might intervene more extensively in the conflict. In recent days, there has also been an exchange of fire in the north of the country between the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and Hezbollah as well as Syria.

In our view, an additional risk could come from the potential for rising tensions between the Jewish majority and Arab-Israeli minority within Israel, as happened during a previous war with Hamas in May 2021, but this risk appears to be contained at the moment.

Even though we assume the conflict will not spread beyond Gaza, we expect it will still hurt Israel's economic performance. The main avenues of transmission are the following:

  • Negative direct economic effect from continuing rocket attacks and resulting logistical disruptions and reduction of business activity;
  • Reduced labor force and additional costs for the government after over 300,000 IDF reserves (representing 3% of Israel's population) called to active service;
  • Extended suspension of gas production at the Tamar gas field due to its proximity to Gaza;
  • Adverse impact on the Israeli tourism sector from the security situation and flight suspensions; and
  • Indirect effects via expected reduced domestic investment and inward foreign direct investment flows.

While it is difficult to gauge the scale of the downturn, we forecast Israel's quarterly GDP will drop by 5% in fourth-quarter 2023 compared with third-quarter 2023, with all expenditure components shrinking, including domestic demand, exports, and imports. This fourth-quarter GDP fall would be slightly over half of the drop experienced in the second quarter of 2020, at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. In both cases, mobility became restricted, businesses shut down, and the tourism sector was disrupted. This expected drop would also be higher than the output reductions following previous military escalations (including the 2014 Gaza war, the 2012 operation in Gaza, the 2008-2009 Gaza war, and the 2006 Lebanon war).

In our view, the structure of the Israeli economy, which is mostly focused on high tech services exports, with a high percentage of employees able to work from home, should somewhat cushion the impact. Additionally, we expect that international support could mitigate some of the negative macroeconomic effects on Israel.

We anticipate the economy will return to growth in the first quarter of 2024 and recover its pre-war output levels by the end of next year. Our current headline growth forecasts are 1.5% in 2023 and 0.5% in 2024, followed by an acceleration to 5% in 2025 as confidence returns and reconstruction and the investment cycle kick in more fully.

We expect Israel's budget deficits will widen in 2023-2024 on account of likely additional government support provisions to households and businesses, as well as extra spending on defense. We forecast an average deficit of 5.3% of GDP in 2023-2024, compared with 2.3% of GDP in our previous forecast.

Israel has several buffers, in our view, which should help mitigate the economic and fiscal impact. In particular, the level of government debt is moderate, at an estimated 60% of GDP. The debt is mostly denominated in local currency and largely held domestically, meaning it is less prone to more volatile nonresident portfolio rebalancing.

The Bank of Israel's international reserves also remain strong at US$199 billion (38% of 2022 GDP) as of end-September 2023, and they cover the gross external debt of the whole economy by 1.4x. We expect Israel will continue to run recurrent current account surpluses averaging 4% of GDP in 2023-2026. The central bank has announced a US$30 billion intervention strategy to smooth excessive exchange rate volatility, as well as additional credit loosening measures for certain commercial bank customers affected by the war.

Key Statistics

Table 1

Israel--Selected indicators
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023f 2024f 2025f 2026f
Economic indicators (%)
Nominal GDP (bil. LC) 1,285.9 1,347.0 1,424.6 1,417.3 1,581.9 1,763.8 1,852.9 1,908.7 2,044.3 2,164.4
Nominal GDP (bil. $) 357.2 375.2 399.7 411.7 489.7 525.0 487.6 465.5 524.2 577.2
GDP per capita (000s $) 41.0 42.2 44.2 44.7 52.3 55.0 50.1 46.9 51.7 55.8
Real GDP growth 4.3 4.1 3.8 (1.5) 9.3 6.5 1.5 0.5 5.0 3.8
Real GDP per capita growth 2.3 2.1 1.8 (3.2) 7.5 4.5 (0.5) (1.5) 2.9 1.8
Real investment growth 3.4 7.6 3.9 (3.1) 13.6 10.4 0.5 (1.5) 6.0 4.0
Investment/GDP 23.0 23.9 23.7 24.2 25.3 26.9 26.3 26.0 26.4 26.4
Savings/GDP 26.5 26.9 27.1 29.0 29.2 30.9 31.0 30.0 30.0 29.9
Exports/GDP 29.3 30.0 29.3 27.6 29.3 31.7 32.0 31.8 31.8 31.8
Real exports growth 4.9 5.6 2.9 (2.4) 14.9 8.6 (2.0) 1.0 4.8 4.0
Unemployment rate 4.2 4.0 3.8 4.4 5.0 3.8 3.8 4.5 4.0 3.5
External indicators (%)
Current account balance/GDP 3.6 3.0 3.4 4.9 4.0 3.9 4.7 3.9 3.6 3.6
Current account balance/CARs 9.9 8.0 9.5 14.6 11.0 10.2 12.3 10.0 9.1 9.2
CARs/GDP 36.2 37.2 36.0 33.4 36.0 38.3 38.4 39.3 39.0 38.6
Trade balance/GDP (2.9) (4.5) (3.8) (2.8) (4.4) (5.0) (4.2) (4.9) (5.4) (5.5)
Net FDI/GDP 2.6 4.1 2.2 4.0 1.8 2.4 0.0 (1.5) 1.0 2.5
Net portfolio equity inflow/GDP 0.0 (4.1) (1.5) (5.2) (0.7) 1.3 (2.0) (2.0) (2.0) (2.0)
Gross external financing needs/CARs plus usable reserves 68.0 66.1 65.0 60.2 58.5 57.3 56.8 58.9 60.6 60.5
Narrow net external debt/CARs (53.9) (46.6) (51.5) (68.7) (66.9) (54.6) (54.0) (56.1) (52.8) (51.1)
Narrow net external debt/CAPs (59.8) (50.7) (56.9) (80.4) (75.2) (60.8) (61.6) (62.4) (58.1) (56.3)
Net external liabilities/CARs (112.5) (98.4) (110.2) (135.2) (89.8) (80.2) (98.3) (112.1) (111.4) (110.9)
Net external liabilities/CAPs (124.9) (107.0) (121.8) (158.3) (100.9) (89.4) (112.2) (124.6) (122.6) (122.2)
Short-term external debt by remaining maturity/CARs 29.6 27.7 26.5 29.9 27.0 28.2 28.1 30.1 27.5 24.5
Usable reserves/CAPs (months) 10.1 10.6 10.6 12.9 13.3 14.2 14.2 13.9 12.6 12.0
Usable reserves (mil. $) 113,011 115,279 126,014 173,297 212,992 194,218 190,317 194,972 201,787 209,290
Fiscal indicators (general government; %)
Balance/GDP (2.3) (4.4) (4.6) (11.5) (5.5) (1.6) (5.0) (5.5) (3.0) (2.0)
Change in net debt/GDP 0.5 3.0 3.0 9.3 2.6 0.6 6.3 5.1 2.5 1.8
Primary balance/GDP 0.6 (1.6) (1.9) (8.8) (3.0) 0.8 (2.3) (2.6) (0.2) 0.8
Revenue/GDP 37.5 35.9 35.0 34.4 36.8 37.6 33.6 34.6 34.9 34.9
Expenditures/GDP 39.8 40.3 39.6 45.9 42.3 39.1 38.6 40.1 37.9 36.9
Interest/revenues 7.7 7.7 7.6 7.8 7.0 6.3 8.0 8.5 8.1 8.0
Debt/GDP 59.8 60.1 59.2 70.9 67.8 60.5 64.2 67.4 65.5 63.6
Debt/revenues 159.6 167.6 169.1 206.3 184.3 161.0 191.1 194.9 187.7 182.1
Net debt/GDP 57.6 58.0 57.9 67.4 63.0 57.1 60.7 64.0 62.3 60.6
Liquid assets/GDP 2.2 2.1 1.4 3.5 4.8 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.0
Monetary indicators (%)
CPI growth 0.2 0.8 0.8 (0.6) 1.5 4.4 4.0 2.8 2.0 2.0
GDP deflator growth 0.0 0.7 1.9 1.0 2.1 4.7 3.5 2.5 2.0 2.0
Exchange rate, year-end (LC/$) 3.47 3.75 3.46 3.22 3.11 3.52 4.20 4.00 3.80 3.70
Banks' claims on resident non-gov't sector growth 4.0 6.2 4.9 4.8 14.2 13.4 5.0 2.0 7.0 5.0
Banks' claims on resident non-gov't sector/GDP 69.4 70.3 69.8 73.5 75.2 76.5 76.5 75.7 75.6 75.0
Foreign currency share of claims by banks on residents 4.3 4.4 3.7 4.1 3.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Foreign currency share of residents' bank deposits 18.6 19.7 19.1 18.3 19.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Real effective exchange rate growth 6.9 (1.9) 1.1 (4.1) 6.3 4.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sources: The Bank of Israel, Israel Central Bureau of Statistics, International Monetary Fund (Economic Indicators); Israel Central Bureau of Statistics, The Bank of Israel (External Indicators); The Bank of Israel, Ministry of Finance of the Government of Israel (Fiscal Indicators); and The Bank of Israel, International Monetary Fund (Monetary Indicators).
Adjustments: None
Definitions: Savings is defined as investment plus the current account surplus (deficit). Investment is defined as expenditure on capital goods, including plant, equipment, and housing, plus the change in inventories. Banks are other depository corporations other than the central bank, whose liabilities are included in the national definition of broad money. Gross external financing needs are defined as current account payments plus short-term external debt at the end of the prior year plus nonresident deposits at the end of the prior year plus long-term external debt maturing within the year. Narrow net external debt is defined as the stock of foreign and local currency public- and private- sector borrowings from nonresidents minus official reserves minus public-sector liquid claims on nonresidents minus financial-sector loans to, deposits with, or investments in nonresident entities. A negative number indicates net external lending. f--Forecast. N/A--Not applicable. LC--Local currency. CARs--Current account receipts. FDI--Foreign direct investment. CAPs--Current account payments. The data and ratios above result from S&P Global Ratings' own calculations, drawing on national as well as international sources, reflecting S&P Global Ratings' independent view on the timeliness, coverage, accuracy, credibility, and usability of available information.

Ratings Score Snapshot

Table 2

Israel--Ratings score snapshot
Key rating factors Score Explanation
Institutional assessment 4 Generally effective policymaking that promotes sustainable public finance and balanced economic growth. Given that relations between Israeli-Jews, Israeli-Arabs, and Palestinians are strained at times, we consider that Israel's civil society is subject to ethnic tensions. Nevertheless, we see a low probability of social upheaval.
Economic assessment 1 Based on GDP per capita ($) as per the Selected Indicators table above.
External assessment 1 Based on narrow net external debt (% of current account payments) and gross external financing needs (% of current account receipts plus usable reserves) as per the Selected Indicators table above.
Fiscal assessment: flexibility and performance 3 Based on the change in net general government debt (% of GDP) as per the Selected Indicators table above.
Fiscal assessment: debt burden 4 Based on net general government debt (% of GDP) and general government interest expenditure (% of general government revenues) as per the Selected Indicators table above.
Monetary assessment 2 Managed-float exchange-rate regime. The central bank has a track record of operational independence. It uses market-based monetary instruments and has the ability to act as a lender of last resort. Consumer price index as per the Selected Indicators table above; the local currency financial and capital markets are deep.
Indicative rating aa As per Table 1 of "Sovereign Rating Methodology."
Notches of supplemental adjustments and flexibility -1 Event risk related to potential cases of rapidly rising external political crises, such as a large-scale ground war with Iran and armed confrontation with Hamas.
Final rating
Foreign currency AA-
Notches of uplift 0 Default risks do not apply differently to foreign-and local-currency debt.
Local currency AA-
S&P Global Ratings' analysis of sovereign creditworthiness rests on its assessment and scoring of five key rating factors: (i) institutional assessment; (ii) economic assessment; (iii) external assessment; (iv) the average of fiscal flexibility and performance, and debt burden; and (v) monetary assessment. Each of the factors is assessed on a continuum spanning from 1 (strongest) to 6 (weakest). S&P Global Ratings' "Sovereign Rating Methodology," published on Dec. 18, 2017, details how we derive and combine the scores and then derive the sovereign foreign currency rating. In accordance with S&P Global Ratings' sovereign ratings methodology, a change in score does not in all cases lead to a change in the rating, nor is a change in the rating necessarily predicated on changes in one or more of the scores. In determining the final rating the committee can make use of the flexibility afforded by §15 and §§126-128 of the rating methodology.

Related Criteria

Related Research

In accordance with our relevant policies and procedures, the Rating Committee was composed of analysts that are qualified to vote in the committee, with sufficient experience to convey the appropriate level of knowledge and understanding of the methodology applicable (see 'Related Criteria And Research'). At the onset of the committee, the chair confirmed that the information provided to the Rating Committee by the primary analyst had been distributed in a timely manner and was sufficient for Committee members to make an informed decision.

After the primary analyst gave opening remarks and explained the recommendation, the Committee discussed key rating factors and critical issues in accordance with the relevant criteria. Qualitative and quantitative risk factors were considered and discussed, looking at track-record and forecasts.

The committee's assessment of the key rating factors is reflected in the Ratings Score Snapshot above.

The chair ensured every voting member was given the opportunity to articulate his/her opinion. The chair or designee reviewed the draft report to ensure consistency with the Committee decision. The views and the decision of the rating committee are summarized in the above rationale and outlook. The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this rating action (see 'Related Criteria And Research').

Ratings List

Ratings Affirmed

Israel

Transfer & Convertibility Assessment
Local Currency AA+

Israel

Senior Unsecured AA-
Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Action
To From

Israel

Sovereign Credit Rating AA-/Negative/A-1+ AA-/Stable/A-1+

Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.spglobal.com/ratings for further information. A description of each of S&P Global Ratings' rating categories is contained in "S&P Global Ratings Definitions" at https://disclosure.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/sourceId/504352. Complete ratings information is available to RatingsDirect subscribers at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.spglobal.com/ratings. Alternatively, call S&P Global Ratings' Global Client Support line (44) 20-7176-7176.

Primary Credit Analyst:Maxim Rybnikov, London + 44 7824 478 225;
maxim.rybnikov@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Karen Vartapetov, PhD, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9225;
karen.vartapetov@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in