Key Takeaways
- To maintain their global lead, Asian EV battery makers will invest in onshore facilities in the U.S. and Europe over the next few years.
- In China, higher export sales will help offset domestic oversupply pressures, but a shakeout of weaker players is likely.
- Even as industry dynamics change, market leaders such as China's CATL and Korea's LG Ensol are benefitting from "first mover" advantages. We expect profit expansions to keep their leverage stable as they continue to build capacity.
Asian companies have invested heavily to gain global dominance in electric vehicle (EV) supply chains. To keep their lead, many EV battery suppliers are increasingly investing abroad. Leading players with strong global partnerships will stay on top amid this industry shift. Some weaker ones in China may not survive.
China's battery industry is the most vulnerable to consolidation over the next few years, due to overcapacity. By our estimates, utilization at battery factories in China languished at under 50% over the first eight months of 2023. Exports are helping to offset some of the pain, with China's share of the global battery market on the rise.
We believe battery makers with stronger export channels and global alliances will outperform in the coming years. Chinese suppliers will focus on increasing their market share in Europe. Korean and Japanese competitors see stronger opportunities in North America, where they face less Chinese competition due to U.S.-China trade tensions.
More Signs Of Oversupply For China EV Battery Markets
China's outsized battery-making industry could see a meaningful consolidation over the next three to five years. Suppliers with less-competitive products could struggle to stay afloat if demand does not improve.
Inventory is building for battery suppliers and automakers. One stark sign of this: the battery installation-to-production ratio dropped to 48% in the first eight months of the year, compared with 76% in 2020 (see chart 1). Some producers are particularly hard hit (see chart 2). We attribute this to weaker technology offerings and intensifying competition as market growth slows. Leading players in China are gaining share (see chart 3).
Chart 1
Chart 2
Chart 3
China's crowded market has weakened pricing power in the industry. This has even weighed on margins of those seeing good volume growth (see chart 4a and 4b)
Chart 4a
Chart 4b
The Boost From Rising Exports Is Not Equal
Demand needs in overseas markets will help Chinese battery players that have penetrated into global auto supply chains. Given battery-supply chains are less developed outside of Asia, many global automakers need to import batteries as they accelerate electrification.
Chart 5
Chart 6
While it will take another few years before their planned local supply facilities become functional, we see scope for China's EV batteries to gain further momentum over the next two to three years. Especially promising is Europe, where the Chinese players have been gaining share from Korean competitors through increasing battery exports from China (see chart 8).
In our view, political risk is relatively lower for Chinese players to penetrate into the market in Europe versus the U.S. The European Commission's recent investigation into government subsidies on EVs from China should not have direct impact on battery players' expansion. At the end of the day, European automakers are in need of battery supply and local companies don't yet have sufficient capacity to support the local EV market growth .
Chart 7
Chart 8
At the same time (see table 1), some major Chinese players are also establishing production facilities in Europe. This, in our view, will enhance their market access in the region. It's also a strategic response to more clarity on potential regulatory changes in Europe with regard to self-sufficiency of strategic raw materials.
Table 1
Chinese battery makers will ramp up production facilities in Europe | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. (CATL): Partnering with Mercedes Benz, Volkswagen, Tesla, BMW, Stellantis, etc. Honda is also a strategic investor and holds ~0.9% of CATL. | ||||||||
Planned production locations | Date announced | Capacity | Likely commissioning date | |||||
Germany | Apr. 2022 | 14 GWh | Operating since 2022 | |||||
Indonesia | Apr. 2022 | Battery integration project (from nickel mining to battery recycling) | Apr. 2025 | |||||
Hungary | Aug. 2022 | 100 GWh | Aug. 2025 | |||||
China Aviation Lithium Battery (CALB): Partnering with Forsee Power and BMZ Group, battery solution providers in Europe. | ||||||||
Planned production locations | Date announced | Capacity | Likely commissioning date | |||||
Portugal | Nov. 2022 | 15 GWh | 2025 | |||||
Germany | Dec 2021 | 20 GWh | NA | |||||
Gotion High-tech Co. Ltd. (Gotion): Volkswagen AG holds a 24.77% stake. | ||||||||
Planned production locations | Date announced | Capacity | Likely commissioning date | |||||
Germany | Jun 2022 | 20 GWh |
Oct. 2023 |
|||||
U.S. | Oct. 2022 | 150k tons of cathode, 50k tons of anode | 2030 | |||||
U.S. | Sept. 2023 | 10 GWh of battery packs and 40 GWh of battery cells | 2024 | |||||
Vietnam | Nov. 2022 | 5 GWh | Dec. 2023 | |||||
Thailand | Dec. 2022 | Battery pack production line | Dec. 2023 | |||||
Eve Energy Co. Ltd.: Suppliers of Mercedes Benz, Kia, and BMW. | ||||||||
Planned production locations | Date announced | Capacity | Likely commissioning date | |||||
Hungary | March 2022 | 20 GWh | 2026 | |||||
Svolt Energy Technology Co. Ltd.: Will start to supply batteries to Stellantis from 2025. | ||||||||
Planned production locations | Date announced | Capacity | Likely commissioning date | |||||
Germany | Nov. 2020 | 30 GWh | March 2025 | |||||
Germany | Sept. 2022 | 16 GWh | Dec. 2027 | |||||
Note: The list is not exhaustive. GWh--Gigawatt hours. Sources: Bloomberg NEF, Company announcements and S&P Global Ratings. |
The proposed Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA), introduced by the European Commission on March 16, 2023, aims to foster the development of local supply chains for 34 critical raw materials, such as cobalt, manganese, and lithium (battery grade) by 2030. The European Union also introduced battery-related environmental regulation, including a recycling requirement, in July 2023.
Table 2
Proposed CRMA should help to boost Europe's local battery supply chain by 2030 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
CRMA targets to increase the contribution of European raw materials through the four objectives below: | ||||
EU Extraction | At least 10% from EU annually | |||
EU Processing | At least 40% from EU annually | |||
EU Recycling | At least 15% from EU annually | |||
External Sources | A single third country cannot provide more than 65% of the EU's annual use of each strategic raw material at any relevant stage of processing | |||
CRMA--Critical Raw Materials Act. Sources: European Commission and S&P Global Ratings. |
Table 3
New EU battery regulation* lays out waste, recycling rules | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Date for compliance | Requirement for battery producers | |||
Aug-25 | Declaration of carbon footprint from raw materials to production of batteries | |||
Dec-25 | Recycling of 75%/65%/80%/50% by average weight of lead-acid batteries/lithium-based batteries/nickel-cadmium batteries/waste batteries respectively | |||
Dec-27 | Recovering at least 90% for cobalt, copper, lead, nickel, and 50% for lithium | |||
Aug-26 | Digital battery passport on information disclosure of EV batteries (e.g. supply chain due diligence, battery contents, etc) | |||
Dec-30 | Recycling of 80%/70% by average weight of lead-acid batteries/lithium-based batteries | |||
Dec-31 | Recovering at least 95% for cobalt, copper, lead, nickel, and 80% for lithium | |||
*Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste, in effect since July 2023. EV-Electric vehicles. Source: European Commission, S&P Global Ratings |
While these ground rules could be further refined, they provide enough certainty to attract further expansion by some China-based competitors. We anticipate stronger players will hasten plans to localize their battery supply chains and enhance their recycling capabilities. That said, some Chinese battery makers may find it difficult to meet the necessary requirements (see tables 2 and 3) to penetrate into the region. Higher research and development costs for material recycling, as required by Europe, could also weigh on their profitability over the next few years.
Korean Players Look Set To Dominate North America's Battery Market
We anticipate Korean players, which used to dominate in the European market, will prioritize the U.S over the next two to three years. A key lure is tax incentive under the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022. This legislation seeks to establish an onshore EV value chain.
By localizing their production of clean-energy components within the U.S., Korean players are eligible for the Advanced Manufacturing Product Credit (AMPC) under the IRA (see table 4). Korean suppliers set to overtake Panasonic Holdings Corp. as the leading player in North America (see chart 9). Although Panasonic is also expanding its capacity in the region, its pace is relatively more conservative than that of the Korean competitors.
Table 4
Tax credits for new battery production in the U.S. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022's Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit | ||||
Asset | Tax credit | |||
Critical minerals* | 10% of the costs to produce the mineral | |||
Manufactured components: | ||||
Electrode active materials | 10% of the costs to produce the materials | |||
Battery cell | US$35 x capacity in kWh | |||
Battery module (without battery cells) | US$10 x capacity in kWh | |||
Battery module (with battery cells) | US$45 x capacity in kWh | |||
There is a credit amount phase-out period since 2030 to 2032 for manufactured components. *Includes battery minerals such as cobalt, graphite, lithium, manganese and nickel etc. kWh--Kilowatt hours. Sources: Department of Energy, S&P Global Ratings. |
Chart 9
Meanwhile, the majority of Chinese players will likely refrain from meaningful direct investments due to intensifying geopolitical tension between China and the U.S. Indeed, under current terms of the IRA, an electric car would be ineligible for tax credits if its battery components are manufactured by Chinese producers from 2024. Without the same entitlements, Chinese players would lose cost competitiveness.
Some "First Movers" Are Still Reaping Rewards
Some first movers like China's Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. (CATL) and Korea's LG Energy Solution Ltd. (LG Ensol) have been strategically expanding capacity in the global battery industry since prior years. This first-mover advantage should support them to firmly stay in top-three of global battery supply despite rising competition on more global entrants (see chart 10). By our estimates, their revenue will grow by double-digit percentages annually through to 2025.
Chart 10
Table 5
Solid customer mix is supporting revenue growth for CATL and LG Ensol | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local-currency revenue growth (yoy % change) | ||||||||||||||
Battery suppliers | Major auto customers | 2021 | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e | ||||||||
CATL | Tesla, Volkswagen, Geely Group, SAIC, Stellantis, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, LI Auto, Nio, Changan, Toyota | 159 | 152 | 50 | 28 | 19 | ||||||||
LG Ensol | Tesla, Volkswagen, General Motor, Geely Group, Ford, Hyundai, Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi, Stellantis | 1,122 | 43 | 22 | 22 | 38 | ||||||||
See table 1 for full name of CATL. e--Estimate. yoy--Year on year. Source: Company disclosures, S&P Global Ratings. |
CATL and LG Ensol's profitability is set to improve in 2023 and 2024
Some battery makers will also benefit from moderating input costs such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel--down 20%-60% in the first eight months of 2023. Raw-materials contribute at least 70%-80% of the total cost of EV batteries. This trend, together with improving economies of scale, should mitigate against pricing pressure for CATL; its EBITDA margin should improve a bit in 2023-2024 despite intensifying battery competition in China.
LG Ensol's margins will keep getting stronger over the next few years. In the U.S., the company should receive production credits of US$1.5 billion-US$2.0 billion over 2023 and 2024. Coupled with increasing electrification boosting battery demand in the U.S. and Europe, the company's EBITDA margin will likely rise to 17%-22% over this year and the next, from 12% in 2022.
Chart 11
Chart 12
First-Mover Risks Will Pay Off…Only For The Winners
Asia's top battery players have taken a lot of risks to be global leaders in the EV supply chain. They've built up capacity for a market that has not yet fully arrived. To keep their lead, they now need to shift more investments abroad, even with oversupply in some home markets.
In our view, the benefits outweigh the risks for leading players. For most rated players (see next section for individual-company outlooks), profits and cashflows will be strong enough to finance higher investment costs. Other players will offset higher spending abroad with more cautious capital expenditure (capex) in domestic locations. Most of the rated EV battery makers are stronger players, who can hold their own as this industry evolves to the next stage.
Rated Asian Battery Markets: Capsule Analyses
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. (CATL; BBB+/Positive/--): Can maintain net cash as it accelerates international growth. CATL will grow its international business by leveraging on its abundant production capacity in China and strategic relationships with international automakers. CATL's ability to meet new battery-related regulations in Europe, such as on recycling raw materials, will give it an edge in that large market. CATL is the leading battery recycling player in China and will continue to expand its supply chain through cooperating with local players in Europe.
The company's EV battery installations outside of China increased 107% year on year in the first half of 2023 and more capacity is coming (see table 1). Its market share in non-China markets also reached 27.2% during this period, up from 20.5% in 2022, according to consultancy SNE Research.
CATL will likely remain in a net cash position over 2023-2024, and likely longer. Profit expansion and cautious domestic capex should support higher free cash flows.
LG Energy Solution Ltd. (LG Ensol; BBB+/Stable/--): Earnings growth to mitigate rising capex. Korea's LG Ensol is strategically partnering with automakers to localize battery production in the U.S. and receive tax credits in the process. A number of joint ventures have been and will be established and billions of dollars will be spent on battery capacity expansion in the U.S. over the next few years.
Table 6
LG Ensol plans large capacity expansion in the U.S. | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Partner and other details for LG Ensol's U.S. projects | ||||||||||
Stand-alone/ JV partner | Location | Operation commencement | Capacity (GWh) | Total investment (bil. US$) | ||||||
General Motor | Ohio/Tennessee/ Michigan, U.S. | 2022-2024 | 140 | 7.3 | ||||||
Stellantis | Ontario, Canada | 2025 | 45 | 4.1 | ||||||
Honda | Ohio, U.S. | Late 2025 (or 2026) | 40 | 4.4 | ||||||
Stand-alone | Michigan/Arizona, U.S. | 2025-2026 | 69 | 7 | ||||||
Hyundai Motor Group | Georgia, U.S. | 2026 | 30 | 4.4 | ||||||
LG Ensol--LG Energy Solutions. GWh--Gigawatt hours. Sources: Company disclosures, media, S&P Global Ratings. |
We estimate LG Ensol's capex burden will expand significantly over 2023-2025, and this will lead to negative discretionary cash flows over the next two to three years. As a result, its adjusted debt could rise to Korean won (KRW) 19.4 trillion (US$14.6 billion) by 2025 from KRW2.8 trillion (US$2.1 billion) in 2022.
We believe, however, the company's debt-to-EBITDA ratio will likely remain below 2.0x through its high investment cycle, ranging between 1.5x and 2.0x in 2023-2025 from 0.9x in 2022. Its capex should peak in 2024 as majority of the investments will be made over 2023-2024.
In addition, the company's strong EBITDA growth, driven by economies of scale, higher bargaining power, and production credits in the U.S., should help LG Ensol keep its leverage steady over the next two to three years.
Chart 13
Chart 14
SK Innovation Co. Ltd. (SKI; BBB-/Negative/--): Aggressive expansion tightens rating headroom. We expect SKI, the largest oil refining company in Korea, will continue to invest aggressively in expanding EV battery capacity as its new growth business. Through its subsidiary SK On Co. Ltd., SKI is the fifth largest battery manufacturer globally, based on market share in the first seven months of 2023.
SK On operates its own EV battery plants in the U.S. state of Georgia (22 gigawatt hour [GWh]) in 2022), and targets to add more capacity via its joint venture with Ford (129GWh in total) and with Hyundai Motor Group (35GWh).
Table 7
SK On is boosting capacity in the U.S. | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SK On's partners and other details for U.S. projects | ||||||||||
Stand-alone/JV partner | Location in U.S. | Operation commencement | Capacity (GWh) | Total investment (bil. US$) | ||||||
Stand-alone | Georgia | 1Q 2022 (Phase 1) - 4Q 2022 (Phase 2) | 22 | 2.6 | ||||||
Ford | Tennessee/Kentucky | 2025 (72GWh) - 2026 (59GWh) | 129 | 11.4 | ||||||
Hyundai Motor Group | Georgia | 2H 2025 | 35 | 5 | ||||||
N.A.--Information not available. GWh--Gigawatt hour. JV--Joint venture. Source: Company disclosures, media, S&P Global Ratings |
With significant investments in EV battery capacity, and its battery business still in the loss-making state, SKI's leverage will likely remain elevated over 2023-2024. As such, the ratings headroom is thinner than some other EV battery makers.
We expect SKI to gradually reduce leverage, through improving profitability of the EV battery segment and U.S. tax-credit benefits over 2024-2025. At the same time, downside risks could arise from incremental investments beyond our expectations and potential execution and competition risks. Of note, the company is working on various nondebt financing efforts, including its recent equity issuance of KRW1.1 trillion in September 2023.
Panasonic Holdings Corp. (A-/Stable/A-2): Leverage to keep steady on cautious expansion. Out of its five business segments, Panasonic now places a higher focus on its EV battery business in U.S. This is given a high growth potential amid the electrification of the auto industry. Panasonic is leading appliance and electronics manufacturers in Japan and the number-three global EV battery supplier (in the first eight months of 2023).
The company's capex will rise on its battery capacity build-up over the next few years. Due to the U.S. tax incentives for onshore facilities, Panasonic is now building its second battery plant in Kansas after its first in Nevada for assembling 2170 batteries for Tesla in the U.S. We estimate Panasonic's capex will advance to US$4.8 billion annually in 2023 and 2024 from US$2.3 billion in 2022.
Nonetheless, the company's expansion appetite is still relatively lower than that of the Korean players. We also expect Panasonic's battery businesses to keep growing and with improving profitability under the AMPC benefit. This together with an expanding customer base (e.g. Mazda) for its batteries should largely mitigate its capex increase. We forecast debt-to-EBITDA ratio will remain low at 1.0x-1.3x in 2023 and 2024.
Related Research
- Credit FAQ: Panelists Debate Risks And Opportunities Along The EV Value Chain, June 7,2023
- An Impending Electric Shock For Japanese Autos?, May 17, 2023
- Glimmers Of Winners Emerge In Asia's EV Push, May 15, 2023
- Korea Inc. Is Caught In Global Crosswinds, April 18, 2023
- Global Auto Sales Forecasts: Macro Risks Demand Pricing And Production Discipline, April 18, 2023
- Korea Is On The Brink Of A Battery Boom, Dec. 6, 2022
- Battery Suppliers, Automakers To Take Charge As Prices Rise, May 18, 2022
- High-Flying Battery Makers Have Much To Win And Lose, June 21, 2021
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analysts: | Stephen Chan, Hong Kong + 852 2532 8088; stephen.chan@spglobal.com |
Jeremy Kim, Hong Kong +852 2532 8096; jeremy.kim@spglobal.com | |
Kei Ishikawa, Tokyo + 81 3 4550 8769; kei.ishikawa@spglobal.com | |
Secondary Contacts: | Claire Yuan, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3542; Claire.Yuan@spglobal.com |
JunHong Park, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3538; junhong.park@spglobal.com | |
Crystal Ling, Hong Kong +852 25333586; crystal.ling@spglobal.com | |
Danny Huang, Hong Kong + 852 2532 8078; danny.huang@spglobal.com | |
Hiroshi Nagashima, Tokyo (81) 3-4550-8771; hiroshi.nagashima@spglobal.com | |
Research Assistant: | Rhett Wang, Beijing |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.