articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/231004-economic-research-which-emerging-markets-are-more-vulnerable-to-a-further-increase-in-energy-prices-12871062 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Economic Research: Which Emerging Markets Are More Vulnerable To A Further Increase In Energy Prices?

COMMENTS

Economic Research: Global Economic Outlook Q1 2025: Buckle Up

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook U.S. Q1 2025: Steady Growth, Significant Policy Uncertainty

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook Emerging Markets Q1 2025: Trade Uncertainty Threatens Growth

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook Canada Q1 2025: Immigration Policies Hamper Growth Expectations


Economic Research: Which Emerging Markets Are More Vulnerable To A Further Increase In Energy Prices?

The ongoing increase in oil prices is an important downside risk for our economic outlook for Emerging Markets (EMs), which was recently updated (see "Economic Outlook Emerging Markets Q4 2023: The Lagged Effects Of Monetary Policy Will Test Resilience," Sept. 25, 2023). Our baseline scenario assumes relatively stable oil prices in the coming quarters, with Brent averaging $85/barrel in the remainder of 2023 and 2024 (see "S&P Global Ratings' Oil And Gas Price Assumptions Are Unchanged," Sept. 20, 2023). However, the price of Brent crude is up 28% since the end of June, topping $95/barrel, in part because of production cuts announced by Saudi Arabia. Slowing inflation has allowed several EM central banks to start lowering interest rates, and others are expected to follow in the coming quarters. Higher energy prices could slow, or delay, future interest rate reductions by EM central banks (see chart 1).

Chart 1

image

Energy generally has a significantly higher weight in the consumer price index (CPI) baskets of EMs than in those of developed economies.   In the median EM, energy prices, which include both fuels for transportation and electricity at home, account for 10% of the CPI basket (see chart 2). In the U.S., for example, they account for 6.9%. In some EMs, the energy weight in the CPI is two to three times higher than that of the U.S. In Poland, for example, energy prices account for 18.3% of the basket, and 13.3% in Hungary.

Chart 2

image

Lower average energy prices than last year have fueled the disinflation prcocess, but the recent increase in the price of oil, if sustained, could slow, or even reverse this trend.   Energy price increases in the median EM have slowed from 15.5% year over year in 2022, to 4.2% so far this year, as of August (see chart 3). Two main caveats are worth noting. So far, natural gas prices, which before the Russia-Ukraine conflict generally moved together with oil prices, have remained relatively stable in recent months. This means that the price of electricity, which in many cases is fueled by natural gas, may not increase much, unless natural gas prices also start moving significantly higher. In addition, several EMs have energy prices (electricity and/or fuel) that are regulated by the government, which means that increases in international energy prices don't always translate to similar increases in domestic energy prices. In those cases, the government typically absorbs those costs through subsidies. This is evident in countries where energy prices are higher this year than last, like Hungary, Colombia, and Indonesia (see chart 3 again).

Chart 3

image

The recent increase in oil prices comes at a time of renewed broad U.S. dollar strength, amplifying the potential impact on inflation in EMs.   In Chilean pesos, oil prices are nearly 45% higher since the end of June, 40% in Hungarian forints, and about 35% in Polish zloty and Turkish lira terms (see chart 4).

Chart 4

image

If the recent increase in oil prices persists, several EM central banks could opt to slow or delay expected interest rate reductions, especially in the case of large net energy importers.   In these countries, external account balances could deteriorate substantially in the event of higher energy prices, and this typically exerts depreciatory pressure on the domestic currency (while increasing external financing needs). In this scenario, EM central banks would likely hesitate to lower interest rates substantially, to prevent disorderly capital outflows, which would weaken currencies further.

Chart 5

image

Out of the 18 major EMs we focus on, only five are net energy exporters, Saudi Arabia, Colombia, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brazil. The remaining are net importers of energy. Thailand, Hungary, Chile, Turkiye, the Philippines, India and Poland stand out for having particularly large net imports as a share of GDP (see chart 5). The good news is that in most of those countries, lower average energy prices this year, compared with 2022, among other factors, helped improve their current account balances in 2023 (see chart 6), so far. However, that could change rapidly if energy trade balances start to deteriorate noticeably.

Chart 6

image

Within the group of large EM net energy importers, higher energy prices could slow the pace of interest rate reductions in Chile, Poland, and Hungary, delay the start of rate cuts in Thailand, the Philippines, and India, and encourage more rate hikes than what is already expected in Turkiye.

  • The central banks of Chile and Poland have already started lowering their benchmark interest rates, but the market (according to interest rate swaps) is pricing in additional 375 basis points (bps) and 100 bps of rate cuts, respectively, in the next 12 months (see chart 7).
  • In Hungary, the central bank has been normalizing its interest rate corridor for several months, finalizing that process in its latest meeting, effectively setting the stage to reduce its base rate. In those cases, the magnitude of interest rate cuts could be lower than what is currently expected if energy prices continue to head higher.
  • Thailand's central bank actually increased its interest rate in its latest meeting (Sept. 27), for the eighth consecutive time. Although it seems to be at or near peak rates, the debate is likely to shift to when it can start lowering interest rates, which could be dismissed if energy prices start to put renewed upward pressure on inflation. In India and the Philippines, the policy rate has been kept unchanged for the last three and four consecutive meetings, respectively.
  • The Turkish central bank has been shifting to more orthodox monetary policy, which meant battling double-digit inflation (near 60% year over year in August) with large increases in interest rates. Its one-week repo reference rate has gone up from 8.50% in June to 30% currently and is expected to continue heading higher in the coming months. Higher energy prices could increase inflation expectations and amplify pressure on interest rates.

Chart 7

image

Higher interest rates will hamper debt refinancing in some EMs.  If the uptick in energy prices keep interest rates higher than what is currently expected, issuers will face greater obstacles in refinance their debt. During the pandemic, most issuers took advantage of the highly accommodative financing conditions to issue debt, strengthen their liquidity profile, and extend their maturity schedule. Hence, maturities have been very manageable in recent years. However, global maturities are building up with considerable peaks coming in 2025 (see chart 8). In the case of EMs, maturities are higher in 2024 than in 2023, and increase further in 2026 (see chart 9). Out of the 18 key emerging economies we follow, the largest maturities will come due for China in 2024 and 2025, with $64 billion and $53 billion coming due in those years, respectively. Excluding China--Mexico, India, and Brazil--have the largest maturities coming due over the next four years (see chart 9).

Chart 8

image

Chart 9

image

Issuer competition for liquidity will be fierce in the next two years. Amid currently high interest rates across the globe, lower-rated EM issuers will likely be disadvantaged as investors will demand additional returns to compensate for the higher country risk premia than those in advanced economies. Speculative-grade maturities are manageable in 2024, at 17.6% of the total debt coming due, but will be increasing significantly in 2025 and 2026, reaching 24.5% and 31.5%, respectively (see chart 10).

It is highly unlikely that issuers will wait until 2025 to refinance, and they will probably tap the market in 2024 with interest rates still high. These conditions could be unsustainable for many issuers, leading to defaults and bankruptcies. Sectors with the largest maturities coming due are financial institutions, oil and gas, homebuilders, real estate and telecommunications (see chart 11). Sectors highly dependent on leverage like real estate, oil and gas, utilities, and telecommunications will suffer the most during times of high interest rates.

Chart 10

image

Chart 11

image

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Chief Economist, Emerging Markets:Elijah Oliveros-Rosen, New York + 1 (212) 438 2228;
elijah.oliveros@spglobal.com
Head of Credit Research, Emerging Markets:Jose M Perez-Gorozpe, Madrid +34 914233212;
jose.perez-gorozpe@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Prarthana Verma, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in