articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/230820-australian-mutual-lenders-competitive-edge-all-but-gone-12816378 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Australian Mutual Lenders' Competitive Edge All But Gone

COMMENTS

Private Credit Casts A Wider Net To Encompass Asset-Based Finance And Infrastructure

COMMENTS

Navigating Regulatory Changes: Assessing New Regulations On Brazil's Financial Sector

Global Banks Outlook 2025

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: How Are North American Banks Using Significant Risk Transfers?


Australian Mutual Lenders' Competitive Edge All But Gone

It's tough being a small fish in a big pond. The commoditized nature of Australian banking makes it difficult for mutuals to stand out from the crowd. Winning and keeping business hinges on four main factors: pricing; efficiency; end-to-end processing; and product and service features. Loyalty, a traditional strength that mutual lenders have leveraged, has eroded significantly. Nevertheless the ownership structure of mutual lenders helps. This is because the high proportion of funding via common equity and full retention of profits partly offsets limitations from their high cost base.

image

Technology is a key driver for customer and broker satisfaction. Many mutuals continue to upgrade their core banking and loan origination and approvals systems to drive efficiencies.

Mergers remain compelling for mutuals lenders. Brand strength and customer loyalty continue to evaporate such that price becomes a key determinant of customer acquisition. Merging provides smaller lenders greater economies of scale. This makes them more efficient and able to price competitively. Mutuals will over time become acquirers or consolidation targets. We believe the banking landscape will settle with a small number of larger mutual players.

Mutual Banks Are Price Takers In A Commoditized Market

Mutuals remain at a competitive disadvantage relative to the larger banks. Competition for mortgages and deposits--a mutual's two key products--is intense, driven by the commoditized nature of banking products. As price takers, mutuals focus on defending and growing market share through sustained competitive pricing. Their balance sheet structure allows them to play in this market. They have higher capital levels on which they do not need to pay returns compared with publicly listed banks. Profitability is nevertheless crucial. Good earnings will support the ability of Australian mutual lenders to invest in products and services, technology, and operating efficiencies.

Ongoing Digital Investment Required

To remain relevant to the changing needs of existing and new members, mutuals will need to continually invest in digital products. Lenders seek to grow their portfolios by attracting younger members as older members roll off. Younger, tech-savvy members are likely to value price and turnaround speed over branches and personalized service. Brand loyalty is all but gone. As such, Australian mutuals need to ensure they continue to invest in their digital products and remain fast followers in technology adoption and product development.

Branches Are Expensive

Customers want to bank how and when they want, usually on a mobile device. Only about one in 1,000 transactions occur in a branch today. However, as of June 30, 2022, about 18% of bank branches in Australia belonged to mutuals compared with their market share of less than 3%.

Branches are expensive. Rationalization would enhance the ability of mutuals to compete. Rent, personnel, and the underlying running costs of a branch remain high relative to the cost of serving customers online. This is notwithstanding the shift across the industry for reduced operating hours and the use of idle branch staff to conduct other back-office bank functions to optimize staff costs.

In addition, mutuals could reinvest the savings made through branch rationalization into digital enhancements.

End-To-End Processing Important For Broker Relationships

Brokers are a key origination channel for banks in Australia. Brokers originate about 60% of mortgages in the system. Brokers largely determine which bank a customer chooses. Many mutuals have recognized this in the past four years. During that time, the average percentage of lending mutuals have originated via brokers has increased to about 45% from about 30% in 2019. While most rated mutual lenders originate a portion of new lending through brokers, this can vary anywhere from 0% to more than 80% of flow depending on the institution. Some mutuals do not use brokers.

Some initial technological investment is necessary to enter the broker channel. Many mutuals are looking to increase the amount of lending originated via brokers and investing in the appropriate systems to achieve this. Today, many mutuals are seeking to streamline their loan-origination systems to reduce their approval times, a key consideration for brokers and customers. While we anticipate all lenders will eventually settle at similar approval times, those that have the resources to invest quickly will benefit from a first-mover advantage. Furthermore, mutuals need to continue to leverage their relationships with their core banking system providers and keep up with technology to maintain or grow their market share.

Mergers Remain Compelling

To remain competitive Australia's mutual lending sector will continue to consolidate over the next two years. This is unlikely to result in higher ratings or materially change the industry's competitive dynamics. Mergers allow mutuals to achieve greater economies of scale, reduce their cost base and invest in technology. In the banking industry, scale usually means efficiency and underpins through-the-cycle returns. This is clear when comparing Australian mutual lenders with midsize regional peers, and again when comparing midsize lenders with the major banks (see charts 1 and 2). Furthermore, larger players that have greater scope to invest will be the first to benefit from artificial intelligence and other technological advances.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Investment in digitization including open banking, lending origination and cyber security will continue to drive technology spending for mutuals. A larger organization will be better able to absorb the costs of these investments.

We have a positive outlook on most of the rated mutual lenders, reflecting a positive trend for Australian banking system risks.

Appendix

Table 1

Australian Mutual Lenders Rated By S&P Global Ratings
Rated mutual lenders Long-term rating and outlook Total loans§ (bil. A$)

Heritage and People's Choice Ltd.

BBB/Positive/-- 18.9

Credit Union Australia Ltd. (Great Southern Bank)

BBB/Positive/-- 16.0

Newcastle Greater Mutual Group Ltd.

BBB/Positive/-- 15.6

Teachers Mutual Bank Ltd.

BBB/Positive/-- 8.8

Bank Australia Ltd.

BBB/Positive/-- 8.1

Beyond Bank Australia Ltd.

BBB/Positive/-- 7.4

Police & Nurses Ltd.

BBB/Positive/-- 6.6

Defence Bank Ltd.

BBB/Positive/-- 2.9

Queensland Country Bank Ltd.

BBB/Positive/-- 2.4

Police Financial Services Ltd. (BankVic)

BBB/Positive/-- 2.3

Members Banking Group Ltd. (RACQ Bank*)

BBB+/Stable/-- 2.2

Police Bank Ltd.

BBB/Positive/-- 2.0

G&C Mutual Bank Ltd.

BBB/Positive/-- 1.2

Australian Unity Bank Ltd.*

BBB+/Stable/-- 1.1

Maitland Mutual Ltd

BBB-/Positive/-- 0.9
QCPU Ltd. (QBANK) BBB-/Positive/-- 0.8

Illawarra Credit Union Ltd.

BBB-/Positive/-- 0.8
*The ratings benefit on Australian Unity Bank benefits from two notches group support. The rating on RACQ Bank benefits from one notch of group support. Names in brackets are trading names. §As of June 30, 2023. Sources: S&P Global Ratings, MADIS as of June 30, 2023.

Editor: Lex Hall, Jasper Moiseiwitsch

Related Research

  • Australian Banks Can Ride Out Market Jitters, March 23, 2023

This report does not constitute a rating action.

S&P Global Ratings Australia Pty Ltd holds Australian financial services license number 337565 under the Corporations Act 2001. S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings and related research are not intended for and must not be distributed to any person in Australia other than a wholesale client (as defined in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act).

Primary Credit Analyst:Lisa Barrett, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2081;
lisa.barrett@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Nico N DeLange, Sydney + 61 2 9255 9887;
nico.delange@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in