Key Takeaways
- Performance weakened for the month of June with prime and subprime annualized losses increasing month over month and year over year. In fact, annualized prime losses were on par with June 2019, and subprime losses were nearly the same as 2019 as well.
- Sixty-plus-day delinquencies rose to the highest ever June level in our composite for subprime and highest June level since 2011 for prime.
- Cumulative net losses for the 2022 vintage, as reflected in our auto loan static indexes, weakened relative to prior vintages. Half of the prime and most of the subprime issuers are reporting higher losses on this vintage than for 2016, which was the last annual cohort that wasn't favorably impacted by COVID-19-related stimulus. The deterioration reflects diminishing pandemic-related savings, inflationary pressures, aggressive loan growth, and lower used vehicle values.
- July's analysis resulted in 26 upgrades and 49 affirmations, bringing the total number of U.S. auto loan ABS-related upgrades, downgrades, and affirmations to 177, six, and 243, respectively.
U.S. auto loan asset-backed securities (ABS) composite performance weakened in June 2023, with annualized losses increasing in the prime and subprime segments month over month and year over year. Prime losses returned to June 2019's levels, while subprime losses were just shy of their June 2019 pre-pandemic levels. The return to historical loss levels reflects consumers having spent much of their COVID-19-related savings, inflationary pressures, growth in lending from 2021 through first-quarter 2022, and lower recoveries, albeit they remain slightly above June 2019's levels. Of particular concern is that the modified subprime composite, which excludes the three large deep subprime securitizers (Exeter, Santander's Drive platform, and American Credit Acceptance (ACA)), reported higher average losses in June 2023 than June 2019. This demonstrates that the deterioration in subprime performance isn't confined to only the deep subprime issuers; other below-prime lenders are also struggling with mounting losses. Further, 60-plus-day delinquencies haven risen above pre-pandemic levels for both prime and subprime.
On a static pool cumulative net loss (CNL) basis, approximately half of the 2022 prime pools are reporting slightly higher than historical loss levels, with most of the weakness being confined to pools with a higher-than-average concentration of used vehicles. The subprime segment is showing more deterioration, with average losses on the 2022 vintage exceeding those of 2008. While some of the weakness can be explained by the greater concentration of deep subprime collateral, even after netting out three large deep subprime issuers who entered the ABS market in 2011 or later, losses for this vintage are in line with 2008. In this report, we illustrate the static pool performance of 30 frequent issuers (from prime to subprime). Within the subprime segment, eight out of 11 issuers that securitized in both 2016 and 2022 are reporting higher CNLs on the 2022 vintage than for 2016; this was the last vintage that did not benefit from COVID-19-related pandemic aid. In addition, half of the prime issuers are reporting higher-than-2016 losses on one or more of their 2022 ABS.
Losses Climb To Pre-Pandemic Levels, Exhibiting Month-Over-Month And Year-Over-Year Increases
Prime annualized net losses increased month over month to 0.48% in June 2023 from 0.32% in May 2023. The month-to-month uptick is consistent with expected seasonal trends in auto loan ABS performance, given that losses tend to rise the further we move away from tax-refund season. June 2023's losses were, however, 65% higher than a year earlier (0.29%) and had normalized to June 2019's level of 0.48%. Prime losses increased month over month for three-quarters of the issuers.
Similarly, subprime annualized net losses increased month over month by 99 basis points (bps) to 6.87% in June 2023 from 5.88% in May 2023. On a year-over-year basis, losses rose approximately 33% to 6.87% from 5.16% in June 2022. June 2023's 6.87% loss level nearly matched June 2019's and June 2018's pre-pandemic levels of 6.92% and 6.86%, respectively. Losses for almost all of the subprime issuers increased month over month, with Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust (SDART), Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust, and Drive Auto Receivables Trust (Drive) being the major contributors, accounting for 48% of the subprime index in June 2023.
After netting out the three large deep subprime issuers, modified subprime annualized losses increased to 6.01% in June 2023 from 5.33% in May 2023 and 3.97% in June 2022. More concerning was that the modified subprime composite reported higher average losses in June 2023 than June 2019. This demonstrates that the deterioration in subprime performance isn't confined to only the deep subprime issuers; other subprime lenders are also struggling with higher-than-pre-pandemic loss levels. We attribute this performance degradation to the negative effects that inflation is having on lower-income consumers, the loss of pandemic-related support programs, the tremendous growth in originations in 2021 through first-quarter 2022, and lower recoveries. Some lenders have also pointed to what they refer as "credit score inflation" as contributing to higher losses.
Table 1
Net loss rate composite(i) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun-09 | Jun-14 | Jun-15 | Jun-16 | Jun-17 | Jun-18 | Jun-19 | Jun-20 | Jun-21 | Jun-22 | May-23 | Jun-23 | |||||||||||||||
Prime (%) | 1.63 | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.06 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.48 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime (%) (ii) | 8.03 | 5.25 | 5.58 | 6.86 | 6.96 | 6.86 | 6.92 | 4.18 | 2.15 | 5.16 | 5.88 | 6.87 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime modified (%) | N/A | 4.81 | 4.98 | 5.58 | 5.76 | 5.43 | 5.47 | 4.04 | 1.85 | 3.97 | 5.33 | 6.01 | ||||||||||||||
(i)Represents monthly annualized losses. (ii)Three large deep subprime issuers-- American Credit Acceptance, Exeter, and DRIVE--are excluded. N/A--Not applicable. |
Chart 1
Recoveries Moderated And Continued To Normalize To Pre-Pandemic Levels
Prime and subprime recoveries declined month over month as well as year over year. For prime, the recovery rate decreased to 63.29% in June 2023 from 68.32% in May 2023 and 67.80% in June 2022. For subprime, the recovery rate decreased to 47.40% from 54.53% in May 2023 and 50.45% in June 2022. Despite these declines, recoveries remained slightly higher than June 2019's levels of 60.18% and 44.16% for prime and subprime, respectively.
June's decline in recovery rates is consistent with normal seasonality patterns, and we would expect them to continue to decline as the year progresses.
Table 2
Recovery rate composite(i) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun-09 | Jun-14 | Jun-15 | Jun-16 | Jun-17 | Jun-18 | Jun-19 | Jun-20 | Jun-21 | Jun-22 | May-23 | Jun-23 | |||||||||||||||
Prime (%) | 52.39 | 68.14 | 63.89 | 65.88 | 62.34 | 58.64 | 60.18 | 56.54 | 98.79 | 67.80 | 68.32 | 63.29 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime (%) | 43.65 | 48.60 | 48.39 | 45.69 | 45.14 | 44.68 | 44.16 | 50.39 | 65.71 | 50.45 | 54.53 | 47.40 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime modified (%)(ii) | N/A | 49.09 | 50.07 | 46.43 | 45.21 | 45.05 | 44.41 | 45.32 | 62.48 | 49.32 | 53.00 | 46.47 | ||||||||||||||
(i)Represents monthly recovery rates. (ii)Excludes three large deep subprime issuers: American Credit Acceptance, Exeter, and DRIVE. N/A--Not applicable. |
Chart 2
Delinquencies Weaken Further Reaching The Highest June Levels
The prime 60-plus-day delinquency rate inched up to 0.49% in June 2023 from 0.48% in May 2023 and 0.41% in June 2022. The subprime 60-plus-day delinquency rate also increased to 5.37% in June 2023 from 5.22% in May 2023 and 4.89% of June 2022. In addition, delinquencies remained higher than their June 2019 pre-pandemic levels of 0.39% for prime and 5.03% for subprime and were the highest ever June level since 2011 for prime and ever for subprime.
We attribute these rising delinquencies to consumers facing financial stress from inflationary pressures, the fading benefit of COVID-19-related support, and growth in originations that came at the expense of credit quality.
Table 3
60-plus-day delinquency rate composite(i) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun-09 | Jun-14 | Jun-15 | Jun-16 | Jun-17 | Jun-18 | Jun-19 | Jun-20 | Jun-21 | Jun-22 | May-23 | Jun-23 | |||||||||||||||
Prime (%) | 0.66 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.49 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime (%) | 4.58 | 3.73 | 4.13 | 4.61 | 4.70 | 4.60 | 5.03 | 3.36 | 3.00 | 4.89 | 5.22 | 5.37 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime modified (%)(ii) | N/A | 3.34 | 3.53 | 3.56 | 3.39 | 3.28 | 3.60 | 2.64 | 1.91 | 3.31 | 4.15 | 4.33 | ||||||||||||||
(i)Represents 60-plus delinquencies. (ii)Excludes three large deep subprime issuers: American Credit Acceptance, Exeter, and DRIVE. N/A--Not applicable. |
Chart 3
Extension Rates Rose Month Over Month And Year Over Year, But Continue To Remain Below Pre-Pandemic Levels
Both prime and subprime issuers saw a rise in extension rates month over month and year over year. Prime extensions increased to 0.48% in June 2023 from 0.42% in May 2023 and 0.37% in June 2022. Similarly, extensions for subprime public and 144a transactions in aggregate increased to 3.37% in June 2023 from 3.23% in May 2023 and 3.26% in June 2022 (see chart 4).
Chart 4
Prime extension rates
Of the 15 prime issuers listed in table 4A, 14 reported a month-over-month uptick in extensions, and one had a stable level (Carvana at 0.28%). In addition:
- CarMax Auto Owner Trust (CarMax) reported the highest extensions for the month at 1.01%, increasing from 0.85% in the prior month and 0.56% a year earlier. CarMax's month-to-month 16 bps increase was also the largest increase in the prime segment. Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust (Ford Credit) had the second-highest extension rate in June 2023 at 0.96%, which was higher than May 2023's 0.84%, but similar to June 2022's rate of 0.95%.
Table 4A
Prime issuer shelf extension (% of balance) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shelf name | Feb-20 | Mar-20 | Apr-20 | Jun-21 | Jun-22 | May-23 | Jun-23 | |||||||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust | 0.37 | 12.01 | 7.49 | 0.46 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.60 | |||||||||
BMW Vehicle Owner Trust | 0.17 | 2.00 | 7.58 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.18 | |||||||||
Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust | 0.01 | 0.82 | 1.94 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.05 | |||||||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust | 0.38 | 3.33 |
7.33 |
0.35 | 0.56 | 0.85 | 1.01 | |||||||||
Carvana Prime | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0.08 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.28 | |||||||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust | 0.75 | 6.30 |
6.35 |
0.81 | 0.95 | 0.84 | 0.96 | |||||||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust | 0.32 | 0.81 | 2.27 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.36 | |||||||||
Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust | 0.20 | 1.85 | 4.01 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.45 | |||||||||
Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust | 0.11 | 2.03 |
4.51 |
0.11 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.16 | |||||||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust | 0.25 | 2.03 |
4.22 |
0.34 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.38 | |||||||||
Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust | 0.15 | 4.62 | 7.21 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.60 | 0.70 | |||||||||
Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust | 0.44 | 4.19 |
5.57 |
0.43 | 0.39 | 0.26 | 0.28 | |||||||||
Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust | 0.28 | 2.79 |
6.24 |
0.26 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.31 | |||||||||
Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust | 0.21 | 0.60 |
5.81 |
0.15 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.19 | |||||||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust | 0.38 | 5.85 | 8.82 | 0.29 | 0.41 | 0.45 | 0.54 | |||||||||
Prime average | 0.32 | 3.75 | 5.76 | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 0.48 | |||||||||
N/A--Not applicable. |
Subprime extension rates
The SEC-publicly registered subprime transactions (Reg AB II issuers in chart 4 and table 4B) had a weighted average extension rate of 2.40% for June 2023, a slight increase from May 2023 (2.22%) and June 2022 (2.30%). These larger issuers, however, continued to report lower extensions than their 144a peers, which as a group logged a weighted average extension rate of 4.69%, down slightly from the prior month (4.75%) and up from the year earlier (4.43%). The improvement month to month was largely due to two large issuers reporting significant drops. Most notably, Flagship's extensions declined 187 bps (to 2.74% from 4.61%) and GLS declined 22 bps (to 2.96% from 3.18%). These two issuers represented approximately 23% of the outstanding 144a transactions in our subprime database. These declines offset the slight increases reported by the other 144a subprime issuers.
Of the 17 subprime issuers whose transactions we rate and for which we have extension data for both May 2023 and June 2023, only five reported a month-over-month decrease in extension rates: Flagship, GLS, Prestige, Carvana, and Avid. The remaining 12 reported higher levels from the previous month. On a year-over-year basis, eight issuers reported improved extension rates, but most of these were only slight declines, with the exception of Flagship whose extensions declined 156 bps year over year (to 2.74% from 4.30%). (Flagship's 60-plus-day delinquencies, however, increased to 9.14% as of June 30, 2023 from 6.51% a year earlier). Other noteworthy observations include:
- Issuers with the largest month-over-month increase were CPS Auto Receivables Trust (86 bps to 5.59% from 4.73%), AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust (48 bps to 3.25% from 2.77%), and United Auto Credit Securitization Trust (56 bps to 5.51% from 4.95%).
- Westlake Automobiles Receivables Trust (Westlake) and CPS Auto Receivables Trust (CPS) had the highest extensions in June 2023, at 5.81% and 5.59%, respectively, followed by Exeter at 5.45%. Although Westlake has relatively high extension rates, its average 60-plus-day delinquency rate across transactions with at least four months of performance data was only 1.23% as of June 30, 2023, while rates for CPS and Exeter were 6.65% and 8.65%, respectively.
Table 4B
Subprime issuer shelf extension (% of balance) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shelf name | Feb-20 | Mar-20 | Apr-20 | Jun-21 | Jun-22 | May-23 | Jun-23 | |||||||||
American Credit Acceptance | 2.84 | 3.66 | 5.15 | 1.75 | 2.85 | 4.16 | 4.43 | |||||||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust(i) | 2.48 | 4.11 | 6.93 |
2.28 |
2.91 |
2.77 |
3.25 |
|||||||||
Avid Automobile Receivables Trust | 2.88 | 3.43 | 2.82 | 3.54 | 3.39 | 3.99 | 3.79 | |||||||||
Carvana Subprime | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1.77 | 1.74 | 1.63 | |||||||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust | 3.71 | 6.18 | 10.21 | 3.30 | 4.75 | 4.73 | 5.59 | |||||||||
Drive Auto Receivables | 1.14 | 8.14 | 20.64 | 1.94 | 1.81 | 1.53 | 1.63 | |||||||||
DriveTime Automotive Group Inc.(ii) | 2.53 | 3.06 | 8.88 | 3.03 | 2.58 | 3.14 | 3.55 | |||||||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust | 3.02 | 4.34 | 11.80 |
3.81 |
5.34 |
5.25 |
5.45 |
|||||||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust | 2.79 | 4.38 | 3.94 | 2.43 | 2.91 | 3.13 | 3.16 | |||||||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust | 2.01 | 9.26 | 18.81 | 2.81 | 4.30 | 4.61 | 2.74 | |||||||||
Foursight Capital Automobile Receivables Trust | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2.73 | |||||||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust | 2.80 | 4.92 | 11.39 | 2.06 | 3.34 | 3.18 | 2.96 | |||||||||
Prestige Auto Receivables Trust | 2.69 | 2.85 | 6.24 | 2.63 | 4.60 | 5.14 | 4.88 | |||||||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust | 1.07 | 7.04 |
17.28 |
1.41 | 1.39 | 1.24 | 1.33 | |||||||||
Tidewater Auto Receivables Trust | 0.96 | 1.59 | 8.36 | 2.25 | 1.77 | 1.63 | 1.65 | |||||||||
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust | 4.75 | 7.54 | 6.02 | 2.11 | 4.29 | 4.95 | 5.51 | |||||||||
Westlake Automobiles Receivables Trust | 4.85 | 11.73 | 7.41 | 4.50 | 6.04 | 5.74 | 5.81 | |||||||||
World Omni Select |
1.58 |
14.72 | 19.58 |
1.24 |
1.53 |
1.07 |
1.24 |
|||||||||
World Omni Select (non-prime) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0.02 | |||||||||
Subprime average | 2.35 | 6.62 | 12.75 | 2.57 | 3.26 | 3.23 | 3.37 | |||||||||
(i)June 2021 and June 2022 includes only AmeriCredit's S&P Global Ratings-rated deals. (ii)Extension rate for DriveTime Automotive Group Inc. for May and June 2023 includes only the 2021-3 through 2023-1 deals. These are the only deals with at least four months of performance in which the servicing reports provide extension info on a dollar basis (as opposed to account-based). The company previously provided dollar-based extensions through Dec. 31, 2021, for all of its o/s deals from August 2019 through Dec. 31, 2021. N/A--Not applicable. N/A--Not applicable. |
Auto Loan Static Indexes (ALSI)
Prime: vintage CNLs continue to rise, but track lower than pre-pandemic levels
While the end of pandemic-related assistance programs, declining used vehicle values, and inflationary pressures are causing prime CNLs to escalate, on an aggregate basis, they have not returned to 2016-2019's levels (chart 5). For example, CNLs for the 2022 vintage at month seven are 0.14%, which is considerably lower than the 0.18%-0.19% for the 2016-2019 vintages at the same month (albeit higher than 0.13% and 0.11% for 2020 and 2021, respectively, at the same month). For issuer-specific CNL performance, see charts 15-45.
Prime cumulative gross losses (CGL) (see chart 6) are showing trends similar to CNLs through vintage 2022.
Cumulative recoveries on the 2022 vintage are trending much lower than the record level set for the 2020 cohort (at approximately 64% at month 31) and near record level for the 2021 cohort (55% at month 19) (chart 7). The 2022 vintage has gotten off to a weak start, with cumulative recoveries inching up to only 38% through month seven (versus a usual rate of 42% to 48%). The initial weakness is likely due to the drop in used vehicle values (they started to decline in early 2022), especially if the repossessed units were new vehicles purchased from mid-2021 to 2022 that were priced above MSRP. This "market-based" pricing is gradually being eliminated, causing recently purchased vehicles to experience greater declines in value. The 2021 and 2022 vintages are also showing weakness on the delinquency front, reporting higher 60-plus-day delinquencies compared with the 2016-2020 vintages at the same months outstanding (see chart 8).
Chart 5
Chart 6
Chart 7
Chart 8
Subprime: 2022 vintage CNLs are tracking higher than historical levels
We expected subprime CNLs to rise from the unsustainably low levels on the 2019-2021 vintages, but rather unexpectedly (given low unemployment levels), the 2022 vintage is reporting worse-than-historical loss levels with 2.60% in CNL as of month seven compared to 1.99% for 2008 and 2.02% for 2016 at the same month (see chart 9). The deterioration started with the 2022 second-quarter cohort. At month 13, its CNLs are 6.03%, which exceeds the 5.73% for 2008 and 5.21% and 5.28% for 2016 and 2017, respectively, at the same month. The subsequent 2022 quarterly vintages are also showing deterioration relative to historical levels, but not to the same extent. Higher CNLs have been due to greater defaults (chart 11), a precipitous drop in recoveries (chart 12), and, in our opinion, either a liberalization of credit standards among some lenders and/or the inability of their underwriting methods to account for pandemic-related "inflated" credit bureau scores.
On a positive note, the deterioration that we've been observing on the second-quarter 2022 vintage relative to 2008 has ameliorated in the last few months. For example, as of month eight, the variance was 107 bps (3.61% for second-quarter 2022 versus 2.54% for 2008), but as of month 13, it has narrowed to only 30 bps. Perhaps there is some validity to issuers' claims that they're taking their losses earlier due to a high volume of full-balance charge-offs as they were encountering repossession delays last year and earlier this year.
Since market participants often ask us whether the greater concentration of deep subprime issuers in recent years is driving up subprime's CNLs, we maintain a modified subprime index wherein three large deep subprime lenders are excluded (Santander's Drive platform, Exeter, and ACA). And yes, as evidenced in table 5, deep subprime issuance has grown relative to 2008, when it was zero due to limited issuance that year. However, for 2022, the portion of deep subprime collateral securitized relative to total subprime collateral declined to 20%, which was down significantly from the range in 2017 to 2021 (45.5% to 33.0%, respectively), due to Santander reducing its origination and securitization volume of deep subprime loans. In fact, their Drive platform did not issue ABS in 2022.
Table 5
Composition of subprime index | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer | % of 2007 original amount | % of 2008 | % of 2016 | % of 2017 | % of 2018 | % of 2019 | % of 2020 | % of 2021 | % of 2022 |
AmeriCredit | 32.2 | 87.7 | 23.9 | 11.9 | 8.4 | 12.0 | 12.8 | 9.7 | 7.8 |
Avid | 0.4 | 0.7 | |||||||
Capital One | 26.5 | ||||||||
Carvana NP | 4.4 | 1.1 | |||||||
CPS | 5.4 | 12.3 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 4.0 |
First Investors | 1.9 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.8 | ||
Flagship Credit Acceptance | 7.5 | 5.0 | 3.3 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 5.7 | ||
Foursight | 1.0 | 0.7 | |||||||
GLS | 1.1 | 3.5 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 5.4 | 4.8 | |||
Honor | 0.5 | ||||||||
HSBC | 6.8 | ||||||||
Prestige | 2.1 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | |
SDART (Santander) | 18.0 | 18.7 | 22.9 | 13.7 | 26.6 | 24.7 | 38.2 | ||
Sierra | 0.7 | ||||||||
Tidewater | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | ||||||
Triad | 8.8 | ||||||||
United Auto Credit | 3.1 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.8 | |
Westlake | 7.7 | 7.9 | 11.8 | 14.2 | 13.6 | 13.7 | 13.1 | ||
WOSAT | 2.3 | 3.0 | 3.4 | ||||||
Large deep subprime issuers | |||||||||
American Credit Acceptance | 4.5 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 7.6 | 5.9 | 5.1 | ||
Exeter | 5.3 | 7.2 | 8.5 | 12.2 | 9.4 | 12.5 | 14.9 | ||
DRIVE (Santander Deep SP) | 15.2 | 18.8 | 33.3 | 27.1 | 22.3 | 9.9 | 14.6 | ||
Deep subprime total | 15.2 | 0.0 | 28.5 | 45.5 | 39.7 | 38.7 | 27.0 | 33.0 | 20.0 |
Even after accounting for the exclusion of these deep subprime players, the 2022 modified subprime index is reporting CNL of 2.00% at month seven (60 bps lower than subprime index's 2.60%), which is in line with 2008's 1.99% level at the same month (chart 10). It is an ominous sign that, even as deep subprime declined to only 20% last year from a peak of approximately 46% in 2017, that the overall subprime and even the modified subprime indexes are trending so high. For issuer-specific CNL performance, see charts 15-45.
Cumulative recovery rates (CRRs) have weakened in the 2022 vintage. Through month seven, the quarterly vintages are reporting CRRs of 22.2%-29.0% for an average of 26.6%, which is substantially below the prior vintages (31.0%-36.0%). While some issuers attribute the lower recovery rates to more full-balance charge-offs because it's taking them longer to find and repossess vehicles, falling used vehicle prices in the secondary market are also contributing to the decline.
Sixty-plus-day delinquencies have ticked up beginning with the 2021 vintage, to 5.99% as of month 19, which is higher than the 2015-2020 vintages at the same seasoning month. The 2022 vintage is worse at 4.59% at only month seven (see chart 13). Even the modified subprime index is showing record 60-plus-day delinquencies: 3.84% versus a previous high of 2.82% for the 2007 vintage (see chart 14).
Chart 9
Chart 10
Chart 11
Chart 12
Chart 13
Chart 14
Issuer-specific CNL deterioration
The confluence of adverse factors affecting the consumer beginning last year has in many cases caused issuers' 2022 vintage pools to experience higher CNLs than their 2016 securitized pools. Given that we derive our base-case CNL levels on an issuer-specific basis, we think it is important to drill down and analyze performance at the issuer level.
Half of the prime issuers are reporting higher-than-2016 losses on their 2022 ABS
In the prime segment of the 14 issuers highlighted below that completed securitizations last year, seven continue to report lower-than-historical loss levels: BMW, Ford Credit, GM Financial, Honda, Hyundai, World Omni, and Nissan. Of the 12 issuers that securitized in both 2016 and 2022 (GMF and Carvana did not), six are reporting higher losses on one or more of their 2022 transactions than on their 2016 pools, which was the last annual vintage that did not benefit from COVID-19-related pandemic stimulus and other forms of borrower support. These issuers are: Ally, Mercedes, CarMax, Harley, Toyota, and USAA.
The prime issuers that are posting a measurable increase in losses are generally those that have a greater percentage of used vehicles in their ABS. For example, used vehicles comprise 52% and 60% of Mercedes' 2022-1 and Ally's 2022-3 transactions, respectively. Meanwhile BMW's 2022-A transaction has only 31% in previously-owned vehicles and still has zero losses. BMW's deal also has a weighted average FICO of 788, the highest of any pool in 2022, a short weighted average original maturity of 64 months and robust seasoning of 14 months. Additionally, the CarMax and Carvana pools are exclusively used vehicles.
Eight of 11 subprime issuers have higher losses on their 2022 ABS than for 2016
In the subprime segment, eight out of 11 issuers that securitized in both 2016 and 2022 are reporting higher CNLs on the 2022 vintage than for 2016. AmeriCredit, Westlake, and DriveTime standout for better than average performance. While all three of them are reporting higher losses on their 2022 transactions compared to those in 2020 and 2021, their losses have not returned to 2016's levels. We attribute their strength to originating better quality loans. For example, AmeriCredit's proprietary scores improved to a weighted average range of 249-254 for its 2022 transactions compared to 244-246 for those in 2016. Both AmeriCredit and Westlake also had stronger weighted average FICO scores and LTV ratios for the 2022 transactions relative to 2016. DriveTime's resilience appears related to lower LTVs, as they declined to 135%-138% for the 2022 transactions from 168%-171% in 2016. Also, their weighted average FICO improved to a range of 550-563 from 540-546.
Chart 15
Chart 16
Chart 17
Chart 18
Chart 19
Chart 20
Chart 21
Chart 22
Chart 23
Chart 24
Chart 25
Chart 26
Chart 27
Chart 28
Chart 29
Chart 30
Chart 31
Chart 32
Chart 33
Chart 34
Chart 35
Chart 36
Chart 37
Chart 38
Chart 39
Chart 40
Chart 41
Chart 42
Chart 43
Chart 44
Chart 45
Collateral Characteristics: Annual Percentage Rates Rise Along With Loan-To-Value Ratios
Prime
The collateral characteristics for prime transactions issued in first-half 2023 were generally comparable to first-half and full-year 2022. The higher weighted average FICO score and lower mix of used vehicles were positives, but loan terms lengthened and the loan to values (LTVs) rose (see table 6A).
Significant changes included:
- The weighted average FICO increased to 759 from 754 for 2022, and is the highest in recent history. In first-half 2022, the weighted average FICO was approximately 754.
- Used vehicles comprised 31.41% in first-half 2023, a decrease from 37.43% and 35.13% in first-half 2022 and full-year 2022, respectively. Given higher levels of new vehicle inventory, due to supply constraints easing, auto prices have declined and incentives have returned, thereby supporting growth in new vehicle sales.
- Loans with original maturities greater than 60 months increased to 67.93% in first-half 2023 from 66.87% for full-year 2022. In first-half 2023, loans with original maturities of 73-75 months decreased to 7.66% from 10.45%, but maturities of 76-84 months increased to 8.21% from 2.77% for year 2022. Longer-term loans are supporting the growth in new vehicle financing, especially given that higher interest rates are driving up monthly payments.
- The weighted average LTV increased modestly to 97.54% from 95.95% in 2022.
- With the Federal Reserve increasing interest rates, unsurprisingly, the weighted average annual percentage rate (APR) rose to 5.19% in first-half 2023 from 4.29% in the first-half 2022 and 4.41% last year 2022.
Table 6A
Prime collateral trends(i) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WA APR (%) | Used (%) | Loans with original terms > 60 months (%) | Loans with original terms of 61-72 months (%) | Loans with original terms of 73-75 months (%) | Loans with original terms of 76-84 months (%)(ii) | Loans with original terms of 73-84 months (%)(ii) | WA original maturity | WA LTV ratio (%) | WA FICO score | |||||||||||||
2016 | 3.51 | 29.75 | 50.15 | 45.00 | - | - | 64.32 | 96.94 | 746 | |||||||||||||
2017 | 3.59 | 28.38 | 55.92 | 48.16 | - | - | 65.52 | 95.94 | 749 | |||||||||||||
2018 | 3.73 | 27.66 | 58.14 | 52.35 | - | - | 65.8 | 95.81 | 755 | |||||||||||||
2019(ii) | 4.50 | 29.66 | 60.51 | 52.54 | 7.01 | 0.95 | 7.96 | 66.16 | 95.64 | 754 | ||||||||||||
2020 | 4.24 | 29.41 | 61.81 | 54.69 | 6.39 | 0.73 | 7.12 | 66.25 | 96.66 | 757 | ||||||||||||
2021 | 4.29 | 36.40 | 63.06 |
52.97 |
8.48 |
1.61 |
10.09 |
66.73 | 96.16 | 754 | ||||||||||||
2022 | 4.41 | 35.13 | 66.87 | 53.65 | 10.45 | 2.77 | 13.22 | 67.17 | 95.95 | 754 | ||||||||||||
First-half 2022 | 4.29 | 37.43 | 66.03 | 53.45 | 10.49 | 2.09 | 12.58 | 67.23 | 95.08 | 754 | ||||||||||||
First-half 2023 | 5.19 | 31.41 | 67.93 | 52.06 | 7.66 | 8.21 | 15.87 | 67.57 | 97.54 | 759 | ||||||||||||
(i)The collateral characteristics of revolving transactions are not included because the collateral pools are dynamic. The 2016-2023 vintages include most term transaction not rated by S&P Global Ratings. (ii)Effective August 2019, we began reporting loans with terms between 73-75 months and 76-84 months. WA--Weighted average. APR--Annual percentage rate. LTV--Loan to value. |
Subprime
The collateral characteristics for subprime transactions issued in first-half 2023 were ostensibly in line with first-half and full-year 2022 (table 6B). There were some slight changes, but most of these are explained by the increased concentration of used vehicle financing and higher interest rates.
Notable observations relative to 2022 include:
- The percentage of used vehicle financing increased to 87.21% for first-half 2023 from 84.75% for full-year 2022. Higher new vehicle prices, coupled with higher interest rates and more stringent underwriting, is steering more below-prime borrowers to used vehicles.
- The percentage of loans with original maturities greater than 60 months decreased to 83.87% from 85.64%, and loans with original terms of 73-75 months declined to 10.36% from 12.60%. Used vehicles typically carry shorter terms than new vehicles.
- The percentage of loans with original terms of 76-84 months remained relatively stable at 2.22%. AmeriCredit and CPS were the largest securitizers of these loans in first-half 2023, with 19.75% and 8.68%, respectively.
- The weighted average LTV increased to 112.86% from 110.30% as used vehicles typically carry higher LTVs than used vehicles.
- The weighted average APR surged to approximately 18.86% for first half 2023 from 16.69% in 2022. Most lenders have increased their APRs given higher ABS funding costs.
- The weighted average FICO score remained the same at 593.
The statistics in table 6B, however, do not capture the extent to which lenders have improved their mix of originations as they do not track the issuers' proprietary scores, which are often better predictors of performance than FICO only. We have noticed that several lenders' 2023 pools have migrated to a stronger composition of borrowers, and, in some cases, lenders have eliminated or greatly reduced certain high loss programs.
Table 6B
Subprime collateral trends(i) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WA APR (%) | Used (%) | Loans with original terms > 60 months (%) | Loans with original terms of 61-72 months (%) | Loans with original terms of 73-75 months (%) | Loans with original terms of 76-84 months (%)(ii) | Loans with original terms of 73-84 months (%)(ii) | WA original maturity | WA LTV ratio (%) | WA FICO score | |||||||||||||
2016 | 16.85 | 68.25 | 83.27 | 79.56 | 68.52 | 112.55 | 575 | |||||||||||||||
2017 | 17.79 | 69.05 | 84.61 | 79.28 | 68.94 | 110.57 | 578 | |||||||||||||||
2018 | 17.97 | 66.53 | 83.03 | 74.55 | 68.65 | 110.28 | 587 | |||||||||||||||
2019(ii) | 17.84 | 70.55 | 82.63 | 74.49 | 8.14 | 68.69 | 112.45 | 584 | ||||||||||||||
2020 | 17.21 | 72.42 | 83.04 | 73.15 | 9.48 | 0.43 | 9.91 | 68.98 | 111.87 | 588 | ||||||||||||
2021 | 17.07 | 78.65 | 86.30 | 76.25 | 8.56 | 1.46 | 10.02 | 69.68 | 109.80 | 590 | ||||||||||||
2022 | 16.69 | 84.75 | 85.64 | 70.13 | 12.60 | 2.27 | 14.87 | 69.75 | 110.30 | 593 | ||||||||||||
First-half 2022 | 16.37 | 84.90 | 84.94 | 69.89 | 12.63 | 2.43 | 15.06 | 69.66 | 109.69 | 593 | ||||||||||||
First-half 2023 | 18.86 | 87.21 | 83.87 | 69.03 | 12.45 | 2.39 | 14.84 | 69.35 | 112.86 | 593 | ||||||||||||
(i)The collateral characteristics of revolving transactions are not included because the collateral pools are dynamic. The 2016-2020 vintages include most term transaction not rated by S&P Global Ratings. (ii)Effective August 2019, we began reporting loans with terms between 73-75 months and 76-84 months. WA--Weighted average. APR--Annual percentage rate. LTV--Loan to value. |
Auto Loan ABS Rating Activity/Revised Loss Expectations
In July 2023, we revised our loss expectations and took a number of rating actions (see table 7).
Table 7
Surveillance actions | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating action (by class) | Expected cumulative net losses (no. of transactions) | |||||||||||||||||
Issuer | Date | Transaction reviewed | Upgrades | Downgrades | Affirmations | Increased | Decreased | Maintained | ||||||||||
Prime | ||||||||||||||||||
HAROT | 7/5/2023 | 6 | 14 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
WOART | 7/14/2023 | 3 | 16 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
TAROT | 7/28/2023 | 2 | 8 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime | ||||||||||||||||||
CAALT | 7/26/2023 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |||||||||||||
DTAT | 7/31/2023 | 9 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 | |||||||||||
Total | 24 | 26 | 0 | 49 | 1 | 18 | 5 | |||||||||||
HAROT--Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust. WOART--World Omni Auto Receivables Trust. TAROT--Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust. CAALT--Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust. DTAT--DT Auto Trust. |
July's analysis resulted in 26 upgrades and 49 affirmations, bringing the total number of U.S. auto loan ABS-related upgrades, downgrades, and affirmations to 177, six, and 243, respectively.
Table 8
Historical ratings activity--U.S. ABS auto loans | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Period | Upgrades | Downgrades | ||||
2015 | 177 | 0 | ||||
2016 | 357 | 0 | ||||
2017 | 322 | 0 | ||||
2018 | 335 | 2 | ||||
2019 | 432 | 5 | ||||
2020 | 332 | 8 | ||||
2021 | 579 | 0 | ||||
2022(i) | 416 | 6 | ||||
2023(ii) | 177 | 6 | ||||
Total | 3,127 | 27 | ||||
(i)The downgrades were a result of error correction. Prior upgrades were too high due to an input error, and as such, the amount of upgrades were reduced with the error correction. (ii)As of July 31, 2023. ABS--Asset-backed securities. |
Table 9
Historical ratings activity--Canadian ABS auto loans | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Period | Upgrades | Downgrades | ||||
2021 | 8 | 0 | ||||
2022 | 3 | 0 | ||||
2023(i) | 0 | 0 | ||||
Total | 11 | 0 | ||||
(i)As of Aug, 31 2023. ABS--Asset-backed securities. |
For the 24 transactions we reviewed in July, we increased our CNLs on one, lowered them on 18, and maintained them on five.
Table 10
Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Series | Original lifetime CNL exp. | Former lifetime CNL exp.(i) | Revised lifetime CNL exp. | |||||
2020-2 | 0.90-1.10 | 0.15-0.25 | up to 0.10 | |||||
2020-3 | 0.90-1.10 | 0.25-0.35 | up to 0.20 | |||||
2021-2 | 0.65-0.75 | 0.35-0.45 | 0.20 | |||||
2021-3 | 0.55-0.65 | 0.40 | 0.25 | |||||
2022-1 | 0.50-0.60 | N/A | 0.40 | |||||
2022-2 | 0.50-0.60 | N/A | 0.45 | |||||
(i)Revised in February 2022 for series 2020-2, 2020-3, and 2021-2; revised in September 2022 for series 2021-3. CNL exp.--Cumulative net loss expectations. N/A--Not applicable. |
Table 11
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Series | Original lifetime CNL exp. | Former lifetime CNL exp. | Revised lifetime CNL exp.(i) | |||||
2022-A | 1.45 | N/A | 1.15 | |||||
2022-B | 1.40 | N/A | 1.20 | |||||
2022-C | 1.40 | N/A | 1.30 | |||||
(i)Revised as of July 2023. CNL exp.--Cumulative net loss expectations. N/A–-Not applicable. |
Table 12
Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Series | Original lifetime CNL exp. | Revised lifetime CNL exp. | ||||
2021-B | 0.55-0.65 | 0.60 | ||||
2021-C | 0.55-0.65 | 0.60 | ||||
CNL exp.--Cumulative net loss expectations. |
Table 13
DT Auto Trust | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Series | Original lifetime CNL exp. | Prior lifetime CNL exp. | Revised lifetime CNL exp. | |||||
2019-2 | 28.50-29.50 | 18.75-19.25 | Up to 18.75 | |||||
2019-3 | 27.00-28.00 | 18.25-18.75 | Up to 18.00 | |||||
2019-4 | 28.50-29.50 | 18.25-18.75 | 18.00 | |||||
2020-1 | 28.50-29.50 | 18.25-18.75 | 18.00 | |||||
2020-2 | 32.75-33.75 | 18.25-18.75 | 17.50 | |||||
2020-3 | 32.75-33.75 | 18.50-19.00 | 18.75 | |||||
2021-1 | 31.50-32.50 | 20.00-21.00 | 20.50 | |||||
2021-2 | 27.75-28.75 | 20.00-21.00 | 20.50 | |||||
2022-2 | 24.75-25.75 | N/A | 20.75 | |||||
CNL exp.--Cumulative net loss expectations. N/A–-Not applicable. |
Appendix I: Auto Tracker Frequently Asked Questions
How do you define prime auto loan ABS?
We generally categorize prime auto loan ABS transactions as those backed by loan pools with initial ECNLs of 3.25% or less and average FICO scores of 700 or higher. We include CarMax and Carvana in this segment.
How do you define subprime auto loan ABS?
We generally categorize subprime auto loan ABS transactions as those backed by loan pools with initial ECNLs of at least 7.5%, average FICO scores of less than 620, and APRs that exceed 14.0%.
How do you calculate the monthly net loss rate?
The monthly net loss rate is annualized. It equals each transaction's net loss rate weighted by the transaction's ending pool balance for the current month over the aggregate ending pool balance of all transactions included in the index.
We only allow a transaction to enter the composite starting in its fourth month outstanding. Transactions usually have zero or low losses during their first three months, which dilutes the composite figures.
How do you calculate the monthly recovery rate?
We calculate recoveries by taking the recovery amount reported (which typically includes all recoveries, including disposition proceeds, post-disposition proceeds, and any other reported recoveries) over the gross loss amount for the current month. Then we weight each transaction's recovery percentage by the transaction's ending pool balance for the current month over the aggregate ending pool balance of all transactions included in the index.
We only allow a transaction to enter the index starting in its fourth month outstanding. During a transaction's first three months, unusually high or low recoveries are reported, leading to a spike in the composite figures.
How do you calculate the monthly 60-plus-day delinquency rate?
We calculate delinquencies by taking each transaction's 60-plus-day delinquency amount over the ending pool balance for the current month. Then we weight each transaction's 60-plus-day delinquency percentage by the transaction's ending pool balance for the current month over the aggregate ending pool balance of all transactions included in the composite.
We only allow a transaction to enter the composite starting in its fourth month outstanding. During the transaction's first three months, zero or fewer delinquencies are reported, which dilutes the composite figures.
What is the Auto Loan Static Index (ALSI)?
Our ALSI monitors the credit performance of securitizations that were originated in the same year on a weighted average basis. The number of months displayed for each vintage is generally determined by the last month that all securitizations for that time period have a data point. We calculate the prime and subprime ALSI CNLs by taking the weighted average of the CNLs of the transactions that were completed in the same time period (generally a year). Each transaction's CNL is weighted by its initial pool balance over the aggregate initial pool balance of all the transactions included in the index for that period. In the subprime ALSI, transactions from Byrider Finance LLC (doing business as CarNow Acceptance Corp.), Credit Acceptance Corp., and DriveTime Automotive Group Inc. are excluded because they do not have the typical indirect auto loan business model.
Which transactions are included in the prime, subprime, and modified subprime composites and indices?
For a list of the transactions included in our prime and subprime composites and indices, see Appendix II. For a list of the transactions included in our prime and subprime composites and indices, see Appendix II. Transactions that indicate unrated or "NR" were not rated by us.
Appendix II: Prime And Subprime Index Composition
Table 14
Prime Auto Loan Static Index composition | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer name | Yearly factor (%) | Original issuance amount ($) | ||||
Q1 2023 cohort | ||||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2023-1 | 11.07 | 1,491,002,574 | ||||
Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2023-1 | 15.72 | 2,117,733,131 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2023-A Owner Trust | 13.47 | 1,813,667,858 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-1 (unrated) | 12.76 | 1,719,195,780 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2023-A | 8.29 | 1,116,806,264 | ||||
Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2023-1 | 11.11 | 1,495,738,191 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2023-P1 | 2.70 | 363,247,959 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2023-A | 12.86 | 1,732,167,318 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2023-1 Owner Trust-(unrated) | 12.02 | 1,619,423,907 | ||||
Total: 9 | 13,468,982,981 | |||||
Q2 2023 cohort | ||||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2023-2 | 7.90 | 1,530,612,496 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2023-P2 | 2.13 | 412,771,947 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-2 | 8.78 | 1,701,737,703 | ||||
GTE Auto Receivables Trust 2023-1 | 1.11 | 215,920,880 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2023-2 Owner Trust | 8.35 | 1,619,450,151 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2023-A | 9.44 | 1,829,751,291 | ||||
Nissan Auto Receivables 2023-A Owner Trust-(unrated) | 7.53 | 1,460,472,154 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2023-B Owner Trust-(unrated) | 9.27 | 1,795,999,450 | ||||
Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2023-1 | 8.81 | 1,707,916,114 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2023-B | 6.00 | 1,162,826,061 | ||||
Porsche Financial Auto Securitization Trust 2023-1 | 5.79 | 1,122,568,278 | ||||
Veridian Auto Rexeivables Trust 2023-1 | 1.60 | 310,549,836 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2023-B | 8.87 | 1,719,380,848 | ||||
SFS Auto Receivables Securitization Trust 2023-1 | 5.65 | 1,095,898,869 | ||||
Citizens Auto Receivables Trust 2023-1 | 8.76 | 1,698,862,694 | ||||
Total: 15 | 19,384,718,772 | |||||
Year 2022 cohort | ||||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2022-1 | 3.03 | 1,604,011,099 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P1 | 1.97 | 1,039,515,051 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2022-A | 2.17 | 1,146,189,073 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-1 | 2.35 | 1,244,538,359 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2022-1 Owner Trust | 3.06 | 1,619,433,199 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2022-A | 2.99 | 1,583,031,004 | ||||
Nissan Auto Receivables 2022-A Owner Trust | 2.16 | 1,142,065,005 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2022-A Owner Trust (unrated) | 3.36 | 1,775,873,551 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2022-A | 1.82 | 964,210,704 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1 | 2.05 | 1,084,569,771 | ||||
BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2022-A | 3.13 | 1,652,928,130 | ||||
Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1 | 3.83 | 2,025,808,403 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2022-2 | 2.71 | 1,432,225,072 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P2 | 1.14 | 605,000,000 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2022-B (unrated) | 2.22 | 1,173,418,193 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-2 | 2.83 | 1,494,418,717 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2022-B Owner Trust | 3.47 | 1,836,639,190 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2022-B | 2.05 | 1,083,969,918 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2022-B | 2.91 | 1,537,128,049 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2022-3 | 2.69 | 1,421,320,054 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2022-C | 2.12 | 1,123,484,105 | ||||
Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2022-2 | 3.91 | 2,066,663,592 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2022-C Owner Trust | 3.14 | 1,661,936,433 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2022-2 Owner Trust | 2.04 | 1,079,632,920 | ||||
PenFed Auto Receivables Owner Trust 2022-A | 0.98 | 519,815,802 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P3 | 0.69 | 364,000,001 | ||||
Nissan Auto Receivables 2022-B Owner Trust | 2.80 | 1,477,843,167 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2022-C | 3.30 | 1,745,303,061 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-3 (unrated) | 2.50 | 1,323,590,279 | ||||
USAA Auto Owner Trust 2022-A | 0.99 | 520,876,091 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-4 | 2.60 | 1,376,173,676 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2022-2 | 2.10 | 1,112,887,614 | ||||
OCCU Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1 | 0.56 | 298,507,816 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2022-4 | 2.70 | 1,430,038,566 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2022-D Owner Trust (unrated) | 3.42 | 1,807,594,098 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2022-C | 3.23 | 1,706,688,348 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2022-D | 2.19 | 1,156,658,990 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2022-D (unrated) | 2.78 | 1,471,280,949 | ||||
Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1 | 4.04 | 2,136,070,683 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2022-3 | 1.95 | 1,028,968,867 | ||||
Total: 40 | 52,874,307,600 | |||||
Year 2021 cohort | ||||||
Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1 | 3.01 | 1,356,483,995 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2021-1 | 3.34 | 1,505,270,561 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2021-2 | 3.46 | 1,558,897,246 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2021-3 | 3.89 | 1,754,385,995 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2021-4 | 3.11 | 1,403,509,095 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P1 | 0.92 | 415,000,001 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P2 | 1.72 | 775,000,002 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P3 | 2.30 | 1,035,000,000 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P4 | 2.34 | 1,055,000,001 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2021-A | 3.14 | 1,415,499,059 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-1 | 3.68 | 1,658,343,698 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-2 (NR) | 2.95 | 1,329,408,247 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-3 | 2.86 | 1,287,305,122 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-4 | 2.87 | 1,294,931,938 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2021 - 4 Owner Trust (NR) | 3.59 | 1,619,491,677 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2021-1 Owner Trust (NR) | 3.59 | 1,619,466,675 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2021-2 Owner Trust | 3.59 | 1,619,437,929 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2021-3 Owner Trust | 3.59 | 1,619,434,214 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2021-A | 3.00 | 1,352,165,787 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2021-B | 3.11 | 1,399,973,721 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2021-C | 3.50 | 1,577,990,687 | ||||
Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1 | 3.68 | 1,657,814,899 | ||||
Nissan Auto Receivables 2021-A Owner Trust | 2.47 | 1,113,826,202 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2021-A Owner Trust (NR) | 4.04 | 1,822,777,183 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2021-B Owner Trust | 3.70 | 1,666,956,330 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2021-C Owner Trust | 3.70 | 1,666,028,015 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2021-D Owner Trust | 3.70 | 1,667,553,463 | ||||
UNIFY Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1 | 0.67 | 302,931,694 | ||||
Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2021-1 | 4.18 | 1,882,301,798 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2021 B-2021-B | 2.45 | 1,102,919,763 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2021-A | 2.57 | 1,157,521,165 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2021-C | 2.67 | 1,202,898,752 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2021-D | 2.63 | 1,183,996,580 | ||||
Total: 33 | 45,079,521,493 | |||||
Year 2020 cohort | ||||||
BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2020-A | 2.53 | 1,054,601,017 | ||||
Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2020-1 | 3.25 | 1,356,484,237 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2020-1 | 3.72 | 1,553,875,032 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2020-2 | 2.77 | 1,156,941,681 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2020-3 | 3.25 | 1,358,148,894 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2020-4 | 3.61 | 1,506,024,109 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2020-P1 | 0.97 | 405,000,000 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2020-A (NR) | 2.19 | 914,193,806 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2020-B | 5.40 | 2,254,021,430 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2020-C | 3.42 | 1,429,578,316 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-1 | 3.12 | 1,304,237,246 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-2 | 2.02 | 841,444,376 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-3 (NR) | 4.01 | 1,673,619,561 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-4 | 3.77 | 1,574,013,675 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2020-1 Owner Trust (NR) | 3.88 | 1,619,433,198 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2020-2 Owner Trust | 3.23 | 1,349,527,667 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2020-3 Owner Trust | 5.17 | 2,159,298,062 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C | 3.17 | 1,324,207,677 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2020-A | 2.97 | 1,238,223,759 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2020-B | 2.86 | 1,194,414,188 | ||||
Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2020-1 | 2.69 | 1,124,777,926 | ||||
Nissan Auto Receivables 2020-A Owner Trust | 2.68 | 1,119,632,941 | ||||
Nissan Auto Receivables 2020-B Owner Trust | 3.37 | 1,405,095,871 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-A Owner Trust | 4.45 | 1,855,904,868 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-B Owner Trust | 3.06 | 1,275,392,995 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-C Owner Trust | 3.98 | 1,659,837,859 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D Owner Trust | 3.96 | 1,652,997,850 | ||||
Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2020-1 (NR) | 3.09 | 1,290,803,106 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2020-A | 2.09 | 874,456,598 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2020-B | 2.15 | 895,761,839 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C | 3.16 | 1,318,405,815 | ||||
Total: 31 | 41,740,355,601 | |||||
Year 2019 cohort | ||||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 (NR) | 2.22 | 1,119,999,920 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2 | 2.22 | 1,120,998,038 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 | 2.22 | 1,120,998,467 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2019-4 | 2.08 | 1,050,522,784 | ||||
Bank of the West Auto Trust 2019-1 | 1.53 | 769,857,130 | ||||
BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2019-A | 2.68 | 1,350,116,131 | ||||
Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 | 2.48 | 1,250,000,001 | ||||
Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2 | 2.80 | 1,410,746,434 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2019-1 | 2.99 | 1,506,024,109 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2019-2 | 2.71 | 1,368,421,078 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2019-3 | 2.98 | 1,503,759,541 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2019-4 | 2.98 | 1,503,750,004 | ||||
Fifth Third Auto Trust 2019-1 | 2.84 | 1,433,531,135 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2019-A (NR) | 3.54 | 1,786,699,021 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2019-B | 2.26 | 1,142,066,659 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2019-C | 2.83 | 1,424,799,288 | ||||
Gm Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-1 (NR) | 2.61 | 1,318,455,649 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-2 | 2.57 | 1,294,890,402 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-3 | 2.06 | 1,039,361,022 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-4 (NR) | 2.06 | 1,039,585,663 | ||||
GTE Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 | 0.37 | 184,889,790 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2019-1 Owner Trust | 2.78 | 1,400,006,655 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2019-2 Owner Trust (NR) | 3.21 | 1,619,433,199 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2019-3 Owner Trust | 2.68 | 1,349,537,391 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2019-4 Owner Trust | 3.21 | 1,619,436,123 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2019-A | 2.18 | 1,101,337,157 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2019-B | 2.31 | 1,165,566,589 | ||||
Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 | 3.20 | 1,615,006,230 | ||||
Nissan Auto Receivables 2019-A Owner Trust (NR) | 2.77 | 1,394,407,180 | ||||
Nissan Auto Receivables 2019-B Owner Trust (NR) | 2.73 | 1,378,201,976 | ||||
Nissan Auto Receivables 2019-C Owner Trust | 2.71 | 1,364,914,302 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2019-A Owner Trust | 3.83 | 1,930,929,363 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2019-B Owner Trust | 3.78 | 1,907,216,812 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2019-C Owner Trust | 2.67 | 1,344,769,910 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2019-D Owner Trust | 3.71 | 1,872,859,971 | ||||
USAA Auto Owner Trust 2019-1 | 1.00 | 503,778,340 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2019-A | 2.20 | 1,110,735,193 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2019-B | 1.74 | 879,483,109 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2019-C | 2.23 | 1,125,526,442 | ||||
Total: 39 | 50,422,618,206 | |||||
Year 2018 cohort | ||||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 | 2.47 | 1,119,773,433 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 (NR) | 2.47 | 1,118,470,195 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 | 2.47 | 1,119,013,480 | ||||
Bank of the West Auto Trust 2018-1 | 1.66 | 750,015,860 | ||||
Bmw Vehicle Owner Trust 2018-A-(unrated) | 3.14 | 1,422,530,959 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2018-1 | 3.00 | 1,356,783,926 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2018-2 | 2.95 | 1,336,359,078 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2018-3 | 3.18 | 1,440,087,232 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2018-4 | 3.33 | 1,507,545,086 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2018-A | 3.82 | 1,727,999,801 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2018-B-(unrated) | 2.57 | 1,161,498,793 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-1 (NR) | 2.97 | 1,346,226,236 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-2 | 3.00 | 1,357,996,691 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-3 | 3.00 | 1,357,918,658 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-4 | 2.98 | 1,347,098,324 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2018-1 Owner Trust | 2.98 | 1,349,538,462 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2018-2 Owner Trust | 2.98 | 1,349,575,738 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2018-3 Owner Trust (NR) | 2.98 | 1,349,529,325 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2018-4 Owner Trust | 2.62 | 1,187,584,346 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2018-A | 2.17 | 980,222,709 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B | 1.71 | 773,633,388 | ||||
Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 | 3.33 | 1,508,391,985 | ||||
Nissan Auto Receivables 2018-A Owner Trust | 2.46 | 1,114,467,625 | ||||
Nissan Auto Receivables 2018-B Owner Trust | 2.49 | 1,128,824,647 | ||||
Nissan Auto Receivables 2018-C Owner Trust | 2.53 | 1,146,026,064 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2018-A Owner Trust | 4.23 | 1,914,792,887 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2018-B Owner Trust | 3.91 | 1,767,851,359 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2018-C Owner Trust | 4.64 | 2,101,423,566 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2018-D Owner Trust | 3.07 | 1,390,010,110 | ||||
Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2018-1 | 3.19 | 1,444,931,385 | ||||
Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2018-2 | 2.42 | 1,096,083,728 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2018-A | 2.39 | 1,079,641,523 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B | 1.95 | 881,240,341 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2018-C | 2.44 | 1,103,449,171 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2018-D | 2.47 | 1,115,466,188 | ||||
Total: 35 | 45,252,002,298 | |||||
Year 2017 cohort | ||||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2017-1 (NR) | 2.70 | 1,116,603,712 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2 (NR) | 2.47 | 1,019,852,296 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3 | 2.56 | 1,057,998,088 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2017-4 | 2.68 | 1,107,866,077 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2017-5 | 1.35 | 559,999,920 | ||||
Bank Of The West Auto Trust 2017-1 | 1.81 | 750,015,107 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2017-1 (NR) | 3.17 | 1,310,000,026 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2017-2 | 2.42 | 1,000,000,008 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2017-3 | 3.33 | 1,375,000,018 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2017-4 | 3.10 | 1,280,000,021 | ||||
Fifth Third Auto Trust 2017-1 | 2.56 | 1,058,536,342 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2017-A (NR) | 4.16 | 1,718,023,630 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2017-B | 3.41 | 1,410,368,511 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2017-C | 4.83 | 1,997,343,293 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2017-1-207-1 | 2.60 | 1,073,193,720 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2017-2 | 2.60 | 1,074,225,436 | ||||
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2017-3 | 2.59 | 1,070,192,079 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2017-1 Owner Trust (NR) | 3.10 | 1,282,051,282 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2017-2 Owner Trust | 3.18 | 1,316,625,779 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2017-3 Owner Trust | 2.42 | 1,000,000,001 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2017-4 Owner Trust (NR) | 3.10 | 1,282,056,234 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2017-A | 3.14 | 1,297,276,907 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2017-B | 2.47 | 1,022,326,581 | ||||
Nissan Automobile Receivables 2017-A Owner Trust (NR) | 2.69 | 1,112,068,201 | ||||
Nissan Automobile Receivables 2017-B Owner Trust (NR) | 3.73 | 1,543,518,691 | ||||
Nissan Automobile Receivables 2017-C Owner Trust (NR) | 4.02 | 1,662,304,332 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2017-A Owner Trust | 3.90 | 1,610,505,282 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2017-B Owner Trust | 4.56 | 1,884,099,091 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2017-C Owner Trust | 4.57 | 1,889,438,548 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2017-D Owner Trust | 4.60 | 1,903,254,414 | ||||
USAA Auto Owner Trust 2017-1 | 1.18 | 485,898,958 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2017-A | 3.32 | 1,371,460,828 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2017-B | 1.70 | 704,748,719 | ||||
Total: 33 | 41,346,852,129 | |||||
Year 2016 cohort | ||||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1 (NR) | 2.96 | 1,066,738,356 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2016-2 | 2.87 | 1,034,838,477 | ||||
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2016-3 | 1.43 | 516,182,818 | ||||
BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2016-A (NR) | 3.75 | 1,353,937,519 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2016-1 | 3.16 | 1,140,000,000 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2016-2 | 3.26 | 1,175,000,014 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2016-3 | 3.46 | 1,250,000,036 | ||||
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2016-4 (NR) | 3.60 | 1,300,000,032 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2016-A | 3.17 | 1,144,164,175 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2016-B | 3.94 | 1,420,298,372 | ||||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2016-C (NR) | 3.96 | 1,429,998,203 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2016-1 Owner Trust | 2.84 | 1,025,648,881 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2016-2 Owner Trust (NR) | 4.26 | 1,538,461,539 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2016-3 Owner Trust | 4.26 | 1,538,461,650 | ||||
Honda Auto Receivables 2016-4 Owner Trust | 4.26 | 1,538,464,271 | ||||
Huntington Auto Trust 2016-1 | 4.16 | 1,500,000,000 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2016-A | 2.83 | 1,019,892,645 | ||||
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2016-B | 3.49 | 1,260,473,581 | ||||
Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1 | 4.41 | 1,591,275,988 | ||||
Nissan Auto Receivables 2016-A Owner Trust (NR) | 3.01 | 1,087,017,857 | ||||
Nissan Automobile Receivables 2016-B Owner Trust (NR) | 4.59 | 1,656,592,637 | ||||
Nissan Automobile Receivables 2016-C Owner Trust (NR) | 3.78 | 1,365,082,528 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2016-A Owner Trust | 3.69 | 1,331,797,103 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2016-B Owner Trust | 4.72 | 1,702,881,152 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2016-C Owner Trust | 3.68 | 1,327,630,185 | ||||
Toyota Auto Receivables 2016-D Owner Trust | 3.68 | 1,327,874,628 | ||||
USAA Auto Owner Trust 2016-1 | 1.40 | 503,778,664 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2016-A | 2.55 | 918,505,675 | ||||
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2016-B | 2.80 | 1,010,382,245 | ||||
Total: 29 | 36,075,379,229 | |||||
NR--Not rated. |
Table 15
Subprime Auto Loan Static Index composition | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer name | Yearly factor (%) | Original issuance amount ($) | ||||
Q1 2023 cohort | ||||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2023-1 | 16.51 | 340,000,043 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-1 | 4.26 | 1,362,938,923 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2023-A | 19.50 | 362,870,335 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-1 | 3.83 | 610,572,063 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2023-1 | 5.34 | 455,000,231 | ||||
Foursight Capital Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-1 | 2.34 | 199,067,029 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2023-1 | 3.99 | 327,709,134 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2023-1 | 7.17 | 1,406,385,310 | ||||
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2023-1 | 17.21 | 326,371,152 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-1 | 16.00 | 1,661,129,568 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-2 | 3.85 | 1,465,668,776 | ||||
Total: 11 | 8,517,712,563 | |||||
Q2 2023 cohort | ||||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2023-2 | 7.64 | 400,000,015 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2023-N1 | 9.88 | 517,052,275 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-2 | 13.00 | 680,726,726 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-3 | 12.14 | 635,832,252 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2023-2 | 8.64 | 452,261,645 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2023-2 | 6.27 | 328,399,758 | ||||
Prestige Auto Receivables Trust 2023-1 | 5.97 | 312,535,002 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2023-2 | 29.39 | 1,538,981,921 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2023-B (unrated) | 7.06 | 369,872,782 | ||||
Total: 9 | 5,235,662,375 | |||||
Year 2022 cohort | ||||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2022-1 | 1.70 | 575,000,155 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2022-2 | 1.12 | 454,545,509 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2022-3 | 0.72 | 310,000,114 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2022-4 | 0.88 | 380,000,007 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-1 (unrated) | 3.46 | 1,167,282,895 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-2 | 4.25 | 1,434,938,755 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-N1 | 1.11 | 375,000,000 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2022-A | 0.98 | 329,999,989 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2022-B (unrated) | 0.85 | 285,833,626 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2022-C | 1.09 | 439,999,873 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2022-D (unrated) | 1.00 | 337,383,029 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-1 | 2.58 | 871,804,507 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-2 | 3.47 | 1,169,804,526 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-3 | 3.18 | 1,073,768,792 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-4 | 1.85 | 624,839,856 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-5 | 1.91 | 643,116,434 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-6 (unrated) | 2.05 | 691,689,832 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2022-1 | 0.92 | 311,648,350 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2022-2 | 0.89 | 300,481,299 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2022-1 | 1.04 | 351,596,117 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2022-2 | 1.81 | 610,070,538 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2022-3 | 1.62 | 547,667,597 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2022-4 | 1.24 | 420,000,027 | ||||
Foursight Capital Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-2 | 0.69 | 232,760,317 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2022-1 | 1.55 | 524,535,883 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2022-2 | 2.26 | 762,611,108 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2022-3 | 1.00 | 338,804,753 | ||||
Prestige Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1 | 1.23 | 415,676,794 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1-(unrated) | 5.37 | 1,813,527,877 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-2-(unrated) | 6.39 | 2,154,769,220 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-3 | 5.24 | 1,767,557,012 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-4 | 5.81 | 1,960,768,027 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-5 | 6.56 | 2,214,921,523 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-6 | 6.09 | 2,056,725,409 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-7 | 3.12 | 1,052,512,968 | ||||
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2022-1 | 0.94 | 318,464,461 | ||||
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2022-2 | 0.84 | 285,000,000 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-1 | 4.49 | 1,516,683,520 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-2 | 4.88 | 1,645,246,584 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-3 | 3.79 | 1,279,819,638 | ||||
Total: 40 | 34,046,856,924 | |||||
Year 2021 cohort | ||||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2021-1 | 1.19 | 460,000,709 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2021-2 | 1.75 | 675,000,822 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2021-3 | 1.75 | 675,000,183 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2021-4 | 1.18 | 454,547,022 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-1 | 4.12 | 1,594,287,962 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-2 | 3.02 | 1,169,198,645 | ||||
Americredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-3 (NR) | 2.47 | 956,519,583 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N1 | 1.03 | 400,000,003 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N2 | 1.03 | 400,000,003 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N3 | 1.09 | 420,000,002 | ||||
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N4 | 1.19 | 460,000,002 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2021-A | 0.63 | 244,999,995 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2021-B (NR) | 0.62 | 240,000,000 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2021-C | 0.78 | 299,999,962 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2021-D (NR) | 0.66 | 256,502,151 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1 | 5.01 | 1,934,846,855 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-2 | 5.56 | 2,150,541,593 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-3 (NR) | 4.12 | 1,524,382,045 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-1 | 3.05 | 1,179,763,578 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-2 | 3.20 | 1,237,144,340 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-3 | 3.46 | 1,336,895,223 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-4 | 2.70 | 1,045,279,734 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2021-1 | 0.60 | 226,782,204 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2021-2 | 0.84 | 325,000,002 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2021-1 | 0.71 | 275,324,691 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2021-2 | 0.96 | 369,549,884 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2021-3 | 0.98 | 379,883,819 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2021-4 | 0.80 | 310,610,553 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2021-2 | 1.49 | 577,821,252 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2021-3 | 1.53 | 591,070,495 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2021-4 | 1.47 | 568,590,584 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1 | 0.85 | 327,799,982 | ||||
Prestige Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1 | 0.84 | 325,013,843 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1 (NR) | 6.27 | 2,215,048,852 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-2 (NR) | 5.98 | 2,312,647,394 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-3-(unrated) | 7.37 | 2,849,018,039 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-4 (NR) | 5.43 | 2,098,958,578 | ||||
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2021-1 | 0.67 | 260,000,000 | ||||
Westlake Auto Receivables Trust 2021-3 | 5.11 | 1,975,517,689 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-1 | 4.31 | 1,664,743,997 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-2 | 4.16 | 1,608,064,987 | ||||
Total: 42 | 38,376,357,256 | |||||
Year 2020 cohort | ||||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2020-1 | 1.51 | 390,000,755 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2020-2 | 1.42 | 366,667,145 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2020-3 | 2.25 | 582,525,272 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2020-4 | 2.41 | 624,790,279 | ||||
Americredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-1 (NR) | 3.78 | 979,421,115 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-2 | 4.27 | 1,105,208,590 | ||||
Americredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-3 (NR) | 4.63 | 1,199,940,245 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2020-A (NR) | 1.35 | 259,999,924 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2020-B | 0.86 | 221,867,556 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C (NR) | 0.76 | 196,290,738 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-1 | 5.02 | 1,298,944,569 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-2 | 4.91 | 1,271,513,438 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-1 | 3.08 | 797,927,461 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-2 | 3.60 | 932,538,738 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-3 | 2.74 | 708,603,517 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2020-1 | 0.72 | 226,786,694 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2020-1 | 1.38 | 356,784,868 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2020-2 | 1.01 | 260,889,922 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2020-3 | 0.87 | 225,000,036 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2020-4 | 1.22 | 314,800,684 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2020-1 | 1.75 | 452,356,021 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2020-2 | 1.10 | 285,860,248 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2020-3 | 1.37 | 354,650,004 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2020-4 | 1.28 | 332,055,211 | ||||
Prestige Auto Receivables Trust 2020-1 | 1.56 | 403,184,242 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-1 | 4.82 | 1,247,660,640 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-2 (NR) | 6.47 | 1,676,630,557 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 (NR) | 8.41 | 2,178,347,989 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-4 (NR) | 6.79 | 1,759,547,956 | ||||
Tidewater Auto Receivables Trust 2020-A | 0.75 | 193,998,632 | ||||
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2020-1 | 1.03 | 267,623,234 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-1 | 3.30 | 855,130,786 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-2 | 4.62 | 1,195,717,188 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2020-3 | 5.63 | 1,458,333,895 | ||||
World Omni Select Auto Trust 2020-A | 3.34 | 865,949,697 | ||||
Total: 35 | 25,847,547,848 | |||||
Year 2019 cohort | ||||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2019-1 | 1.10 | 280,000,453 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2019-2 | 0.92 | 234,000,021 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2019-3 | 1.30 | 330,033,247 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2019-4 | 1.06 | 269,100,010 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-1 | 5.10 | 1,295,278,089 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-2 (NR) | 3.43 | 870,551,703 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-3 | 3.43 | 870,598,400 | ||||
Avid Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-1 | 0.68 | 173,159,161 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2019-A | 1.04 | 264,999,934 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2019-B | 0.91 | 229,999,906 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2019-C | 0.96 | 244,124,069 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2019-D | 1.08 | 274,999,633 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 | 5.06 | 1,284,910,630 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2 | 5.14 | 1,306,759,251 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 | 6.10 | 1,550,251,005 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-4 | 5.82 | 1,477,898,386 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-1 | 2.28 | 578,947,371 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-2 | 2.87 | 729,166,667 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-3 | 3.48 | 885,416,667 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-4 | 3.47 | 880,829,111 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2019-1 | 0.92 | 233,589,034 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2019-2 | 0.98 | 249,328,485 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2019-1 | 0.68 | 172,681,607 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2019-2 | 1.08 | 273,519,959 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2019-3 | 1.06 | 269,266,808 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2019-4 | 1.26 | 320,554,172 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2019-1 | 1.15 | 291,000,014 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2019-2 | 1.49 | 379,406,000 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2019-3 | 1.57 | 400,000,002 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2019-4 | 1.38 | 350,500,000 | ||||
Prestige Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 | 1.54 | 391,692,183 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 | 4.38 | 1,113,309,233 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2 (NR) | 4.59 | 1,166,174,584 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 | 4.60 | 1,169,220,162 | ||||
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2019-1 | 1.09 | 278,225,806 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-1 | 4.04 | 1,025,640,000 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-2 | 4.84 | 1,230,800,000 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-3 | 5.19 | 1,319,802,676 | ||||
World Omni Select Auto Trust 2019-A | 2.93 | 744,382,102 | ||||
Total: 39 | 25,410,116,541 | |||||
Year 2018 cohort | ||||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2018-1 | 1.03 | 280,001,269 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2018-2 | 1.01 | 276,324,265 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2018-3 | 1.03 | 280,000,000 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2018-4 | 0.73 | 198,900,169 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-1 | 4.39 | 1,196,987,846 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-3 (NR) | 4.00 | 1,088,999,608 | ||||
Avid Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-1 | 0.44 | 120,041,897 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2018-A | 0.71 | 193,581,250 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B | 0.75 | 204,999,947 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2018-C | 0.88 | 239,870,474 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2018-D | 0.90 | 245,002,288 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 | 4.26 | 1,161,713,631 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 | 5.96 | 1,625,505,005 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 | 6.03 | 1,643,374,873 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-4 | 5.94 | 1,617,751,847 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-5 | 4.78 | 1,302,590,076 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-1 | 2.13 | 580,781,427 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-2 | 2.13 | 580,781,501 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-3 | 2.08 | 567,010,608 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-4 | 2.13 | 580,781,628 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2018-1 | 0.60 | 163,519,432 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2018-2 | 0.73 | 200,000,007 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2018-1 | 0.45 | 121,705,459 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2018-2 | 0.83 | 225,880,103 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2018-3 | 1.10 | 301,048,040 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2018-4 | 0.88 | 239,965,922 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2018-2 | 1.20 | 327,199,011 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2018-3 | 1.16 | 315,010,000 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 | 1.09 | 297,718,941 | ||||
Prestige Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 | 1.60 | 437,349,827 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 (NR) | 4.88 | 1,329,807,616 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 (NR) | 4.37 | 1,189,966,410 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 | 4.78 | 1,303,839,445 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-4 | 4.17 | 1,137,912,495 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-5 | 4.62 | 1,260,396,693 | ||||
Tidewater Auto Receivables Trust 2018-A | 0.77 | 211,072,529 | ||||
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2018-1 | 0.68 | 186,666,667 | ||||
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2018-2 | 0.73 | 200,000,000 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-1 | 3.78 | 1,030,927,835 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-2 | 3.78 | 1,030,965,918 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-3 | 4.15 | 1,131,109,303 | ||||
World Omni Select Auto Trust 2018-1 | 2.31 | 629,617,794 | ||||
Total: 42 | 27,256,679,056 | |||||
Year 2017 cohort | ||||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2017-1 | 1.22 | 248,810,951 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2017-2 | 1.28 | 262,820,749 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2017-3 | 1.34 | 274,641,215 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2017-4 | 1.15 | 235,988,206 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2017-1 | 4.95 | 1,011,969,929 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2017-4 | 6.92 | 1,414,654,756 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2017-A | 1.03 | 209,999,919 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2017-B | 1.12 | 229,999,997 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2017-C | 1.12 | 229,999,891 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D | 0.98 | 199,999,966 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-1 | 6.76 | 1,382,670,257 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2 | 5.77 | 1,180,452,151 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3 | 7.50 | 1,534,751,067 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-A | 6.56 | 1,342,298,460 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-B | 6.66 | 1,363,027,661 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2017-1 | 2.07 | 423,282,215 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2017-2 | 2.31 | 472,447,168 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2017-3 | 2.83 | 578,958,061 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2017-1 | 1.10 | 225,000,002 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2017-2 | 1.11 | 226,937,569 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2017-3 | 0.82 | 167,373,827 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2017-1 | 1.53 | 313,266,352 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2017-2 | 0.79 | 161,901,636 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2017-3 | 1.14 | 232,757,923 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2017-4 | 1.33 | 272,624,663 | ||||
GLS Auto Receivables Trust 2017-1 | 1.14 | 233,902,181 | ||||
Prestige Auto Receivables Trust 2017-1 | 2.10 | 430,238,035 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-1 | 5.98 | 1,224,015,127 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2 | 7.35 | 1,503,674,884 | ||||
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3 | 5.33 | 1,091,197,679 | ||||
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2017-1 | 0.81 | 166,666,667 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2017-1 | 3.66 | 748,701,856 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2017-2 | 4.21 | 860,215,054 | ||||
Total: 33 | 20,455,246,071 | |||||
Year 2016 cohort | ||||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2016-1 | 0.99 | 220,503,617 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2016-2 | 1.15 | 257,703,200 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2016-3 | 1.21 | 269,233,437 | ||||
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2016-4 | 1.12 | 250,001,003 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-1 | 5.82 | 1,298,698,994 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-2 | 5.85 | 1,305,762,931 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-3 | 6.34 | 1,414,581,983 | ||||
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-4 | 5.85 | 1,305,999,471 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2016-A | 1.52 | 339,997,079 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2016-B | 1.52 | 339,999,991 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2016-C | 1.46 | 324,999,995 | ||||
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2016-D | 0.94 | 209,999,959 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-A | 4.32 | 964,475,131 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-B | 7.10 | 1,584,988,186 | ||||
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-C | 7.32 | 1,633,986,932 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-1 | 1.69 | 376,749,329 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-2 | 1.46 | 325,205,229 | ||||
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-3 | 2.11 | 471,206,346 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2016-1 | 0.90 | 199,828,962 | ||||
First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2016-2 | 1.03 | 230,000,013 | ||||
Foursight Capital Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-1 | 2.06 | 459,183,895 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2016-1 | 1.83 | 408,163,270 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2016-2 | 1.39 | 311,185,919 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2016-3 | 1.33 | 297,012,719 | ||||
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2016-4 | 1.02 | 228,297,917 | ||||
Honor Automobile Trust Securitization 2016-1 | 0.50 | 112,359,550 | ||||
Prestige Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1 | 1.46 | 326,790,103 | ||||
Prestige Auto Receivables Trust 2016-2 | 1.99 | 443,353,651 | ||||
Sierra Auto Receivables Securitization Trust 2016-1 | 5.27 | 1,177,234,998 | ||||
Tidewater Auto Receivables Trust 2016-A | 6.04 | 1,348,321,605 | ||||
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2016-1 | 6.69 | 1,493,903,161 | ||||
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2016-2 | 0.70 | 156,069,364 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-1 | 0.78 | 174,178,461 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-2 | 0.82 | 181,958,973 | ||||
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-3 | 0.74 | 164,848,455 | ||||
SDART 2016-1 (NR) | 2.10 | 468,750,000 | ||||
SDART 2016-2 (NR) | 2.59 | 578,952,799 | ||||
SDART 2016-3 (NR) | 2.98 | 664,897,326 | ||||
Total: 38 | 22,319,383,955 | |||||
NR--Not rated. |
Related Research
- Ratings Affirmed On Eight Classes From Two Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust Transactions, July 31, 2023
- Ratings Affirmed On Eight Classes From Two Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust Transactions, July 28, 2023
- Six Ratings Raised And Five Affirmed From Four Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust Transactions, July 26, 2023
- Sixteen Ratings Affirmed From Three World Omni Auto Receivables Trust Transactions, July 14, 2023
- Fourteen Ratings Affirmed On Six Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust Transactions, July 6, 2023
- Seniority Has Its Privileges: Some 2022 Subprime Auto ABS Senior Classes Upgraded Despite Weaker Collateral Performance, July 12, 2023
- Scenario Analysis: The Potential Impact Of A Recession On Prime Auto Loan ABS Ratings, April 12, 2023
- How The Next Downturn Could Affect U.S. Subprime Auto Loan ABS Ratings, Dec. 8, 2022
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Amy S Martin, New York + 1 (212) 438 2538; amy.martin@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Jennie P Lam, New York + 1 (212) 438 2524; jennie.lam@spglobal.com |
Steve D Martinez, New York + 1 (212) 438 2881; steve.martinez@spglobal.com | |
Sanjay Narine, CFA, Toronto + 1 (416) 507 2548; sanjay.narine@spglobal.com | |
Research Contributor: | Manali Kithani, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.