articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/230704-corporate-india-is-on-a-stronger-credit-footing-12777061 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Corporate India Is On A Stronger Credit Footing

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

U.S. Not-For-Profit Transportation Infrastructure 2023 Medians: Demand And Revenue Growth Improved Financial Medians To Post-Pandemic Highs

COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In Cyber Security: Cyber Hygiene Can Affect Creditworthiness

COMMENTS

European Refinancing Flows Have Flipped As Public Leveraged Debt Replaces Private


Corporate India Is On A Stronger Credit Footing

image

Indian rated corporates are as well placed as any in the region. This is due to strong underlying growth and accommodative balance sheets. S&P Global Ratings estimates aggregate EBITDA in fiscal 2024 will be about 50% higher than five years back for rated companies. Yet aggregate debt is hardly changed.

A supportive factor is India's economic growth, which is the highest in the region, at 6.0% for 2023 and 6.9% in 2024, by our forecasts. A growing economy can paper over some cracks, such as the impact of China's reopening, which could create price competition for steel and chemicals producers. Despite tough offshore funding conditions, companies have easily tapped onshore financing.

We expect limited rating upside, however, given the improvement in credit quality is reflected in our base case assumptions. Some 85% of our ratings on India-based corporate and infrastructure entities have a stable outlook. That said, financial profiles are strengthening within current rating categories.

Earnings Outlook Is Positive Across Most Sectors

Solid earnings momentum over the next two years, by our forecasts, will make for one of the healthiest four-year stretches seen in a while (see chart 1).

Rising domestic demand and sector-specific recovery are more than offsetting negatives, including tough global economic conditions and higher policy and borrowing rates. For the 35 corporate and infrastructure entities we rate in India (this includes some confidential ratings), we forecast average EBITDA growth of about 10% in fiscal 2024 (year ending March 31, 2024), outpacing GDP growth.

Chart 1

image

Table 1

image

Earnings growth is coming mainly from higher margins in some sectors. This is driven by:

  • Lower input prices--especially commodity sectors, excluding downstream energy, which will see a reversal in margin squeezes from last year's rise in raw material prices. Beneficiaries include steel.
  • Increased volumes in sectors such as auto where volumes are normalizing with the easing in chip supply;
  • Higher usage, especially data, in telecom. Consumers are in good shape--a growing middle class and improving affordability is positive.
  • Higher non-aeronautical revenues led by increased consumer spending in the airport sector.

We expect below-average earnings growth for information technology earnings. Downstream energy will be among the few sectors with weaker earnings, given a declining pricing environment.

Balance-Sheet Management Will Stay Strong

We expect debt reduction to remain a focus for many rated companies, though the pace of deleveraging will slow. Financial discipline aided by strong operating cash flows led to significant deleveraging in Indian corporates over the past three years.

Working capital needs will fall as input costs ease, especially in the commodity, chemicals and auto sectors. This will also support cash flow generation.

By our forecasts, the median debt to EBITDA for our rated portfolio (excluding debt-free IT companies and infrastructure/utility companies that typically have higher leverage) will fall to about 2.4x by March 2024 from about 2.7x the year before. This is a significant decline from 4.3x as of March 2020.

Leverage for infrastructure/utility entities is likely to decline to about 5.2x by March 2024 from our estimated 6.3x as of March 2023. This is driven by a higher earnings base, rather than debt reduction. Rated infrastructure and utility companies are unlikely to deleverage below 5.0x given capex funding at 70:30 debt to equity mix.

Chart 2

image

Tata Steel Ltd., Tata Motors Ltd. and Bharti Airtel Ltd. are likely to deleverage the most in fiscal 2024, benefitting from strong free cash flow generation. Tata Motors also looks set to reduce debt through asset monetization, with the proposed listing of Tata Technologies Ltd.

Renewable energy companies will continue to have the highest leverage. For those players with aggressive growth capex, debt-to-EBITDA ratios will remain over 6x. We expect deleveraging to be limited because the intermittency of renewables is driving many players into pumped storage and round-the-clock power projects, and these have longer gestation. Nonetheless, improving business profiles due to scale and resource diversity has garnered more resilient cash flows.

Steadily Rising Capex Is Backed By Stronger Cash Flows

Aggregate capex is about a third higher than the pre-COVID high in fiscal 2019. By our forecasts, capital expenditure for the rated corporate portfolio will increase on average by 12% in fiscal 2024

Increased capex is supported by stronger operating cash flows. Fiscal 2024 capex as a percentage of EBITDA is lower than that in fiscal 2019 (see chart 3). The current capital-spending cycle is not denting balance sheets--unlike 2017-2020. This is due to stronger operating cash flows and, in some cases, deleveraging initiatives undertaken in the past two years.

Chart 3

image

Sectors with above-average capital expenditure include infrastructure, utilities, steel, telecom and auto.

  • Tata Steel is completing a facility with capacity of 5 million tons per annum (mtpa). It plans to add an additional 15mtpa of capacity after the completion of this project. Other domestic steel companies are adding sizable capacity as well.
  • Bharti Airtel and Reliance Industries are investing in 5G capabilities. While we expect a steep increase in capex for Bharti in fiscal 2024, we believe it should decline in subsequent years.
  • Tata Motors is increasing capex both in India and in Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC (JLR). In India, the company's capex will likely increase about 30% to Indian rupee (INR) 80 billion in fiscal 2024, driven by investments in the electric-vehicle business. JLR's capex is likely to increase to about GBP3 billion from about GBP2.5 billion, as part of its articulated transition strategy.
  • Oil and Natural Gas Corp. Ltd. (ONGC) will likely step-up investments in renewable energy and diversify its petrochemical business starting fiscal 2025. With total investments of about INR1.5 trillion on these projects, the company aims to reach 10 gigawatts of green-energy generation by 2030 and net zero for scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2038.
Rated infra and utilities have typically larger spending needs

The capex cycle for rated infrastructure and utilities companies will likely peak in fiscal 2024 with spending expanding about 27%. This coincides with the commissioning of several contracted projects for renewable players and the completion of the Teesta hydro asset acquisition by Greenko Energy Holdings. We expect capex to decrease over the subsequent two years, barring new pipeline projects or large investments in the growing green hydrogen space. Moreover, capex requirements for rated airports will reduce significantly from past few years with the completion of their terminal expansion in fiscal 2024.

India's Growing Resilience To External Volatility

Strong operating cash flow and onshore liquidity mitigate challenging offshore market conditions. Less than 10% of our rated corporates are assessed to have weak or less than adequate liquidity. This includes Vedanta Resources Ltd.. The company's liquidity position is strained by the US$3.2 billion of bond maturities over the next 18 months.

Chart 4

image

Chart 5

image

Rated Indian corporates, apart from utility and infrastructure entities, have had limited funding needs given that about half of them are free cash flow positive. While about two-thirds of utilities and infra entities are free cash flow negative due to growth-related spending in the past year, funding has been available for projects with good cash flow visibility.

Companies are comfortably funding through the banking system and the onshore bond market. The cost of onshore debt has not increased as much as for offshore debt. Funding has also been available in larger sizes than before, with the equivalent of benchmark-sized U.S.-dollar issues becoming more common.

Several companies have also redeemed maturing offshore bonds without accessing the capital markets. We expect strong onshore and alternate funding sources (including private markets) to support credit profiles of corporate India at least over the next few quarters.

Table 2

Indian corporates have redeemed offshore bonds with alternate funding sources
Company Bonds Funding source

Tata Steel

US$300 million due July 2023 Bank loan

Oil and Natural Gas Corp. Ltd.

US$500 million due May 2023 Syndicated bank loan

Tata Motors

US$250 million due October 2024 (partial buyback of about US$112 million) Cash balance

Vedanta Resources

US$900 million in April and May 2023 Cash balance, private credit, banks, funding from global commodity traders

Greenko Energy Holdings

US$500 million due August 2023 Cash balance

ReNew Power Private Ltd.

US$525 million due March 2024 Five- year domestic project loan

GMR Hyderabad International Airport Ltd.

US$300 million due April 2024 (partial buyback of US$226.4 million) 10-year domestic loan

GMR Hyderabad International Airport Ltd.

US$300 million due Feb 2026 (partial buyback of US$12.7 million) 10-year domestic loan

Adani Ports

US$650 million due July 2024 (partial redemption of US$130 million) Cash balance
Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Operating, financing and liquidity conditions are emblematic of the India Inc. story at the moment. The country's corporates are more resilient to external turbulence compared with past periods of elevated commodity prices, weak global growth, and a strong dollar. We expect this trend to stay on track for the foreseeable future.

Table 3

Publicly rated Indian corporate and infrastructure entities
Entity Issuer Credit Rating
Adani Electricity Mumbai Ltd. BBB-/Negative/--
Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Ltd. BBB-/Negative/--
ANI Technologies Pte. Ltd. B-/Stable/--
Bharti Airtel Ltd. BBB-/Stable/--
Delhi International Airport Ltd. B/Positive/--
Genpact Ltd. BBB-/Stable/--
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. BB/Stable/--/--
GMR Hyderabad International Airport Ltd. BB-/Stable/--
Greenko Energy Holdings BB-/Stable/--
HCL Technologies Ltd. A-/Stable/--
Infosys Ltd. A/Stable/--
NHPC Ltd. BBB-/Stable/--
NTPC Ltd. BBB-/Stable/--
Oil and Natural Gas Corp. Ltd. BBB-/Stable/--
Power Grid Corp. of India Ltd. BBB-/Stable/--
Reliance Industries Ltd. BBB+/Stable/--
Summit Digitel Infrastructure Ltd. BBB-/Stable/--
Tata Motors Ltd. BB/Stable/--
Tata Power Co. Ltd. BB+/Stable/--
Tata Steel Ltd. BBB-/Positive/--
UPL Corp. Ltd. BB+/Stable/--
Vedanta Resources Ltd. B-/Stable/--
Wipro Ltd. A-/Stable/--
Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Appendix

Chart 6

image

Chart 7

image

Chart 8

image

Editor: Cathy Holcombe

Digital design: Evy Cheung, Tim Hellyer

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Neel Gopalakrishnan, Singapore + 65-6239-6385;
neel.gopalakrishnan@spglobal.com
Cheng Jia Ong, Singapore + 65 6239 6302;
chengjia.ong@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in