articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/230411-u-s-auto-loan-abs-tracker-february-2023-performance-12697197 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Auto Loan ABS Tracker: February 2023 Performance

COMMENTS

Private Credit Could Bridge The Infrastructure Funding Gap

COMMENTS

The Opportunity Of Asset-Based Finance Draws In Private Credit

COMMENTS

Private Credit Casts A Wider Net To Encompass Asset-Based Finance And Infrastructure

COMMENTS

Weekly European CLO Update


U.S. Auto Loan ABS Tracker: February 2023 Performance

U.S. auto loan collateral performance saw positive performance in February 2023, largely due to consumers starting to receive tax refunds. This was particularly beneficial for the subprime segment, as losses not only declined month to month but fell below the pre-pandemic levels in February 2020. Prime losses also declined and remained 25% below pre-pandemic levels. After a general rise in delinquencies since October 2022, they finally retreated in February 2023. We attribute this primarily to consumers using their tax refunds to catch up on late auto payments. Another benefit could have materialized from subprime lenders tightening their underwriting standards during second-half 2022, but it's too early to be certain. Even with the decline in delinquencies, 60-plus-day delinquencies remain higher than pre-pandemic levels. Recoveries diverged, as the subprime segment posted higher levels (45% compared with 37% and 41% in January 2023 and February 2020, respectively), while the prime segment declined to 55% from approximately 58% in both January 2023 and February 2020.

Losses Take A Breather, Especially In Subprime

Prime losses fell seven basis points (bps) month over month to 0.42% from 0.49%. While this was significantly higher than the record low of 0.25% posted in February 2022, losses remained approximately 25% below the 0.56% posted pre-pandemic in February 2020.

After four consecutive months of higher net charge-offs, subprime losses took a breather and fell 17.84% to 7.42% from 9.03% in February 2023. Although subprime losses were up 41.87% from the unusually low level of 5.23% in February 2022, they were down from 8.63% in February 2020. The improvement in subprime losses was largely due to higher recoveries and the beginning of the tax refund season. Additionally, based on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's Center of Microeconomic Data, the origination volume of subprime loans (i.e., those with an Equifax score of less than 620) declined in third- and fourth-quarter 2022 on a year-over-year basis (10.40% and 7.80%, respectively) due to tighter credit. The pullback in lending may also be contributing to improved performance, but one month doesn't make a trend.

Table 1
Net loss rate composite(i)
Feb-09 Feb-14 Feb-15 Feb-16 Feb-17 Feb-18 Feb-19 Feb-20 Feb-21 Feb-22 Jan-23 Feb-23
Prime (%) 1.93 0.41 0.39 0.58 0.63 0.59 0.56 0.56 0.29 0.25 0.49 0.42
Subprime (%) 9.83 6.45 6.38 8.06 8.39 9.18 8.50 8.63 4.67 5.23 9.03 7.42
Subprime modified (%)(ii) N/A 4.39 5.67 6.51 6.78 7.24 6.44 6.73 3.66 3.78 7.43 6.47
(i)Represents monthly annualized losses. (ii)Excludes the three large deep subprime issuers. N/A--Not applicable.

Chart 1

image

A Divergence: Subprime Recoveries Increase, While Prime Decline

Prime recoveries declined slightly to 55.10% in February 2023 from 57.65% in the prior month. Prime recovery rates have now fully normalized back to pre-pandemic levels. In February 2022, prime recoveries were as high as 74.41%, which was up slightly from 70.08% in February 2021. Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust (Capital One), Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust (Hyundai), Carvana Auto Receivables Trust (Carvana), and Honda Auto Receivables Trust (Honda) were among the issuers hampering recoveries for February 2023 compared with the prior month. Capital One was the most prominent detractor, with recoveries of 108.64% in February 2023, which normalized to 65.44% in March. Recoveries fell to 61.99%, 45.93%, and 78.76% in March 2023 from 73.95%, 65.31%, and 87.01% in February 2023 for Hyundai, Carvana, and Honda, respectively.

Subprime recoveries were robust, with a 21.66% increase in February 2023 to 45.32% from 37.25% in January 2023. The top five issuers contributing to the strong performance were Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust (Santander), AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust (Exeter), American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust, and Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust (Westlake). Recoveries for those issuers stood at 53.53%, 60.79%, 41.13%, 65.45%, and 41.41%, respectively, in February 2023, which was up from 40.81%, 44.43%, 29.76%, 41.87%, and 33.11%, respectively, in January 2023. In our view, part of the subprime segment's improvement in recoveries stemmed from certain lenders catching up on repossessing and liquidating vehicles on accounts for which they had already taken a charge-off. To the extent that a lender had charged-off an account prior to liquidation, the subsequent auction proceeds would count as recoveries. Also, used vehicle values improved during the first two months of 2023, as shown by the increase in the Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index (see chart 2).

Table 2
Recovery rate composite(i)
Feb-09 Feb-14 Feb-15 Feb-16 Feb-17 Feb-18 Feb-19 Feb-20 Feb-21 Feb-22 Jan-23 Feb-23
Prime (%) 48.34 66.57 63.96 57.21 53.97 54.36 56.26 58.16 70.08 74.41 57.65 55.10
Subprime (%) 41.08 49.77 48.09 43.52 38.76 39.21 41.24 41.38 46.15 49.85 37.25 45.32
Subprime modified (%)(ii) N/A 53.26 48.34 44.33 40.15 39.59 41.33 41.10 44.06 51.46 37.16 44.18
(i)Represents monthly recovery rates. (ii)Excludes the three large deep subprime issuers: American Credit Acceptance, Exeter, and DRIVE. N/A--Not applicable.

Chart 2

image

February's Tax Refunds Bring Delinquency Relief

The prime 60-plus-day delinquency rate decreased month over month to 0.47% in February 2023 from 0.54% in January. The subprime 60-plus-day delinquency rate retreated to 5.33% in February 2023 from 5.96% a month earlier. Despite the improvements, delinquencies in the prime and subprime segment remained 17.5% and 7.0% higher than the pre-pandemic levels (February 2020) of 0.40% and 4.98%, respectively.

Table 3

60-plus-day delinquency rate composite(i)
Feb-09 Feb-14 Feb-15 Feb-16 Feb-17 Feb-18 Feb-19 Feb-20 Feb-21 Feb-22 Jan-23 Feb-23
Prime (%) 0.60 0.36 0.36 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.41 0.40 0.34 0.39 0.54 0.47
Subprime (%) 4.10 3.38 3.65 4.27 4.70 5.15 5.01 4.98 3.59 4.44 5.96 5.33
Subprime modified (%)(ii) N/A 2.35 3.22 3.51 3.59 3.95 3.56 3.52 2.46 2.99 4.61 4.23
(i)Represents 60-plus day delinquencies. (ii)Excludes the three large deep subprime issuers: American Credit Acceptance, Exeter, and DRIVE. N/A--Not applicable.

Chart 3

image

Based on historical performance, we would expect to see continued improvement in late payments for at least another month. However, industry sources point to average refunds of approximately $3,000, which is about 11% lower year over year. This, coupled with lower-income consumers increasing their outstanding credit card balances, could lead to a weaker-than-anticipated tax refund season.

Extensions Fare Well Due To Tax Rebate Season

Prime and subprime issuers saw lower extension rates month over month in February 2023. However, despite this decline, extensions increased both year over year and relative to pre-pandemic levels in February 2020. Although prime extensions declined to 0.36% in February 2023 from 0.43% in January 2023, it is higher than in February 2022 (0.30%) and February 2020 (0.32%). The fall was sharper for subprime public and 144a transactions in aggregate, which declined to 2.92% in February 2023 from 3.61% in January 2023, but exceeded that of February 2022 (2.62%) and February 2020 (2.35%) (see chart 4).

Chart 4

image

Prime extension rates

All 15 of the prime ABS auto issuers that have transactions outstanding reported lower month-over-month extensions (see table 4a).

  • Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust, Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust, and Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust saw declines of more than 10 bps or more over the last month (18 bps, 11 bps, and 10 bps, respectively).
  • Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust and CarMax Auto Owner Trust continued to report the highest extension levels of 0.81% and 0.72%, respectively.
  • Capital One reported the lowest extensions, with a reduction of one basis point to 0.04% in February 2023 from 0.05% last month.

Table 4a

Prime issuer shelf extension % (based on $ balance)
Shelf name Feb-20 Feb-21 Feb-22 Jan-23 Feb-23
Ally Auto Receivables Trust 0.37 0.61 0.59 0.52 0.47
BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 0.17 0.20 0.11 0.16 0.11
Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 0.01 0.16 0.07 0.05 0.04
CarMax Auto Owner Trust 0.38 0.41 0.38 0.78 0.72
Carvana Prime N/A 0.08 0.13 0.27 0.23
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 0.75 0.88 0.74 1.00 0.81
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 0.32 0.36 0.30 0.38 0.33
Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 0.20 0.35 0.34 0.46 0.36
Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust 0.11 0.24 0.09 0.13 0.10
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 0.25 0.33 0.31 0.39 0.29
Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 0.15 0.31 0.35 0.54 0.51
Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust 0.44 0.59 0.35 0.32 0.25
Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.29 0.25
Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 0.21 0.07 0.14 0.18 0.11
World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 0.38 0.36 0.33 0.53 0.47
Prime average 0.32 0.40 0.30 0.43 0.36
Subprime extension rates

Weighted-average extensions for 144a subprime issuers declined to 3.91% in February 2023 from 4.97% the prior month, but increased from February 2022 (3.51%) and from pre-pandemic February 2020 (3.18%).

Similarly, weighted-average extension rates for subprime public issuers decreased to 2.15% in February 2023 from 2.60% the previous month, but increased from February 2022 (1.87%) and from February 2020 (1.53%).

Of the 17 prime ABS auto issuers that have transactions outstanding, only one reported higher month-over-month extensions (see table 4b).

Other noteworthy changes in February include the following:

  • Avid Automobile Receivables Trust was the only issuer to report an increase in extensions month over month (59 bps to 3.93% from 3.34%).
  • The top four issuers to report month-over-month declines were Westlake (fell 167 bps to 5.23% from 6.90%), United Auto Credit Securitization Trust (140 bps to 4.85% from 6.25%), Flagship Credit Auto Trust (133 bps to 3.71% from 5.04%), and DriveTime Automotive Group Inc. (101 bps to 2.34% from 3.35%).
  • The Westlake and CPS Auto Receivables Trust transactions had the highest extensions, at 5.23% and 5.00%, respectively. Although Westlake continues to have relatively high extensions, their average 60-plus-day delinquencies were 1.31% compared to the subprime composite average of 5.33%. However, CPS Auto Receivables Trust's average 60-plus-day delinquencies of 6.42% were above the subprime composite average.

Table 4b

Subprime issuer shelf extension % (based on $ balance)
Shelf name Feb-20 Feb-21 Feb-22 Jan-23 Feb-23
American Credit Acceptance 2.84 2.69 1.49 3.34 2.48
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust (i) 2.48

2.43

2.28

3.22

2.67

Avid Automobile Receivables Trust 2.88 3.52 3.50 3.34 3.93
Carvana Subprime N/A N/A 1.37 2.08 1.94
CPS Auto Receivables Trust 3.71 3.18 4.33 5.39 5.00
Drive Auto Receivables 1.14 3.12 1.31 2.08 1.50
DriveTime Automotive Group Inc (i) 2.53 1.74 1.80 3.35 2.34
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 3.02

3.15

4.65

4.70

4.30

First Investors Auto Owner Trust 2.79 2.04 2.33 2.74 2.38
Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2.01 2.83 4.13 5.04 3.71
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust 2.80 2.87 3.15 4.15 3.39
Prestige Auto Receivables Trust 2.69 2.27 2.71 3.93 3.66
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 1.07 1.91 1.10 1.79 1.33
Tidewater Auto Receivables Trust 0.96 2.43 1.40 1.65 1.59
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 4.75 3.50 3.47 6.25 4.85
Westlake Automobiles Receivables Trust 4.85 4.80 4.51 6.90 5.23
World Omni Select

1.58

1.32

1.30

1.52

1.36

Subprime average 2.35 2.84 2.62 3.61 2.92
(i)February 2022 and onwards includes AmeriCredit transactions rated by S&P Global Ratings. (ii)Extension rate for DriveTime Automotive Group Inc. for January 2023 includes only the 2021-3 through 2022-2 transactions. These are the only transactions with at least four months of performance in which the servicing reports provide extension information on a dollar basis (as opposed to account-based). The company previously provided dollar-based extensions through Dec. 31, 2021, for all of its outstanding transactions from August 2019 through Dec. 31, 2021. N/A--Not applicable.

Auto Loan ABS Rating Activity/Revised Loss Expectations

In March 2023, we revised our loss expectations and took the following rating actions:

These rating actions resulted in 13 upgrades, four downgrades, and 27 affirmations, bringing the total number of upgrades and downgrades on publicly rated U.S. auto loan ABS transactions to 20 and four, respectively, as of March 31, 2023 (see tables 5 and 6).

Table 5

Historical ratings activity--U.S. ABS auto loans
Period Upgrades Downgrades
2015 177 0
2016 357 0
2017 322 0
2018 335 2
2019 432 5
2020 332 8
2021 579 0
2022(i) 419 6
2023(ii) 20 4
Total 2,973 25
(i)The downgrades were a result of error correction. Prior upgrades were too high due to a input error and as such the amount of upgrades were reduced with the error correction. (ii)As of March 31, 2023.

Table 6

Historical ratings activity--Canadian ABS auto loans
Period Upgrades Downgrades
2021 8 0
2022 3 0
2023(i) 0 0
Total 11 0
(i)As of March 31, 2023.

As of March 31, 2023, a total of six classes are on CreditWatch with negative implications. These include the class E and F notes from American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2022-1 and 2022-2, the class E notes from Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-5, and the class E notes from United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2022-2. The issuers have foregone paying themselves servicing fees on these transactions, and, as of March 30, 2023, Exeter has made capital contributions to the 2022-2 and 2022-3 transactions to prevent the ratings on the class E notes from falling below BB- (sf).

Table 7

CreditWatch placements
Transaction Class Current rating CreditWatch
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2022-1 E BB+ (sf) Negative
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2022-1 F BB- (sf) Negative
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2022-2 E BB- (sf) Negative
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust 2022-2 F B (sf) Negative
United Auto Credit Securitization Trust 2022-2 E BB (sf) Negative
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-5 E BB (sf) Negative

We lowered our expected cumulative net losses (ECNLs) on nine transactions and raised them on five transactions that we reviewed in March 2023 (see tables 8-10).

Table 8

Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust transactions
Series Original lifetime CNL exp. Former lifetime CNL exp. Revised lifetime CNL exp.
2019-B 1.00-1.20 0.60-0.80(i) Up to 0.55
2019-C 1.00-1.20 0.55-0.75(i) Up to 0.50
2020-B 1.30-1.50 0.55-0.75(i) 0.40
2020-C 1.40-1.60 0.80-1.00(i) 0.55
2021-A 1.24-1.45 0.90-1.10(i) 0.60
2022-A 1.10-1.30 1.10-1.30(ii) 1.00
(i)As of Jan. 13, 2022. (ii)Original lifetime CNL exp. CNL exp.--Cumulative net loss expectations.

Table 9

Prestige Auto Receivables Trust transactions
Series Original lifetime CNL exp. Prior lifetime CNL exp.(i) Revised lifetime CNL exp.(ii)
2018-1 13.00-13.75 12.75-13.25 Up to 12.00
2019-1 13.25-14.40 13.50-14.50 12.50
2020-1 18.25-19.25 13.50-14.50 9.25
2021-1 14.50-15.50 N/A 15.75-18.50
(i)As of the January 2022 distribution date. (ii)As of the March 2023 distribution date. CNL exp.--Cumulative net loss expectations. N/A--Not applicable.

Table 10

Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust transactions
Series Original lifetime CNL exp. Current lifetime CNL exp.(i)
2022-1 18.50-19.50 22.00
2022-2 18.25-19.25 At least 23.00
2022-3 18.50-19.50 At least 23.00
2022-4 18.50-19.50 At least 23.00
(i)As of the collection period ended Feb. 28, 2023. CNL exp.--Cumulative net loss expectations.

Appendix: Auto Tracker Frequently Asked Questions

How do you define prime auto loan ABS?

We generally categorize prime auto loan ABS transactions as those backed by loan pools with initial ECNLs of 3.00% or less, average FICO scores of 700 or higher, and annual percentage rates (APRs) of 0.00%-5.00%.

How do you define subprime auto loan ABS?

We generally categorize subprime auto loan ABS transactions as those backed by loan pools with initial ECNLs of at least 7.50%, average FICO scores of less than 620, and APRs that exceed 14.00%.

How do you calculate the monthly net loss rate?

The monthly net loss rate is annualized. It equals each transaction's net loss rate weighted by the transaction's ending pool balance for the current month over the aggregate ending pool balance of all transactions included in the index.

We only allow a transaction to enter the composite starting in its fourth month outstanding. Transactions usually have zero or low losses during their first three months, which dilutes the composite figures.

How do you calculate the monthly recovery rate?

We calculate recoveries by taking the recovery amount reported (which typically includes all recoveries, including disposition proceeds, post-disposition proceeds, and any other reported recoveries) over the gross loss amount for the current month. Then we weight each transaction's recovery percentage by the transaction's ending pool balance for the current month over the aggregate ending pool balance of all transactions included in the index.

We only allow a transaction to enter the index starting in its fourth month outstanding. During a transaction's first three months, unusually high or low recoveries are reported, leading to a spike in the composite figures.

How do you calculate the monthly 60-plus-day delinquency rate?

We calculate delinquencies by taking each transaction's 60-plus-day delinquency amount over the ending pool balance for the current month. Then we weight each transaction's 60-plus-day delinquency percentage by the transaction's ending pool balance for the current month over the aggregate ending pool balance of all transactions included in the composite.

We only allow a transaction to enter the composite starting in its fourth month outstanding. During the transaction's first three months, zero or fewer delinquencies are reported, which dilutes the composite figures.

What is the Auto Loan Static Index (ALSI)?

Our ALSI monitors the credit performance of securitizations that were originated in the same year on a weighted average basis. The number of months displayed for each vintage is generally determined by the last month that all securitizations for that time period have a data point. We calculate the prime and subprime ALSI CNLs by taking the weighted average of the CNLs of the transactions that were completed in the same time period (generally a year). Each transaction's CNL is weighted by its initial pool balance over the aggregate initial pool balance of all the transactions included in the index for that period. In the subprime ALSI, transactions from Byrider Finance LLC (doing business as CarNow Acceptance Corp.), Credit Acceptance Corp., and DriveTime Automotive Group Inc. are excluded because they do not have the typical indirect auto loan business model.

Which transactions are included in the prime, subprime, and modified subprime composites and indices?

For a list of the transactions included in our prime and subprime composites and indices, see "U.S. Auto Loan ABS Tracker: June 2022 Performance," published Aug. 17, 2022. However, note that we subsequently added transactions that have since closed.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Amy S Martin, New York + 1 (212) 438 2538;
amy.martin@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Jennie P Lam, New York + 1 (212) 438 2524;
jennie.lam@spglobal.com
Steve D Martinez, New York + 1 (212) 438 2881;
steve.martinez@spglobal.com
Sanjay Narine, CFA, Toronto + 1 (416) 507 2548;
sanjay.narine@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Veerbhadrappa Umbargi, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in