articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/230314-singapore-banks-2023-outlook-a-strong-start-with-some-fade-12665557 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Singapore Banks 2023 Outlook: A Strong Start With Some Fade

COMMENTS

Why Most EMEA Emerging Markets Are Slow To Adopt Bank Recovery And Resolution Plans

COMMENTS

Forecast Change: China's Bad Loans Likely To See Larger Tariff-Related Downside

COMMENTS

Tadawul On The Rise: Saudi Arabia's Investment Plans Fuel Growth

COMMENTS

Credit Trends: This Month In Credit: 2025 Data Companion


Singapore Banks 2023 Outlook: A Strong Start With Some Fade

Singapore banks are readjusting. In 2022, they benefited from fatter margins on rising interest rates. Now they face the second part of the story, when rates and inflation feed through to higher funding costs and lower loan appetite.

Overall, S&P Global Ratings believes profitability will remain good for Singapore banks in 2023. But margins will peak, and tepid loan growth will crimp further upside.

High Margins That Could Plateau

Net interest margins (NIMs) look set to peak this year after consecutive quarters of rising asset yields throughout 2022. Singapore's overnight and interbank rates have been rising in tandem with the U.S. Federal Reserve's hikes. Policy rates are also on the uptrend in all of the major overseas markets where Singapore banks operate, with the exception of China.

Singapore banks are well-positioned to take advantage of tightening cycles; the majority of their floating rate loans have quickly repriced upward, while their balance sheets remain flushed with liquidity and low-cost customer deposits. Acquisitions are also starting to pay dividends. For example, United Overseas Bank Ltd.'s integration of Citigroup's consumer portfolio in Malaysia and Thailand contributed to about 8 basis points (bps) of NIM uplift in the fourth quarter of 2022.

Chart 1

image

In our view, the upside on interest margins will likely start tapering and peak in the middle of 2023, in line with the likely cresting in the Fed's rate cycle. At the same time, funding costs are starting to catch up. Depositors have been shifting into higher-yielding fixed deposits, and the proportion of low-cost current and savings account (CASA) deposits has steadily declined over consecutive quarters (see chart 2).

Banks are also getting competition from Singapore treasury bills. Recent issuances of these 'AAA' securities have been yielding close to 4%, offering a compelling alternative to bank deposits. Singapore banks have responded by upping deposit rates, and not just on fixed deposits; for example, promotional CASA rates offer enhanced returns if certain conditions are met, such as salary crediting. Such trends will eat into margins.

Chart 2

image

Rate Hikes And Economic Issues Could Weigh On Credit Appetite

Borrowing appetite will likely moderate this year. We forecast loan growth in low-mid single digits in 2023. Systemwide gross loans for Singapore commercial banks have declined for three consecutive months since September 2022. This coincided with a spike in lending yields, which will continue to weigh on consumers and businesses this year.

Other weights on credit demand include property-cooling measures and recession risk for major economies. China's reopening will provide some offset.

Weaker momentum in Singapore residential property.  Measures including a lower loan-to-value limit for public housing loans may further dampen credit demand. Such measures were introduced last September and, coupled with rising mortgage rates, are already hitting prices for residential property. A benchmark price index for private residential property edged up 0.2% sequentially in the fourth quarter of 2022, down from 3.8% the previous quarter. The Housing Development Board's resale price index for its flats moderated to 2.3% growth in the fourth quarter, compared with 2.6% in the previous quarter. Slowing momentum in property prices could hinder demand for mortgage loans--which account for approximately a quarter of total loans in Singapore.

Uncertain global economic outlook.   Fears of recession in major economies present further downside risks to credit demand. Singapore's externally oriented economy relies significantly on final demand in the U.S. and Europe. Activity in these economies will likely slow later this year, weakening export demand for several key markets in the region (see "U.S. Business Cycle Barometer: Constrained By Tight Monetary Policy," published on RatingsDirect on Jan. 25, 2023).

The China cushion.   The country's reopening and rapid dismantling of its zero-COVID policy could offset some of the drag from the Western slowdown. Nonetheless, the net impact on export demand should generally be negative this year. This will dampen overall credit demand for Singapore banks. (see "Asia-Pacific In 2023: China Rebound Cannot Offset Western Slowdown," Feb. 23, 2023). That said, DBS Bank Ltd. and Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd. (OCBC) could benefit more from China's reopening than peers, given their larger direct exposures and presence in the country.

Economic uncertainty and increased market volatility will also crimp fee income for banks. Singapore banks have been investing in their wealth franchises, leveraging on the city-state's status as a prominent offshore wealth management hub. The prevailing risk-off sentiment highlights inherent volatility in wealth-management income.

Chart 3

image

Resilient Asset Quality, Manageable Deterioration

The realities of higher borrowing costs, coupled with still elevated inflation, will register more prominently in 2023. This could result in some backsliding after last year's continued improvement in nonperforming loan (NPL) ratios. In 2022, new NPL formation was modest, and offset by recoveries and write-downs. Loan loss provision were also very low at about 14bps, better than pre-COVID levels.

Consumers and small and midsized enterprises (SMEs) typically bear the brunt of high input costs and interest rates. In our view, any deterioration in asset quality will be manageable, likely emanating from pockets of weaker or overleveraged borrowers as economic conditions get tougher.

Chart 4

image

Gross NPL ratios for banks could weaken slightly over the next 12-18 months. The banks also have exposure to economies in Indonesia and Thailand, where the level of restructured loans remains elevated post COVID. Loan-loss provision could tick up to 20bps-25bps, which is closer to normalized levels. We note that Singapore banks have been conservative in reversing management overlays made during the pandemic, and total provision coverage is over 100% of reported NPLs (and over 200% when considered the unsecured portion). This adds to their resiliency.

Table 1

Singapore Banks: Key Financial Data And Forecasts
2019 2020 2021 2022 What we expect for 2023
GDP (yoy % change) 1.1 (4.1) 7.6 3.6 Growth to moderate to 2.3% after high growth with low base last year.
Profitability (%) 1.1 0.8 1.0 1.1 Profitability back to pre-COVID levels, with ROA at 1.1%-1.2% on solid margins and low credit costs.
NIM* (%) 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.8 NIM to peak at 2.0%-2.2% as the tightening cycle fades and funding costs start catching up with asset yields
Credit costs (% of provisions) 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.1 Credit costs to remain in pre-Covid range of 20-25 bps.
NPL (% of gross loans) 2.0 2.6 2.1 1.8 Any asset-quality deterioration should be manageable, with the NPL ratio to remain below 2%.
Provision coverage (% of NPLs) 86 110 102 111 Coverage to remain elevated at above 100%, but may dip slightly as banks’ use up the reserve for active NPL management and cleaning up their books.
Loan growth (%) 4.4 (0.4) 9.8 (2.6)§ Loans growth to remain tepid in the range of 3%-5%, reflecting lower borrower appetite due to higher rates.
*Weighted average of local Singapore banks. §The 2022 loan contraction is partially attributable to foreign-exchange impact of the SGD strengthened against foreign currency exposures in the main regional markets of Singapore banks. ROA--Return on assets. NIM--Net interest margins. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Sound Fundamentals Underpin Ratings On Singapore Banks

Rates and global recession risk will dampen, but not derail, momentum. Singapore banks have adequate capitalization and good provisioning buffers to absorb changes in business cycles. They are also cushioned against idiosyncratic risks emanating from exposure to regional developing markets, including a wider range of GDP per capita, economic fundamentals, and macroeconomic dynamics.

Last year's sweet spot for Singapore banks led to generous payouts for the fiscal year, including special one-time dividends. Capital management has been a balancing act between prudence and efficiency; the former taking precedence during COVID, and the latter being more apparent during good times. We believe management will continue to exercise good judgment in both capital and risk management.

Table 2

Our Rated Issuers
Full name Short name Issuer credit rating

DBS Bank Ltd.

DBS AA-/Stable/A-1+

Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.

OCBC AA-/Stable/A-1+

United Overseas Bank Ltd.

UOB AA-/Stable/A-1+
Source: S&P Global Ratings.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Ivan Tan, Singapore + 65 6239 6335;
ivan.tan@spglobal.com
Sue Ong, Singapore 62161082;
sue.ong@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Geeta Chugh, Mumbai + 912233421910;
geeta.chugh@spglobal.com
Research Assistant:Saurabh S Surwar, Pune

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in