Key Takeaways
- We expect credit stability across most of U.S. public finance in 2023. The economic outlook has deteriorated with a recession now expected but financial reserves and federal stimulus should provide sufficient flexibility for most sectors.
- A weaker economic outlook in the year ahead could pressure revenues while inflation and higher interest rates remain a challenge for operating and capital budgets; effective budget management will be important to fiscal performance.
- Extreme weather, cyber, and other risks will continue to present fiscal and operational challenges; proactive risk management will be key from a credit standpoint.
At the start of the year, credit conditions have weakened due to higher inflation, rising interest rates, and slowing economic growth (see "Economic Outlook U.S. Q1 2023: Tipping Toward Recession," published Nov. 28, 2022, on RatingsDirect). Despite this, all sector views are stable except not-for-profit health care and mass transit. Higher education has a mixed sector view, with lower-rated institutions and those with limited enrollment or financial flexibility facing more credit pressures. The rating distribution to start the year remains strong; 95% of outlooks are stable, 3% are positive, and 2% are negative (see "U.S. Public Finance Rating Activity, December 2022," published Jan. 6, 2023).
We have published our credit outlooks for all key sectors. In each report, we provide insight on the key issues we are watching in the year ahead. Federal fiscal and policy support has been significant since the onset of the pandemic and passage of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act represent an important shift in funding U.S. infrastructure, promising much-needed federal support and relieving some pressure on state and local governments. Despite these generally positive developments, the announcement by the U.S. Treasury that on Jan. 19, the U.S. sovereign debt level would hit the statutory limit established by law contributes to uncertainty for U.S. public finance.
We expect that Congress will engage in brinksmanship with the debt ceiling but will address it on time, either raising it or suspending it, understanding the severe consequences on financial markets and the global economy of not doing so (see "Credit FAQ: U.S. Sovereign Debt Hits The Ceiling Again," published Jan. 20, 2023).
Inaction on the U.S. debt ceiling and a default would have a broad range of economic, budget, liquidity, and capital market implications across U.S. public finance that could lead to widespread credit deterioration.
There are many debt issues in U.S. public finance that are directly linked to the sovereign rating by our criteria, such as municipal housing issues backed by the federal government or reliant on investment in U.S. government securities, government-related entities in the housing and public power sectors, federal leases, and defeased bonds that rely on investment in U.S. Treasury or agency securities for debt repayment.
For the remainder of public finance issuers, we do not directly link our ratings to the U.S. sovereign debt rating. However, the ability to be rated above the sovereign and the framework for determining the notching are outlined in our methodology "Ratings Above the Sovereign--Corporate and Government Ratings."
Following is a more detailed look at key sectors including links to each report.
U.S. States
The shallow recession forecast for the first half does not equate to a hurricane for states' finances. Although certain revenue and expenditure assumptions may get dampened, states' generally strong reserves will function as a credit-stabilizing umbrella. ("Outlook For U.S. States: Rainy Day Funds Will Support Credit In A Shallow Recession," Jan. 5, 2023.)
U.S. Local Governments
Our view reflects the local government sector's financial reserves and long history of effective responses to unexpected circumstances. Having federal stimulus money on hand prior to a recession—rather than after a long period of economic weakness—should also help operating stability for cities, counties, and school districts. We expect they will have time to respond to economic challenges before credit quality is threatened, underscoring our view of the stable nature of the sector. However, any LGs that aren't proactively managing high inflation and preparing for a weaker economy could be challenged to maintain balanced operations. ("Outlook For U.S. Local Governments: Reserves And Agile Management Will Provide Stability In A Recession," Jan. 10, 2023.)
Not-For-Profit Higher Education
Our view of the sector in the U.S. is mixed. While institutions with strong demand, sound resources, and excellent reputations will likely maintain or strengthen their positions, we expect that less selective, regional institutions will struggle amid growing competition, higher expenses, and operating margin pressure that could weaken credit quality. Institutions at the lower end of the rating scale and those with limited enrollment or financial flexibility will face credit stress in 2023. ("Outlook For Global Not-For-Profit Higher Education: Credit Quality Continues To Diverge," Jan. 18, 2023.)
U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care
We have revised our not-for-profit health care sector view to negative given persistent operating pressures coupled with investment market volatility that has eroded much of the balance sheet cushion built during the pandemic. Margins and cash flow recently have at best demonstrated limited sustainability of a post-pandemic recovery and at worst have accelerated to uncharacteristically high losses. We do not expect full margin recovery in 2023 and will likely see continued operating losses, albeit at lower levels than 2022, for many institutions. Meaningful improvement will likely take multiple years. ("Outlook For U.S. Not-For-Profit Acute Health Care: A Long Road Ahead," Dec. 1, 2022.)
Transportation Infrastructure
Our view of business conditions and credit quality across the U.S. not-for-profit transportation infrastructure sector in 2023 is stable for airports (and related special facilities), toll roads, ports, parking and all federal grant-secured credits. We have revised our sector view for mass transit to negative from stable to reflect financial pressures facing operators with a historical reliance on fare revenues, and other headwinds. ("Outlook For U.S. Not-For-Profit Transportation Infrastructure: COVID In The Rearview Mirror, Yet Transit Stuck In Second Gear," Jan. 11, 2023.)
U.S. Public Power And Electric Cooperative Utilities
We expect a continuation of rating stability among public power and electric cooperative utilities. Our opinion reflects expectations of sound financial performance given the essentiality of electric service, coupled with the sector's record of credit-supportive ratemaking decisions and access to capital and liquidity. We will continue to assess management strategies for facing numerous risks and challenges, including inflation, recession, supply chain hurdles, increasingly stringent emissions regulations, climate change, and grid security. ("Outlook For U.S. Public Power And Electric Cooperatives: Essentiality And Strategic Planning Temper Challenges," Jan. 17, 2023.)
U.S. Charter Schools
Charter school demand continues to grow, per-pupil funding levels are healthy overall, significant federal funds remain available, and we expect credit stability for states. These positives partially offset increased expense pressures, enabling the sector to enter 2023 with greater financial flexibility. ("Outlook For U.S. Charter Schools: Credit Profiles Hold Steady," Jan. 24, 2023.)
U.S. Public Finance Housing
Housing entities enter the year with healthy balance sheets and liquidity sufficient to sustain activities through the shallow recession we forecast. Nonetheless, market headwinds may dampen both single-family and multifamily loan production, delay development, and pressure properties with thin operating margins. ("Outlook For U.S. Public Finance Housing: Economic Winds Won't Blow The House Down," Jan. 19, 2023.)
U.S. Municipal Water And Sewer Utilities
Although cost pressures are mounting, cash reserves have grown, and rate-setting flexibility is strong. But there are some pockets of credit pressure, especially for utilities with substantial deferred maintenance or limited economic underpinnings. ("Outlook For U.S. Municipal Utilities: Stable, Though Risks Are Rising," Jan. 12, 2023.)
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analysts: | Robin L Prunty, New York + 1 (212) 438 2081; robin.prunty@spglobal.com |
Eden P Perry, New York + 1 (212) 438 0613; eden.perry@spglobal.com | |
Sector Lead: | David N Bodek, New York + 1 (212) 438 7969; david.bodek@spglobal.com |
Geoffrey E Buswick, Boston + 1 (617) 530 8311; geoffrey.buswick@spglobal.com | |
Suzie R Desai, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7046; suzie.desai@spglobal.com | |
Kurt E Forsgren, Boston + 1 (617) 530 8308; kurt.forsgren@spglobal.com | |
Jenny Poree, San Francisco + 1 (415) 371 5044; jenny.poree@spglobal.com | |
Jane H Ridley, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4487; jane.ridley@spglobal.com | |
Jessica L Wood, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7004; jessica.wood@spglobal.com | |
Marian Zucker, New York + 1 (212) 438 2150; marian.zucker@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.